Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 11

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    TEXAS - The Lone Star State
    Posts
    16,941

    END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP: 3 More Bill Co-Sponsors

    END BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP: 3 More Bill Co-Sponsors (Flores, Fortenberry & Schweikert)

    Friday, March 18, 2011, 1:06 PM EDT - posted on NumbersUSA

    * Sponsored the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011
    Updated Friday, March 18, 2011, 1:20 PM EDT - posted on NumbersUSA

    Total 71 Sponsors

    * (AL) Bachus
    * (AL) Brooks
    * (AL) Rogers
    * (AL) Schweikert
    * (AR) Crawford
    * (AR) Griffin
    * (AR) Womack
    * (CA) Bilbray
    * (CA) Calvert
    * (CA) Campbell
    * (CA) Hunter
    * (CA) Miller
    * (CA) Royce
    * (CO) Coffman
    * (CO) Lamborn
    * (FL) Adams
    * (FL) Miller
    * (FL) Nugent
    * (FL) Posey
    * (FL) Ross
    * (FL) Stearns
    * (FL) West
    * (GA) Broun
    * (GA) Gingrey
    * (GA) Graves
    * (GA) Kingston
    * (GA) Westmoreland
    * (GA) Woodall
    * (IL) Manzullo
    * (IN) Burton
    * (IN) Stutzman
    * (IA) King
    * (LA) Alexander
    * (LA) Fleming
    * (LA) Landry
    * (LA) Scalise
    * (MD) Bartlett
    * (MD) Harris
    * (MI) Benishek
    * (MI) Walberg
    * (MN) Cravaack
    * (MN) Klein
    * (MS) Palazzo
    * (MS) Harper
    * (MS) Nunnelee
    * (MO) Akin
    * (MO) Graves
    * (NE) Fortenberry
    * (NC) Foxx
    * (NC) Jones
    * (NC) Myrick
    * (NE) Smith
    * (NJ) Garrett
    * (OH) Schmidt
    * (PA) Barletta
    * (SC) Duncan
    * (TN) Duncan
    * (TX) Burgess
    * (TX) Carter
    * (TX) Conaway
    * (TX) Culberson
    * (TX) Gohmert
    * (TX) Hall
    * (TX) Johnson
    * (TX) Marchant
    * (TX) Neugebauer
    * (TX) Poe
    * (TX) Sessions
    * (VA) Forbes
    * (WV) McKinley


    Official H.R. 140 cosponsor list


    Reps. Bill Flores (R-Texas), Jeff Fortenberry (R-Neb.), and David Schweikert (R-Ariz.) have cosponsored the Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011 introduced by Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa). The bill currently has 70 cosponsors and amends current U.S. code to require at least one parent to be a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident for a new born to receive automatic citizenship.

    The Fourteenth Amendment extends citizenship to all persons born in the U.S. and "subject to the jurisdiction"; it also grants Congress the power to enforce and define the provisions of the amendment.

    Since the Civil Rights Act of 1866, Congress has defined Birthright Citizenship through appropriate legislation, which for decades has granted citizenship to newborns with both parents illegal aliens, foreign tourists or temporary foreign workers and students. The Fourteenth Amendment gives Congress the right to define birthright citizenship differently.

    The Birthright Citizenship Act of 2011 would add to the existing federal code a provision that requires at least one parent of a new born to be a U.S. citizen or legal permanent resident in order for the new born to receive automatic citizenship.
    The United States is one of two industrialized nations (Canada) to offer Birthright Citizenship.



    Rep. Flores represents Texas' 17th Congressional District. He is serving his first term in Congress and earned "True Reformer" status during the mid-term elections.

    Rep. Fortenberry represents Nebraska's 1st Congressional District. He is serving his 4th term in Congress and has a career A grade.

    Rep. Schweikert represents Arizona's 5th Congressional District. He is serving his first term in Congress and earned "True Reformer" status during the mid-term elections.

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    3,757
    While this is all well and good , it will never get past dingy harry in the senate , much less illegal obummer in the White House ,

    They need to keep adding co sponsers and in 2012 we need to get the senate and white house on our side

    KICK THE ANCHOR BABIES OUT ,

    I don't care if its insensitive or what , or even if you call me a racist

    I DON'T WANT THOSE BORDER JUMPING CRIMINALS dumping their putrid anchors in my country

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    1,966
    Quote Originally Posted by Justthefacts
    While this is all well and good , it will never get past dingy harry in the senate , much less illegal obummer in the White House ,

    They need to keep adding co sponsers and in 2012 we need to get the senate and white house on our side

    KICK THE ANCHOR BABIES OUT ,

    I don't care if its insensitive or what , or even if you call me a racist

    I DON'T WANT THOSE BORDER JUMPING CRIMINALS dumping their putrid anchors in my country
    At least we know who our friends are. Lets try and keep it that way!
    Theres always a deal and a sell out.

    Kids are kids until they grow up!

    pu·trid (py tr d) adj. 1. Decomposed and foul-smelling; rotten. 2. Proceeding from, relating to, or exhibiting putrefaction. 3. Morally rotten; corrupt: "and all the ...

    I understand, But NO! I am anti-illegal immigration but right to life.
    That is why I call anchor/jackpot kids spoiled brats!

    Their parents on the other hand.....................

  4. #4
    Senior Member Mickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    777
    How many of the co-sponsors are Democrats?

  5. #5
    Senior Member roundabout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    3,445
    I sure would like to see the Supreme Court weigh in on this one. A little clarification could go along ways.

  6. #6
    Senior Member stevetheroofer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    somewhere near Mexico I reckon!
    Posts
    9,681
    Quote Originally Posted by Mickey
    How many of the co-sponsors are Democrats?
    "Excellent question!" let us know!
    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    TEXAS - The Lone Star State
    Posts
    16,941
    Quote Originally Posted by stevetheroofer
    Quote Originally Posted by Mickey
    How many of the co-sponsors are Democrats?
    "Excellent question!" let us know!
    none

  8. #8
    Senior Member Mickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    777
    Quote Originally Posted by Justthefacts
    While this is all well and good , it will never get past dingy harry in the senate , much less illegal obummer in the White House ,

    They need to keep adding co sponsers and in 2012 we need to get the senate and white house on our side

    KICK THE ANCHOR BABIES OUT ,

    I don't care if its insensitive or what , or even if you call me a racist

    I DON'T WANT THOSE BORDER JUMPING CRIMINALS dumping their putrid anchors in my country
    Anchor babies are U.S. Citizens, so they won't be kicked out. If they law is changed, they will no longer be called anchor babies. So either way, no anchor babies will be kicked out. Just the facts because I know there will be no creation of a retroactive law that will kick out citizens.

    Nothing personal, but I don't think it's appropriate to call babies, any babies, putrid. Utilizing that kind of descriptive terminology doesn't help our cause.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Mickey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    777
    Quote Originally Posted by jamesw62
    Quote Originally Posted by stevetheroofer
    Quote Originally Posted by Mickey
    How many of the co-sponsors are Democrats?
    "Excellent question!" let us know!
    none
    Why am I not surprised.

  10. #10
    April
    Guest
    Immediate action needed in Oregon and NC! Please help!

    http://www.alipac.us/ftopicp-1204642.html#1204642

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •