Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Link to blogger with a window allowing scroll-through of the ScribD docs

http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/ ... ml?showall

Wayne Madsen: Foreign Intelligence Agencies Say Obama Birth Certificate Is Fake
By Wayne Madsen – April 28, 2011
From intelligence agencies around the world, the verdict on President Obama’s newly-released certificate of live birth from Hawaii is in: the certificate is a rank forgery on the same level as the Niger “yellow cakeâ€

[quote=MinutemanCDC_SC]I agree with April. It is better to be called a fool than to be one. I would not call for impeachment (unlikely); I recommend an official House investigation instead. A House investigation is much easier to start, is the correct process for crimes committed before taking office, doesn't involve the Senate, and has the same result (the fraudulent impostor resigns).

Anyway, here are the links from J.B. Williams' article. The linked contact can include a personal message, such as,

"I call for a House investigation with subpoena powers, which covers misconduct before taking office, such as misrepresentation of identity and election fraud."

[quote="J.B. Williams":278xo0r7][size=7][url=http://www.patriotsunion.org]The United States Patriots Union[/url] is making its secure [url=http://www.congressweb.com/cweb2/index.cfm/siteid/resourcecenter/action/TakeAction.Background/LetterGroupID/29]People's Lobby[/url] software available to the public, free of charge, for the purpose of contacting your House representatives regarding the impeachment of Barack Hussein Obama II.

Patriots prepared to take action can do so by contacting their House Representatives [url=http://www.congressweb.com/cweb2/index.cfm/siteid/resourcecenter/action/TakeAction.Background/LetterGroupID/29]here[/url].
Join a Patriots Union [url=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/twanablevins/2011/04/30/patriots-union--potus-must-be-a-natural-born-citizen]discussion[/url] on this matter [url=http://www.blogtalkradio.com/twanablevins/2011/04/30/patriots-union--potus-must-be-a-natural-born-citizen]Friday night at 9:00 PM ET[/url].[/size][/quote]
[size=7]This picture in the gatewaypundit article is quite convincing.

[url="http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Long-Form-Fake.jpg"]http://gatewaypundit.rightnetwork.com/w ... m-Fake.jpg[/url] [/size][/quote:278xo0r7]

Tim Harrington and JB Williams explained last night on patriot union blog talk that we need to take action, the impeachment investigations will not only stop Obama's agenda but might force him to step down as happened with Nixon. I did take action on their alert to send email to my rep to take action on this. I think everyone should take all action available to them to have Obama forced out of office. SO EVERYONE please take some action to alert your rep that this needs to be investigated and sending the Patriot Union free email would be good as well. The BC is obviously a fraud and he has no business being in the WH. Also for those who did not hear the blog radio talk it is still available to be heard at the originally posted link. There was lot so VERY GOOD INFORMATION. I pleasantly surprised at how knowledgeable these men were. Please everyone take some type of action. Calls followed by emails would be the best, it is up to us to take our country back.

Link to free email:
http://www.congressweb.com/cweb2/index. ... GroupID/29

Blog talk discussion here:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/twanablevi ... rn-citizen

Originally Posted by April

Also for those who did not hear the blog radio talk it is still available to be heard at the originally posted link. There was lot of VERY GOOD INFORMATION. I was pleasantly surprised at how knowledgeable these men were. Please everyone take some type of action. Calls followed by emails would be the best, it is up to us to take our country back.

Link to free email:
http://www.congressweb.com/cweb2/index. ... GroupID/29

Blog talk discussion here:
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/twanablevi ... rn-citizen

The extent of Mr. Williams' knowledge was no surprise to me. But it did surprise me how different is their area of expertise from what we know here on the ALIPAC Obama ineligibility thread. Their focus on some points we haven't mentioned (and lack of knowledge about some things we have discussed) lead them to different plans of action.

Whichever plan we pursue, we must stick together with the other groups that are actively supporting and defending the Constitution. You should make up your own mind about whether to press for impeachment, as Harrington and Williams recommend, and/or to call for a House investigation with subpoena powers. My personal preference for a House investigation is based on the following:

• 1. Election fraud committed before taking office is an appropriate subject for a House investigation. But it will be outside the scope of impeachment proceedings. Impeachment is for crimes committed while in office.
  
  2. No threat of being overruled by the Senate discourages or impedes a House investigation.
  
  Impeachment requires a two-thirds majority in the Senate to convict, which is a high hurdle to leap, psychologically, for many Representatives. They may fear being stigmatized by their constituents and by Democrats in general after a "not guilty" verdict in the Senate, which they foresee as a slam-dunk for the Democrats. Although I don't recall any such marginalization of Representatives who voted for impeachment of then-Pres. Clinton, their memory of that experience may differ.
  
  3. House investigations are commonplace, but impeachment is a more radical action. Change is anathema to an incumbent, who tends toward inaction and away from initiative except within the "sweet spot" of positions dear to his or her constituency. Those at the top of the heap cling to the unstable equilibrium at the top. "Follow orders." "Stick with the program." "Keep in line." "Don't rock the boat." "Accentuate the positive and avoid negativity."
  
  But nothing can stay in the middle of the road for long except traffic lines and roadkill.
  
  4. It is wise to begin with a House investigation. Having the facts and evidence in hand will give any future impeachment proceedings a needed impetus. On the other hand, if an impeachment fails, thereafter it will be much harder to initiate a House investigation.
  
  5. A House investigation is more likely to succeed than impeachment, and the desired end result, that the fraudulent impostor resigns, is much the same. On the other hand, if impeachment fails, only the "not guilty" verdict impacts the minds of the sheeple. Regardless of whatever action follows, a House investigation exposes the corruption and expects a conviction in the court of public opinion.

IMO, a House investigation is a better move than impeachment. Way mo bettah.

Cc: J.B. Williams

Originally Posted by Liberal blogger Andrew Rice

First, a little historical background: the elder Barack Hussein Obama arrived in the United States in 1959, via an exchange program known colloquially in Kenya as the "Tom Mboya airlift," after the politician who sponsored it, a Luo tribesman of his. (These sorts of ethnic connections matter in Africa.)

Originally Posted by [url=http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=125351

For WorldNetDaily, Jerome R. Corsi[/url]]Official documents catch Barack Obama in another apparent misrepresentation of his life story, this time challenging a claim made during his campaign that his father was part of a JFK-era airlift to bring Kenyan students to the U.S. to study in American universities.

WND research indicates Barack Obama Sr. was not brought to Hawaii in 1959 by any airlift of Kenyan students organized by baseball great Jackie Robinson, John F. Kennedy or the African-American Students Foundation, the AASF.

Nor was Barack Obama Sr. on any of the three subsequently chartered airplanes in what became known as the "second airlift" organized by Kenyan Luo politician Tom Mboya in 1960 after the Joseph P. Kennedy Jr. Foundation contributed $100,000 to AASF.

Moreover, after a thorough search of the Jackie Robinson papers at the Manuscript Division of the Library of Congress, WND can find no mention of Barack Obama Sr. in the files on deposit, either as an applicant or candidate for an airlift from Kenya to study in the U.S.

The manifest of the 81 students actually flown from Kenya Sept. 9, 1959, in a plane chartered by Jackie Robinson in conjunction with the AASF does not contain Barack Obama Sr.'s name. Robinson was assisted by singer Harry Belafonte and actor Sidney Poitier.

By the time of the Sept. 9, 1959, airlift to New York City, Barack Obama Sr. was already in Honolulu, enrolled in classes as an undergraduate at the University of Hawaii.

Continued...

Originally Posted by FreedomFirst

Read the FOIA documents linked in this post
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-236525.html

Let me know what you think?

Where's the similar material on BHO junior? As bad as he might have been, at least BHO senior left his record behind.

