Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

**florgal** · 12-12-2012, 03:33 PM

New Army Manual Orders Soldiers Not To Criticize Taliban

December 11, 2012 | 1 Comment

Here is a strong indicator that the Obama Administration’s crusade to appease Islam has gone too far; a new U.S. military handbook for troops deployed to the Middle East orders soldiers not to make derogatory comments about the Taliban or criticize pedophilia, among other outrageous things.
It gets better; the new manual, which is around 75 pages, suggests that Western ignorance of Afghan culture— not Taliban infiltration—is responsible for the increase in deadly attacks by Afghan soldiers against the coalition forces.
The soon-to-be-released Army handbook is still being drafted, but a mainstream newspaper got a sneak preview and published an article that should infuriate the American taxpayers funding the never-ending war on terror. The manual is being created because someone with authority bought the theory that cultural insensitivity is driving insider attacks on U.S. troops in Afghanistan.
More than three dozen insider attacks have killed 63 members of the U.S.-led coalition this year, according to the article, and some blame “American cultural ignorance.” The bottom line is that troops may experience social-cultural shock and/or discomfort when interacting with Afghan security forces, the new military handbook says. “Better situational awareness/understanding of Afghan culture will help better prepare [troops] to more effectively partner and to avoid cultural conflict that can lead toward green-on-blue violence.”
The draft leaked to the newspaper offers a list of “taboo conversation topics” that soldiers should avoid, including “making derogatory comments about the Taliban,” “advocating women’s rights,” “any criticism of pedophilia,” “directing any criticism towards Afghans,” “mentioning homosexuality and homosexual conduct” or “anything related to Islam.”
At least one high-ranking military official had the backbone to publicly criticize the new manual, albeit through a spokesperson. U.S. Marine General John Allen (publicly smeared and questionably attached to the Petraeus 'shiny thing sex scandal'), the top commander in Afghanistan, doesn’t endorse it and rejected a proposed forward drafted by Army officials in his name. “He does not approve of its contents,” according to a military spokesman quoted in the story.

Earlier this year the Obama Administration changed the way federal agents are trained to combat terrorism and violent extremism by eliminating all materials that shed a negative light on Muslims. Under White House orders, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) destroyed instructional material that characterizes Muslims as prone to violence or terrorism in a government-wide call to end Islamophobia.
Under Obama practically every major federal agency has been ordered to participate in Muslim outreach initiatives, including the Justice Department with a special program to protect Islamic civil rights, Homeland Security meetings with extremist Muslim organizations and the nation’s space agency (NASA) with an unprecedented mission to focus on Muslim diplomacy.
Additionally, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton signed a special order to allow the reentry of two radical Islamic academics whose terrorist ties long banned them from the U.S. and the administration sent an America-bashing mosque leader (Feisal Abdul Rauf) who blames U.S. foreign policy for the 9/11 attacks on a Middle Eastern outreach mission. The Obama Administration even ordered a government-funded meal program for home-bound seniors to offer halal cuisine prepared according to Islamic law.

New Army Manual Orders Soldiers Not To Criticize Taliban | Judicial Watch

**AirborneSapper7** · 12-12-2012, 10:07 PM

BREAKING! Sup. Court of Alabama To Hear Eligibility Case? Arpaio Investigation...full on!

Added by Bill Bissell Moderator on December 11, 2012 at 4:21pm

BREAKING! Sup. Court of Alabama To Hear Eligibility Case? Arpaio Investigation...full on! - YouTube

ORIGINAL WND ARTICLE 2nd bite to challenge Obama’s eligibility? Hear Carl Gallups (narrator) every Friday - 1330 WEBY AM - Gulf Coast Talk Radio Freedom Friday With Carl G...

BREAKING! Sup. Court of Alabama To Hear Eligibility Case? Arpaio Investigation...full on! - Patriot Action Network

**Newmexican** · 12-15-2012, 01:10 PM

HOW TO STOP AN INELIGIBLE 'PRESIDENT'

Exclusive: Larry Klayman demands GOP lawmakers challenge Electoral College tally

12/15/2012 by LARRY KLAYMAN Email | ArchiveLarry Klayman is a former Justice Department prosecutor and the founder of Judicial Watch and Freedom Watch. His latest book is"Whores: Why and How I Came to Fight the Establishment."More ↓

Over the last four years, modern-day “Sons of Liberty” – such as Joseph Farah, WND, its prized investigative reporters such as Jerome Corsi and courageous lawmen like Joe Arpaio and his Cold Case Posse – have worked tirelessly to have President Barack Hussein Obama thoroughly investigated over the issue of his place of birth.

It is well-known that Obama had for years refused to release his claimed Hawaiian birth certificate and other official documents that reflect on whether he was born in U.S. territory as he claims, or in Kenya where his father of the same name hailed. If born in Kenya or somewhere else outside of American territory, Obama would be ineligible to run for and serve as president. And, even if born in America, Obama does not qualify as a “natural born citizen” under our Constitution, since he was not, as also required under our law to be president, sired by two American citizen parents. Only his mother was an American at the time of his birth.

The author and readers of this column know this issue well; we have lived and agonized over it as the Republican Party – the so-called opposition to the racist/socialist Muslim who lied his way into the White House – proceeded to bring the nation to its financial, social and international knees, put its head in the sand and looked the other way for fear they would be vilified by the leftist mainstream media.

Obama’s father, an anti-neo-colonialist, anti-American, anti-Semitic and anti-Christian Muslim featured in his son’s book “Dreams from my Father,” is smiling from his grave.

Now, this Republican Party, soundly beaten in the November elections and essentially politically a dead letter, has yet a new opportunity to resurrect itself and show some courage. While We the People should not hold our breath that political establishment dinosaur hacks of the likes of Speaker of the House John Boehner or Senate Minority leader Mitch McConnell will lead the charge, other so-called tea-party conservatives, such as Rep. Michele Bachmann and Sen. Marco Rubio have the power in their hands to throw a monkey wrench into Obama’s coronation on Jan. 21, 2013, and start an official proceeding over Obama’s place of birth and his natural born citizen status. If, indeed, the Republican Party wants to regain any standing among the patriotic and law-abiding populace, do what is right for the nation and carry out its constitutional duties, it has a golden opportunity to do so immediately, without wasting any more time and subjecting the country to another four years of rule by this truly evil and destructive president.

