Thread: "Obamanation."

Originally Posted by kathyet2

Are we Being Betrayed from Within by an Islamist in the White House

By Paul Dowling / 21 August 2014 / 53 Comments

“It's easier to fool people than to convince them that they have been fooled.” —Mark Twain


The Islamist Cometh
Is it possible that Barack Hussein Obama is an Islamo-fascist, akin to a member of the Muslim Brotherhood? Let us pretend he is and see if it helps to explain his mystique.

During the 2008 primary season, Hamas was phone-banking for Obama. Hamas is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood.

Obama’s Taqiyya
Upholding the Oath of Office would be distasteful to an actual Islamist president. Supporting the Constitution would mean going against the totalitarian, Islamo-fascist principles of the Koran. Muslim’s are, however, allowed to lie to non-Muslims—this is called taqiyya.
Obama is a profoundly anti-Constitution president, telling Americans he does not respect their views, as represented in Congress. “I have a pen, and I have a phone,” he says, threatening to make law by executive action. In the style of a totalitarian caliph, Obama rejects representative government, exhorting Americans to submit to his will. Islam means “submission.”

Harming the Military & Military Families
Nidal Hasan opened fire at Fort Hood, killing 13 soldiers. Obama denied it was Muslim terror, categorizing it as “workplace violence.” The re-designation deprived military families of the “terrorism benefits” they should have accrued. This demoralization has punished military families who have fought against Islamism for a decade.
Obama punishes Christians in the military for making religious remarks. Even a military chaplain did not escape censure for stating in a personal blog that “there are no atheists in foxholes.” Christians risk discharge, if fellow soldiers report religious statements on- or, in some cases, off-duty.
Muslims are more easily promoted in the armed forces. Submission to Obama, above the Constitution, is desired. Those who have no problem firing on their fellow, non-Islamist, Americans are put on the fast track.

The US military is forced to fast during Ramadan. Religious remarks that show Islamic preferences are not punished and sometimes are rewarded.

Obama’s Military Fecklessness
Obama is training 70,000 Taliban in American military methods, in Afghanistan. Obama released the five most dangerous Taliban from Gitmo in exchange for an away-without-leave, Islamist traitor. He helped only Muslims in this deal, and harmed America to boot.
Obama has fostered an environment in the Mid-East that has nurtured the birth of the Islamic State. Obama released their Caliph Ibrahim from US custody in Camp Bucca, Iraq, back in the spring of 2009, when he went by Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi. Obama continues only to stalemate IS. He will not kill the cancer while it is still easily done. An Islamist president would not wish to harm or restrain IS more than politically necessary.
Obama has sent Secretary of State Chuck Hagel to Qatar with an $11 billion-dollar weapons deal. Qatar provides arms to Hamas.
Obama has held up arms shipments to Israel during their war with Hamas. He has made statements condemning Israel. He sympathizes with Hamas.

Betraying the Infidels
Obama is cutting the US army to pre-WWII levels and the navy to pre-WWI levels. He has taken our nuclear missile defense from 5,500 to 1,550 without getting concessions from the Chinese or Russians.
Obama is helping our enemy, Iran, to get nuclear weapons by way of a sham treaty. Iran, as an Islamist state, lies in its treaties. Obama has declared Iran off-limits to attack, during the protracted negotiations. An Islamist president would prefer to help an Islamist regime, rather than aid America—the
Great Satan!

In a dangerous world of terror, Obama has canceled the Tomahawk and Hellfire missile programs. He has also opened the US border to terrorists, who are streaming across it. An Islamist president would gladly jeopardize America.

Harms Against Israel
On April 2, 2012, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta leaked a report concerning Israel’s plan for a possible attack on Iran “in April, May, or June” of that year. This leak—a first in the history of US-Israel relations—removed any element of surprise Israel might have had, and effectively canceled any potential Israeli strike, while allowing Iran additional time to prepare by further developing its nuclear weapons program.

In June, 2010, Obama leaked information that Israel might use Saudi airspace to fly a more direct route to Iran. The Saudi-Israeli cooperation was revealed to the London Times, citing “US defense sources.” An Islamist president would revel in helping a potentially nuclear Islamist state in this way.
The US Defense Department, on June 4, 2013, leaked more than 1,000 pages of details of an Israeli system whose success rests on being totally invisible to enemy eyes. It was a great blow to the defense of Israel, because the Arrow 3 is designed to seek out and blow up Iranian Shihab 3 and other long-range missiles. An Islamist president would leak this information, without qualms.

Also, Foreign Policy Magazine has reported—citing an anonymous American source in the Defense Department—that Israel had arranged to use an air base in Azerbaijan as a way to launch an air strike against Iran. The Christian Science Monitor asked, “Did the U.S. just torpedo an Israeli deal for a base in Azerbaijan?” and began to wonder whether the U.S. was Israel’s “best friend” anymore—at least under this president.

Targeting Threats to Islam
Not only conservative and libertarian groups were targeted by the Obama IRS, Pro-Israel Jewish groups were also targeted. Obama has said he considers the greatest enemies of the US to be conservatives!

Ultra-liberals have not compared conservatives to terrorists, before Obama. Why would Obama say this? Constitutional conservatives believe in an ideal that is an anathema to Islamists— individual liberty, as enshrined in the Constitution! Pro-Israel Jews believe in the legitimacy of a safe haven for Jews—a Jewish state—something an Islamist president cannot countenance.

Predicting Obama
I have been predicting Obama’s actions for quite some time. Some marvel at my accuracy. My secret? Plain and simple: I imagine Obama to be an Islamist.


Read more at http://eaglerising.com/8089/betrayed-within-islamist-white-house/#leEGf6AXzZoePu7v.99


isn't it about time we all start saying:

""""We will stand with the Christians should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.”""""

Personally I think it is getting very ugly out there folks!!!!!

I would say yes!!!!

Mark Levin to Obama: ‘Get Your Ass Off The Golf Course, Act Like a President, or Get the Hell Out!’



Share this Tweet this Google +
August 21, 2014 11:41 pm

• Obama Nation

(TPNN) – Radio talk show great, best-selling author, and constitutional scholar Mark Levin came back from a three-day vacation, and came out swinging in a fiery scorching of Obama’s obsession with cowardly escaping to the golf course in the face of tragedy.
“You know, folks, an American is decapitated in the middle of the desert by some British-Islamo-Nazi puke,” Levin begins exhibiting righteous indignation. “This puke, this punk, ties one of our citizens up, his hands behind his back, lifts up his chin, and saws his head off!” Levin shouted.
“Is it too much to expect this pathetic president to spend more than five minutes on it?” Levin asked, referring to Obama hitting the links immediately after issuing his brief emotionless prepared statement regarding the barbaric beheading of photojournalist James Foley.
FAX BLAST SPECIAL: Impeach Obama NOW!
Guess What ‘King Putz’ was Doing During the Funeral of Major Gen. Greene
Levin continued by not just complaining about how Obama handled the tragic and horrific situation (golfing, as usual), but the former Chief of Staff for the attorney general in the Reagan Administration offered his educated opinion how a real president should have handled such a horrible event.

“This man should have been in the Situation Room with the press there, with the Joint Chiefs of Staff, with the head of his national security team, with the Director of the CIA. He should have been there with the President Pro Tem, and the Senate Majority Leader and the Republican Leader. He should have been there with the Speaker of the House and the Democrat Leader in the House. And he should have been there and made a statement–not from the friggin’ golf course!”

A passionately livid Levin said Obama should have called back the vacationing Congress and given a speech in front of Congress in the House chamber before the American people and should rally Congress.
“He should rally Congress, rally the nation, rally the world, lay out the case for the war against these cockroaches,” Levin advised, referring to Muslim terrorists.

“Mr. President–Get your ass off the golf course. I’m gonna be the father you never had. Get your ass off the golf course, get the hell back into Washington, D.C., act like a president, or get the hell out!”

LISTEN BELOW via RightVID:

http://www.tpnn.com/2014/08/22/boom-...-the-hell-out/

- See more at: http://www.teaparty.org/mark-levin-o....YavYt6Fl.dpuf

Guess what.....

(http://instagram.com/p/r9_dxdD9qU/)

#Obama #golf 







Nate Beeler - Aug. 21, 2014
patriotpost.us

Obama hits the gas on regs




Getty Images
By Tim Devaney - 08/23/14 06:17 AM EDT

Groups that closely follow regulations are expecting the Obama administration to continue issuing controversial rules through the midterm elections, despite the political risk it could pose for Democrats.

With time running out on President Obama’s second term, federal agencies are hitting the gas on a number of regulatory initiatives that are central to the White House’s “go-it-alone” agenda.

The pace of rulemaking is a stark contrast from the months leading up to the 2012 presidential election, when the flow of rules came screeching to a near halt.

The expectation that the gears of the regulatory process will keep moving highlights how the president's desire for a second-term legacy sometimes conflicts with the short-term political considerations of congressional Democrats.“We can’t underestimate the role politics plays in regulatory decisions,” said Stuart Shapiro, a former staffer at the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, who is now an associate professor at Rutgers University. “It’s important to remember that at the heart of regulations are political decisions.”

Obama’s regulatory push is having a notable impact on Kentucky’s Senate race, where Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R) is using the Environmental Protection Agency’s controversial climate rule against his opponent Alison Grimes, a Democrat.

Critics say Kentuckians stand to lose thousands of coal jobs under the EPA’s climate rule, making it very unpopular in the state. McConnell has promised to fight back against the EPA’s climate rule, and has not been shy about pointing out Grimes’ Democratic ties to President Obama.

But Obama isn’t “backing away” from the EPA’s climate rule, said Ronald White, regulatory policy director at the left-leaning Center for Effective Government — or for that matter, from the EPA’s waters rule, which is just as controversial.

The EPA says the water regulation is needed to clarify ambiguity in the law, while critics say it would give federal regulators expansive powers over the small bodies of water such as those found on many farms.

“Obviously, there are still some sensitivities, but if President Obama were really worried about negatively influencing the midterm elections, would he have been this aggressive on climate? Would he have been as supportive on the waters rule?” White asked. “I suspect not.”

The opposite was true leading up to the 2012 presidential election, when critics say Obama twisted then-EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson’s arm into dropping a controversial ozone rule that would have established stronger air quality standards.

The ozone rule was unpopular with the business community, so the White House pushed it to the backburner to deprive Republicans of a campaign attack, White said.

“That was clearly politically motivated,” White said. “They made some lame attempt to say it was ongoing, but it was clearly politically influenced by the White House’s policy folks, who didn’t want to take on a major controversial rule in the year before a presidential election.”

The ozone rule wasn’t the only regulation that stalled in the runup to the 2012 presidential elections.

The number of economically-significant regulations that OIRA approved dropped to 83 in 2012, about a 35 percent decline from an average of about 127 rules during each of Obama’s first three years in office.

“The results of the election made people in the Obama administration realize that excessive regulation was a talking point Republicans could use,” said Susan Dudley, a former OIRA administrator during the George W. Bush administration.

The assertion from critics that the Obama administration may have been playing election-year politics during his 2012 campaign was given credence by a government report that came out late last year.

The analysis by the Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS), an independent federal agency that monitors the government’s rule-making process, found that regulatory delays at OIRA spiked in 2012 as the administration put controversial rules on hold until after the election.

But the same can’t be said this time around with the congressional midterms approaching in November, observers say.

“I don’t think the Obama administration is willfully delaying regulations right now — at least not for the benefit of members of Congress running in November,” said Sam Batkins, regulatory director at the conservative American Action Forum.

OIRA is currently reviewing 24 rules and has already completed reviews of another 70 rules, putting the agency on pace to cycle through close to 125 rules by the end of the year.

Some say the tempo of regulations points to a schism between President Obama, who is focused on carving his legacy in Washington before his term expires in two years, and congressional Democrats, who are consumed with keeping control of the Senate.

“There is certainly a cost from President Obama’s point of view to slowing down the amount of regulations,” said James Gattuso, who studies regulations at the conservative Heritage Foundation. “I don’t see any reason why he would want to do that.”

Shapiro, the former OIRA official, suggested President Obama has “less incentive” to protect Senate Democrats this time around than he had to protect himself during the 2012 campaign.

“The president has some reason to put his priorities first, because generally speaking, an individual regulation won’t play as big of a role in a congressional election,” Shapiro said. "It’s hard to see a Senate race turning on that.”

That said, it’s not as if President Obama can accomplish all of his policy goals while completely disconnecting from his Democratic colleagues in the Senate, said Cal Jillson, a political science professor at Southern Methodist University.

“The last two years of his presidency will be determined, in large part, by whether Democrats maintain control of the Senate,” Jillson explained. “So he does have a stake in the midterms, but it’s not as immediate of an issue for him."


Read more: http://thehill.com/regulation/pendin...#ixzz3BDrZpjAZ
Follow us: @thehill on Twitter | TheHill on Facebook


Anything that will expedite our destruction and/or demise for him and his Puppet Masters. He just follows orders and needs to be arrested and convicted for treason. Maybe some day he and his owners will be, WTSHTF!!!

Barbarism Not an Anomaly Within Islam: Obama Sides with Sharia Law in Mid East

Posted by Adina Kutnicki on Aug 23, 2014 in Islam


WITH the west’s horrified eyes fixated on the beheading of James Foley, an American photojournalist, some truly believe that said barbarism is an anomaly within Islam. Not only that, with Obama Inc.’s Allah-washing mouthpieces in the forefront, their mendacity, capacity to lie – regarding the underpinnings of Islam (propped up by Shariah law) – exceeds all normal and rational bounds.

THE above is emblematic of which side Barack HUSSEIN Obama is on, as if there has ever been any doubt!
NOT on this end…. Commentary by Adina Kutnicki

The Obama/Erdogan relationship is closer than close…it is lock-step…eye to eye…nose to nose…

WHEREVER Islamic terror embeds, rest assured, the Brotherhood Mafia’s quest for global dominance is front and center. This is indisputable, regardless of those who attempt to deflect from said inherent truth; the Islamist-in-Chief being a front and center reprobate and liar. However, some of us know what’s going on, as such, we are unafraid to shout it from the rooftops. They can’t silence all of us. Let them try.

“A LOADED, INFORMATION-PACKED, MUST-READ-AND-SHARE EXPOSÉ INTERVIEW [with video clips] by Wolff Bachner of “The Inquistr” with Adina Kutnick, Muslim Brotherhood expert and investigative journalist!

In this riveting interview, Adina “turn[s] up the spotlight – and hopefully the heat – on the most dangerous terror apparatus the west has ever known: the Muslim Brotherhood,” sounding an urgent call to open our eyes and act—AND OPEN OUR EYES SHE DOES!

Adina names names, exposing “overwhelming evidence” of the Muslim Brotherhood’s infiltration into Western society—its institutions, academia, the media, social networking circles, the U.S. government, its proxy organizations, and more—and its overt and covert methods and plan to garner support, execute jihad, and ultimately dominate the world!”

THE above Sunni Brotherhood jihadi-linked facts are immutable, notwithstanding their necessary alliances with their Shia brothers-in-arms. It just depends on which infidel (non-believer in Allah) requires whacking. Hence, the Mafia appellation. Well earned.

BUT before we tie-in the nexus between the Islamist-in-Chief to Turkey and link both of their relationship’s to ISIS, one must throw off the mental baggage ofTurkey being aligned with the “moderate”camp, unless being in bed with ISIS, Hamas et al. is your definition of “moderate”. Suit yourselves. In tandem, while you are throwing off the yoke, ignore Turkey’s alliance with NATO. It is nothing but a dangerous smokescreen.

