Thread: Democrat controlled NYS intent on rigging 2024 election with no-excuse mail-in voting

NBC New York

More Than 200 Dead People Shown to Have Voted in NY County Elections: Report 1
More than 6,000 dead people are registered to vote in Nassau County and records show about 270 of them actually voted after their deaths, according to a Newsday analysis of voter registration and federal death records.

cbsnews.com
2 Investigators: Chicago Voters Cast Ballots From Beyond The Grave 1
Election officials insist there is an explanation as to why deceased people are still showing up on voter rolls. CBS 2's Pam Zekman reports.

wkyc.com – 17 Oct 22
Ohio Secretary of State Frank LaRose claims at least 75 residents voted... 1
The individuals allegedly voted in one state before casting unlawful second ballots in Ohio. However, LaRose's office says voter fraud is still 'exceedingly rare.'

The Daily Signal – 25 Oct 17
Noncitizen Immigrants Voted Illegally in Pennsylvania Elections
An agency analysis found 544 improper ballots cast from 2000 through 2017.

And look at this, which is something you just can't make up:

PhillyVoice – 30 Apr 21
Delco man gets probation for casting dead mother's vote for Donald Trump
Bruce Bartman, 70, used an old driver's license to circumvent Pennsylvania's online voter system
From the article:
Bruce Bartman, 70, pleaded guilty to felony counts of perjury and unlawful voting last December after investigators discovered he had successfully cast a mail-in ballot for his mother, who died 12 years ago.

Truth be told, it is a irrefutable fact that there is no practical way to confirm that the one who filled out a mailed-in ballot and made the choices thereon and sent it in, is the actual person issued the ballot.

A number of elections, having suspected “election fraud” in 2020, and used mail-in voting, appear to have been concentrated and limited to a few key battleground states which decided the election. Fulton County Georgia comes to mind, which is where one of our nation's most corrupted government officials have taken root. No-excuse mail-in ballots is their wet dream and makes election fraud easy as pie.

Is it not true that in some of our very tight races, a ton of mail-in ballots magically appears and suspiciously pull the Democrat candidate over the finish line, even though it is not confirmed the one who filled out these mail-in ballots, is the actual person issued the ballot or a qualified voter and made the choices thereon?

.
Here is the latest news on Rep. Elise Stefanik's lawsuit involving New York's legislatively imposed no-excuse mail-in ballot voting.


Mail-in voting expansion stays in place for now, but lawsuit lingers

JAN 3, 2024

"The appeals court could maintain Ryba’s decision, keeping the law in place as the larger lawsuit carries on. Or the appeals court could overturn her decision and side with the Republicans, stopping the law from being implemented until the state courts make a decision on the larger lawsuit."

Note that Judge Ryba’s refusal to issue an injunction was, no irreparable harm had been claimed in the filing which is what N.Y. State claimed.


SEE: AFFIRMATION IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION PENDING APPEAL

The fact is, if the new law allowing no-excuse mail-in ballots is kept in place for February's, special House election, there will be an irreparable harm. That harm is, the legitimacy of February's special election winner will never be known because there is no practical way, when counting mailed in ballots, to scrutinize them and confirm, that the one who filled out a mailed-in ballot, and made the choices thereon and sent it in, is the qualified and legitimate voter of that ballot.


.

.


It seems a bit suspicious that Rep. Elise Stefanik’s lawyers, who filed for an “irreparable harm" preliminary injunction against NY’s Early Voting Act while its constitutionality is being argued in NY’s Supreme Court, would fail to list the actual, and legitimate irreparable harm that will occur, if an injunction is not granted before February’s special election.

Instead, Stefanik’s lawyers LISTED three absurd claims for the injunction which were easily refuted, while failing to list the fundamental irreparable harm which unquestionably will occur if an injunction is not granted before February’s special election, and no-excuse mail-in ballot voting is allowed.

The irreparable harm is, the legitimacy of February’s special elections’ supposed winner will never be known because there is no practical way, when counting mailed in ballots under the Act, to scrutinize them to confirm, that the one who filled out a mailed-in ballot and made the choices thereon and sent it in, is the qualified and legitimate voter of that ballot.

