Thread: Rumblings, Rumors, and our next move

Chertoff, Bush Look for Next Move on Immigration


All Things Considered, June 8, 2007 · Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff has been the Bush administration's point person on its comprehensive immigration reform bill, which collapsed in the Senate on Thursday night. Chertoff talks with NPR's Robert Siegel about where the White House will go from here.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/s...oryId=10876256

Mass_Citizen

Originally Posted by olivermyboy

As the editors on NRO said:

The American people came out of the shadows...

Someone over there also pointed out that the American people let these things slide by if they are done one at a time attached to other bills. Vigilance is required. Libs have been doing this for 40+ years now and that's how we got where we are in the U.S. today!

Exactly, look how many bills the Dream act has been in and now they are presenting it like, if you grew up here and went to school so many years(can't remember amount) you can get citizenship, they don't even mention the in-state tution because it is what was stopping it before!!So now they are trying to give them citizenship and then they will qualify for the in-state tuition, sneaky slim they are!!

Originally Posted by SOSADFORUS

Exactly, look how many bills the Dream act has been in and now they are presenting it like, if you grew up here and went to school so many years(can't remember amount) you can get citizenship, they don't even mention the in-state tution because it is what was stopping it before!!S

The Dream Act is a big back door amnesty. The student ony has to live here 5 years, and they only have to go to Junior College or trade school for two years. Then they get a green card and can sponsor all their relatives!

Plus they lie about the numbers, they say only 60,000 illegals will qualify, that is 60,000 per year, plus all their relatives, plus of course they underestimate, so in reality probably half the illegals will get amnesty.

SOSADFORUS wrote:

So now they are trying to give them citizenship and then they will qualify for the in-state tuition, sneaky slim they are!!

The good thing it is NOT going to work SOSAD, because Americans are awake and READY TO ROLL!!!

I've been thinking. it wouldn't do any good to email or fax Chertoff. He's not elected, he works for Bush.

Like this, going on the offense instead of playing defense.

Well W for one we should go after the Assistant Traitor Kennedy. He says the immigration system is broken. Well since he has been in charge of it for the past 42 years that must mean he has broken it! He is hardly the guy that should be in charge of fixing it.

Plus we can show everything he has said about immigration over the past 42 years have been big lies. The 1965 bill, the 1986 amnesty, the 1990 H2A Ag guest worker bill, they have all turned out exactly the opposite of what he promised.

Then his brother JFK said this when proposing what eventually became the 1965 immigration bill:

"Elimination of Discrimination Based on National Origins ....
The use of a national origins system is without basis in either logic or reason. ..... such a system is an anachronism, for it discriminates among applicants for admission into the United States on the basis of accident of birth."

and

"natives of no one country should receive over 10 percent of the total quota numbers authorized in any one year. This will insure that the pattern of immigration is not distorted by excessive demand from any one country."
Â*
Yet Mexico has recently contributed 35% of US immigrants/legalized illegal aliens; future amnesties being proposed could raise this to 50% or more.Â* Thus any type of amnesty for illegal aliens is the opposite of what JFK supported, since it discriminates based on national origin.

What do you think about running an ad with these quotes in the Boston Globe and Washington Post? We can use both fat Teddy's and his brother's words against any new amnesty.

But I just posted the 1986 Amnesty and how these guys voted. According to the Congressional record, both Kennedy and McCain voted against it back then.

They have been saying the same things over and over for the past year. The talking points of coming out of the shadows, doing jobs Americans won't do, family reunification, etc. We should keep repeating the same message of Why should we trust you, 1986, Enforce the current laws, Build the Fence, No Benefits.

When they will stand up, insult us, and say we don't care about our political careers, they are willing to do just about anything, including political suicide.


Psalm 91

If you run an ad I would like to run one in my local paper. Need more locals involved too.