REGARDLESS, it must be understood: beheading is hardly an anomaly for committed Islamists, that’s for sure. Who recalls the 2002 Al-Qaeda beheading of Daniel Pearl, a Wall Street Journal reporter? BTW, ISIS is merely the latest outgrowth of Al-Qaeda; its updated incarnation. BOTH are part and parcel of the Brotherhood Mafia. Don’t ever forget this. Keeping your head atop your shoulders may depend on this verily lesson learned, especially if Shariah law enters your western sphere! Footnote: parts of America have effectively “introduced” Shariah law. Oh yeah, they have.

Two verses from the Koran are used by terrorists to justify the practice.
“When you meet the unbelievers, smite their necks,” says an ayah, or verse in Sura (chapter) 47.
Sura 8:12 reads: “I will cast dread into the hearts of the unbelievers. Strike off their heads, then, and strike off all of their fingertips.”

Decapitations are also described in some of the earliest histories of Islam.
Muhammad’s earliest biographer, Ibn-Ishaq, describes how the prophet approved the beheadings of between 600 and 900 men from the Jewish Banu Qurayza tribe following the Battle of the Trench.

It was a common form of execution under the Ottoman Empire, where it was the “primary form of symbolic aggression among Ottoman soldiers”, according to historian James J Reid.

In Saudi Arabia, where a strict interpretation of Sharia law is enforced, beheading is the form of punishment for a range of crimes, including drug running and apostasy, with approximately 80 people believed to have been beheaded by the kingdom last year.

Though there are no calls for beheading as punishment for specific crimes in sharia law, it is one of a range of executions that may be used, along with stoning or hanging.

NOW that that’s settled, let’s concentrate on ISIS and their (all of a sudden) prominence, mainly due to their barbaric video depicting the beheading of James Foley, an American photojournalist. Not content with one head on a platter, what makes them think they can threaten Americans and that they will get away with it? Oh, they know that the Islamist-in-Chief has their backs! Otherwise, they wouldn’t dare to go up against many millions of Americans, enough of whom are (legally) armed to boot. (Fellow) Americans, you are on your own…your leadership has effectively abandoned you.

Gruesome video link….
STILL yet, due to ISIS’s catapult to top Islamist dog we are forced to play connect the (three main) dots; leap-frogging from Obama Inc.’s ties to ISIS; to Turkey’s nexus and both their linkages to ISIS and Hamas.
EXHAUSTING, but mandatory.

Dot One:
BUT to connect the Jihadi-in-Chief to ISIS one must resurrect the roots of his Mid East wildfires. Upheavals. Alas, from the moment that he PLANNED the ouster of Egypt’s Mubarak all hell broke loose, as intended. Say what?

WELL, as a result of his “meddling” and his championing of the Brotherhood Mafia, Egypt’s leaders filed an indictment against Barack HUSSEIN Obama and Hill too. Interesting. Congress has yet to do the same. Orwellian.

The underlying theme of the trial seems to be a case being made against the Obama administration. Testimony by Mubarak administration officials is that the Obama administration had a direct hand in the 2011 revolution in Egypt. In reality, according to testimony, it wasn’t a revolution at all but a conspiracy.

KNOW this to the nth degree: Egypt’s toppling was designed as a knock-on effect to lead into Libya; ipso facto as a gateway to topple Syria via MASSIVE weapons-running – MAN-PADS as prime booty – resulting in Benghazigate. The operational end point involved transfers to the “rebels” in Syria. Basically, said fires were meant to assist the “rebels” – via the Islamist-in-Chief’s mischief – to install the Brotherhood Mafia into power, even though Obama Inc.’s thrust into Egypt didn’t go as planned. Machiavellian.

MORE specifically, ISIS is an outgrowth of said “rebels” and Obama Inc. helped to arm and train them! Sounds like conspiracy-talk, but no less true.

Training: American troops join Jordan and Iraq for an exercise as it is revealed Syrian “rebels” (aka ISIS factions) are being helped. In Qatar, Mr Kerry said assistance would help change the balance on the battlefield!






