Results 5,191 to 5,200 of 5732
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
09-21-2012, 10:21 PM #5191
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
Originally Posted by kathyet
I think that his associating with Mus|ims, reciting the Qu'ran and the Mus|im call to prayer, bowing low to Saudi King Abdullah, siding with Dar al'Is|am against Israel, sometimes practicing Ramadan and other customs and traditions of Is|am - for example, taking off his shoes when entering a mosque for a prayer service, etc., are a "bad boy" black identity thing rather than an article of faith.
What I think is, of course, irrelevant to what the Lord Jesus Christ will think of Barack Hussein Obama II at the judgment.
But I think that kathyet will find this interesting. So, for kathyet . . .
Wedding ring is in for repair?
Since when does a plain wedding band need repairs, along with your watch, for a whole month?
Another piece falls into place. In a press conference last week Obama was not wearing his wedding ring nor was he wearing his watch.
When noticed, his staff said his ring was out for repairs. No reason was given for the missing watch.
So it's just a coincidence that Muslims are forbidden from wearing jewelry during the month of Ramadan. Can't possibly be that, because although he hasn't gone to a Christian church service since entering the White House, we know he's a committed Christian "cause he said so during his campaign!" ...........And I've got a bridge to nowhere to sell you also.
This is the same president that spent the Christmas holidays in Hawaii to avoid religious obligations as PRESIDENT at the White House. His children do not receive Christmas presents.
Let's just face the facts and quit trying to distort the truth, we have a Muslim for president in the White House, and he has no knowledge of American history[, that is, America's Christian heritage].
Please pass this on to those who are aware what is happening to our Great Nation, and to those who are still in denial.
[anonymous, by email]
"It is good neither to eat meat nor drink wine nor do anything by which your brother stumbles or is offended or is made weak." - Romans 14:21
"Therefore, if food makes my brother stumble, I will never again eat meat, lest I make my brother stumble." - 1 Corinthians 8:13
It could be that. /sarc. I think it is dhimmitude, or fear of offending against Shari'a, or just being politically correct for his Mus|im homies.Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 09-22-2012 at 02:56 PM.
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
09-22-2012, 03:59 PM #5192
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
An Israeli-Iran war may well bring to the fore the politicization of U.S. military flag officers (generals and admirals), forcing some resignations.
Rutherford B. Hayes, 19th President of the U.S. (1877 - 1881), wrote:
"Our partisanship about generals is now rebuked. General McClellan has serious faults or defects, but his friends can truly claim that if he had retained command, this disaster would not have occurred. The people and press would perhaps do well to cultivate patience. It is a virtue so needed in a struggle so equal as this. If the people can hold out, we shall find the right man after [a] while."
December 20, 1862
From the "Scripture Out of Context" version:
"For you have need of patience..."
"that in due season you may reap, if you do not lose heart."
Partisan policies which change every 4 or 8 years cannot effectively change the course of a war which has continued for nearly 1400 years. The expectation of victory within a 4 to 8 year timeframe can only result in failure, causing an unending oscillation in policy and military strategy.Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 09-25-2012 at 02:10 AM.
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
09-22-2012, 06:12 PM #5193
I have believed he was Muslim since he visited all 57 states
Proud American and wife of a wonderful LEGAL immigrant from Ireland.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797) Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
09-23-2012, 05:20 PM #5194
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
Have most people just accepted as a settled fact that the U.S. has been overtaken by a malevolent and totalitarian foreign dictator, and they are just making the best of a bad situation by going along to get along?
Most people I know realize that some evil thing has taken over Washington, D.C.. But they seem to be reciting Reinhold Niebuhr's Serenity Prayer, "Lord, grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change," without ever reaching the second line, "courage to change the things I can," and therefore, they have no need of wisdom to know the difference.
There really does seem to generally be a resignation to the coup d'état and usurpation of the federal government, nullification of the U.S. Constitution, and the communist/anti-American/Is|amist takeover, as an accomplished work. People realize that no totalitarian government has ever been unseated by a public election. Since there is nothing, short of bloodshed, that they can do about it, they do a cognitive disconnect and pretend the usurpation of the federal government by America's enemies has never happened.
I don't think that ignorance of the facts accounts for the blinders and earplugs that the sheeple wear. They know; they have written their Congresscritters; but beyond that, they just can't deal with it, so they imitate the ostrich with its head in the sand, waiting for the inevitable end.Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 09-24-2012 at 12:06 AM.
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
09-23-2012, 09:17 PM #5195
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
I highly respect Butterdezillion's legal reasoning. She may not have every detail perfectly, but considering the web of deceit Mr. Obama has woven, her version is probably as accurate as anyone else's. Some of her links I hadn't seen before.
