Thread: Bush's Immigration Comments Rile Conservatives

Originally Posted by Dixie

I think France still owes us from WWII. We can call that note or just give them France. Isn't the foreign exchange rate pretty good? Aren't they using the Euro?

Dixie

We probably gave them interest-free loans, which means that repayment would cover a year's hospital bills of 1/4 of the illegal immigrants that we're having to treat.

Dixie,
Just our luck there was a statue of Limitation on it anyway!!

SOSADFORUS wrote:
Crocket,
Are you saying if we default on the money we own China they could come in and take those lands as payment?

China is nowhere near our largest creditor. It's the Federal Reserve (a private banking cartel) and the European Banks established by the old monarchies that I would be worrying about. And yes, under international mercantile law, any creditor has a right to collateral in the event of a default.

So what are the real-world implications of this? Could a creditor actually demand a certain amount of US land/territory as payment of debt? Could this happen?

"We should establish a legal and orderly path for foreign workers to enter our country to work on a temporary basis," Bush said in his seventh State of the Union address Tuesday evening. "As a result, they won't have to sneak in, and that will leave Border Agents free to chase down drug smugglers and criminals and terrorists."

Yeah George, and we should get banks to keep their money on the sidewalk at night too. We won't have to rob, steal and go to work anymore. The police then could concentrate on drug dealers, perverts, and terrorists. Great plan!

Originally Posted by Kate

SOSADFORUS wrote:
Crocket,
Are you saying if we default on the money we own China they could come in and take those lands as payment?

China is nowhere near our largest creditor. It's the Federal Reserve (a private banking cartel) and the European Banks established by the old monarchies that I would be worrying about. And yes, under international mercantile law, any creditor has a right to collateral in the event of a default.

So what are the real-world implications of this? Could a creditor actually demand a certain amount of US land/territory as payment of debt? Could this happen?

Absolutely. Don't forget that creditors already cleaned out our treasury after the 1930 bankruptcy. FDR took all the gold out of circulation and handed it over to the banks so that he could gain enough credit to finance his socialist New Deal.

Is this how the one world order is going to come about? The US goes bankrupt, the creditors demand payment, take over half of the US territory, and make the rest of the population move west of the Rockies?


Does anyone ever wish they could plug back into the Matrix?

We are preparing to work harder than ever to ensure that President Bush lives up to his promise and that the new Congress performs differently from the old one."

I don't like it when people illegally in our country try to convince our president to go against what we the citizens are asking. And we're suppose to not worry and be nice about it?

Only a fool would not be concerned.

Originally Posted by Kate

Is this how the one world order is going to come about? The US goes bankrupt, the creditors demand payment, take over half of the US territory, and make the rest of the population move west of the Rockies?


Does anyone ever wish they could plug back into the Matrix?

Maybe. Or maybe they just keep pressing their advantage and tightening the screws until one day we wake up and realize that we are tenants and they are overlords.

Let's not forget all the AMERICAN LAND that is now in the UNITED NATIONS OF THEFT & GENOCIDE's hands!

Idaho &/or Utah immediately comes to mind.

.

What war on terror is Bush fighting? You cannot expect people to really believe you are serous about fighting that war when you are willing to leave your own borders wide open for the terrorist to come on in. I no longer believe Bush if fighting war on terror, in fact now I wonder if he ever had any real intentions of fighting a war on terror! Off the top of my head, has anyone seen very much of the first lady anymore? She seems to be keeping a very low profile.