BEFORE anything else, let it be noted: U.S. troops are often tasked to train outside forces, those which are supposed to be helpful in securing American interests within their respective regions. Otherwise, what’s the point, right? But said strategic doctrine is predicated upon an American patriot situated at the helm and properly vetting this one and that one!

MOST significantly, how many readers recall this site’s continuous harping on the Muslim Brotherhood Mafia’s entrenchment within Obama Inc.? For those who are newly aboard, time to catch up to speed via this blogger’s interview (Oct. 2013), one which highlights certain DHS top Brotherhood appointments! Mind you, it has EVERYTHING to do with the title, the implications, of today’s commentary.
Wolff Bachner: In a modern, highly political world, one must have enablers and allies to enact any global initiative, especially one that is subversive and secretive. Who are some of the enablers and allies of the Muslim Brotherhood and how high up the political food chain do they go?

Dot Two:
NO, Turkey hasn’t been lost in the discussion. In fact, Turkey’s Erdogan is a central Brotherhood player to all of the above, as he marches toward resurrecting the Caliphate, the Ottoman Empire. First and foremost, in area of importance, is Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s Islamist relationship to President (former PM) Erdogan. Their demonstrably copacetic bindings.

Dot Three:
MOST ominously, the anti-western duo are inexorably linked to ISIS and Hamas. In point of fact, Erdogan shields Hamas’s top killers in Turkey, as well as serves as a main transit corridor for ISIS Brotherhood butchers! There are no ifs, ands or buts about these tidbits.

Prime Minister’s Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s “AKP government has helped us a lot” since the war in Syria began, an Islamic State fighter told a Turkish journalist.
The Jihad and Terrorism Threat Monitor of MEMRI (the Middle East Media Research Institute) exclusively provided The Jerusalem Post with a report on Tuesday based on an interview with the fighter, who is in Ankara for medical care, by journalist Deniz Kahraman from the left-liberal Aydinlik newspaper and the OdaTV website, in which the fighter says Turkey played a crucial role in the Sunni group’s spectacular advances.
“Turkey paved the way for us. Had Turkey not shown such understanding for us, the Islamic State would not be in its current place. It [Turkey] showed us affection. Large number of our mujahedeen [jihadis] received medical treatment in Turkey,” he said.

OMG…

RESULTANT to all the above: a few orders of magnitude stand out:

Order One:
THERE is little doubt that the jihad perpetrated on 9/11/01 will be relegated to child’s play, when ISIS pounces within the U.S. Yes, it has been reported that some are already burrowed inside America! More likely than not.

The ranking Republican on the Armed Services Committee in the U.S. Senate is warning that ISIS terrorists, those who this week beheaded an American journalist, are trying to develop the capability of blowing up an entire American city.

DESPITE the enormity of the threat, one that has been building for years, which Obama Inc. has a direct hand in, a State mouthpiece (in reality, a well-paid whore) has the temerity to posit: Foley’s beheading isn’t directed at the U.S. and the Islamic State (ISIS) is not behaving as representative of Islam!!

INDEED, as if Islam has NO relationship to blood….

IN the main, this investigative journalist has warned westerners, particularly Americans and Israelis: stealth jihad will be the death of the west, sooner than frontal jihad will. Its insidious effects are such: few will have a clue, before they even realize that their freedoms are gone. Kaput.

SO, is it possible that Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s otherwise inexplicable and somewhat schizophrenic tactics – regarding approving drone strikes here and there against Al-Qaeda and ISIS alike, while propping up Islamists on the back end – are actually “Muruna” – a “cousin” of “Taqqiya” – both of which underpin stealth jihad? {Full Disclosure: the embedded link is part of Islam Exposed, a site this American-Israeli serves as Israel Administrator on behalf of }

ADINA KUTNICKI, ISRAEL ADMINISTRATOR
As an expert on the Muslim Brotherhood, I am often called upon to contribute to various forums on its dangers, particularly via its world-wide overarching tentacles. I am an investigative journalist and contribute op-eds to various Zionist and conservative media outlets.