Originally Posted by Butterzillion
Plainly, Mr. Obama is not subject to the rule of law. Rather, he is above the law
. . . even above the Constitution.Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 09-23-2012 at 10:47 PM.
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
09-23-2012, 11:58 PM #5196
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
Atty. Larry Klayman sent this letter to DNC General Counsel Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie, with, enclosed, Arizona SOS Ken Bennett's request for verification, and in reply, Hawaii State Registrar Alvin T. Onaka's verification, with which he included a copy of the counterfeit Certificate of Live Birth (long form). Mr. Klayman also sent copies to the Attorney General and Secretary of State (or Lt. Governor where no SOS) of each of the 50 states. He has the returned receipt from each one, so none can claim ignorance.
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
09-24-2012, 11:13 AM #5197
- Join Date
- Aug 2009
- Posts
- 9,266
An Impeachment Warning To Obama
Saturday, September 22, 2012 19:16
September 22, 2012 “Information Clearing House” – Congressman Walter B. Jones (R-NC) held a press conference, Sept. 21, in Rayburn B-318, to discuss House Concurrent Resolution 107. Rep. Jones was joined by a group of senior retired military officials, constitutional lawyers, and congressional co-sponsors, to discuss HCR 107 (the bill to send an impeachment warning to Obama), which currently has 11 cosponsors.
This bi-partisan resolution, introduced in March of this year, reasserts the power of Congress to declare war, and states that any President who circumvents Congress, unless the United States is attacked, will face an article of impeachment.
Speakers at the press conference included:
Congressman Walter B. Jones (R-NC)
Bruce Fein, specialist in constitutional and international law, Associate Deputy Attorney General under President Reagan, author, “American Empire: Before the Fall”.
Lt. Colonel Lawrence Wilkerson (USA.Ret), former Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Colin Powell (2002-05) Lt. Colonel Anthony Shaffer, author of “Operation Dark Heart”, exposed the Pentagon data mining program known as Able Danger, and uncovered two terrorist cells involved in 911.
A statement of support from Gen. Joseph P. Hoar (USMC-ret.), who served as the Chief of Staff and later as the Commander-in-Chief of the Central Command, was also read.
======
Bill Text
112th Congress (2011-2012)
H.CON.RES.107.IH
H.CON.RES.107 — Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high… (Introduced in House – IH)
HCON 107 IH
112th CONGRESS
2d Session
H. CON. RES. 107
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
March 7, 2012
Mr. JONES submitted the following concurrent resolution; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary
CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
Expressing the sense of Congress that the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
Whereas the cornerstone of the Republic is honoring Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution: Now, therefore, be it
- Resolved by the House of Representatives (the Senate concurring), That it is the sense of Congress that, except in response to an actual or imminent attack against the territory of the United States, the use of offensive military force by a President without prior and clear authorization of an Act of Congress violates Congress’s exclusive power to declare war under article I, section 8, clause 11 of the Constitution and therefore constitutes an impeachable high crime and misdemeanor under article II, section 4 of the Constitution.
Click here to read, "An Impeachment Warning To Obama"...
Also this is what prompted it...
Senate Votes 90-1 Declaration Of War: “A De-Facto Declaration Of War” Against Iran – Rand Paul
Saturday, September 22, 2012 22:12
Advertisement<a href='http://opx.beforeitsnews.com/delivery/ck.php?n=aa00448f&amp;cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_ HERE ' target='_blank'><img src='http://opx.beforeitsnews.com/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=20&amp;cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_ HERE &amp;n=aa00448f' border='0' alt='' /></a>Privacy | Remove Ads
Hattip: A BIN reader. This article may be freely reproduced in its entirety provided a link is provided back to the original BIN story.
Isn’t it nice that our Senate ‘leaders’ have decided upon a “de-facto declaration of war” against Iran, according to Senator Rand Paul. We’ve been warned over and over again by knowledgeable sources such as the LA Times and Family Security Matters that Iran has sleeper cells thoughout the US just waiting to unleash un-holy Armageddon upon Americans should we launch an attack against them. From the LA Times story linked above:
” Iranian terrorist cells inside the U.S. have weapons, explosives, money and safe houses; they use contacts with Mexican and Latin American drug cartels to smuggle explosives and weapons into the U.S.”
“They have very detailed information about sensitive sites such as bridges, railroads, airports, military bases, power plants, nuclear sites, water plants, railway stations,” he says.
“If the U.S. or Israel attacked Iran, he says, sleeper cells inside the U.S. would launch suicide bombings and sabotage. Iran would attack Israel and U.S. bases in Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf.”
We’ve learned that Iran practices shooting off EMP missiles on a regular basis. In fact, should they do this to the US after being attacked, over 90% of Americans would likely be dead within 10 months because of the widespread loss of what we depend upon most, electrical power. What a failure of National Security that would be. In the meantime, our own DHS has been shown to NOT have a plan to deal with an EMP attack. How many millions of dollars have these “people” wasted worrying about the trivial while neglecting potential attacks that could leave 90% of our country dead? This doesn’t pass the smell test.
How is it that these Senate ‘leaders’ of our once great nation don’t take into account the potential loss of lives of hundreds of millions of Americans should we do something so insane as to launch an attack against a nation that hasn’t attacked another foreign nation in over 250 years?How does America rate in comparison to that? We seem to start another war every few years against some country’s dictator that we previously installed that the global elitists want to run out of town. Meanwhile, Iran’s own neighbor secretly owns enough nuclear weapons to wipe out Iran and all the rest of the Middle East along with it. Any attack upon Iran should be thought out a whole lot more before we just go charging full steam ahead like we’ve done far too many times in the last 50 years. The lives of 9 out of the 10 people you see around you right now could very well be at stake with another disastrous US military decision. Or, is that what they want?
The story below from YouTube reporter Mary Greeley.
Published on Sep 22, 2012 by Marygreeley1954
Thank you for you donations.
mary240qgreeley@hotmail.com http://www.jpost.com/International/A...aspx?id=285853
“Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for “fair use” for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use.”
http://beforeitsnews.com/war-and-con...l-2443528.html
Last edited by kathyet; 09-24-2012 at 11:18 AM.
-
09-25-2012, 01:16 AM #5198
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
kathyet, I must respectfully disagree with Sen. Rand Paul and Marygreeley1954. We cannot stand aloof from our ally Israel while madmen perform warlike provocations - even acts of war - and prepare to kill as many Jews as they can.
(I'm not telling you anything you don't know when I write this:
Iran declared war against the U.S. in 1979 and has never called a truce since. Through Hamas, Hezbollah, and other Mus|im Brotherhood affiliates, Iran has been waging a terrorist campaign of war against Israel and the Jews for at least 25 or 30 years. Iran is supplied and supported by Russia and Communist China, armed with Russian military hardware, defended by advanced Russian anti-aircraft systems, and mentored by working relationships with Russia's nuclear program. Just as North Korea is Red China's military proxy, Iran is Russia's military proxy.)
Why does the United States have standing armies, in conflict with the Founders' expressed intent to the contrary? Is it not because, ever since Imperial Japan attacked Pearl Harbor in 1941, we can no longer defend our country by just calling up the militia like a volunteer fire department. We sacrifice thousands of young lives, lives filled with promise, and spend trillions of dollars... not to force the blessing of freedom upon the billions enslaved by despots and malignant ideologies, not to spread the employee wages and consumer benefits of capitalism around the globe, not to set up constitutional republics governed by democratically elected representatives, not even to compel the heathen nations to come into God's family by trusting the blood sacrifice of His Son for salvation from sin and death, the devil and hell. It is nothing so idealistic as all that.
We have armed forces to defend our country and ourselves:
- because evil is loosed upon the world and loose in the world system;
- because millions of people envy us, hate us and want to kill us or enslave us, taking for themselves the blessings God has so richly bestowed upon us - our families, our homes and our native land, our health care, education, and welfare safety net systems, our pleasures, privileges, lifestyles and cellphones, and our position at the top of the heap;
- because entire nations are stirred up to violent hatred by toxic ideologies, false religions, and the lusts and ambitions of powerful and persuasive men;
- because America is "a city set on a hill" and "a lamp put on a lampstand," which makes other nations look bad, and "because their deeds are evil," they would rather bury the truth - and us with it - than be shown up as wrong.
The mad moolahs are possessed by a Satanic religious insanity, and they will steal, kill, and destroy the Jews and America to the extent of their capabilities... until Jesus returns and sees that insane ideology cast into the lake of fire, along with the Eurocentric, communist, atheistic, one world government. Those two kingdoms will no longer exist when Messiah, enthroned in Jerusalem, rules and reigns over all the earth for a thousand years.
Originally Posted by marygreeley1954
This recent Senate bill is hardly an article of aggression, since Iran declared war upon the U.S. in November of 1979 and has never withdrawn that declaration of war. Need someone to blame for the Senate "war declaration"? Point your finger at Iran. The Senate is merely responding with an acknowledgement that Iran's standing declaration of war against the U.S. can no longer be ignored, and that nµclear weapons cannot be allowed to fall into the hands of madmen who have openly declared their intent to destroy Israel, and who are also threatening the U.S. through the invasion by hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Hezbollah cell members, all over the U.S..
