Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=126357

STEALING THE NEXT ELECTION
From amnesty to universal registration, Obama's strategy for maintaining power
Posted: March 01, 2010 10:47 pm Eastern
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

As Barack Obama's approval ratings continue to plummet, the tea party movement explodes and Democrats lose election after election – even in Massachusetts – one giant question looms large for Team Obama: How to stay in power?

The answer to that question can be found in the groundbreaking March issue of Whistleblower magazine, titled "STEALING THE NEXT ELECTION."



This game-changing special report is summarized in its long subtitle: "Amnesty, universal voter registration, felons voting, operatives planted: Team Obama's strategy for maintaining permanent power."

"The people currently running the show in Washington," said Whistleblower Editor David Kupelian, "come from the radical leftist world of Saul Alinsky in which everything they do – no matter how unethical, corrupt and flat-out illegal – is morally justified if it advances their agenda. Winning votes and elections by any means possible is their stock in trade."

"STEALING THE NEXT ELECTION" surveys the various stratagems the far left is currently developing to consolidate power in the U.S. long-term. The list includes:

Universal voter registration: Now being secretly prepared by at least two prominent members of Congress, this is essentially a scheme to legalize voter fraud by shifting responsibility for registering to vote from the citizen to the government, meaning people are automatically registered to vote, based on DMV records, income-tax returns, welfare rolls, unemployment lists and other government databases.

Illegal immigrant registration: Since government databases contain names of non-citizens, not to mention mentally incompetent individuals and felons – factors that would ordinarily disqualify a person from voting in most states – universal registration would open the floodgates to fraud. And since many people own property in more than one location and pay taxes to numerous government entities, they would be afforded the opportunity to vote in multiple locations.

Amnesty: Disguised once again by euphemisms like "comprehensive immigration reform," amnesty will create millions of new Democrat voters. As Obama adviser and SEIU executive vice president Eliseo Medina said recently regarding amnesty: "Can you imagine 8 million new voters who care about our issues and will be voting? We will be creating a governing coalition for the long term, not just for an election cycle."

Convicted felons voting: The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals late last year cleared the way for inmates to vote from prison. The court overturned a Washington state law prohibiting felons from voting until they are released and off parole, arguing state restrictions unfairly penalized minorities since they have a higher incarceration rate. Polls show felons overwhelmingly prefer Democrats.

Planting operatives in America's statehouses: A subversive, Soros-backed group called the Secretary of State Project is gearing up to steal the 2012 election for Obama and congressional Democrats by installing left-wing Democrats as secretaries of state across the nation, from which posts they can help tilt the electoral playing field.

"This is just a taste of the astonishing revelations in March's Whistleblower edition," said Kupelian. "It gets much worse."

Highlights of "STEALING THE NEXT ELECTION":

• "The next big gambit" by Joseph Farah
  
  "Democrats plan to steal the vote" by Chelsea Schilling, who warns, If you thought Obamacare was scary, check out universal registration
  
  "Why Obama wants control of the census" by John Fund, on White House hopes to find "missing" Democratic voters in the 2010 count
  
  "Soros group preparing to steal 2012 election" by Matthew Vadum, who shows Stalin was right in saying, "The people who count the votes decide everything"
  
  "How to lock Democrats in power" by James Simpson, who exposes strategies the party is using to engineer a new electorate
  
  "Voters think ACORN steals elections" – one quarter of Americans believe the disgraced group tied to Obama affected the outcome of the 2008 election
  
  "Obama adviser: Amnesty will ensure 'progressive' rule" by Aaron Klein. Boasts the SEIU executive, "Can you imagine 8 million new voters who care about our issues?"
  
  "The New Black Panthers and the White House" by Hans A. von Spakovsky, who asks, What did the president's men know and when did they know it?
  
  "Is Obama's $789 billion buying votes instead of jobs?" by Drew Zahn, on studies showing "stimulus" funds were spent on Democrats, not unemployment.
  
  "Incarcerated felons have right to vote, rules court" by Art Moore, who shows that surveys show prisoners overwhelmingly favor Democrats
  
  "The Democrats' technological thuggery" by Phil Elmore, on violence, abuse, libel, slander and propaganda in the service of power
  
  "Don't progressives like free speech?" by John Stossel, who explains why Democrats recoil as a major electoral advantage bites the dust
  
  "Are Republicans 'due'?" by Thomas Sowell, who warns the fate of America is on the line in this fall's elections
  
  "What states can do to safeguard America's election system" by Hans A. von Spakovsky, who outlines specific actions that will assure the will of legitimate voters prevails
  
  "Time to 'roll back' liberalism" by Ben Shapiro, who explains that perversions of the Constitution are not entrenched forever

"In this issue of Whistleblower, we are blowing the whistle on what could be the biggest political scam in history – one that results in a virtual coup d'etat for America – one from which it [is] unlikely ever to recover," said WND founder and Editor Joseph Farah. "This is an issue you will want to share with your friends. This is information vital to our national security and sovereignty. This is information that might mean the difference between preserving American freedom and losing it forever."

(Continued...)

From a reuters.com "Healthcare Reform" blog:

Originally Posted by blacknblue2

The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to an electorate willing to have such a man for their president.

The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.

Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC

From a reuters.com "Healthcare Reform" blog:

Originally Posted by blacknblue2

The danger to America is not Barack Obama but a citizenry capable of entrusting a man like him with the presidency. It will be easier to limit and undo the follies of an Obama presidency than to restore the necessary common sense and good judgment to an electorate willing to have such a man for their president.

The problem is much deeper and far more serious than Mr. Obama, who is a mere symptom of what ails us. Blaming the prince of the fools should not blind anyone to the vast confederacy of fools that made him their prince. The republic can survive a Barack Obama. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.

I am saddened to admit that I agree with him (or her). Thank you for sharing.

Eligibility issue hits Hotlanta!
'Where's the birth certificate?' campaign finds new location
________________________________________
Posted: March 07, 2010
9:33 pm Eastern

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=126911

ATLANTA – The billboard campaign that launched a thousand imitators marches south this week with a new location seen by thousands every day as they enter downtown Atlanta on the MARTA subway train from Hartsfield International Airport.

As they say, you can't miss it.

http://www.wnd.com/images/misc/100304atlanta.jpg

Newest in 'Where's the Birth Certificate' billboard campaign, in Atlanta

The latest "Where's the birth certificate?" billboard is located on the I-20 between Turner Field and the Georgia Dome adjacent to the Morehouse School of Medicine on Whitehall Street.

"As I said all along when this billboard campaign got underway last spring, we're in this for the long-term – right through 2012, if necessary," said Joseph Farah, editor and chief executive officer of WND, who conceived the idea for the controversial effort to call attention to Barack Obama's failure to prove he is constitutionally eligible for the office of the presidency.

But to sustain and grow the program, Farah is asking for donations from the public.

"This is a real economic stimulus program for the sagging billboard industry," says Farah. "In addition, it's a way to get a message out to the American public that the Big Media are determined to silence and ridicule."

In fact, many of the nation's billboards are owned and controlled by Big Media corporations, which banned the "Where's the birth certificate?" campaign from their locations shortly after it was launched.

However, there are still hundreds of thousands of locations available from independent outdoor advertising operators – a virtual unlimited supply if the funds are available to procure them.

"Some folks got the idea that we couldn't find billboard companies willing to lease to us," said Farah. "That was never the case. There are some off-limits because the ownership of major media companies that are heavily regulated by government are afraid to tangle with Washington. WND, however, believes that is the proper and central role of the free press in a free society. If we can't ask simple, straightforward questions in the press, there is simply no reason for us to exist. There is no reason for constitutional protections of a timid media watching over their shoulders fearing how Big Daddy is going to punish them."

Not only have dozens of "Where's the birth certificate?" billboards been placed all over the country in the last 10 months, but many independent groups and citizens have picked up on the idea to erect their own.

While not everyone has the resources to put up billboards expressing their anger at government, anyone can contribute to the "Where's the birth certificate?" campaign for as little as $5. Billboards like this are not cheap. The vinyl needs to be produced and there are monthly charges for keeping them up that are bigger than most individuals' entire paychecks. But the billboards are having their intended effect – raising the eligibility question in the minds of about half the American public, according to polls.

As Farah said at the first National Tea Party Convention in Nashville last month: "I have a dream. My dream is that IF Barack Obama even seeks re-election as president in 2012, he won't be able to go to any city, any town, any hamlet in America without seeing signs that ask, 'Where's the birth certificate?'

"It's a simple question," he said.

Interesting "flap" and maybe another ruse to discredit folks as kooks ...

http://maggiesnotebook.blogspot.com/201 ... birth.html

http://citizenwells.wordpress.com/2010/ ... heck-colb/


===========

Chanise Foxx, free republic, FreeRepublic.com, March7, 2010, I helped Obama campaign staffer Divorah Adler create a fake birth certificate, Fact Check, COLB
March 7, 2010 · 277 Comments
Chanise Foxx, free republic
*** Update below March 7, 2010, 10:06 ET ***

The following comment was posted on this blog at 2010/03/06 at 10:13pm.

“HUGE NEWS AT FREEREPUBLIC!!!
“My name is Chanise Foxx. I work at a office supply store in Kenwood, IL. After nearly 3 years of silence and death threats to me and my family to stay quiet, I am compelled to come forward and tell the world my secret.
“I helped Obama campaign staffer Divorah Adler create a fake birth certificate for use in the famous Fact Check story to prove the world of Obama’s birth in the 2008 election. Divorah approached me in early 2007 and held onto the birth certificate until she released it in August 2008.
“As I’ve been making fake IDs part-time for local college students for about eight years now, faking a birth certificate was actually quite easy. Our first step was to get our hands on someone else’s birth certificate from Hawaii. We then created the stationary to match.
“Next, we had to create an embossed stamp and rubber signature stamp for Hawaiian officials. With the help of a high-resolution scanner at the store, I did most of my work at night when the place was vacant…â€

RED ALERT, STOP AMNESTY, GO HERE!!!!!

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-190480.html

Monday, March 8, 2010
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

Obama and Congress File Their Opposition Brief to the Kerchner Appeal

Today, March 8, 2009, putative President Barack Obama and Congress filed their Opposition Brief to the Kerchner appeal currently pending in the Third Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia. The brief may be viewed at this link. We now have until March 22, 2010, to file our reply brief which will address the arguments the defendants have made in their opposition brief.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/28042875/Kerc ... 8-Mar-2010

The defendants brief is a presentation of general statements of the law of standing. Appealing to what other courts have done, the defendants basically tell the court that the Kerchner case should be dismissed because all the other Obama cases have been dismissed. Its main point is that the Kerchner plaintiffs have not proven that they have standing because they failed to show that they have suffered a concrete and particularized injury.

The brief does not even acknowledge our factual allegations against Obama which are that he is not and cannot be an Article II “natural born Citizenâ€

[size=117]Taitz v. Obama, Quo Warranto in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Reply [edited] to the Opposition Filing of Feb. 26, 2010
__________________________________________________ _______________

Dr. Orly Taitz, esq

29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, STE 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

Tel: (949) 683-5411; Fax (949) 766-7603

E-Mail: dr_taitz@yahoo.com



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA



Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE

Plaintiff,

v.

Barack Hussein Obama,

Defendant.

• [list:2gazgutm][list:2gazgutm] § HONORABLE ROYCE LAMBERTH
  
  § PRESIDING
  
  § Civil Action: 10-151 RCL
  
  §
  
  § REPLY TO OPPOSITION TO
  
  §
  
  § PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
  
  §
  
  § ORAL ARGUMENT REQUESTED
  
  §
  
  §

[/list:u:2gazgutm][/list:u:2gazgutm]Motion for leave of court
to add Ronald Machen, Jr., US Attorney, Rudolph Contrehras, Assistant US Attorney, Alan Burch, Assistant US Attorney, as additional defendants, and
[to] add a Cause of Action for RICO-Racketeering Influenced Corrupt Organizations as an Additional cause of action in the first Amended Complaint.

• [list:2gazgutm] 1. RICO

[/list:u:2gazgutm]One of the reasons for [the] need for recusal of the US Attorney’s office is a conflict of interest between the interests of the main client of the US Attorney’s office - the People of the United States of America - and interests of the Defendant, Barack Hussein Obama.

The number one function of the US Attorney’s office is to protect us, the public, from criminal activity, violation of criminal statutes, fraud and treason.

I have presented in my Quo Warranto complaint not only ample evidence of Barack Obama usurping the position of the President and Commander in Chief, but of him violating federal statutes, defrauding Social Security, and engaging in identity theft, by using Social Security number XXX-XX-4425 [redacted; original contains the numbers].

I have provided affidavits from licensed investigators, as well as an official Selective Service printout, showing him using this Social Security number, even though it was assigned to another individual born in 1890 and assigned in CT between 1976 [and] 1977, while Obama resided in HI, and in light of the fact that Obama was never a resident of CT.

This evidence is so overwhelming that it doesn’t even require additional investigation.

• Pursuant to US Code Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 1 § 4 – Misprision of Felony
  § 5-121.05. Compromise of felony; withholding information; receiving compensation from person arrested or liable to arrest; permitting escape.
  It is unlawful for any private detective, or any member of the police force, or for any other person to compromise a felony or any other unlawful act, or to participate in, assent to, aid or assist any person suspected of crime to escape a full judicial examination by failing to give known facts or reasonable causes of suspicion, or withholding any information relative to the charge or suspicion from the proper judicial authorities; or in any manner to receive any money, property, favor, or other compensation from, or on account of, any person arrested or subject to arrest for any crime or supposed crime; or to permit any such person to go at large without due effort to secure an investigation of such supposed crime. And for any violation of the provisions of this section, or either of them, such member of the police force, or private detective, or other person guilty thereof, shall be deemed as having compromised a felony, and shall be thereafter prohibited from acting as an officer of said police force, or as a private detective, and shall be prosecuted to the extent of the law for aiding criminals to escape the ends of justice.
  