In March 2010, The Post & Email published Mr. Sweeney’s analysis of the Certification of Live Birth image posted on the internet in June 2008 purported to be Obama’s “birth certificate.â€

Obama Birth Certificate Faked In Adobe Illustrator - Official Proof

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7s9StxsF ... r_embedded


If you haven't seen this video; you need to watch it; this guy is good

Boy, this came as a huge surprise to me. I don't know about you, but I'm shocked... absolutely shocked, that a pathological liar can be found to have lied in many more areas than originally expected. Truly amazing.

Maybe this is a good thing if it teaches us how not to be stupid when it comes to nominating and electing politicians.

======================

Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume

Author: Anthony Martin
Source: Examiner.com
Date: April 3rd, 2010 7:15 pm ET
http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in ... ama-resume

In what is being called 'the biggest hustle in human history,' a special investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on Barack Obama's resume, including the outright lie that he was a 'Constitutional scholar and professor.'

The claim turns out to be false.

As investigators delve further into the background of Barack Obama, a disturbing picture is emerging of a man who is not who he claims to be. The information the public has been told concerning Obama is turning out to be false--fabrications and inventions of a man and an unseen force behind him that had clear ulterior motives for seeking the highest office in the land.

According to a special report issued by 'the Blogging Professor,' the Chicago Law School faculty hated Obama. The report states that Obama was unqualified, that he was never a 'constitutional professor and scholar,' and that he never served as editor of the Harvard Law Review while a student at the school.

The real truth is that Barack Obama was merely an 'instructor' at Chicago Law School, not a professor. Commonly, instructors are non-tenure-track teachers hired by colleges and universities to teach certain courses for a salary that is well below that of Associate Professors or full Professors.

In the hierarchy of higher education, the status of instructors is below that of associate professors and professors because they lack the credentials.

In fact, it can be safely concluded that the claims of Barack Obama concerning his educational credentials and work history in higher education are a complete sham. The President of the United States is a complete fraud.

According to Doug Ross:

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about "Barry." Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn't even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn't have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

Thus, the question arises, was the claim that Obama was editor of the Harvard Law Review a 'put-up job' as well, allowing the student to claim he held this prestigious position without having the qualifications or meeting the requirements of holding that position? And why?

Further,

Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he "fibbed" on his bar application.

2. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.

3. So, we have the President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.

4. A senior lecturer is one thing. A fully ranked law professor is another. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, "Obama did NOT 'hold the title' of a University of Chicago law school professor". Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.

5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school, but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

These are highly disturbing facts, verified facts from the people who know at the Chicago Law School.

There is more from Ross, however:

6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the U.S. Constitution recently during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

8. The B-Cast posted the video.

9. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal."

10. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?

When you are a phony it's hard to keep facts straight.

Obama has made sure that all of his records are sealed tight. And apart from the courageous souls at the various educational institutions who dared to speak the truth, the schools Obama claimed to attend unanimously refuse to release transcripts, records, or other bits of evidence concerning Obama's presence in their institutions.

BREAKING DEVELOPMENT--just as these disturbing facts come to light about Barack Obama, the White House is busy making deals with numerous 'journalists,' promising unprecedented access to the President in exchange for refraining from reporting certain information 'they may discover.'
.

Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan

Boy, this came as a huge surprise to me. I don't know about you, but I'm shocked... absolutely shocked, that a pathological liar can be found to have lied in many more areas than originally expected. Truly amazing.

Maybe this is a good thing if it teaches us how not to be stupid when it comes to nominating and electing politicians.

======================

Investigation reveals numerous bogus claims on Obama resume

Author: Anthony Martin
Source: Examiner.com
Date: April 3rd, 2010 7:15 pm ET
http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in ... ama-resume

In what is being called 'the biggest hustle in human history,' a special investigation has discovered numerous bogus claims on Barack Obama's resume, including the outright lie that he was a 'Constitutional scholar and professor.'

The claim turns out to be false.

As investigators delve further into the background of Barack Obama, a disturbing picture is emerging of a man who is not who he claims to be. The information the public has been told concerning Obama is turning out to be false--fabrications and inventions of a man and an unseen force behind him that had clear ulterior motives for seeking the highest office in the land.

According to a special report issued by 'the Blogging Professor,' the Chicago Law School faculty hated Obama. The report states that Obama was unqualified, that he was never a 'constitutional professor and scholar,' and that he never served as editor of the Harvard Law Review while a student at the school.

The real truth is that Barack Obama was merely an 'instructor' at Chicago Law School, not a professor. Commonly, instructors are non-tenure-track teachers hired by colleges and universities to teach certain courses for a salary that is well below that of Associate Professors or full Professors.

In the hierarchy of higher education, the status of instructors is below that of associate professors and professors because they lack the credentials.

In fact, it can be safely concluded that the claims of Barack Obama concerning his educational credentials and work history in higher education are a complete sham. The President of the United States is a complete fraud.

According to Doug Ross:

I spent some time with the highest tenured faculty member at Chicago Law a few months back, and he did not have many nice things to say about "Barry." Obama applied for a position as an adjunct and wasn't even considered. A few weeks later the law school got a phone call from the Board of Trustees telling them to find him an office, put him on the payroll, and give him a class to teach. The Board told him he didn't have to be a member of the faculty, but they needed to give him a temporary position. He was never a professor and was hardly an adjunct.

The other professors hated him because he was lazy, unqualified, never attended any of the faculty meetings, and it was clear that the position was nothing more than a political stepping stool. According to my professor friend, he had the lowest intellectual capacity in the building. He also doubted whether he was legitimately an editor on the Harvard Law Review, because if he was, he would be the first and only editor of an Ivy League law review to never be published while in school (publication is or was a requirement).

Thus, the question arises, was the claim that Obama was editor of the Harvard Law Review a 'put-up job' as well, allowing the student to claim he held this prestigious position without having the qualifications or meeting the requirements of holding that position? And why?

Further,

Consider this: 1. President Barack Obama, former editor of the Harvard Law Review, is no longer a "lawyer". He surrendered his license back in 2008 possibly to escape charges that he "fibbed" on his bar application.

2. Michelle Obama "voluntarily surrendered" her law license in 1993.

3. So, we have the President and First Lady - who don't actually have licenses to practice law. Facts.

4. A senior lecturer is one thing. A fully ranked law professor is another. According to the Chicago Sun-Times, "Obama did NOT 'hold the title' of a University of Chicago law school professor". Barack Obama was NOT a Constitutional Law professor at the University of Chicago.

5. The University of Chicago released a statement in March, 2008 saying Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) "served as a professor" in the law school, but that is a title Obama, who taught courses there part-time, never held, a spokesman for the school confirmed in 2008.

These are highly disturbing facts, verified facts from the people who know at the Chicago Law School.

There is more from Ross, however:

6. "He did not hold the title of professor of law," said Marsha Ferziger Nagorsky, an Assistant Dean for Communications and Lecturer in Law at the University of Chicago School of Law.

7. The former Constitutional senior lecturer cited the U.S. Constitution recently during his State of the Union Address. Unfortunately, the quote he cited was from the Declaration of Independence, not the Constitution.

8. The B-Cast posted the video.

9. In the State of the Union Address, President Obama said: "We find unity in our incredible diversity, drawing on the promise enshrined in our Constitution: the notion that we are all created equal."

10. By the way, the promises are not a notion, our founders named them unalienable rights. The document is our Declaration of Independence and it reads: We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

11. And this is the same guy who lectured the Supreme Court moments later in the same speech?

When you are a phony it's hard to keep facts straight.

Obama has made sure that all of his records are sealed tight. And apart from the courageous souls at the various educational institutions who dared to speak the truth, the schools Obama claimed to attend unanimously refuse to release transcripts, records, or other bits of evidence concerning Obama's presence in their institutions.

BREAKING DEVELOPMENT--just as these disturbing facts come to light about Barack Obama, the White House is busy making deals with numerous 'journalists,' promising unprecedented access to the President in exchange for refraining from reporting certain information 'they may discover.'
.

Highlander, that's why people like Obama are called "Pathological" Liars. It's systemic in a classical sense for a narcissist like obama. My intuition told me from day one to stay away from this guy. His path to the WH was paved with fraud, lies, payoffs, threats and blackmail.