Results 21 to 25 of 25
Thread: Children future
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
06-30-2006, 10:21 AM #21
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 227
Babies born to illegal alien mothers within U.S. borders are called anchor babies because under the 1965 immigration Act, they act as an anchor that pulls the illegal alien mother and eventually a host of other illegal relatives into permanent U.S. residency.
That 1965 immigration act needs to be changed! When these illegals come over here and either are already knocked up and give birth in the U.S. I consider this premeditated felonius crime. just sayin'"What part of illegal don't you understand?"
-
07-01-2006, 12:04 PM #22
Re: Children future
Originally Posted by John_Lan
As for the "poor" children - there is an old saying about the "sins of the fathers being visited upon their children". I DO feel sorry for the kids -- they didn't ask for this. But, what are the alternatives -- take them away from deported parents and put them in the "system"? I don't think that's going to help anyone.
As for the anchor baby statements - Here is the statement in the 14th Amendment:
"Every Person born within the limits of the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are FOREIGNERS, ALIENS , or who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.
Senator Jacob Howard, Co-author of the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment, 1866.
In this case, I think these children should simply be sent back to their native lands with their parents.
-
07-01-2006, 12:17 PM #23
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 206
Where did people (politicians) get the idea that just because you're born in the US, you are automatically an American citizen. That is NOT what the 14th Amendment says.
-
07-01-2006, 12:38 PM #24
- Join Date
- Feb 2006
- Posts
- 1,021
Isn't it odd that the 14th amendment can be interpreted so loosely, yet the 2nd amendment which is so clear can have it's meaning contested by the left.
-
07-01-2006, 01:02 PM #25
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 206
Nah, I don't think it's odd at all. If it doesn't add to their interest, they'll ignore it. If it is a perceived threat to their interest, they will try to destroy it.
Just like it's fine for certain groups to protest and whatnot because that's "freedom of speech", yet it's "racist" or even possibly "hate crime" when other groups do the exact same thing.
Long Beach Declares Public Health Emergency Due to ‘Surprising’...
05-04-2024, 07:58 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports