Thread: Democrat controlled NYS intent on rigging 2024 election with no-excuse mail-in voting

.
We are almost in a situation where national elections resemble elections as happen in China, Russia and Cuba, where there is one party rule.

If this push for no-excuse mail-in ballot voting, which is being forced on the people by the Democrat Party Leadership [e.g. see: NY Dems’ latest bid to snub voters, flout the Constitution — and lock in power], is not nipped in the bud and stopped in its tracks, voting in our national elections will in fact resemble those as happen in China, Cuba, and Russia, where there is one party rule.

Forewarned is forearmed.


JWK

Let us not forget, the scary truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

.
See: Bridgeport primary election: Ganim, Gomes camps pick new date

From the article:

November 15, 2023

It also adds new conditions specifically for this primary:

• Municipal election officials must put serial numbers on absentee ballot applications if the applications are provided to an individual who has requested five or more absentee ballots for this primary.

• The town clerk will be required to stamp each absentee ballot received through a drop box with a stamp reading “drop box” in addition to stamping it with their printed name and date and time received, as done in every other election.

The article goes on to note that “. . . someone came into the town clerk’s office on Tuesday and took out 200 applications. Those will no longer be usable.”

Let us keep in mind, when these mail-in ballots are counted, it will not be known if the one who filled out the ballot and sent it in, is the person whose name appears on the ballot, or if the choices on the ballot were knowingly and willingly made by that person, and without undue influence.

In-person voting eliminates many of the creative ways cheaters have come up with to steal the votes of others. And that is one exceptionally good reason for limiting mail-in voting, e.g., to ". . . qualified electors who may, on the occurrence of any election, be absent from the municipality of their residence, because their duties, occupation or business require them to be elsewhere or who, on the occurrence of any election, are unable to attend at their proper polling places because of illness or physical disability or who will not attend a polling place because of the observance of a religious holiday or who cannot vote because of election day duties . . . " See PA's Constitution, ARTICLE VII, ELECTIONS, § 14. Absentee Voting, which I might add, Pennslyvania's Democrat controlled Supreme Court recently subjugated, and without the people's consent, arbitrarily invoked no-excuse, mail-in voting.

If this push for no-excuse mail-in ballot voting, which is being forced on the people by the Democrat Party Leadership, is not nipped in the bud and stopped in its tracks, voting in our national elections will in fact resemble those as happen in China, Cuba, and Russia, where there is one party rule.

Forewarned is forearmed.

.
JWK


The scary truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

.
See: Bridgeport ballot case wraps up. What’s next could be election chaos

"The State Elections Enforcement Commission recently recommended criminal charges for Geter-Pataky and two other Ganim supporters for their roles in the 2019 election."

The troubling truth with allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

Additionally, there is no practical way to confirm that the one who filled out a no-excuse mail-in ballot and sent it in, is the actual person whose name appears on the ballot.


JWK


The Democrat Party Leadership is not content with having turned NYC into a rat, garbage and crime infested crap hole It has now saw fit to include in its infestation tens of thousands of illegal entrant poverty-stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, criminal, and terrorist foreign nationals.

.
Just for the record, only 12 states make an attempt to verify the named voter on a mail-in ballot actually filled out the ballot. Those states have a witness requirement rule regarding verification that the person filling out the ballot, is the voter named on the ballot. Those States are Alabama, Alaska, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, Oklahoma, North Carolina, Rhode Island, South Carolina, Virginia, and Wisconsin.

Of course, even with such attempts, there is no practical way to confirm that the one who filled out a no-excuse mail-in ballot and made the choices thereon and sent it in, is the actual person whose name appears on the ballot.

JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership is not content with having turned NYC into a rat, garbage and crime infested crap hole. It has now saw fit to include in its infestation tens of thousands of, illegal entrant poverty-stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, criminal, and terrorist foreign nationals.

I heard Washington State has all mail-in ballots and you have to check the box on the OUTSIDE of the envelope if it is Republican or Democrat.

Gee, they don't even have to open the envelope to cheat. If it is marked Republican, I have no doubt they just throw it in the trash!

Oregon all mail-in voting.

Wrought with fraud.

Originally Posted by Beezer

I heard Washington State has all mail-in ballots and you have to check the box on the OUTSIDE of the envelope if it is Republican or Democrat.

Gee, they don't even have to open the envelope to cheat. If it is marked Republican, I have no doubt they just throw it in the trash!

Oregon all mail-in voting.

Wrought with fraud.

It appears you are correct and that violates voter secrecy.

Your vote won't count in Washington's primary if you don't declare a party. That's wrong

From the article:

Washington state’s presidential primary requires voters to declare a party affiliation on their ballot envelope, for all to see. This has understandably raised concerns with voters — and many have decided not to play ball, nullifying their vote in the process. Recent reports indicate that over 36,000 primary ballots in Washington have so far been disqualified for not indicating a party affiliation.

Also see: Presidential Primary FAQ | WA Secretary of State

"Voters who choose to participate in the nomination process will mark and sign party declarations on their ballot return envelopes. State law sets the date-setting process, how candidates get on the ballot, and how parties use the results."

JWK

The troubling truth with allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

.

See: Legal Problems Pile Up For Pereira – State Investigating Absentee Ballot Fraud...

From the article:

“Had John Gomes not released the tape the seniors would still be in the dark about what is legal and what is not,” says Barr. “That woke up the seniors to know that what Pereira was telling the seniors to do was actually illegal. They saw what was going on on television and news accounts so they spoke up.”

.
Also see video "Maria Pereira Manipulating Senior Citizens"




It is sickening how these vote stealers take advantage of our nation's elderly in nursing homes.



.

And no one is arrested or doing time in prison.

Democrats are dirty, deviant, disgusting, cheating, lying, vermin. That whole party should be abolished.

They cannot be of "sound" mind to want to deliberately destroy and bankrupt a beautiful free Nation. Just look at the screaming looney bins Maxine Watters, Sheila Jackson-Lee, AOC, Tahlib, Pressley, and Omar.

Originally Posted by Beezer

And no one is arrested or doing time in prison.

Democrats are dirty, deviant, disgusting, cheating, lying, vermin. That whole party should be abolished.

They cannot be of "sound" mind to want to deliberately destroy and bankrupt a beautiful free Nation. Just look at the screaming looney bins Maxine Watters, Sheila Jackson-Lee, AOC, Tahlib, Pressley, and Omar.

You are absolutely correct about the Democrat Party Leadership. The only remotely good news is some democrat voters are beginning to realize that and are leaving the democrat party.

JWK

The Democrat Party Leadership is not content with having turned NYC into a rat, garbage and crime infested crap-hole. It has now saw fit to include in its infestation tens of thousands of, illegal entrant poverty-stricken, poorly educated, low skilled, diseased, disabled, criminal, and terrorist foreign nationals.

.
When one considers how mail-in voting opens the door to countless clever ways to steal votes and engage in voter fraud, I suspect no-excuse mail-in voting "got started" under the influence and directions of some nefariously evil doers.

Unlike elections in Cuba, China, Russia, etc., where there is one party rule and an authoritarian government where "might makes right" during election time, here in the United States the same type of thugs, have decided to game the voting system with no-excuse mail-in voting, rather than use the barrel of a gun to have elections decided in their favor.

If this no-excuse mail-in voting is not stopped in its tracks, America's way for peaceful change through fair elections will have been sabotaged and conquered by those types who now rule with an iron fist in Cuba, China, Russia, etc.

JWK

The troubling truth with allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.