  
  Title 18, Part 1, Chapter 1 § 3. Accessory after the fact:
  
  Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States has been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact. Except as otherwise expressly provided by any Act of Congress, an accessory after the fact shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the principal, or both; or if the principal is punishable by life imprisonment or death, the accessory shall be imprisoned not more than 15 years.

US Attorneys’ actions in not prosecuting this matter go beyond mere negligence. They fall within the realm of misprision of felony, compromising of felony and aiding and abetting commission of felony, predicate acts, which will tie in the above US Attorneys to Mr. Obama, and [which will be] sufficient for RICO legal action.



These actions of Obama and US Attorneys have exposed me to further severe emotional distress, assaults, insults, death threats, and numerous hate crimes relating to my legal actions, representing my clients and myself and trying to protect the public at large from this massive fraud committed by Obama and currently aided and abetted by US Attorneys.

2. As felonies were reported, the court itself cannot ignore those issues, and [it is] obligated to investigate.

Evidence reported in the complaint and [in] the application for preliminary injunction [includes] affidavits of licensed investigators as well as an official Selective Service printout, which clearly indicate use of multiple Social Security numbers, Social Security fraud, identity theft, fraud as well as a high likelihood of a number of other white collar crimes by the defendant. At this point, if the court does not grant the application or dismisses the complaint, the court itself will be guilty of aiding and abetting all of the above crimes and misprision of felonies. [Therefore,] the court has no other alternative but to proceed with the discovery, and to proceed expeditiously.

3. The Court is entitled to obtain [the] Defendant’s Records.

The defendant intentionally misrepresents the complaint by claiming that the Plaintiff is not entitled to the Defendant’s records, quoting the Freedom of Information Act.

This is a case of Quo Warranto. The defendant is an attorney, who during the campaign represented himself as a constitutional scholar and a constitutional professor. As such, he is surely aware of the fact that Quo Warranto has existed for some 700 years before the Freedom of Information Act was ever enacted.

I have requested that the Attorney General and US Attorney fulfill their duties and verify Obama’s qualifications under Quo Warranto. As they breached their duties, I am asking the court to grant me Ex Relator Status, step in the shoes of these derelict US Attorneys, who didn’t do their job, which we, the tax payers, have paid them to do. As the court grants me Ex Relator status, I will be entitled to obtain all the necessary records to prove or disprove Obama’s legitimacy. This shows that the Defendants assertion that I have no Entitlement to records is an absurd and was brought to confuse Your Honor.

4. Defendant’s claim, that my complaint is a non-justiciable political question, is a complete absurdity and was brought to mislead Your Honor.

About a third of the brief, 4-5 pages, is completely irrelevant, as those [pages] are devoted to the mechanisms of the elections and removal of the president from office. I have never asked your Honor to remove Mr. Obama from office. All I have asked for is discovery, and based on this discovery, a declaratory relief, declaring whether Mr. Obama has indeed qualified to office or not, per Quo Warranto and per Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution. Did he provide valid records or did he defraud the voters, Electors, and Congress? This is the whole purpose of Quo Warranto. Quo Warranto was used for hundreds of years. It is codified in DC statutes as explained in the complaint. The Department of Justice and US Attorneys’ office in the Central District of CA argued that the District of Columbia is the proper jurisdiction, and Judge David O. Carter dismissed the Quo Warranto in CA, noting that he doesn’t want to “rob the District of Columbia of its Jurisdiction.â€

Originally Posted by Atty. Mario Apuzzo

Obama and Congress File Their Opposition Brief to the Kerchner Appeal

The defendant's brief is a presentation of general statements of the law of standing. Appealing to what other courts have done, the defendants basically tell the court that the Kerchner case should be dismissed because all the other Obama cases have been dismissed. Its main point is that the Kerchner plaintiffs have not proven that they have standing because they failed to show that they have suffered a concrete and particularized injury.

Supposedly, the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia has sole jurisdiction over questions about the eligibility of office-holders within the District. Therefore, IMO, the only purpose of such cases in other courts, which lack jurisdiction, is to put the judges on record as having abdicated their primary responsibility to support and defend the U.S. Constitution, and as having refused to exercise a justifiable lack of judicial restraint in order to challenge the usurpation.

Any U.S. Army Private has the courage to lay down his life for his country on the battlefield.

Can we not expect the same of the respected and honorable U.S. Judges on the bench?




Then again, if the Honorable Judge Royce Lamberth is the only person on earth
who can rightfully depose the Kenyan-in-Chief, we're not in a free America any more.

U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth
333 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20001-2804
(202) 216-7380

MinuteMan,

Thanks for posting the Orly Taitz Reply to Judge Lamberth's court. I don't know who is doing the actual writing of her briefs, but I sure do love the wording and the flow. Excellent, and about time someone called these people to task!

Where did you find this piece or craftsmanship? What is the link? I'm going to post it on Scribd.

Never mind. Found it:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=8667