Thread: Whether or not you like Paul this is huge!!!

Before voters of Sutton called to complain their vote was not counted.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/janu ... screen.jpg

Now here is the story. I told you Romney should not have conceded when he did, the whole election is fixed, it was determined to give it to McCain.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/ja ... ounted.htm

Whoever you support this should get you steaming mad!!!

Ron Paul Votes Not Counted In New Hampshire District
Vote fraud confirmed, Clinton reversed mammoth pre-polling deficit to beat Obama, Diebold machines aid Giuliani, Romney
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, January 9, 2008




Major allegations of vote fraud in New Hampshire are circulating after Hillary Clinton reversed a mammoth pre-polling deficit to defeat Barack Obama with the aid of Diebold electronic voting machines, while confirmed votes for Ron Paul in the Sutton district were not even counted.

According to a voter in Sutton, New Hampshire, three of her family members voted for Ron Paul, yet when she checked the voting map on the Politico website, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero.

With 100% of precincts now reporting, the map still says zero votes for Ron Paul as you can see below.


It's not as if Sutton had a handful of voters like some other districts - a total of 386 people voted yet we are led to believe that not one voted for Ron Paul? Judging by the Iowa results, around 10% of residents would be expected to vote for the Congressman, returning a total of around 38 votes in this district. Let's be ultra-conservative and say just 5% support Paul - he'd still get 19 votes - but he got absolutely none whatsoever. Is there something wrong with this picture?

Greenville also tallied 144 votes yet not one for Congressman Paul.

Anyone else in Sutton who voted for Ron Paul needs to go public immediately with the charge of vote fraud and make it known that they were cheated out of their right to vote.

Diebold voting machines also did Congressman Paul no favors last night - compared to hand counted ballots Giuliani gained just short of 0.5% from electronic voting whereas Paul lost over 2%, which was the difference between finishing 4th and 5th, as this graph documents.

Mitt Romney profited the most from the Diebold swing, he received 7% more votes compared to hand counted ballots.

In the Democratic race the Diebold voting machines clearly swung the primary in Hillary Clinton's favor at the expense of Barack Obama, who had a commanding lead over the New York Senator going into the contest.

Zogby polling numbers had Obama leading Clinton by a whopping 42/29 per cent, yet Clinton eventually took the primary by three per cent.

"If I was Barack Obama, I'd certainly not have conceded this election this quickly," writes The Brad Blog. "I'm not quite sure what he was thinking. And as far as offering an indication of whether he understands how these systems work, and the necessity of making sure that votes are counted, and counted accurately, it does not offer a great deal of confidence at this hour."

"While I have no evidence at this time --- let me repeat, no evidence at this time --- of chicanery, what we do know is that chicanery, with this particular voting system, is not particularly difficult. Particularly when one private company --- and a less-than-respectable one at that, as I detailed in the previous post --- runs the entire process."

Clinton would not have beat Obama without the aid of Diebold voting machines. In precincts where electronic voting machines were used, Clinton got a 7% swing over Obama, having gained 5% in comparison to hand-counted ballots and Obama losing 2%.

As we reported yesterday, the contract for programming all of New Hampshire's Diebold voting machines, which combined counted 81 per cent of the vote yesterday, is owned by LHS Associates, whose owner John Silvestro has gone to great lengths to deflect accusations that the machines can easily be rigged.

After purchasing a Diebold 1.94w machine, the same system used in New Hampshire, a computer repair shop employee picked at random by Black Box Voting was able to zero in on the system's vulnerable memory card within just ten minutes. Hacking expert Harri Hursti testified in front of the New Hampshire legislature that the machines were wide open to fraud.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

From rmsings Links

http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/janu ... screen.jpg



http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/ja ... ounted.htm

I suggest some one from Paul’s Flower Pot call cnn Fox abc cbs and nbc because they all had all Ron Paul’s votes counted and posted and he actually ate Thompson alive so I suggesting maybe one of Paul’s people or maybe just an average Joe has made a mistake in this report above ...

I know they reported them, it was zero last night, but it was changed today, it just makes me suspicious of vote fraud, for any candidate, think about it what if Romney had more votes and they gave them to McCain, come on think about it. I don't think it is all about Paul, with the New Hampshire papers endorsing McCain, that is how they needed it to come out. This is our republic, and even if you don't support Paul this should be an outrage.
Thank you for calling me a Ron PAul flower pot whatever that is supposed to mean, I will interpret it to mean I am growing in my resolve to stop the corruption. Think about the immigration bill they tried to pass recently, they would not make it public, they want everything done behind closed doors, and the outcome screws us the citizen, so I do not put it past them to throw the election, they know McCain can not win against Hillary.
So take it for what it is worth, my $.02.

Whether it's Dibold machines rigging an election or human error, it's time for people to go to jail.

Votes must be tallied by hand verifying the Dibold machines ... right there on the spot... no more behind the scenes tampering will be pemiitted or tolerated

Clinton would not have beat Obama without the aid of Diebold voting machines. In precincts where electronic voting machines were used, Clinton got a 7% swing over Obama, having gained 5% in comparison to hand-counted ballots and Obama losing 2%.

As we reported yesterday, the contract for programming all of New Hampshire's Diebold voting machines, which combined counted 81 per cent of the vote yesterday, is owned by LHS Associates, whose owner John Silvestro has gone to great lengths to deflect accusations that the machines can easily be rigged.

After purchasing a Diebold 1.94w machine, the same system used in New Hampshire, a computer repair shop employee picked at random by Black Box Voting was able to zero in on the system's vulnerable memory card within just ten minutes. Hacking expert Harri Hursti testified in front of the New Hampshire legislature that the machines were wide open to fraud.

Why am I not surprised?????

They have been doing everything they can to diminish the support of Ron Paul. This is the kind of crooked stuff we have been putting up with in this country. It's time for some to take accountability for their actions. This is an outrage!

Supposedly the Republican Party in New Hampshire had a problem with FOX not allowing Ron Paul at the debate yet they apparently did not count his votes...

Regardless of your choice for a candidate is, you're at risk of voter fraud throughout this election if this is allowed to continue. Unless the people want the elites to pick their candidates for them, they better speak out.