Either Stefanik’s lawyers have been negligent in not understanding the security vulnerabilities of mail-in ballot voting, and how moving to no-excuse mail-in ballot voting under NY’s Early Voting Act exasperates an existing problem and unnecessarily increases the risks for vote stealing and election fraud, or, Stefanik’s lawyers are intentionally sabotaging Stefanik’s case against New York’s unconstitutional Early Voting Act, which, if upheld, would lead to the same kind of elections held in in China, Russia and Cuba, where there is one party rule.

JWK

The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

.

Last night, during the Iowa Caucuses, we witnessed a fair, transparent election and another wrapped up in a process ripe for fraud.


The Republican leadership's Iowa Caucuses used paper ballots in plain sight, vote counting in full view of everyone, and complete transparency, while Iowa’s Democrat Leadership has locked-in the use of mail-in ballots for the 2024 presidential caucus, which allows for vote manipulating, vote counting fraud and a rigged Democrat Caucus outcome.


The corrupted Democrat Party Leadership was exposed last night for what it now is . . . old style, Tammany Hall election riggers.
.

At this point, I am all for fingerprint match, Voter ID, and the National Guard oversee the counting of the vote, all on surveillance. No more machines.

I would like a QR code on our personal ballot with our Voter Registration Number embedded in it.

No more motor voter registration. No same day registration. 60-day cutoff to register to vote. No lowering the voting age.

No non-citizens can vote in any local, state, or federal elections or on school boards. Any states who allow non-citizens to vote should be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law and all involved fired on the spot. This is election interference and a felony. Diluting the votes of LEGAL U.S. citizens.

Non-citizens are here on a temporary basis, they have NO legal right to vote in our elections and can be expelled at any time. It is a privilege to come here, not a right, and we do not give one damn about their political views, they are not legal U.S. citizens and should have NO bearing on how we run our country.

Illegal aliens should not be counted in our Census, more cheating by the deviant Democrats!

Many citizens have to be fingerprinted for jobs, military, law enforcement, financial firms, banks, casinos, government jobs, etc. We can fingerprint to vote!

When you register to vote, you submit your fingerprint in the database at the Voter Registrar's Office. No motor voter! When you vote, you put your fingerprint on the ballot that you were issued with your QR Code on it. They must match in the system!

These rotten corrupt politicians have been cheating in our elections for decades. California is a prime example infested with criminal government workers undermining our votes. They should be arrested and put in prison.

We need to put a cap on total donations to campaigns and make it a level playing field. After all, isn't that what they want with DEI???

No lobbyist money, no foreign money, no union money, no AARP money, no Soros money, no Zuckerburg money, no Wall Street money. No states donating to other states candidates. California Democrat corrupt billionaires should not be able to donate to Georgia or any other state election, this is election interference!

INDIVIDUAL donations only and cap that as well.

One day to vote, make it a national holiday.

All votes get counted and locked in all 50 states before ANY results are announced. Stop the corrupt media from fearmongering and interfering in our elections stressing us out.

Our country lives in perpetual hell 24/7 from these corrupt swamp rats lying, cheating, destroying our country, and bankrupting us.

We never get a break or a chance to catch our breath and live our lives in peace anymore. They are in our face day in and day out.

We need drastic policy changes, and we need to fire and punish the cheaters who get in the way.

Originally Posted by Beezer

At this point, I am all for fingerprint match, Voter ID, and the National Guard oversee the counting of the vote, all on surveillance. No more machines.

I would like a QR code on our personal ballot with our Voter Registration Number embedded in it.

No more motor voter registration. No same day registration. 60-day cutoff to register to vote. No lowering the voting age.

Keep in mind that mail-in ballots have been the major target for rigged elections for generations, and dates back to New York’s Tammany Hall’s vote riggers.

Making no-excuse mail-in ballot voting universal, which is what New York’s Democrat Leadership is now trying to impose upon the people without their consent, and in spite of the people intentionally voting down a constitutional amendment which would have permitted it, exasperates the risks and exposure for vote stealing and government orchestrated election fraud, and is more than likely why New York’s corrupted Democrat Leadership’s actors are now, in court at this very minute, trying to force mail-in ballot voting upon the people, just like they forced the use of mail-in ballot voting for their 2024 presidential caucus, which allows for vote manipulating, vote counting fraud and a rigged Democrat Caucus outcome.

On the other hand, the Republican leadership's Iowa Caucuses used in-person voting, paper ballots in plain sight, vote counting in full view of everyone, and complete transparency.

Does the above comparison not, in itself, speak volumes regarding the Democrat Leadership’s, and I emphasize Leadership's, lust for holding on to power by whatever means necessary, even during the Democrats 2024 presidential caucus?






The bottom line is, with respect to mail-in ballot voting, there is a loss of chain of custody from the time a mail-in ballot is received by a theoretically legitimate recipient of a mail-in ballot, to the time when that mail-in ballot is counted, and, there is no practical way to scrutinize a mail-in ballot when counted, to verify that it was actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who allegedly was issued the ballot.


JWK

“We often give enemies the means of our own destruction.” – Aesop.

.
See: Voter Fraud More Widespread Than Some Think

"The prosecutions and convictions brought within the past three months—ranging from illegal voting and ballot tampering to fraudulent registration—underscore the vulnerabilities in the electoral system.

As these cases unfold, they also underscore the importance of continuous efforts to strengthen election laws and protect the vote as we move into 2024—enabling us to safeguard the democratic foundations of the United States."

No-excuse mail-in ballot voting exasperates the opportunities for vote stealing and government perpetrated election fraud and is why mail-in voting ought to be limited to a legitimate excuse-base need. If it is not limited as such, evil doers will have won, and our election process will be an illusion of the people's choices.

.

.
It seems that New York's Supreme Court is intentionally slow-walking Elise Stefanik's lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of NY's Early Voting Act, which was adopted without the people's consent. See: Plaintiffs' motion to expedite appeal (Jan. 18, 2024)

With a special election coming up next month to replace Representative George Santos, who was expelled from Congress, the use of no-excuse mail in ballots will thus be used in spite of the pending lawsuit, and in spite of the fact there is no practical way to scrutinize a mail-in ballot when counted, to verify that it was actually filled out, and the choices made thereon, were by a qualified voter who allegedly was issued the ballot, and this in turn undermines the integrity of the election's results.

Keep in mind Justice RYBA has denied an injunction against the Early Voting Act pending its adjudication in NY's Supreme Court, even though a constitutional amendment allowing no-excuse mail-in voting was rejected by the good people of NY.

Something fishy seems apparent in the State which gave birth to Tammany Hall's election riggers.

JWK

The troubling truth about allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

.

N.Y's Supreme Court Justice, Christina Ryba, who refused to grant a temporary injunction on NY's Early Voting Act while its constitutionality is being adjudicated, seems to have had an ethical problem in the past. See:

Presumptive judge Christina Ryba offered new job in court system after firing

Nine days after she was fired as an Appellate Division lawyer for alleged "ethical missteps," state Supreme Court justice candidate Christina Ryba has been offered a job to work for one of the top judges in the state.

The state's Unified Court System sent Ryba a letter on Wednesday all but begging her to work as special counsel for Supreme Court Justice Michael Coccoma, the state's deputy chief administrative judge for all courts outside New York City.

It's looking like Christina Ryba is part of the elitist's "made" justices, is loyal to NY’s Tammany Hall type vote riggers,and why she refused to grant the temporary injunction on a voting law which obviously violates NY's Constitution and allows for vote stealing and government orchestrated election fraud.

The facts regarding mail-in ballot voting are:


FACT: There is no practical way to scrutinize a mailed-in ballot to confirm, that the one who filled out a mailed-in ballot and made the choices thereon and sent it in, is the qualified and legitimate voter of that ballot.



FACT: There is a loss of chain of custody from the time a mail-in ballot is received by a theoretically legitimate recipient of a mail-in ballot, to the time when that mail-in ballot is counted.



JWK



The troubling truth with allowing no-excuse mail-in voting in one state is, when acts of corruption infect an electoral process in one jurisdiction “they transcend mere local concern and extend a contaminating influence into the national domain.” Justice DOUGLAS in United States v. Classic (1941)”.

.
.
It seems the N.Y. Democrat Leadership is still slow walking a ruling in the constitutional challenge against N. Y's. Early Mail Voter Act in order to ensure fraud-prone mail-in ballots are used in next month's special election to replace Representative George Santos, who was expelled from Congress.

The NY Democrat Leadership seems determined to win this seat by hook or by crook, just as old-school NY's Tammany Hall types did to win elections.

.