Results 1 to 4 of 4
Like Tree9Likes
  • 3 Post By lorrie
  • 2 Post By Judy
  • 2 Post By nntrixie
  • 2 Post By Beezer

Thread: Trump can unilaterally & LEGALLY shut down broken refugee program

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1
    Senior Member lorrie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Redondo Beach, California
    Posts
    6,677

    Trump can unilaterally & LEGALLY shut down broken refugee program

    Trump can unilaterally & LEGALLY shut down broken refugee program

    September 11, 2017 07:28 AM



    What if I told you that President Trump could unilaterally shut off the stream of refugees for the remainder of his presidency and force long-term reforms to the entire refugee program

    — all without interference from the courts?

    It’s actually quite simple.

    The president controls refugee intake unconditionally


    The Refugee Act of 1980 (8 U.S.C. §1157(a)(2)) grants the president unilateral authority to set the cap and countries of origin of refugees. It merely requires the State Department to consult with and inform the Senate Judiciary Committee prior to setting the cap in a written report in the weeks preceding the next fiscal year. That time is now. Obama used it to the detriment of the country to bring in over 100,000 refugees in his last year in office; Trump can use it to protect our security by setting the cap at zero.

    While the 1980 Refugee Act was sold to the public as a way of granting Congress and the states more input, it left the door open for a president who doesn’t respect his nation’s concerns to unilaterally bring in as many refugees as he desires. This has been a source of much consternation for conservatives, because over the past two decades, this has allowed the presidents to flood the country with hundreds of thousands of refugees from Somalia, Iraq, and other places that do not fit the description of religious or ethnic persecution. Now the shoe is on the other foot. The president most certainly may bring in as few as he wants. There is no mandatory minimum. Now that he is no longer working off Obama’s FY 2017 determination, he can chart his own course, without Congress and without the meddling courts.

    Refugee program serves nobody but unscrupulous private contractors


    The refugee program is broken beyond repair. We spend 12 times as much money resettling migrants in America as it would cost to resettle them in their respective regions. Moreover, as Christians and Jews in the Middle East are becoming extinct, much of the resettlement program has become a fundamental transformation of America by bringing in thousands of non-assimilating Muslims. The cost to Americans in terms of welfare, security, and culture is staggering [D1] — and it all enriches self-promoting and parasitic refugee contractors.

    We’ve brought in close to one million refugees since FY 2004. According to the State Department’s refugee database, America has admitted roughly 160,000 Iraqi refugees since FY 2007. We have admitted over 143,000 Somalis over the past two decades, 24 years after the civil war commenced. Why should we actively bring in more?

    How does the scheme work? As I write in Stolen Sovereignty:

    As far back as 2000, David M. Robinson, a former acting director of the refugee bureau in the State Department, described the insidious power of the contractors as follows: The agencies form a single body [that] wields enormous influence over the Administration’s refugee admissions policy. It lobbies the Hill effectively to increase the number of refugees admitted for permanent resettlement each year and at the same time provides overseas processing for admissions under contract to the State department. In fact, the federal government provides about ninety percent of its collective budget. If there is a conflict of interest, it is never mentioned.

    By setting the cap as close to zero as possible, Trump could break the back of this insidious scam within just one year and end the stolen sovereignty whereby the UN and private NGOs determine the future of our country and fundamentally transform local communities[D2]

    Recognize Kurdistan and have it resettle those truly persecuted


    The few truly persecuted refugees, such as the Yazidis and Assyrians in Iraq, have no interest in moving to America. They want to live in their homeland. We should recognize an independent and stable Kurdistan in northern Iraq and refocusing the refugee program on resettling the persecuted within their own lands.

    President Trump promised to reorient the refuge program towards resettling truly persecuted ethnic and religious minorities, the statutory definition of a refugee, close to their homeland.

    Trump was absolutely right in focusing on safe zones rather than UN resettlement. A recent Center for Immigration Studies analysis of a “UNHCR Projected Global Resettlement Needs” report demonstrates that not only is the refugee program a ruse for socially transforming America, but it also doesn’t even address the neediest individuals and does not therefore harmonize with humanitarian goals. "Contrary to UNCHR and U.S. official claims, it is not necessarily the most vulnerable and urgent cases that are being submitted for resettlement,” writes Nayla Rush of the CIS.

    This is where Kurdish independence comes into play, killing two birds with one stone. As we’ve noted before at CR, from a foreign policy standpoint we should already be supporting Kurdish independence in northern Iraq. The Kurd bloc is the only stable pro-Western ally that serves as a hedge against both Iran and the Sunni Salafists and could actually hold ground in Iraq. In addition, an independent Kurdistan could serve as a homeland for all those persecuted in Syria and Iraq. The Kurds have already agreed to serve as that safe zone. By spending a fraction of the taxpayer funds we spend on the current program, we could resettle so many more people there, help build up an Israel-style ally in the heart of enemy territory, and achieve our humanitarian goals as well. The only ones who stand to lose are the taxpayer-funded NGOs.

    President Trump’s already small list of accomplishments is dwindling. From Obamacare and debt to taxes, the Iran deal, religious liberty, moving the Israel embassy, and getting out of Afghanistan — it sure seems like the election never even happened. Some of those items face complications from Congress. But when it comes to refugee policy and recognizing Kurdish independence, Trump can unilaterally control our course. It’s an opportunity he will not get again.

    https://www.conservativereview.com/a...efugee-program
    artist, Beezer and Judy like this.


    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty
    by joining our E-mail Alerts athttp://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  2. #2
    Senior Member Judy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    52,169
    I totally agree with this view. The Obama set refugee limits at 110,000 as he was leaving office, Trump reduced them to 50,000 because 25,000 of Obama's had already been approved prior to Inauguration. Trump can set his limits at ... ZERO .... for next year because we have an abundance of issues in our country, 2 Hurricanes to rebuild from, an escalation of war in Afghanistan, and an pending war in North Korea. We have no time or money to deal with people in other countries at this time or in the foreseeable future who are not part of a significantly reduced highly selective merit-based visa and green card immigration program as proposed through the RAISE ACT.
    lorrie and Beezer like this.
    A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
    Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy

    Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    7,377
    Yes, why are these refugees from the ME being brought to America.

    First, we need to get out of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria. We do owe a lot to those countries, but let's help them in their own area.

    What good can come from bringing them to another part of the world, a totally different culture? None.

    It does serve to create chaos and division and some vile elements of our government and country seems to feed on that.

    Most people would prefer to remain home, if they had a home left.
    Judy and artist like this.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Beezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Posts
    10,056
    Trump promised to set up Safe Zones on their soil.

    Get it done and ship them OUT. Reunite them on their soil.

    Stop bringing them here and stop the chain migration.

    They need to go back, rebuild, open their businesses and be with their families there...not here!
    Judy and artist like this.
    TO BECOME AN AMERICAN YOU MUST CHANGE YOUR VALUES ...NOT YOUR LOCATION

    STAY HOME AND BUILD AMERICA ON YOUR SOIL

Similar Threads

  1. Congress seeks to fund US Refugee Admissions Program as if Trump didn’t exist
    By Newmexican in forum illegal immigration News Stories & Reports
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 05-02-2017, 04:15 PM
  2. Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-26-2017, 07:06 AM
  3. Does Donald Trump know he can cap refugee program now?
    By European Knight in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-13-2017, 05:48 PM
  4. House votes 289-137 to shut down or pause Syrian refugee program
    By ALIPAC in forum illegal immigration Announcements
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-19-2015, 05:46 PM
  5. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-16-2015, 08:18 PM

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •