Results 4,041 to 4,050 of 5732
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)
-
02-07-2011, 10:33 AM #4041
Go to www.khow.com and go to peter boyles page for Obamas selective service registration, just like his ss number being from connectuit, the numbers are all screwey!
Work Harder Millions on Welfare Depend on You!
-
02-07-2011, 11:58 AM #4042AprilGuest
ALERT!!! Help shut down Illegal Alien License Mills!
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-227270.html
-
02-07-2011, 01:36 PM #4043
Re: Clarification, please.
Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC
There are numerous holes which really don't matter except for the POTUS and they are abusing every one of them. Now I personally don't think he was eligible of course but yah.
But yah, we'd have to prove somehow that its bogus which would be very hard to do because we'd be required to have bulletproof evidence and many of the possibilities would be off limits such as specific Grandma in Kenya's words having any meaning and other things. It would need to be a case that skips straight to the SC as no lower judge would touch it with a 100 foot pole.
-
02-08-2011, 11:08 AM #4044Originally Posted by ReformUSA2012
The 1948 British Nationality Act governing at the time of Obama's birth allowed for a retroactive claim to British citizenship if the biological father later married the mother. But no British citizenship at the time of a child's birth if it was out of wedlock.
This loophole is what you would see Obama exploit, in a heartbeat, if the NBC issue ever received a full hearing. He would point to there being no marriage license and/or to there being a bigamous (null, void, of no legal effect) marriage if a license is ever located.
-
02-08-2011, 01:38 PM #4045
BORN IN THE USA?
Obama's Social Security number goes to court
Complaint in federal district seeks evidence of suspected fraud
Posted: February 07, 2011
8:55 pm Eastern
By Jerome R. Corsi
© 2011 WorldNetDaily
President Barack Obama participates in a national tele-town hall meeting at the Holiday Park Multipurpose Senior Center with senior citizens to discuss the Affordable Care Act and ways to combat scams targeting seniors in Wheaton, Maryland on June 8, 2010. Secretary of Health and Human Service Kathleen Sebelius was on hand to moderate the questions from seniors. UPI/Gary Fabiano/Pool Photo via Newscom
An attorney who has aggressively pursued the release of President Obama's Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate filed a complaint in federal court yesterday to force the release of Obama's Social Security files.
"I'm not asking for Obama's Social Security number," Attorney Orly Taitz told WND, acknowledging that the Social Security Administration will not release the number of a living person. "I want related information, including information about deceased individuals that will help us prove whether or not Obama has committed Social Security fraud."
Taitz filed in U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia to force the Social Security Administration to respond to her Freedom of Information Act request seeking information on Obama's Social Security number.
At the heart of Taitz's complaint to the court is the suspicion that Obama has engaged in Social Security fraud by using a number initially issued to another person.
Taitz contends the Social Security number Obama has used the most often since around 1980 was, according to Lexis Nexis and Choice Point, initially assigned to an elderly individual born in 1890 who resided in Connecticut.
In her complaint, Taitz claims that Obama is linked in national databases to some 39 different Social Security numbers, including one allegedly issued in1976 or 1977 to a person born in 1890 who was living in Connecticut at the time of the Social Security application.
"In and around 1976-1977 due to new Social Security requirements multiple elderly individuals, particularly women, who were housewives and never worked before, applied to obtain Social Security Benefits," Taitz explained in her complaint.
"Therefore the date of birth of 1890 originally connected to [Obama's Social Security number] was consistent with many other examples of elderly individuals, born between 1890-1915, applying for Social Security cards for the first time between 1976-1977."
This is Taitz's second FOIA request to the Social Security Administration, seeking to obtain Obama's Social Security records. An earlier request was denied May 18, 2010, on privacy grounds.
The D.C. court denied Taitz's appeal to the previous FOIA filing on the grounds that the appeal was filed prior to the final determination by the Social Security Administration.
On Oct. 4, 2010, Taitz filed a second FOIA request with the Social Security Administration, refining her request in an attempt to avoid the privacy concerns that determined the agency's previous denial.
So far, the Social Security Administration has not responded to Taitz's second FOIA request, despite six certified letters she has sent the agency since Oct. 4, 2010.
To buttress her arguments, Taitz submitted to the federal court affidavits signed by private investigators Susan Daniels and John Sampson.
Both Daniels and Sampson state that in the 1980s, Obama assumed as his own a Social Security number that had been applied for in Connecticut and was issued by the Social Security Administration between the years 1976 and 1977
Sampson, a retired senior investigator with the Department of Homeland Security, provided in his affidavit an expert opinion that there is no reasonable explanation for a person residing in Hawaii to get a Social Security number issued in Connecticut.
"The affidavits of the private investigators indicates Obama is using a fraudulent Social Security number," she said, "so I am requesting information from the Social Security Administration that would help us track down the Connecticut-issued number Obama is using as well as the multiple Social Security numbers that show up for Obama in the private investigator databases."
Daniels, in a previous interview with WND, said the Social Security Administration never re-issues Social Security numbers.
"A person who wants to hide their true identity often picks up the Social Security number of a deceased person, thinking that nobody would ever look into it," Daniels said. "I think it was sometime in the 1980s that Obama decided to hide who he really is."
The Social Security website confirms the first three digits in Obama's Social Security number are reserved for applicants with Connecticut addresses, 040-049.
WND previously reported that Obama worked as a teenager in Hawaii at a Baskin-Robbins ice cream store in the Makiki neighborhood on Oahu, which USA Today documented still was in operation one year after Obama's inauguration.
A current photograph of the Baskin-Robbins can be seen on the website "Obama's Hawaii Neighborhood."
WND can find no record of any Social Security number Obama used working at the Baskin-Robbins.
Politifact.com, a website typically supportive of Obama, claims he worked at the Baskin-Robbins in 1975 or 1976, prior to the issuance of the Connecticut Social Security number he is currently using.
There is nothing in the public record that would document Obama ever lived in or even visited Connecticut during his high school years.
There also is no indication in the limited background documentation released by the Obama 2008 presidential campaign or by the White House to establish that Obama ever lived in Connecticut.
Nor is there any suggestion in Obama's autobiography, "Dreams from My Father," that he ever had a Connecticut address.
Also, nothing can be found in the public record that indicates the president visited Connecticut during his high school years.
Barack Obama Sr. lived in Hawaii from 1959 until June 1962, when he moved to Massachusetts to attend Harvard University; nothing can be found in the public record that indicates Barack Obama Sr. ever had a Connecticut address.
WND has further confirmed that the Social Security number in question links to Obama in the online records maintained by the Selective Service system. Inserting the Social Security number Obama is currently using, his birth date and his last name produced a valid Selective Service number identified with Obama.
Here is a screen capture that shows the Selective Service cross-verification of the Social Security Number that President Obama is currently using:
WND has also reported that the Social Security Administration has decided to randomize all future Social Security numbers issued, beginning on or about June 25, 2011, in a move that will eliminate state-specific assignment of the Social Security numbers..
Read more: Obama's Social Security number goes to court http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=261033#ixzz1DOEx9gcd
-
02-08-2011, 05:19 PM #4046
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
Originally Posted by FreedomFirst
In 1961, the year that Barack Obama was born, Anna Obama could not transmit to her son Barack citizenship of any kind, according to Sec. 301 (a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (in effect until 1986).
[quote="A professional investigator hired by Western Journalism"][size=117]“ 7 FAM 1133.2-2 Original Provisions and Amendments to Section 301
(CT:CON-204; 11-01-2007)
“a. Section 301 as Effective on December 24, 1952: When enacted in 1952, section 301 required a U.S. citizen married to [incorrect: parentage, not marriage, was the criterion] an alien to have been physically present in the United States for ten years, including five after reaching the age of fourteen, to transmit citizenship to foreign-born children. The ten-year transmission requirement remained in effect from 12:01 a.m. EDT December 24, 1952, through midnight November 13, 1986...
“As originally enacted, section 301(a)(7) stated:
Section 301. (a) The following shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
. . .
[b](7) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than ten years, at least five of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years...â€One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
02-09-2011, 06:01 PM #4047
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
Originally Posted by [url=http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=261393
"They effectively will destroy the constitutional rule of law?"
I only question Mr. Unruh's use of the future tense. We now live under the constitutional rule of law only insomuch as it does not interfere with the rule of the usurper and the Gang of 545+ in Washington, D.C..One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
02-09-2011, 07:26 PM #4048
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
With a hat tip and a thank you to natborncit, here is the text of the Nebraska eligibility bill. [I added indentations and corrected typos.] http://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDoc ... /LB654.pdf
Originally Posted by [url=http://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/Current/PDF/Intro/LB654.pdfOne man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
02-10-2011, 02:20 PM #4049
[quote=MinutemanCDC_SC]With a hat tip and a thank you to natborncit, here is the text of the Nebraska eligibility bill.
[I added indentations.] http://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDoc ... /LB654.pdf
Originally Posted by "[url=http://nebraskalegislature.gov/FloorDocs/Current/PDF/Intro/LB654.pdf
It's beyond the comprehension of my pea size peasant brain to understand why states would EVER find it necessary to draft bills to validate and ensure the eligibility of a POTUS candidate. Unbelievable!! Think about it! It looks like to me that the states are sending a clear message to the federal government "We don't trust you to do your job so we are going to protect ourselves." Isn't this exactly what a state might do before it finally secedes and declares it's independence? Is this what we're coming to?...I call on you in the name of Liberty, of patriotism & everything dear to the American character, to come to our aid...
William Barret Travis
Letter From The Alamo Feb 24, 1836
-
02-10-2011, 08:45 PM #4050
Legislation is necessary because each state legislature decides how to select it's Presidential Electors. Currently all state's choose to do it by a popular vote. (All states except Nebraska and Maine give the winner of the statewide popular vote all it's electroal votes. Nebraska and Maine allocate a portion of their electoral votes according to the popular vote by congressional district.)
Since the voting for President is actually 50 separate state elections (all held on the same day), it is up to each state to administer it's presidential election under it's state election laws.
The memo at this web site
http://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/CRS- ... -Questions
from the Congressional Research Service confirms that there is NO federal eligibility check for president (see paragraphs 2-4).
Nebraska's proposed legislation would also make it a felony for a Presidential Elector from the state to vote for a candidate who is not certified by the Secretary of State as eligible.
Durbin pushes voting rights for illegal aliens without public...
04-25-2024, 09:10 PM in Non-Citizen & illegal migrant voters