We’ve been warned over and over again by knowledgeable sources such as the LA Times and Family Security Matters that Iran has sleeper cells thoughout the US just waiting to unleash un-holy Armageddon upon Americans should we launch an attack against them. From the LA Times story linked above:
” Iranian terrorist cells inside the U.S. have weapons, explosives, money and safe houses; they use contacts with Mexican and Latin American drug cartels to smuggle explosives and weapons into the U.S.”
“They have very detailed information about sensitive sites such as bridges, railroads, airports, military bases, power plants, nuclear sites, water plants, railway stations,” he says.
“If the U.S. or Israel attacked Iran, he says, sleeper cells inside the U.S. would launch suicide bombings and sabotage. Iran would attack Israel and U.S. bases in Afghanistan and the Persian Gulf.”
And somehow, this is the reason why we should NOT defend Israel from Iran?
The illegal alien invasion, specifically, the invasion by Iranian illegal aliens and their reunitings in Hezbollah cells around the nation, are all the more reasons to put an end to the Iranian threats, not cause to give in to them.
We’ve learned that Iran practices shooting off EMP missiles on a regular basis.
In fact, should they do this to the US after being attacked, over 90% of Americans would likely be dead within 10 months because of the widespread loss of what we depend upon most, electrical power. What a failure of National Security that would be. In the meantime, our own DHS has been shown to NOT have a plan to deal with an EMP attack. How many millions of dollars have these “people” wasted worrying about the trivial while neglecting potential attacks that could leave 90% of our country dead? This doesn’t pass the smell test.
How is it that these Senate ‘leaders’ of our once great nation don’t take into account the potential loss of lives of hundreds of millions of Americans should we do something so insane as to launch an attack against a nation that hasn’t attacked another foreign nation in over 250 years?
Student revolutionaries took over the U.S. Embassy in Tehran for 444 days, from Nov. 4, 1979, until Pres. Ronald Reagan was inaugurated on Jan. 20, 1981.
After Iraq invaded Iran in 1980, in 1983, Iran invaded Basrah in Iraq.
That's just in 3 particularly bad years. Do we really need to look up the history of Iran's "religion of peace" all the way back to 1762?
Iran has been threatening to "wipe Israel off the map" for years, but its quest for atomic bσmbs now makes that a serious threat, not to be ignored. Iran is enriching uranium to a U-235 concentration of 20% or higher, for which the atomic bσmb is the only application (at 90+%): .
Iran’s own neighbor secretly owns enough nµclear weapons to wipe out Iran and all the rest of the Middle East along with it.
But Marygreeley1954's anti-semitic tone leads one to believe she is taling about Israel. If Israel's nµclear arsenal is a secret, how does she know about it, and how does she have a count of warheads on hand?
Israel has made no nµclear weapon threats against anyone, even as retaliation in kind. Any perceived threat to Is|amic states would appear to be mere projection. Just because enemies of Israel want to blow it out to sea doesn't mean that Israel has any such desires in return.
Any attack upon Iran should be thought out a whole lot more before we just go charging full steam ahead like we’ve done far too many times in the last 50 years. The lives of 9 out of the 10 people you see around you right now could very well be at stake with another disastrous US military decision. Or, is that what they want?
If Iran were to choose to openly attack the U.S. with an IRBM EMP attack, that would truly be INSANE. Of course, the Shi'ites believe that igniting World War IV would somehow cause the 12th Imam to show up or the Shi'ite Mahdi to stand up and take over the world (just as the Antichrist will do at some point during the seven year tribulation period before the 2nd Coming of Christ).
And that is undoubtedly what the Shi'ites want.
The story below from YouTube reporter Mary Greeley.
Published on Sep 22, 2012 by Marygreeley1954
Senate Votes 90-1 Declaration Of War: "A De-Facto Declaration Of War" Against Iran - Rand Paul | War and ConflictLast edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 09-26-2012 at 03:41 AM.
One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
-
09-25-2012, 04:48 AM #5199
FLORIDA DEM ASKS FOR 'DISCOVERY' INTO OBAMA ELIGIBILITY
President 'conspicuously offered no evidence' of status
September 21, 2012 by BOB UNRUHEmail |
A Florida Democrat who went to court to determine whether Barack Obama is qualified for the office of president is asking the First District Court of Appeal there to order legal “discovery” in the case, a process in which each side examines evidence held by the other.
