Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

You guys are sounding more and more like the Founding Fathers every day.

Congratulations!

Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan

You guys are sounding more and more like the Founding Fathers every day.

Congratulations!

Highlander, the only difference is, our forefathers would have these treasonous snakes hanging from a tree!

Originally Posted by TexasBorn

Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan

You guys are sounding more and more like the Founding Fathers every day.

Congratulations!

Highlander, the only difference is, our forefathers would have these treasonous snakes hanging from a tree!

Yup or at least tarred and feathered

On "birthers," heed "Radio Patriot," not Glenn Beck
By Michael Gaynor
January 6, 2010
http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/gaynor/100106

The logical conclusion is that there is SOMETHING on the document that Obama does not want to share with the American people. Even the Beckster should realize that!

Glenn Beck is an Obama critic, but he's not a "birther" and ridicules "birthers" as the dumbest of the dumb and even helpful to Obama. "Radio Patriot" Andrea Shea King, a "birther," knows better.

World Net Daily's Drew Zahn, "Glenn Beck on birther issue: 'Dumbest thing I've ever heard'" (January 4, 2009) ( http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=120992 ):

"On the air today, popular radio host Glenn Beck mocked 'birthers' and claimed there is a concerted campaign to get those questioning Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility onto the airwaves — a strategy Beck said would actually benefit Obama.

"'There's always games being played behind the scenes at a talk radio show,' Beck said. 'Rush has always called them seminar callers. But instead of being coy with the seminar callers or with you, I'm just going to expose the game that is going on. Today there is a concerted effort on all radio stations to get birthers on the air.'

"'I have to tell you, are you working for the Barack Obama administration?' Beck scoffed. 'I mean, that's the dumbest thing I've ever heard.'"

It's Beck's scoffing that's dumb.

This morning on "Fox & Friends" there was a report that President Franklin Delano Roosevelt really died of a brain tumor, not a stroke, and his brain tumor was concealed for political purposes.

What strikes some (or even most) as unbelievable (or "dumb") may be true.

Beck calls radical Obamaton and ACORN 8 leader his "Rosa Parks," so his own capacity for "dumbness" is not in doubt.

Beck just proved that again this year by joining the big dog at Fox News, Bill O'Reilly, in mocking the "birthers."

I don't know where Obama was born, but I believe that "birthers" are right to respect the United States Constitution and demand proof that Obama is eligible to be President and the burden of proof on that issue belongs on Obama.

In 2008 John McCain quickly produced his birth certificate, but Obama still has not done so.

Obama's refusal to produce his birth certificate is NOT proof that he was born in Kenya, but it IS a strong sign that he's hiding SOMETHING.

Zahn:

"The ongoing dialogue then spun off into ridicule as Beck caricatured those who question the sitting president's eligibility with straw-man arguments reminiscent of jibes made by Obama's apologists in other news outlets.

"Beck defined birthers as people who believe Obama was born in Kenya or other foreign country, was raised as a Manchurian candidate and somehow brainwashed Hillary Clinton into not exposing his fraud. According to Beck's running joke, birthers believe someone — maybe Obama's KGB 'control' — preemptively placed Obama's birth announcement in 1961 Hawaiian newspapers with a 'roadmap' of getting an African man into office.

"As for Obama producing a long-form birth certificate to actually prove his place of birth, Beck questioned, 'Why do that when these people ["birthers"] are so discrediting themselves?'"

But, as Zahn put it: "The 'certification of live birth' posted online and widely touted as 'Obama's birth certificate' does not in any way prove he was born in Hawaii, since the same 'short-form' document is easily obtainable for children not born in Hawaii. The true 'long-form" birth certificate — which includes information such as the name of the birth hospital and attending physician — is the only document that can prove Obama was born in Hawaii, but to date he has not permitted its release for public or press scrutiny."

Scrutiny of Obama (in sharp contrast to Sarah Palin) is something that the liberal media establishment avoided and Fox News did not do nearly well enough.

Perhaps Beck and O'Reilly mock the "birthers" because they too would be embarrassed if the true "long form" birth certificate were made public and contained any significant information that would bear on either Obama's eligibility or suitability to be President of the United States. (It was not until long after Obama was inaugurated that those two Fox News hosts focused on The New York Times killing an Obama/ACORN expose on October 21, 2008, even though I reported it on the Internet the next day.)

Zahn:

"The radio host further argued that by distracting the public from actionable issues, 'birthers' have become 'a dream come true' for Obama, an ideal situation akin to the fantasies of adolescent boys after Hollywood bombshells.

"'Barack Obama looks at the birthers as Megan Fox,' Beck said, referring to the star and sex symbol of the popular 'Transformers' films."

Message to Beck: As a faithful student of community organizer Saul Alinsky, Obama has followed his rules for radicals. Like a faithful Alinskyite, you too ridicule the "birthers." But ridicule is not a substitute for Obama's original birth certificate.

Zahn rightly rebutted Beck:

"'Birthers'...reflect a far greater diversity of opinion than is assumed by Beck's characterization. For example, while the term has been applied to anyone questioning Obama's eligibility to serve as president under the Constitution's 'natural born citizen' clause, many 'birthers' don't doubt Obama's Hawaiian birth, but instead take issue with his father's foreign citizenship.

"While other top radio hosts, including Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Michael Savage, Mark Levin and Lou Dobbs, have all said unequivocally and publicly that the Obama eligibility issue is legitimate and worthy, a few — including Beck and fellow Fox TV host Bill O'Reilly — have taken the position that the issue is, in O'Reilly's words, 'bogus.' Both Beck and O'Reilly cite the contemporaneous appearance of birth announcements in two Honolulu newspapers as prima facie evidence Obama was born in Hawaii and 'birthers' are conspiracy nuts.

"However, what neither talk host realizes is that newspaper birth announcements are not placed by parents phoning their local paper with the good news that they had a child. Rather, as WND has reported based on interviews with the two Hawaii papers involved, the Obama newspaper birth announcements stemmed from information automatically sent to the papers by Hawaii's Department of Health upon the state's issuance of a 'Certification of Live Birth,' which, as WND has also reported, is considered insufficient on its own to positively document the president's birthplace.

"Many people remain unaware that a child does not even have to be born in Hawaii to receive a 'Certification of Live Birth — that's the 'short form' that provides no hospital name, delivering physician or any of the other information that traditionally appears on a legitimate birth certificate. And yet the 'short form' COLB is the one and only piece of evidence the White House has cited in defending its assertion Obama was born in Hawaii.

"Hawaiian law specifically allows 'an adult or the legal parents of a minor child' to apply to the health department and, upon unspecified proof, be given the birth document.

"The only requirement for proof cited in the law doesn't address the birth of the child either, just 'that the legal parents of such individual while living without Territory or State of Hawaii had declared the Territory or State of Hawaii as their legal residence for at least one year immediately preceding the birth or adoption of such child.'

"Demand the truth by joining the petition campaign to make President Obama reveal his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!

"And since Obama's long-form birth certificate remains locked away from public view and sealed by privacy laws, no brainwashing device — such as Beck alluded to in his program — would be necessary to keep Hillary Clinton from discovering the contents of Obama's original birth certificate."

The logical conclusion is that there is SOMETHING in the document that Obama does not want to share with the American people.

Even the Beckster should realize that!

Zahn pointed out that concealment is the Obama way.

Zahn:

"Obama's birth papers... aren't the only piece of the sitting president's past that Obama has refused to reveal.

"As WND has reported, other documentation not yet available includes Obama's kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records and his adoption records."

Who really thinks there's nothing there that might reasonably influence voters if known?

Beck, who last year publicly stated that Obama is racist, now wants to challenge Obama only on his policies and actions.

Beck: "Why don't we go after the things that are provable, after the things that actually you need to stop right now? And if you want to argue, then let's argue based in fact, based on things that are provable and true. And what do you say? Do you want to argue the Constitution? Good. Let's show the number of people in Congress and in the Senate that don't even read the Constitution — can't tell you right now if healthcare is even in the Constitution. Let's talk to the scholars. Let's talk to the average Joe that understands this isn't in the Constitution. Let's argue the Constitution on the laws and the systems that they are building today. Instead of arguing the Constitution and whether or not he was born in America, why don't we argue the constitutionality of a little known thing called czars and the power that these people have?"

Message to Beck:

First, most Obama/ACORN critics can multitask!

Second, we need to expose the truth about the Obama/ACORN relationship that helps explain why Obama appointed all those "czars."

Third, Marcel Reid is an ardent Obama supporter with personal and radical political agendas and not a "Rosa Parks.

"Radio Patriot" Andrea Shea King surely is disappointed with the Beckster ridiculing "birthers."

"Radio Patriot," in "The Lamestream Media Is Chewing Towels" (December 4, 2009) ( http://radiopatriot.wordpress.com/2009/ ... ng-towels/ ):

"What toute la monde is chewing dishtowels about this morning ranges from 'Sarah's a birther!' to 'It's a reasonable question'. But it's one that the mainstream media won't — can't — touch with a ten foot pole.

"As my show producer Dave said, they're in quandary — "They can't take this opportunity to smash Palin once again for fear of reporting on the birth certificate story. They've got the club in their hand but they can't use it."

"Pinch is half insane this morning. If Palin had come out and said 'I believe in flying saucers', they'd report that in a hot second, but they can't touch this — you know they're banging their heads on the edge of their desks. They can't write this story — cannot take this opportunity to smash Palin. This birth certificate/eligibility issue is a no-fly zone.

"And they like to paint her as stupid? I'm laughing out loud. Dumb like a fox. She's placed this issue squarely on the front page of controversy. Where it needs to be."

"Radio Patriot" related:

"Anyone who has read my blogs or tuned in to my radio program knows I've been asking 'who the heck is Barack Hussein Obama' ever since he first appeared on the national radar screen. And here's why:

"What we DO know about BHO:

* His childhood mentor was Frank Davis Marshall, who spied on U.S. military installations in Hawaii for the Soviet Union; edited a communist newspaper; authored pornographic novels; and wrote poetry in praise of Joseph Stalin.

* BHO was mentored by and is still supported by radical Muslims.

* BHO promised t[r]ansparency in government, but has spent over a million dollars in legal fees hiding information that would determine his Constitutional eligibility to be President.

* He is a former drug user.

* BHO's academic records are sealed from kindergarten through law school.

* He was deserted in childhood by his supposed biological father.

* He has produced no legitimate birth certificate which would indicate his place of birth, the attending physician, and any other pertinent information found on your or my birth certificate.

* He is a president who refused to intercept or inspect a North Korean ship virtually certain to be carrying weapons of mass destruction to Burma.

* A president who wants to cancel all missile defense while rogue nations are developing long-range ballistic missiles. An American president who blames the violence in Mexico on America.

* A Commander in Chief who claims to have been unaware that Air Force One was taken on a terrifying, low-level 'photo-op' over Manhattan. And do we really know who was on-board that aircraft during the flyover joyride?

* A president who berates American CEOs for flying in private planes at private expense on company business, but whose wife spends hundreds of thousands of tax payer dollars flying to Paris for a shopping spree.

* A president who promised a transparent administration but requires all questions be screened before impromptu appearances.

* A man who freely admits his energy policies are designed to bankrupt the American coal industry.

* A president who has presided over the loss of 14.7 + million jobs and whose energy policy will cause the loss of another million jobs.

* A president whose energy policy will increase the average American utility bills by over $2,000 a year, in the middle of the Great Recession.

* A man about whom liberal journalist Tom Brokaw said, 'There's a lot about him we don't know'... just one week before the election.

"But someone knows who he is.

* Someone paid for his travel expenses to Pakistan and Indonesia.

* Someone engineered legal challenges to all of his election opponents for the State Senate and had them disqualified.

* Someone straightened and leveled his path to the U.S. Senate when a Democrat Judge made public the child custody records of his Republican opponent.

* When he was a candidate for the U.S. Senate, someone arranged for him to speak at the 2004 Democratic National Convention

* Someone saw to it that all of his records were sealed, at home and abroad Someone assembled the massive organization for his run for Presidency

* "Someone knows all about him. And it for sure isn't us.

"But we're disparaged as 'Birthers' by hypocrites who 'won't go there', yet still ask why it is we know so little about Obama; Conspiracy Freaks by those who are simply ignorant of the facts; and 'Trolls"' by self-appointed 'betters' simply for asking.

A few months ago there was a story written in the Canadian Free Press reguarding Barack Obama and Joe Bidens Nomination. The author provided a Copy of the original Certification of Nomination for the two, signed by Nancy Pelosi and Notorized Aug. 28th 2008. With it he provided a Certification of Nomination from South Carolina, signed again by Nancy Pelosi, Notorized and Recieved Aug.29th 2008. The problem is, it was missing a very importand sentence :
"and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution"...
I was amazed and curious to see if South Dakotas' DNC Nomination was missing this valuable paragraph. So I recieved a copy and it was dated "Recieved Aug.29th,2008", and sure enough NO MENTION of Constitutional Eligibility!
On November 20th 2009 I Faxed copies of the mentioned documents to my State Attorney General asking this SIMPLE question:
WHY did Nancy Pelosi sign and NOTORIZE two Nomination Certifications?
I called the AG office on two seperate occasions checking on my fax, and on Dec.17th 2009 I recieved an email from the AG office requesting I mail the Documents and my concern to The AG Office in Pierre.
On the 19th I did... And on Jan. 12th 2010 I recieved a letter from the Asst. Attorney General stating the following :
Barack Obama and the three Electors were properly vetted to be placed on the Ballot in South Dakota.
This office does hereby consider this matter closed.

I'm sorry... Was my question ever answered?

Originally Posted by PatriotofPast

A few months ago there was a story written in the Canadian Free Press regarding Barack Obama and Joe Bidens Nomination. The author provided a Copy of the original Certification of Nomination for the two, signed by Nancy Pelosi and Notarized Aug. 28th 2008. With it he provided a Certification of Nomination from South Carolina, signed again by Nancy Pelosi, Notarized and Received Aug.29th 2008. The problem is, it was missing a very important sentence :
"and that the following candidates for President and Vice President of the United States are legally qualified to serve under the provisions of the United States Constitution"...

I was amazed and curious to see if South Dakotas' DNC Nomination was missing this valuable paragraph. So I received a copy and it was dated "Received Aug.29th,2008", and sure enough NO MENTION of Constitutional Eligibility!

On November 20th 2009 I Faxed copies of the mentioned documents to my State Attorney General asking this SIMPLE question:

WHY did Nancy Pelosi sign and NOTARIZE two Nomination Certifications?
I called the AG office on two separate occasions checking on my fax, and on Dec.17th 2009 I received an email from the AG office requesting I mail the Documents and my concern to The AG Office in Pierre.

On the 19th I did... And on Jan. 12th 2010 I received a letter from the Asst. Attorney General stating the following :

Barack Obama and the three Electors were properly vetted to be placed on the Ballot in South Dakota.

This office does hereby consider this matter closed.

I'm sorry... Was my question ever answered?

You got an answer alright, just a wrong answer for the wrong question.

You might go back and ask exactly what vetting was done and by whom, because you want a copy of the vetting certification.

Obama birthplace lawyer denied new trial

January 13th, 2010, 11:55 am
by Martin Wisckol, Politics reporter

Laguna Niguel attorney Orly Taitz’s effort to have President Barack Obama removed from office because he was born in Kenya - or perhaps Indonesia - has run into another dead end, as U.S. District Judge David O. Carter issued this order denying her request to move the case from Santa Ana to Washington, D.C.

In his order, Carter states simply that he dismissed her case on Oct. 29 - meaning that there is no action currently pending, and so no case to transfer. In that dismissal, Carter ruled that the federal courts do not have the constitutional power to remove a sitting president - that only Congress has that authority.

Taitz responded to the Oct. 29 ruling with a number of unorthodox filings. On Nov. 9, she filed a fiery declaration to Carter, which among other things claimed that a Carter law clerk previously worked for a law firm defending Obama, and that that clerk wrote most of Carter’s ruling dismissing Taitz’s suit. She also denied witnesses’ affidavits saying she’d asked them to lie to the court.

The same day as she filed the declaration lashing out at Carter and others, she’d filed a motion asking Carter to reconsider his dismissal of her case.

On Dec. 3, she filed new allegations with Carter’s court.

“There was a concerted and a well orchestrated effort by a number of individuals to assassinate my character, endanger my law license and ultimately derail my case against Mr. Obama,â€

Originally Posted by Martin Wisckol

On Dec. 4, Carter denied her request for reconsideration, saying legal language that he had ruled once and for all - and that meant the case was finished in his court.

This doesn’t have anything directly to do with her court case, but it’s of interest to note that on her blog later in December, she suggested armed rallies and protests might be in order.

That is bad. We are living in evil days, and today is an evil day among evil days.
The perpetrators will be held responsible for these crimes they are committing before our eyes, even though now we don't know how. Justice is not dead, just delayed.

I replied to the discussion at
http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/20 ... ial/28143/

"No person except a natural born citizen . . . shall be eligible to the office of President;" - U.S. Constitution, Art. II, Sec. 1.

When a fraudulent government headed by an unlawful usurper deprives law-abiding citizens of all legal recourse when denied due process and their God-given rights as guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution, the Declaration of Inpendence is clear:

Originally Posted by Thomas Jefferson, William Henry Drayton, George Mason, James Madison, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, R.H. Lee, et al

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor.

Would any of you Obots care to - dare to - count how many of these Intolerable Acts have been repeated by your Dear Leader?

Jon Christian Ryter reminds us today

If the people can keep the crooks from stuffing the ballot boxes Brown [Senate candidate in Massachusetts] will win. But, when Obama stole 35,626,580 and the information was sitting on the White House website and the FEC website for the whole world to see... and nobody saw nuttin' you have to wonder if anyone cares that ACORN is minding the store.

Obama, in an attempt (I guess) to convince the masses that he's the legitimate president, attempted to prove it by placing election statistics on the White House website sometime just before Nov. 28, 2009. He listed the number of registered voters, that 56.8% of the registered voters voted, and the fact that Obama won with 69,456,897 votes to McCains 58 million or so. The chart Obama used had one number missing--the number of people who actually voted. The blank box stood out like a sore thumb since if you knew how many registered voters there were, and that 56.8% of them voted, then you should know how many people actually voted. I had to go to the FEC site for that info. 96,992,000 people voted. When you total up the votes counted for Obama, McCain, and the third party candidates, you realize that even though on 96,992,000 people voted, there were 132,618,580 votes in the ballots boxes. You might want to read the article (URL below) and pass it around. Because if no one's watching the store when people are shopping for new Congressmen and Senators, stealing the election of 2010 will be even easier than the theft of the Election of 2008.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/23495809/Jon- ... the-Future

For those of you who are interested, there is an online Constitutional course offered by Michael Badnarik. The following YouTube link will take you to the series of course elements divided into smaller 8-10 minute sessions.

http://tinyurl.com/ycrtopw