CONFUSED? Don’t be. Think like them, not like freedom-loving westerners. It may save your lives.

BESIDES, pretending that beheading (and, in general, Islamic barbarism) has NOTHING to do with Islam is like feigning that alcoholism isn’t directly related to excessive drinking, capable of wrecking countless lives in the process. Who can be so blind?

WITHIN reality-based thinking, Islam/Shariah law has already proven to be a monumental disaster!

EARTH shattering!
About the author: Adina Kutnicki


Adina Kutnicki is an investigative journalist and independent op-ed contributor to various Zionist and Conservative media outlets. She contributed to an in-depth investigative series at FrontPage Magazine with Lee Kaplan from 2003-2007. They are still working together. Her op-eds have been featured at American Thinker, Israel National News,Israel Insider, The Jewish Press, MidEast Outpost, The Freeman Center For Strategic Studies, HONENU – Providing Legal Aid To Israeli Soldiers & Civilians In Distress, JEWSNEWS.co.il(http://adinakutnicki.com/2012/11/10/...ewsnews-co-il/) as well as at other sites. Some interviews include: The Inquisitr Interviews Adina Kutnicki: The Reality Of Life For An Israeli Patriot and ‘The Muslim Brotherhood’s Quest For Global Dominance – An Interview With Adina Kutnicki.’ Her recent book review On A Wing From The Holy Land [Review Of An Exciting New Novel About The Spiritual Journey Of An Israeli Woman] was also spotlighted at Inquisitr. In addition, she is the Israel Administrator at Islam Exposed Online Her blog - www.adinakutnicki.com - received a ‘Watcher of Weasels’ Award - see within – scroll down to ‘Non-Council’ winners. Her full profile can be found at - http://adinakutnicki.com/about/
View all articles by Adina Kutnicki



Read more at http://joeforamerica.com/2014/08/isi...yvX4VWj3fBW.99

Politics: In January Obama thought ISIS was the 'jayvee' team. Now they're a threat 'beyond anything we've seen'


Dismissive administration caught with its pants down.
Back in January it was clear to everyone whose name isn't Barack Obama that our Middle East pullout had created a massive power vacuum. Filling that vacuum was a variety of Rebel groups - Al Qaeda offshoots that had gained a foothold in Syria and Iraq. We now know them as ISIS or ISIL, and we've been witnessing their brutality against Christians, Jews, and resistant Muslims for months. If only someone could have talked to President Obama at the beginning of the year and warned him that this new insurgency was a genuine threat that needed to be taken seriously.

Oh wait. Someone did.

In an interview with the New Yorker, Obama was asked about these various "rebel factions." His response was a mish mash of non-interventionist rhetoric and naive, flippant, dismissal:

And yet thoughts of a pacific equilibrium are far from anyone’s mind in the real, existing Middle East. In the 2012 campaign, Obama spoke not only of killing Osama bin Laden; he also said that Al Qaeda had been “decimated.” I pointed out that the flag of Al Qaeda is now flying in Falluja, in Iraq, and among various rebel factions in Syria; Al Qaeda has asserted a presence in parts of Africa, too.

“The analogy we use around here sometimes, and I think is accurate, is if a jayvee team puts on Lakers uniforms that doesn’t make them Kobe Bryant,” Obama said, resorting to an uncharacteristically flip analogy. “I think there is a distinction between the capacity and reach of a bin Laden and a network that is actively planning major terrorist plots against the homeland versus jihadists who are engaged in various local power struggles and disputes, often sectarian.

“Let’s just keep in mind, Falluja is a profoundly conservative Sunni city in a country that, independent of anything we do, is deeply divided along sectarian lines. And how we think about terrorism has to be defined and specific enough that it doesn’t lead us to think that any horrible actions that take place around the world that are motivated in part by an extremist Islamic ideology are a direct threat to us or something that we have to wade into.”

According to President Obama, ISIS was just another junior varsity team - a bunch of pretenders. They weren't a threat to the United States.
So, seven months later, what does Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel say about them?

"ISIL is as sophisticated and well funded as any group that we have seen. They're beyond just a terrorist group. They marry ideology, a sophistication of strategic and tactical military prowess. They are tremendously well-funded.

Oh. This is beyond anything that we've seen.

So, we must prepare for everything.And the only way you do that is that you take a cold, steely, hard look at it…and get ready

...When you look at what they did to Mr. Foley, what they threatened to do to all Americans and Europeans - what they are doing now, I don't know any way to describe it other than 'barbaric.' They have no standard of decency - of responsible human behavior - and I think the records pretty clear on that.

So yes, they are an imminent threat to every interest we have, whether it's in Iraq or anywhere else."




From J.V. team to imminent threat in just 7 months?
Either ISIS has one heck of a training camp, or the administration so desperately wanted to score the talking point of "ending George Bush's war" that they were willing to ignore any potential threat that might deflate the pullout narrative.

We'd love to believe that the President has learned his lesson and is now taking ISIS seriously. Sadly, since he's willing to run back to the golf course just seven minutes after making a statement on ISIS beheading an American citizen, we're somewhat less than convinced...



Be sure to "like" Robert Laurie over on Facebook and follow him on Twitter. You'll be glad you did.
h/t @IowaHawkBlog



http://www.caintv.com/in-january-obama-thought-isis

These people running our Government are liars they will do, and have done, anything to all of us to get their way..They have no moral compass as we are taught to have, they have no remorse of care for anything but their own beliefs. They are all Psycho's...

Obama wants amnesty for 100 million muslims living in the U.S. before he leaves office


Posted on Wednesday, January 15th, 2014 at 6:49 pm.by: Conservative Infidel

According to Arabic language broadcasts, “The Muslim world is saying that President Obama wants amnesty for the current Hispanic 12 million illegal immigrants in the US in order to pave the way for the next wave of tens of millions of illegals from the Middle East to the United States, leading to 50 to 100 million Muslims living in the US. before the end of Obama’s second term.

“Is Barack Obama Really A Saudi/Muslim ‘Plant’ in the White House?” The answer is obvious. The video claims that “for years before” the 2008 election, Lipkin’s wife, who worked for the Israeli government monitoring Arabic radio broadcasts, picked up broadcasts of Saudis saying, “We will have a a Muslim in the White House in 2008.”




While the world fixates on the Middle East upheaval, there is a quiet undertow building toward mass protests and terrorism in the United States; according to author/translator in the Israeli Prime Minister’s office, Avi Lipkin, who has been reporting on Islamic population and terrorist concentrations in Latin America and Canada now for about twenty years, wrote about it extensively in his first book, “Is Fanatic Islam a Global Threat?” (published in 199.

Avi Lipkin has a source with a senior United Nations official that the U.S. will be a Muslim country by the end of Obama’s second term. It is now easy to see who that can happen, and quickly, since the economies of Egypt and other Mid East nations will likely fall apart under impending rigid Islamic rule with the new regimes. Lipkin outlines Obama’s three prong plan in the Middle East:

1) Obama fomenting unrest in each Middle Eastern country so that each regime can be taken over by fanatic Muslim Brotherhood Sunni Regime in order to use them as proxies to overthrow the competing Shiite regime in Iran without involving American troops.

2) As a result of the takeover of the regimes in the Middle East there will be a massive exodus of Sunni Muslims and Christians from Egypt to America and to Europe in order to bring about Muslim majorities in European countries, U.S., Canada and Latin America.

3) The Muslim Brotherhood nations will then march on Israel in an effort to destroy it and thus Obama keeps his promise to show the Muslim world what he’s going to do to destroy Israel.

http://www.barenakedislam.com/category/islam-in-america/

http://www.conservativeinfidel.com/u...leaves-office/


My feeling is who knows, to me he is an evil man who lies as easily as a duck swims. So if it walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, well you know it is a duck!!!

This Instead of This






Hopefully one goes the other follows!!! which one is the prize here, looks to me like they are all the booby prize, America looses again either way...

My Face

Should the Government...

Comment | Share