“Appellant submitted multiple sworn affidavits setting forth the fraudulent nature of Appellee Obama’s birth certificate and other identifying documents,” said the appeal of a decision by Judge Terry Lewis, who said Obama is eligible and the case shouldn’t go forward.
The arguments were filed by attorney Larry Klayman, founder of both Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch. The case is on behalf of Michael Voeltz, a registered member of the Democratic Party of Florida.
“Appellee Obama conspicuously offered no evidence to the contrary and instead asked for a stay of discovery in order to avoid a proper determination of his citizenship. With only appellant’s affidavits in front of him as no contra-affidavits were put forth by appellee Obama, Judge Lewis ignored this sworn evidence and incorrectly determined that appellee Obama was a natural born citizen,” the filing explains.
It continues: “A question of fact such as this cannot be determined without the parties having been given the opportunity to take discovery. Appellant was not permitted to investigate through discovery or even observe the underlying documents that allegedly establish appellee Obama’s natural born citizenship.
“If appellee Obama was born outside of the United States then he is not a natural born citizen, or even a citizen. In addition to being born within the United States, as noted above, a natural born citizen must be born to two U.S. citizen parents. If it is shown through discovery that Barack H. Obama Sr., appellee Obama’s father, was not a U.S. citizen at the time of appellee Obama’s birth, then appellee Obama is clearly not a natural born citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution.”
The case seeks to exclude Obama from the 2012 ballot. Klayman and Voeltz claim that Obama is not a natural born citizen as required by Article 2, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution, because he was born a British subject.
The case cited the evidence produced by Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s special investigative unit, which has asserted that the birth documentation from Hawaii that Obama claimed was “proof positive” of his Hawaiian birth is not real.
As WND reported, Voeltz, a voter and taxpayer in Broward County, challenged Obama’s eligibility, arguing that the “natural born citizen” clause was rightly understood in historical context to mean a child not only born in the U.S., but born to two American-citizen parents, so as not to have divided loyalties. Obama, however, readily admits to being born a dual citizen because of his father’s British citizenship.
But Lewis rejected the evidence before him and ruled that Obama is eligible.
“The United States Supreme Court has concluded that ‘every person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, becomes at once a citizen of the United States,’” Lewis wrote.
Not exactly, Klayman explained.
“The judge equated being a ‘citizen’ with a ‘natural born citizen’ and cited no authority to conclude the two terms are the same,” Klayman said. “He quotes other state’s cases, where judges reached that conclusion, but that’s not precedent for him. What other courts said in lower cases means nothing to him.”
Is Obama constitutionally eligible to serve? Here’s WND’s complete archive of news reports on the issue
Lewis also said the case had to be dismissed because Obama, the only candidate offered by the Democratic Party, actually was not “nominated” as a candidate for president because at that time the nominating convention had not been held.
Lewis also said his court lacked jurisdiction in the case.
Klayman argued in the appeal brief that Lewis is wrong on several counts.
“Lewis’ ruling bars any elector contest of eligibility in a presidential primary, or in any unopposed primary, and is clearly contrary to the plain wording of the well crafted and crystal clear Florida statutes,” he wrote. “Appellant rightfully has standing, and the judiciary is obliged to make a determination as to eligibility of ‘any candidate,’ including presidential candidates.”
He continued: “By his own birth story, well told, he is not an eligible natural born citizen, due to foreign citizenship at birth. Appellant also asks for a determination of current citizenship that would require examination of all of Mr. Obama’s passport and other relevant records.
“If it is found that Barack Obama Sr. is indeed the father of Barack H. Obama II, then appellant also seeks an injunction, preventing the placement of the name Barack H. Obama on the Florida General Election Ballot by order of the Florida judiciary, since he would not be an eligible natural born citizen.”
Florida Dem asks for ‘discovery’ into Obama eligibilitySupport our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
09-28-2012, 01:28 AM #5200
- Join Date
- Jan 2006
- Location
- tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
- Posts
- 3,207
“Obama” is ABSOLUTELY NOT a “natural born Citizen”….
by Yoel
Liberals, moles, and trolls, and those without souls,
all telling us the story has been told.
Sell outs, and hacks, and government spies,
spreading falsehoods with their tricks and their lies.
They like to use labels to distract us from hope,
they say we are crazy, they say we’re on dope.
"Where is your proof?" they scream to the sky,
when the proof is right here, right in front of their eyes.
They cannot know freedom, for they are bound in their hearts;
stuck to their masters and stuck to their lies…One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.
Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.
The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!
Exclusive – Sen. Marsha Blackburn at Border: ‘Walls Work,’ Need...
03-28-2024, 09:54 PM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports