Thread: Democrat controlled NYS intent on rigging 2024 election with no-excuse mail-in voting

.

See: NY Mail-Voting Law Will Be in Effect for Santos Special Election

Judge said Republicans failed to show they’ll be harmed by law

The irrefutable fact is, there certainly will be “irreparable harm”. The legitimacy of February’s special election supposed winner will never be known, because there is no practical way, when counting mailed in ballots under the Early Voting Act, to scrutinize them to confirm, that the one who filled out a mailed-in ballot and made the choices thereon and sent it in, is the qualified and legitimate voter of that ballot.

The Judge lied in order to advance an election vulnerable to Tammany Hall type vote rigging.

.

.

.



In Stefanik’s latest court filing in ELISE STEFANIK vs. KATHY HOCHUL, Case No.: CV-23-2446 in which New York’s Early Mail Voter Act is challenged as violating the State’s Constitution, her lawyers fail to articulate the most obvious, and irrefutable, “irreparable harm” which the Act unnecessarily exacerbates.


In view of the fact that mail-in ballots have an inherent security flaw which is, there is no practical way to scrutinize a mailed-in ballot when counted, to confirm, that the one who filled out a mailed-in ballot and made the choices thereon and sent it in, is the qualified and legitimate voter of that ballot.


While there is a need for mail-in ballot voting in cases where in-person voting is a real and significant obstacle for a voter, to expand this option and make mail-in ballot voting an option to all voters, it likewise exacerbates the fundamental flaw with mail-in ballots mentioned above, and to the point that the supposed winner of next month’s special election cannot be verified as there is no way to confirm a mail-in ballot was filled out, and the choices made thereon, was by the legitimate person to whom that ballot was issued.


By limiting mail in ballots as mentioned in NY’s Constitution, i.e., a legitimate excused based need, the total number of mail-in ballots would be reduced to a fraction of what is allowed under the New York Early Mail Voter Act, and in so doing, even though the opportunity for illegitimate cast ballots still exists, their effect on an election would be greatly reduced by the reduction in actual mail-in ballots allowed, and thereby gives significantly more credibility to the results of an election and its declared winner.


Unfortunately, allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in New York’s special election next month, exacerbates an existing problem and creates an irreparable harm in that the supposed winner will never be known because there is no practical way, when counting mailed in ballots under the Act, to scrutinize them to confirm, that the one who filled out a mailed-in ballot and made the choices thereon and sent it in, is the qualified and legitimate voter of that ballot. And this is why mail-in voting ought to be limited as intended under New York’s Constitution.


JWK


The troubling truth with allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

.

See: The Constitutionality of the New York Early Mail Voter Act

The article rightfully concludes with the following:

"An action challenging the constitutionality of the new statute was brought within one day of the Governor’s approval of the bill.[6] We now need a final decision on the validity of the 2023 statute well in advance of the April 2, 2024, primary elections to allow those elections to proceed without the risk of uncertainty and, even worse, the possibility that mail-in votes will be rejected after having been cast pursuant to the statute."


So why is New York's Supreme Court slow walking the case, and not granting an injunction while the case is being litigated? Seems the Court is intentionally looking to invite contention and confusion for next month's special election.

.