Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Minuteman, Congress no longer works for "We the People"...
They work for the RNC & DNC, Wallstreet and ANYONE with the money to BUY thier Attention.

From the Post & Mail...there also other links at the site..

[quote]
Kenya angry over ruling granting political asylum to Obama’s aunt

Print This Post

WOULD SHE REALLY HAVE BEEN PERSECUTED?

by Sharon Rondeau

Why do Obama's relatives refer to Kenya as Obama's "home"?

(Aug. 29, 2010) — The judge who granted political asylum to Zeituni Onyango, Obama’s half-aunt who had defied a deportation order from 2004, said that his decision was justified because a government official had leaked Onyango’s status to the Associated Press three days before the 2008 presidential election.

His decision reportedly included the fact that Obama was “elected as the first black president.â€

Originally Posted by PatriotofPast

Minuteman, Congress no longer works for "We the People"...
They work for the RNC & DNC, Wallstreet and ANYONE with the money to BUY thier Attention.

I think it is worse than you suggest. We are actually controlled by a ruling elite that simply keeps us poor and hungry and thus we are more easily enslaved to provide their needs and their enrichment.

A couple of interesting articles include:

Say Good-bye to all that - very perceptive by a really unusual guy:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34245998/Taku ... o-All-That

We have our own ruling class:
http://spectator.org/archives/2010/07/1 ... ss-and-the

And we can't even get fair and honest elections to vote the criminals out of office:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/34325799/Fred ... o-Articles

It would seem we are headed for nullification of the federal government first, and secession second (if nullification doesn't work). But, in contrast to open warfare, that is a good thing.

What personally concerns me most is some of the wisdom offered by former FBI Manager Ted Gunderson whose speech is embedded in this document:
http://www.stopnwo.com/ish.html

I'm not fond of the idea of our returning military being used as targets of opportunity by international military forces. Especially our spec ops guys.

The ruling elite are about to close us down. Well, they are if you assume they can make no mistakes. But this former CIA operative says THEY are about to go down.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xsiYOrSlf1I

To summarize, there is something BIG a foot. Too much secrecy and whistling past the graveyard. This may be a critical year for America.

We ARE living in interesting times.

A fraudulent impostor, a usurper who is not a lawfully elected president, being impeached as a de facto president?
What is your opinion?
[quote="WorldNetDaily"][size=117]Documented: Grounds for impeachment
'This is the beginning of the end for the United States unless ... '

Lying, bribing, subverting election laws, payoffs, aiding the nation's enemies, seeking the abrogation of the U.S. Constitution – which of these does not fall under the "high crimes and misdemeanors" required in the nation's founding documents for the removal of a sitting president, asks a new special report.

"The Case for Impeachment: Why Barack Hussein Obama Should be Impeached to Save America" by Steven Baldwin covers all of these issues and more in making its arguments.

"This is the beginning of the end for the United States unless the people exercise their precious remaining liberties and stand and demand that their elected representatives impeach this president before further mortal damage is inflicted upon America," the report concludes.

The author explains that the Founding Fathers enshrined the impeachment clause into the United States Constitution because they feared that a president intent on subverting the very principles upon which the American experiment was built would someday rise to power.

"Despite all the checks and balances and obstacles they put in place, the Founders knew a determined cabal could still gain control of all three branches of government and wield this consolidation of power to dismantle our cherished constitutional principles, and eradicate the freedoms that generations of Americans sacriï¬

[quote="MinutemanCDC_SC"]A fraudulent impostor, a usurper who is not a lawfully elected president, being impeached as a de facto president?
What is your opinion?
[quote="WorldNetDaily"][size=117]Documented: Grounds for impeachment
'This is the beginning of the end for the United States unless ... '

Lying, bribing, subverting election laws, payoffs, aiding the nation's enemies, seeking the abrogation of the U.S. Constitution – which of these does not fall under the "high crimes and misdemeanors" required in the nation's founding documents for the removal of a sitting president, asks a new special report.

"The Case for Impeachment: Why Barack Hussein Obama Should be Impeached to Save America" by Steven Baldwin covers all of these issues and more in making its arguments.

"This is the beginning of the end for the United States unless the people exercise their precious remaining liberties and stand and demand that their elected representatives impeach this president before further mortal damage is inflicted upon America," the report concludes.

The author explains that the Founding Fathers enshrined the impeachment clause into the United States Constitution because they feared that a president intent on subverting the very principles upon which the American experiment was built would someday rise to power.

"Despite all the checks and balances and obstacles they put in place, the Founders knew a determined cabal could still gain control of all three branches of government and wield this consolidation of power to dismantle our cherished constitutional principles, and eradicate the freedoms that generations of Americans sacriï¬

Thanks for the heads up on the youtube video HighlanderJuan. Hope you don't mind, I am going to post it on another thread.

Interesting times? Almost seems like an understatement.

[quote="TexasBorn"][quote="MinutemanCDC_SC"]A fraudulent impostor, a usurper who is not a lawfully elected president, being impeached as a de facto president?
What is your opinion?
[quote="WorldNetDaily"][size=117]Documented: Grounds for impeachment
'This is the beginning of the end for the United States unless ... '

Lying, bribing, subverting election laws, payoffs, aiding the nation's enemies, seeking the abrogation of the U.S. Constitution – which of these does not fall under the "high crimes and misdemeanors" required in the nation's founding documents for the removal of a sitting president, asks a new special report.

"The Case for Impeachment: Why Barack Hussein Obama Should be Impeached to Save America" by Steven Baldwin covers all of these issues and more in making its arguments.

"This is the beginning of the end for the United States unless the people exercise their precious remaining liberties and stand and demand that their elected representatives impeach this president before further mortal damage is inflicted upon America," the report concludes.

The author explains that the Founding Fathers enshrined the impeachment clause into the United States Constitution because they feared that a president intent on subverting the very principles upon which the American experiment was built would someday rise to power.

"Despite all the checks and balances and obstacles they put in place, the Founders knew a determined cabal could still gain control of all three branches of government and wield this consolidation of power to dismantle our cherished constitutional principles, and eradicate the freedoms that generations of Americans sacriï¬

Originally Posted by roundabout

Thanks for the heads up on the youtube video HighlanderJuan. Hope you don't mind, I am going to post it on another thread.

Interesting times? Almost seems like an understatement.

'May you live in interesting times' is a Chinese curse.

Post away, my friend, while we still have a free Internet.

Originally Posted by cayla99

Impeachment must come from the house. There is a far better chance of me regaining my youth than of Queen Nancy bringing up impeachment charges.

Me thinks Queen Nancy may be a short timer.

Originally Posted by cayla99

Impeachment must come from the house. There is a far better chance of me regaining my youth than of Queen Nancy bringing up impeachment charges.

Cayla99, would you trade the wisdom of experience for the naïveté of youth, especially during these "interesting" and perilous times before the Messiah's return?

Judgment begins with the house of God. Until there is a purging of corruption from the Christian churches in America, the American right, and then the right side of the aisle (as viewed from the podium), any purging of corruption from the left side of the aisle will be insignificant.

No one is saying Rep. Pelosi might bring up impeachment charges. Impeachment depends upon the voters' rejection of incumbent Democrat Socialists, a rejection which prevails over "possible" election fraud.[quote="[url=http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0810/41603.html]Politico[/url]"]Gallup: GOP Has Largest Poll Lead Ever
Monday, 30 Aug 2010 10:17 PM
[size=117]
A new Gallup poll released Monday shows Republicans with a record 10-point edge over Democrats on the "generic ballot" test — the question of whether voters prefer a Democratic or Republican congressional candidate. It’s the largest GOP polling edge at this stage in the 68 years of the generic ballot poll.

While party optimists say Democrats may cling to a small majority after the November election, an increasing number of Democratic strategists now say privately that they fear the House is already lost.

The Gallup poll, coming at the end of a brutal August for Democrats and President Barack Obama, reinforces the rapidly forming prevailing view that the horizon is as bleak for Democrats as it ever has been.

Indeed, the Republicans' 51 percent to 41 percent for Democrats on the generic ballot poll represents the largest Republican edge heading into a midterm election since the poll was first conducted in the 1942 election cycle, giving them greater reason for optimism than in the weeks leading up to their 1952 and 1994 House takeovers. It also represents a stunning reversal from the 6-point lead Democrats posted in the poll mid-July. . .

"You have millions of Americans worried about the economy, jobs, deficits, their children's future, and we're out there talking about what — Bush, Iraq?" said Chris Kofinis, a longtime Democratic strategist. "Our message needs to be more positive, more hopeful, more focused, and we need [to] talk to the economic reality of everyday Americans and their families. There is time to pivot, but we're just not there yet."
. . .
Republicans say the equation is pretty simple: Bad polling is a function of unpopular policy.

"The Democrats’ budget-busting, job-killing agenda has not only hurt middle-class Americans, but it has been a disaster politically as well," said Ken Spain, spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee. "President Obama and Speaker Pelosi promised this would be a ‘recovery summer,’ but since that announcement, the economy has only slowed and the unemployment rate remains unacceptably high. This is an administration and a Congress that is grossly out of touch with the voters and the poll numbers are a reflection of that.â€