For instance, the process for objecting to electoral votes is laid out in Title 3 of the U.S. Code, section 15. Under this law, the Congress will meet in a joint session in the House of Representatives on Jan. 6, 2013, to conduct the official tally of electoral votes. The vice president, as president of the Senate, will serve as the presiding officer. Two tellers are then appointed to open, present and record the votes of the states in alphabetical order, beginning with the state of Alabama. The president of the Senate will then announce the results of the vote and declare who have been elected president and vice president of the United States. The president of the Senate will then call for objections to be made. Any objections made must then merely be submitted in writing and be signed by at least – and importantly only – one member of the House and Senate. Indeed, all that is needed is for one person from each chamber to stand up and attempt to do what he or she has sworn to do: support and defend the Constitution of the United States. This would force the House and Senate to withdraw to their respective chambers and consider the merits of any objections and would finally trigger an official inquiry to be made as to the eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to be president of the United States.

While I and others have filed eligibility challenges that are pending in states like Florida and Alabama, thus far the courts have strained to buy the false argument of Obama’s lawyers that the “proper” and only mandated procedure to challenge his eligibility is under this federal statute, rather than state law, at this time. And, while the liberal and other judges who have so ruled are not correct and are simply doing what they think is “politically correct,” in violation of the law, and while my cases are on appeal or, in the case of Florida, have been refiled (see also Freedom Watch), there is no excuse, especially for House and Senate Republicans, to shirk their
constitutional duty. Is there not one Republican representative or senator who has the guts to do what must be done to save the nation?

This process is not without precedent. In January 2005, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Rep. Stephanie Tubbs Jones, D-Ohio, lodged a formal challenge to the Electoral College results of the 2004 election, objecting to Ohio’s 20 electoral votes for President George W. Bush based on alleged voting irregularities. The challenge to Bush’s re-election, according to a New York Times report, sparked a two-hour debate and the eventual affirmation of Bush’s Electoral College victory.

I thus call upon the Michele Bachmanns and Marco Rubios of the Republican Party to now put their “money where thus far only their mouths have been” for years and take legal and appropriate steps to prevent this evil and destructive president from fraudulently seizing control of the White House again. I am not calling for a coup d’etat, only that the Constitution be respected and enforced. If these constitutional conservatives and their Republican Party cannot summon the courage, which is not difficult at all, to follow the law, then they, themselves, have no real or inherent authority to be in Congress.

Our Founding Fathers risked and gave of their honor, sacred fortunes and lives to found a new nation. Now, today, 236 years later, We the People simply request that what is left of the Republican Party obey the law and properly object to Barack Hussein Obama’s claim that he is eligible to be president and thus start a constitutionally mandated process that will lead to an official inquiry before he takes the oath of office on Jan. 21, 2013.

Too much to ask from us conservatives and other concerned Americans? As it now stands, for the Republican Party, the answer is likely yes! I therefore urge you to contact these and other House members and senators and demand that they do their constitutional duty or forfeit their offices, having proved themselves “ineligible” to serve We the People.

Read more at How to stop an ineligible ‘president’

**AirborneSapper7** · 12-15-2012, 10:19 PM

A Stolen Presidency – America’s Shame

Saturday, December 15, 2012 11:59

(Before It's News)

—– Original Message —–
From: Robert Quinn
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 9:45 AM
Subject: Fw: A STOLEN PRESIDENCY….AMERICA’S SHAME

To America Dec.14, 2012

PRELUDE

I do not write for fun. I write for Faith-my Catholic Faith and my faith in America. In Barack Obama, I believe that we have an enemy of both. For the record, I was prepared to vote for Herman Cain until he withdrew from the race. Also, many African-Americans willingly accept copies of my letters, as I do theirs… Robert Quinn

A STOLEN PRESIDENCY-AMERICA’S SHAME

“No person except a natural born Citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution shall be eligible to the office of president; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five years and been fourteen years a resident within the United States.” Article II, Section 1. Constitution. In 2008 after exhaustive research computer experts nationwide declared a document which Obama was using to convince America he was a “natural-born” American citizen was a fraudulent copy of a limited” Certification of Live Birth”,hereafter (COLB). It was not a “Certificate of Live Birth”, the proper document for anyone claiming Presidential eligibility. As a former Constitutional teacher, Obama knew he was not eligible to seek the Presidency, yet deliberately pursued his deception. Truth and honesty did not inhibit his ambition. Suddenly, in 2011, when States began insisting on viewing a valid long-form “Certificate of Live Birth” before the 2012 Election, Obama, realizing his COLB would no longer deceive a now-challenging Public, announced that a long-form Certificate of Live Birth had been”found” and he posted it on a government website for all to see but forbade the Hawaiian Dept. of Health to release their copy to Public scrutiny and verification. Obviously, if their’s was valid he would have had no reason to suppress it’s release, but there were two important reasons why he did. First, if it matched his 2011 fraudulent “find”(which experts had already “branded” as another fraudulent document), it would make both fraudulent and, therefore, it had to be kept hidden. Second, if no document existed in Dept.of Health files,that fact must also remain hidden. Simply put,disclosure would mean exposure and exposure would mean expulsion from the Presidency.

‘THE ONLY PEOPLE WHO DON’T WANT TO DISCLOSE THE TRUTH ARE THOSE
WITH SOMETHING TO HIDE.” Barack Obama-to Newsday, Aug.22,2010

Below are short recaps detailing how Obama’s actions clearly identify him as one of the “only people” he himself defines above.Transparency, a virtue he repeatedly claims title to, means (to him) saying or doing anything, everything or nothing if it helps him attain any goal, at any cost….to others. This includes lying, withholding or falsifying incriminating documents, ignoring or rejecting our Justice system, and silence, which, closely followed by ridicule, comprises the loudest forms of Obama’s retaliation when Truth demands to be heard.

Recap 1:Former Army Lt.Col.Terrence Lakin, a Bronze Star recipient and leading flight surgeon charged with caring for the Chief-of-Staff’s pilots and air crews, after going through channels to no avail, twice wrote to Obama, asking for confirmation of his eligibility status since the Colonel had taken an officer’s oath to uphold The Constitution and Obama’s legitimacy was now being challenged by millions. Obama’s response was silence, a silence which hastened the Colonel’s court-martial and dishonorable discharge for refusing to accept a second mid-east assignment until Obama responded to his requests.As I mentioned above, Obama wanted the Presidency at any cost….to others.

Shameless, also,was the conduct of the presiding Army trial judge, Major General Carla Hawley-Bowland, who would not allow Colonel Lakin to introduce any Obama records in his defense “lest they embarrass the president (her words.)- years of faithful military service ended by her disgraceful deference to Obama. Vigilante justice prevailed at that trial. A special reflection: two men had taken an oath to defend The Constitution. One did, and, for so doing,lost his career. The other upended The Constitution and stole a Presidency. Obama’s title should be Commander-in-Thief for he is the only person in our history to use fraudulent documents to secure our Nation’s highest Office!

Recap 2:In previous letters(freely available via e-mail), I had written of how Obama tried to induceKapIolani Medical Center to confirm his birth there, to no avail. Not one hospital in Hawaii will admit to having been Obama’s birth hospital….not one! I hope Bill O’Reilly, karl Rove and Chris Matthews read this for they certainly don’t mention it through their own organizations.

Recap 3:Globe Magazine offered Obama $100,000 to help minority students who desperately(and deservedly) sought aid for higher education and a better life. Also, Donald Trump recently offered $5,000,000 (that’s 5 million) dollars to help others in need but Obama did not have the “guts” to respond to either offer. Why….because each asked for proof of his eligibility. Remember, during the recent election Obama kept “pushing” Mitt Romney to produce his previous tax returns for public viewing. Too bad Mr.Romney didn’t challenge Mr.Obama to produce a valid Birth Certificate. The result could have saved me writing this letter.

Recap 4:Hawaiian Governor Neil Abercrombie stated he personally knew the Obama family and would prove Obama’s eligibility with a copy of the Health Dept.birth certificate. A few days later he said nothing was found to confirm Obama’s birth in Hawaii; no “Certificate of Live Birth” and no “Certification of Live Birth(COLB), the document which Obama said matched his Daily Kos posting.How does one photocopy a non-existant document? The Governor’s fruitless search contradicted Obama’s claim of having provided proof of his status. I must congratulate the Governor for his candid admission that no actual birth certificate of any kind was found.

Recap 5:In May, 2011, when Obama claimed the Hawaiian Health Dept. had “located” his long-form “Certificate of Live Birth”, General Colin Powell (ret.) then told South Carolina University graduates that “he particularly enjoyed when President Obama took out his birth certificate copy and blew away Donald Trump and all the birthers. What an uninformed and irresponsible remark for what Obama “took out” was the fraudulent “Certificate of Live Birth” which was previously unmentioned, unseen and never before offered as proof of his eligibility. Remember, in 2008, he said his COLB matched the Health Dept.copy, which would have made both COLB’s ineligibile. Now, in 2011, he claims his newly found long form certificate also matches the Health Dept copy, a clear contradiction. Two fraudulent certificates do not add up to a legitimate one. Since his 2011 copy was also “branded” a fraud by experts, he no longer allows anyone to examine the Health Dept files, including General Powell, whose blind acceptance of Obama’s copy was followed by ignoring an offer of the “Birthers Summit” organization of $15,000 for allowing them three hours to challenge Obama’s 2011 claim and hear the General’s response.

Recap 6:John Jay convinced George Washington to include in The Constitution (art.II) a provision limiting the Presidency and Vice-Presidency to natural-born American citizens, so no on with a dual-nationality or other foreign allegiance could adversely influence the Office of President. Obama, by withholding access to virtually every document bearing his name plus criminally offering a false COLB and a more recent false “Certificate of Live Birth” has cloaked his eligibility in secrecy and lies. What Jay feared has become reality! Recently, on National TV, America accidentally overheard Obama telling his subordinates to “find a way around The Constitution,”this from a man who, when inaugurated, swore under oath to defend it. Well, what’s one more act of deception?

Recap 7:Sheriff Arpaio of Arizona sent a special task force to Hawaii, on their own time and expenses, to verify Obama’s status and concluded that his birth documents were fraudulent, yet, Media representatives attending the presentations of their findings were only interested in questioning his team’s motives for pursuing this isue, not the issue itself.

Recap 8:Barack Obama,a man whose national allegiance is unknown to the American people, is governing us and controlling our military, thereby determining our future survival yet his hidden identity is never challenged by the Major Media. Lawsuits and subpoenas ordering him to appear in Courts with a valid birth certificate were ignored,yet were not reported by them.

One instance, in particular, took place in Georgia where Obama’s attorney actually wrote to the Judge, saying that neither Obama nor their firm would appear in Court, as ordered by the subpoena. Obama had spoken….and the cowering Court wilted. I wonder why the name CZAR came to mind.O’reilly’, whose “unfair and unbalanced” reporting on the Obama “eligibility” issue consisted of sarcasm or suppression, only succeeded in high-lighting his ignorance (feigned or otherwise) of this issue. He adds insult to injury each evening when ending his program with “we’re looking out for you”, for, if he is, he’s “looking out” in the wrong direction. None of the above recaps were reported by the Major Media, but at least they kept us up to date on Romney’s previous years tax returns.

GENERAL INFORMATION

I can safely say that millions, including all on my e-mail list, are aware of Obama’s deception, including many Democrats and Republicans. I pray another Col.Lakin will rise up and also be counted, be he military or civilian. When politicians of any Party casually dismiss this issue with remarks like “this is not a major issue to me”, as was said by some, are they aware of what they are saying? The person acting as President of the World’s most powerful Nation has power to lead America toward prosperity or ruin. Also, to those who claim his eligibility has been authenticated by proof he provided, I remind them that proof consisting of fraudulent and/or ineligible documents is merely proof of fraud and/or ineligibility and Obama is an expert at providing fraudulent documents. Ask him, however, for a valid “Certificate of Live Birth”, his 1981 passport to Pakistan, his original Social Security records, college records-he’ll make mimes chatty by comparison. This is but a portion of Obama’s tales of deceit. The full pain and sorrow which he has inflicted on those standing up for God and Country cannot be imagined. When asked to simply produce valid documents to confirm his presidential eligibility he has answered requests by either submitting fraudulent (as in “criminal”) documents or by forcing over 100 lawsuits to proceed against him, at taxpayers expense. Judges should have insisted that he stop his legal charade and simply produce the documents in question.It would only have taken a few phone calls to comply.Instead, they dismissed most plaintiff’s as having “no standing”, turning a simple “show and tell” solution into an afterthought, resulting in horrific consequences!

In closing,I again suggest that all should contact their elected representatives and voice your concern for Truth and Justice. Let the election boards of every State know that if they certify Obama as legitimately being re-elected they will be condoning his deception for the second time.If they don’t stand up for something, they will have again fallen for anything. Either Truth and Consequences await Obama or Crime really does pay. America, which will it be? Time is running out and we must reset our clocks to FST. THAT’S FREEDOM SAVINGS TIME !

With sincerity and sorrow…………robertquinn

bcc:The U.S.Supreme Court and all on my e-mail list.

All receiving this letter are free to pass it on to any and all

H/T: Sher Zieve

A Stolen Presidency - America's Shame | Obama

**MinutemanCDC_SC** · 12-18-2012, 11:47 PM

Sheriff Joe, Where Did You Go? Questioning the Media Blackout of His Investigation.

Earlier this year, Arizona Sheriff, Joe Arpaio, requested that his Cold Case Posse investigate possible fraud and forgery in Barack Obama’s birth certificate. Their findings not only addressed problems with the online document presented by the White House, but also with Obama’s Selective Service registration card. So, why hasn’t this news gone anywhere?

In an exclusive interview, Sheriff Joe Arpaio talks to PolitiChick’s Ann-Marie Murrell about the media block regarding his investigation into President Obama’s records.

View Politichicks.TV interview with Sheriff Joe, Part 1 of 2

View Politichicks.TV interview with Sheriff Joe, Part 2 of 2

Sheriff Joe, Where Did You Go? Questioning the Media Blackout of His Investigation. :: Minute Men News

Originally Posted by OtherStalin

Romans 13:1-8 :
"Everyone is to obey the governing authorities. For there is no authority that is not from God, and the existing authorities have been placed where they are by God. Therefore, whoever resists the authorities is resisting what God has instituted; and those who resist will bring judgment on themselves. . ."

Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC

@OtherStalin, you can twist the scriptures to play devil's advocate, but you will be held accountable for speaking falsely as from the Lord, as well as for being an accomplice to sedition by the unlawful overthrow of the Constitution of the United States, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5: "No person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President."

Romans 13:1-7 is one of the most misapplied texts in the Bible. It has been used to justify submission to tyrants of every sort - from Suleiman, to Genghis Khan, to King George III, to Adolph Hitler, to Pol Pot, to Idi Amin, to Papa Doc Duvalier, to Nicolai Caecescu, to Saddam Hussein, and now to the constitutionally ineligible usurper, the Enemy-Combatant-in-Chief.

"We have no KING but Jesus," and "Rebellion against tyrants is obedience to God." Under God, the ultimate governing authority in the U.S. is the Constitution of the United States... not the President, not a majority of Congress, not five Supreme Court Justices. To not support and defend the Constitution is oath-breaking or perjury on the face of it. For the Executive Branch to neglect to enforce the Constitution and the U.S. Code of Laws is dereliction of duty and possibly other high crimes and misdemeanors up to or including sedition and tr__s_n.

Any person who usurps a government office in violation of the law is neither an officeholder nor a governing authority, but a criminal usurper unlawfully representing himself as an officer of the United States. It is likewise a crime to obey an unlawful order, which includes any and every order issued by an unlawful authority (except such an order, otherwise lawful, which is justified or legitimized later as having been issued under the COLOR of LAW). It is not possible for a fraud, masquerading as legitimate authority, to issue any lawful order, no matter how reasonable, appropriate, or seemingly legally authorized. Such a counterfeit officer is NOT a governing authority but a CRIMINAL, who must be arrested and brought to justice for his crimes.

For example, if a burglar breaks into your house in your absence and then claims to be the legitimate occupant or homeowner, what is he when you return home and find him occupying it and claiming ownership? Does his occupation of your property make him the governing authority over it? Can he have you arrested for attempting to enter your home when he is ensconced and "enthroned" inside? Possession being 90% of the law, is he the owner of your house until you can prove his claim false in a court of law? Nonsense. He is a criminal trespasser and is to be immediately evicted and arrested by law enforcement, IF LAW ENFORCEMENT IS FUNCTIONING ACCORDING TO LAW.

But to shield a criminal usurper of authority behind the smokescreen of Romans 13:1-7 is to share in his evil deeds and to be an accomplice to his crimes. Twisting the scriptures to mean what you want them to say is being a false witness of God... which is probably not your best choice of occupations in the long run. Don't "lie for God" - He will not suffer His truth and honor to be besmirched, and you will be exposed as a liar.

**MinutemanCDC_SC** · 12-27-2012, 04:52 PM

Noonan, MacLeran, Judd, Taitz v Bowen submitted to SCOTUS Chief Justice John Roberts

Posted on | December 26, 2012

Press Release

Law offices of Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ

Chief Justice John Roberts [is] to rule on Noonan et al v Bowen [that is, Justice Roberts is to decide whether to grant a hearing to an application for a stay on California election results]. This is a case filed by Attorney Orly Taitz on behalf of 3 Presidential candidates against Secretary of State of CA Deborah Bowen.

Additionally, Attorney Taitz will be arguing a case, Grinols et al v Electoral College et al, on January 3, 2013, [at] 2pm, before Judge Morrison C. England, chief Judge of the Eastern district of CA, Sacramento. Patriots who believe in the rule of law and the U.S. Constitution are asked to be there in the courtroom in a show of support for Attorney Taitz and the Plaintiffs. Plaintiffs, Presidential Electors and Presidential Candidates, are seeking to enjoin the certification of Obama election due to Barack Obama’s use of forged IDs and a stolen CT social Security number, nnn-nn-4425. Additionally, they are seeking to enjoin certification of CA election due to one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California.

Taitz subpoenaed Obama, Michael Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security, Patrick Donahoe, Postmaster General, Lawrence Romo and others. Astrue is requested to provide the original application for CT SSN nnn-nn-4425, which Obama is using in his tax returns, but which was never assigned to Obama, according to E-verify and SSNVS. Romo is requested to provide the original application for Selective Service for Obama, which represents [is] a forgery according to Sheriff Arpaio and other experts. Romo is also requested to provide information as to what did he do to apprise the law enforcement and the U.S. Congress of forgery in Obama’s IDs.

Postmaster General Donahoe is requested to provide information, what actions did he take to apprise the law enforcement and the U.S. Congress before the January 6 confirmation of Obama’s Presidential election of the fact that there is a forged U.S. stamp in Obama alleged Selective Service [registration] Certificate. For over two hundred years, all the letters sent by the US Post Office contained a postal stamp with a four digit year. The only time a postal stamp was found with a two digit year is on Obama’s Selective Service [registration] certificate.

Attorney Taitz had to send a check for $753.20 for each official to fly from DC to CA to the hearing. Taitz sent a check for $975.40 for Obama to fly from Hawaii, where he is vacationing. Public is asked to assist Attorney Taitz with donations to cover enormous expenses of these cases, which she is prosecuting pro bono.

Additionally, Attorney Taitz has 5 other related cases in different state and Federal courts. Among them is Taitz et al v Democratic Party et al filed in MS, where among other causes of action is a RICO cause of action, where Taitz states that Obama, “Obama for America”, registrar of the Health Department in HI Alvin Onaka and others entered into a racketeering scheme, where they colluded to raise 2 billion dollars in two elections for Obama, who is a foreign national, citizen of Indonesia, was never legitimate for the U.S. Presidency, and got into the position of power by using all forged IDs and fraudulently obtained CT SSN.

More information on the cases, pleadings, affidavits, summons and subpoenas can be found on the web site OrlyTaitzESQ.com. Public can donate on that web site via PayPal or by check to be sent to the address listed below:

Orly Taitz ESQ
29839 Santa Maragrita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
fax 949-766-7603 phone 949-683-5411
orlytaitzesq.com

Supreme Court Documents

Docket
- Oral Argument

Docket for 12A606

No. 12A606

Title:

Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants

v.

Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State

Docketed:

December 13, 2012

Lower Ct:

Supreme Court of California

Case Nos.:

(S20707

~~~Date~~~	~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012	Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012	Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012	Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz	29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy	(949) 683-5411
	Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris	Attorney General	(916) 445-9555
	1300 I Street, Ste. 1740
	Sacramento, CA 95814-2919
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State

December 26, 2012 | Version 2012.0
--

Dr Orly Taitz ESQ
29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
ph 949-683-5411 fax949-766-7603
orlytaitzesq.com

**AirborneSapper7** · 12-28-2012, 10:25 AM

Obama Freaks - Tries To Stop Sibley, Suppress Subpoenas

http://www.montgomeryblairsibley.com...ry/Press10.pdf

**MinutemanCDC_SC** · 12-29-2012, 01:26 AM

[ED.: This is not news to us on this thread, but I post it here for reference.]

December 10, 2012 by Leon Puissegur
Lord Monckton: Obama Is An Illegal President

834 Comments

Could this be a possibility? What would happen if by pure chance this was found to be true? What would this mean to all the laws and Executive Orders Obama signed? People have seen the Democrats along with their close allies in the Socialist Democratic Party deny this to be nothing more than a huge Conspiracy theory by those who question Barack Hussein Obama and his true birth place. We really must ask this question of any President or Presidential Candidate. It should be the First thing demanded from any person running for President of the United States since the Constitution, under Article 2 Section 1, Paragraph 5, does in fact states:

“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; Neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.”

Now given some of the first statements from a few people that had tried to dig into President, (in this case the term President is very loosely used,) Obama’s past before he even entered office and were shut down very fast. One individual, Dr. Drew whom had the opportunity to talk with Obama while he was in California and stated in his articles that Obama was not qualified to be President.

Perhaps the largest and most widely known person associated with digging up questions about the Birth Certificate of Obama is Sheriff Joseph Arpaio of Maricopa County, Arizona, and after [completing] a six-month criminal style investigation on March 1, 2012[,] Sheriff Arpaio signed an affidavit on June 12, 2012, stating that Barack Obama’s Birth Certificate was a Fake! But of course[,] very few people will really find out[,] since Obama has made it nearly impossible to see the true certificates or other documents, since Obama placed all his [Presidential] records out of [reach] through his first Executive Order.

What would happen if it comes to be shown that Obama cannot hold the office of President due to his status of maybe not being a Natural Born citizen? Well, first all the Executive Orders he signed would become null and void as would all the other laws he signed and forced down the peoples throat! It may also show that our nation has been run the past 4 years by a fraud. This is a far reach, but if one does go and look at the material produced by Sheriff Arpaio, then they would scratch their heads and begin to ask questions, although many of those with very small brains would never even consider this[,] since they have fallen into the entire trap of the Socialist and Communist now backing Barack Obama, but even this may be questionable[,] especially since we do have proof that Obama was taken under the wings of one Frank Marshal Davis[,who] was on the FBI watch
[list] due to his Communist association.

Now let us just look at a couple of Affidavits which show people of pretty high standing now believing that Obama has thrown a false Birth Certificate out to the public[,] and very few have even questioned this. Lord Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, a former advisor to Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, and the first man to call attention to the possibility that “Global Warming” was a false idea[,] was invited to go see the documents that Sheriff Arpaio had which seem to prove that Barack Obama is Not a Natural Born Citizen. We have placed what Lord Monckton has given under a sworn affidavit[,] and this brings questions that should be answered by those now in office[,] since if this is true, our nation is being led by a fraud and liar.

The affidavit is very important, so please bear with its length.

AFFIDAVIT

I, the undersigned Christopher Walter Monckton, commonly known as The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley, Peer of the Realm, of Runhams Farm, Harrietsham, Maidstone, ME17 1NJ, being first duly sworn, do hereby state under oath and under penalty of perjury that the facts are true:

1. I am over the age of 18 and am a resident of the United Kingdom. The information herein is based upon my own personal knowledge. If called as a witness, I could testify competently thereto. I have a degree in Classical Architecture from Cambridge University. The course included instruction in mathematics. I am the Director of Monckton Enterprises Ltd., a consultancy corporation which, inter alia, specializes in investigating scientific frauds at government level, on which I advised Margaret Thatcher from 1982-1986 at 10 Downing Street during her time as Prime Minister. I have experience in the use of certain mathematical techniques which allow rigorous assessment of probabilities including the probability that a document has been forged. I have published papers in the reviewed literature on climate science and economics and am an appointed expert reviewer for the forthcoming Fifth Assessment Report (2013) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. I was this year’s Nerenberg Lecturer in Mathematics at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

2. I am asked to give expert testimony on the probability, taking into account the published results of a law-enforcement investigation by the Cold Case Posse acting for the Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, that the document purporting to be a digital photographic image of an original paper long-form Hawaiian birth certificate for President Obama that was personally endorsed by him at a Press Conference on April 27, 2011, and was thereupon posted on the White House website, is genuine.

3. I rely on the findings published by investigators acting at the instance of the Sheriff of Maricopa County, Arizona, in two press conferences, given on 1 March and 17 July[,] 2012[,] respectively. At the second press conference, the Sheriff said he was now certain that the White House document was a forgery. Based on the findings of the law-enforcement investigation, I have conducted a probability analysis to establish the likelihood that the White House document is genuine.

4. Where a document contains what appear to be irregularities, they may have arisen by inadvertence or by design. Probability theory assists in evaluating the likelihood that all of the irregularities were indeed inadvertent.

5. The method is based on one of the earliest and simplest principles in the theory of probability, which arose from the mathematical study of the odds at games of chance. A simple heuristic will illustrate the method. Suppose that two dice are rigged so that they will always show a pair of identical numbers when thrown. Then the odds that a double-six, for instance, will occur are 1 in 6. On the other hand, if the dice are not rigged in any way, so that they land randomly, the chance of a double six occurring is just 1 in 36, for the face that lands uppermost on one dice is entirely independent of the face that lands uppermost on the other, and the probability that the first die will display a six is 1 in 6, and each time that occurs[,] there is only a 1 in 6 chance that the other die will also display a six.

6. In general, therefore, the probability that a series of independent events will occur is simply the product of the individual probabilities that each of the independent events in the series will occur. Thus, with two dice each independently possessing a 1 in 6 probability that a six will show, the probability of a double six is 1 in 6 times 1 in 6: i.e., 1 in 36. With three such dice, the probability of a triple six is 1 in 6 times 1 in 6 times 1 in 6, or 1 in 216; and so on. The probabilities become rapidly smaller with each additional independent event.

7. The same technique may be applied to assessing the probability that a suspect document is genuine. The technique is particularly suitable for the testing of those documents in which the irregularities are so varied that unless they arose by design – as in the fabrication of a forgery – they cannot be dependent upon one another. If the irregularities arose naturally or by inadvertence, then they are very likely to be truly independent of one another, and their individual probabilities fall to be multiplied together to determine the probability that, overall, the irregularities occurred in a single document by inadvertence rather than by design.

8. The value of taking an explicitly mathematical approach to weighing evidence suggestive of forgery – particularly where the context is inescapably political – is that the test is, as far as possible, objective. Once it is accepted that certain irregularities exist[,] and that the probability of each irregularity occurring by mere inadvertence is as stated, then the probability that the document is genuine becomes a matter of arithmetic. If any individual probability is thought unsuitable, a preferred value may be substituted and the calculation redone. The method and the results are explicit, transparent, and independent of any expertise or prejudice on the part of the mathematician. They may be independently reviewed by any other mathematician.

9. The first step in the probabilistic analysis of a document, then, is to list the individual irregularities found therein and to assign a reasonable and legitimate individual probability to each irregularity. I have had detailed discussions with the Sheriff’s investigators and with some experts so as to form a view on the probabilities that each of the errors that have been identified are inadvertent.

10. The investigators have said during their press conferences that one of their most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, inferentially by drawing together digitized data from several genuine birth certificates. [ED.: Where such digitized data was (hypotetically) copied-and-pasted onto the counterfeit Certificate of Live Birth, there are now breaks or gaps in the wire frame on the pre-printed government form, breaks introduced by the copy-and-paste actions.] Not the least of the reasons why the investigators have reached this conclusion is that the distribution of the electronic data between nine distinct “layers” is entirely uncharacteristic of a paper document that has been scanned to create a simple, digitized photographic image that may (or may not) also have been processed either to sharpen the image using optical character-recognition software or to compress the file-size by using file-compression or optimization software.

11. The electronic data file of the White House document, when opened in Adobe Illustrator, can be separated into nine separate data “layers” and one clipping-mask path that groups the layers. Forensic experts for the Cold Case Posse established that these layers were not an artefact either of optimization or of optical character recognition. In any event, statements from the Governor of Hawaii and from the White House Press Office establish a chain of custody whereby no mention was made of any alteration or processing of the photocopied images at any point.

12. The electronic image was posted at the White House website in the form of a Portable Document Format (.pdf) file at 12.09 pm on 27 April 2011[,] using a programme called Macintosh Preview, which is recorded among the properties of the data file as the application that created it. However, I am told that forensic experts have deduced that a different software suite, Adobe Photoshop, was used to fabricate or alter the electronic image; then yet another program, Adobe Illustrator, was used to compile the various “layers” and export them as a .pdf [file]; then, immediately before posting on the internet, Macintosh Preview was used in an unsuccessful attempt to erase the digital traces of the previous use of Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator, and to reduce the file size.

13. A key reason for this deduction is that Macintosh Preview will not generate layers in the optimization process, though it will maintain any pre-existing layers generated by the user. For this reason, the investigators consider that the attributes of the layers in the White House document were fabricated before the file was optimized in Macintosh Preview. The presence of layers and their object-code attributes implies that Adobe Photoshop and Adobe Illustrator were significant contributors to and evidence of the fabrication of the electronic image, which was not derived from a photocopy. However, for the sake of caution[,] I have taken no account of this irregularity.

14. No genuine electronic document image scanned, photocopied, or photographed from a paper birth certificate in a bound volume without further processing by way of optical-character recognition, file-compression, or optimization would be at all likely to contain more than one layer. Electronic images of scanned, photocopied, or photographed documents typically consist of a single data layer. Yet the White House document contains not only a single layer of 8-bit quality but also eight separate layers each of 1-bit quality, not one of them black [ED.: ??? In this fabricated document, each of the "1-bit quality" layers is "black-and-white." ???]. The meaning of “1-bit quality” is that each dot of colored light that comprises the photographic image (a “picture element”, or “pixel”), is represented in the electronic data file by a single binary digit (or “bit”). A bit may have the integer value 0 or 1, and is represented in any electronic circuit by a switch where 0 represents “off” and 1 represents “on”.

15. The meaning of “8-bit quality” is that each pixel is represented by a group of eight bits (called a “byte”), representing values from “00000000”, for zero, to “11111111”, for 255. Thus each pixel is digitally represented by an integer giving a different color value from 0 to 255. Each eight-bit “byte” in a color layer represents a distinct hue. Clusters of pixels of various hues allow millions of distinct colors to be displayed on a color TV monitor.

16. No optimization software generates any non-black layers of 1-bit quality, yet all of the 1-bit-quality layers in the White House document are non-black. No such software generates more than one layer of 1-bit quality, yet the White House document has eight such layers. No such software generates no black layer of 1-bit quality, yet none of the eight 1-bit-quality layers in the White House layer is black. No such software generates only one color layer, yet the White House document has a single color layer. No such software generates fewer than 50-150 layers for an image as complex as the White House document, yet that document possesses only nine layers.

17. Multiple layers of 1-bit quality each representing a distinct color other than black can only be created by an operator deliberately. If the document had acquired multiple layers as a result of optimization, it would possess only one 1-bit layer, representing all pixels that scan as black. This layer is akin to the edges of the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle. All of the non-black “layers” in standard optimization software would normally be of 8-bit quality. Each 8-bit color “layer” represents a single colored region entirely bounded by black pixels. Each layer, therefore, is not really a “layer” at all: instead, it represents the colored picture on a single “puzzle piece” bounded by black edges. In effect, the “puzzle pieces” form a “jigsaw puzzle”. When assembled, they comprise the entire image.

18. Any document that possesses multiple layers after automated optimization will possess only one layer of 1-bit quality with a black colour value. The remaining layers will be of 8-bit quality to represent the remaining colours within the image at various locations within the document. No such document would possess merely the single 8-bit colour layer that is present in the website copy of the birth certificate. In the data file for the White House document, the single 8-bit color layer represents the entire greenish “basket-weave” pattern of the readily obtainable “security” paper on which the black data were superimposed.

19. Yet a genuinely-created document that possessed layers as a result of a legitimate, automated optimization process would not have the background isolated on one 8-bit color layer: instead, the electronic representation of the basket-weave pattern in an image as complex as a long-form birth certificate would normally be distributed among as many as 50-200 separate “jigsaw-piece” layers each bounded by a black part of the image. The investigators have told me they regard the existence of the single 8-bit color layer representing the entire [green] basket-weave substrate as compelling evidence that the data structure of the document indicates that it was fabricated layer by layer, and that it was not generated by any optimization program.

20. Where an event is certain not to occur, its probability is 0. Where it is unlikely to occur, its probability is less than 1 in 2. Where it is likely to occur, its probability is greater than 1 in 2. Where it is certain to occur, its probability is 1. Standing the gravity of the discrepancies between the distribution of layers in the image on the White House website and in an image created after processing by a normal optimization program, it would be legitimate to assign small probabilities (somewhat close to 0) at least to each of the following discrepancies: Multiple distinct layers of 1-bit quality, 1 in 10; none of the layers of 1-bit quality represents black, 1 in 10; a single color layer of 8-bit quality represents the entire basket-weave paper, 1 in 10. If each of these discrepancies were independent of the others, then the abnormalities in the distribution of data among the layers that are evident would have a combined probability of 1000:1 against their having occurred in the same document by inadvertence.

21. It is arguably more appropriate to regard these three probabilities as connected. It is possible that an untypical optimization program not known to the investigators was used. However, the investigators reviewed some 600 distinct optimization programs for the Windows operating system and the same 600 programs for the Macintosh operating system, and did not find a single program that created a layering structure in any way consistent with that which the White House document exhibits. Since it is difficult [impossible] to demonstrate that no optimization program consistent with the observed layering structure exists, I have arbitrarily assumed that ten such programs exist, so that the probability that one of these programs was used is approximately 1 in 60. [ED.: Arbitrarily generous. If one such program did exist in the sample of 600 + 600 programs, its probability would be 1 in 1200. Since no such program exists in the sample, the probability assigned to such a hypothetical program would therefore be something less than 1 in 1200. Or so it seems to me.]

22. The date when the copy was certified by the registrar, and the registrar’s stamp adjacent to it, each appear independently on separate layers of the White House document. Furthermore, these distinct layers contain no other data of any kind. No scan of an original document could possibly produce such separation of discrete items into distinct layers. The forensic experts tell me they regard this as definitive evidence that – contrary to the chain-of-custody account from official sources – the document was not photocopied[,] but fabricated piecemeal. No legitimate document process would result in this separation of information into independent layers.

23. It would have been simple to place a genuine photocopy from Hawaii into a scanner, capture the electronic image, and then print from it the copies to be distributed to reporters at the White House press conference of April 27, 2011, uploading the innocent-seeming electronic image from the photocopied document and concealing entirely the rare – if not impossible – layering irregularities considered here. The presence of these irregularities establishes that the simpler route was not followed, as it would have been if the original document had been genuine, and that instead the image was pieced together electronically from several sources [and not finally printed as hard copies on paper for distribution to reporters].

24. The two irregularly-layered stamps, if inadvertent, would not only be genuinely independent of one another but so rare as to be for all practical purposes impossible. Nevertheless, for caution I accord them a probability of 1 in 100 each, or 1 in 10,000 together. These irregularities, taken with the independent 1 in 60 probability of the layering irregularity, yield from the analysis of electronic irregularities alone a probability of only 1 in 600,000 that the White House document is genuine.

25. There are further irregularities in the presentation of the apparently mechanically-typed entries on the long-form certificate of live birth. Manual typewriters were in use in 1961. All mechanical typewriters then in use have fixed spacing: all letters, capital or lower-case, occupy the same width. A common width was the Elite escapement (typically 6 points wide, i.e. 12 characters to the inch horizontally; and 12 or 24 points line spacing, i.e. 6 single-spaced or 3 double-spaced lines to the inch vertically). Yet the White House document is poorly aligned both horizontally and vertically. To demonstrate how the alignments should have appeared on a genuine form, I invited forensic specialists to use a mechanical typewriter to enter data into a blank specimen form. The resultant image, overlaid with a red grid to show the regularity of line-spacing and letter-spacing compared with the irregularities in the White House document, is marked “M of B 1”, annexed [attached] and signed as relative hereto.

26. The experiment demonstrates how orderly the alignment of the typewritten margins, letters, words, and lines of text would have been if the original birth certificate had been created, like others in the public domain, by inserting a pre-printed form into a manual typewriter, aligning the carriage at the appropriate starting point at top left, and then filling in the form line by line. By contrast, the White House document shows how unnaturally irregular the letter, word and line spacings and alignments are.

27. In the White House document, the line spacing of the typewritten entries varies by 1 to 3 points (1/72 to 1/24 in.) above or below the usual 24-point (1/3 in.) double-spacing. That variability would not occur if the original document had been genuinely typewritten rather than electronically fabricated. The Hawaiian long-form certificate, like most forms of its day that were intended for typewriters, was designed precisely to allow double-spaced entries, so that once the first line entered was correctly registered[,] all other lines of type would automatically fall in the right place within the successive form-lines as the carriage-return lever advanced the paper past the ribbon.

28. The rollers in a manual typewriter hold the paper firmly enough against the platen to avoid slippage. The numerous visible irregularities in the line spacing of Mr Obama’s copy birth certificate is very considerably beyond what would be expected, suggesting that the typed data in the form were placed by hand, or “eyeballed”.

29. The leftward foot of the letter “M” in “Male” is, as it should be, below the rightward foot, because, as the form-lines above and below it show, the page-image curves downward near the binding. By contrast, the word “Kapiolani”, unlike the word “Male” above it, does not curve downward to the left as it should have done if the image had been scanned from a bound volume, following the curvature of the form-lines above and below it.

30. The word “BARACK” is not aligned either to the curvature of the printed form-lines or – at its right-hand end – to the words “HUSSEIN” and “OBAMA” later in the line. Also, the year “1961” is below the adjacent month and day.

31. Variations not only [in] line spacing but also in letter spacing are evident throughout the typewritten form entries. One consequence is that the three flush left lines on the document are not vertically aligned with one another, as all flush-left entries on the forensic experts’ document are. For instance, the whole word “Male” is offset by almost half a character to the left compared with the word “Kapiolani” two form-lines below it, indicating that one or the other word (or both) may have been imported electronically from another form and inserted. In a genuine document, all the typewritten letters and words on the form should normally have had the same vertical alignment.

32. The comma after the figure “4” is offset too much to the right, indicating that it may not have been typed but may instead have been “pasted” in position electronically during the composition of the image.

33. Many of the words towards the right-hand side of the form are aligned horizontally almost half a character farther to the right than the words on the left-hand side. This irregularity definitively demonstrates that the document was not typed line by line from left to right. It is unlikely that a clerk entering data into the form would have filled in the data on the left-hand side first and would then have removed and reinserted the form in such a way as to cause so substantial a misalignment when the right-hand half of the form was completed. [ED.: Other contemporaneous Hawaii Certificates of Live Birth, such as the Nordyke twins' Certificates of Live Birth, do not have this "left-right" mismatch.].

34. The typist would normally have inserted the form into the typewriter, aligned it, closed the rollers over the platen to hold the form firmly in alignment, and then typed the lines successively from left to right. If so, the systemic rightward shift that is evident in the letters and words appearing towards the right-hand side throughout the form could not have occurred. However, it is possible that this discrepancy arose because of parallax in the microfilm camera that was used to take different portions of the fabricated long-form birth certificate from other documents. [ED.: Arbitrarily generous to a fault. Even one example, please, of parallax shifting the typing by half-a-character, without also shifting the underlying pre-printed text.].

35. The variable letter spacing suggests that many of the typewritten letters were placed by hand [copied-and-pasted in a computer graphics program], and not typed on a typewriter. For instance, the lower-case “a” appears several times on the form more closely to the right than normal, but the capital “A” does not. On a mechanical typewriter, the capital letter is carried on the same arm as the lower-case letter, so that if the document had genuinely been typewritten[,] either the “A”s and “a”s would have been correctly spaced or they would all have been biased [shifted] either leftward or rightward.

36. Word spacing is also variable in a fashion inconsistent with typewriting. Whole words are misaligned by 1 to 3 points (1/72 to 1/24 in., or one-sixth to one-half of a character), suggesting the words were individually “pasted in” as the document was fabricated piecemeal. Yet, for caution, I have taken no account of word-spacing irregularities. [ED. Once again, arbitraily generous, especially given the frequency of such irregularities.]

37. Though it would have been legitimate to assign individual probabilities to each of the typewriter irregularities to which I have referred, for they would have been independent of one another if they were inadvertent, I have cautiously assigned a single probability of 1 in 10 to all of the irregular line spacings taken together as one irregularity, and a separate single probability of 1 in 20 to the irregular letter spacings, likewise taken together as one irregularity. Distinct probabilities for vertical and horizontal irregularities are appropriate because a typist creating a genuine document would have had to take two different actions to create both irregularities. Thus, based on the misalignments in the typing alone, the probability that the White House document is genuine is 1 in 200.

38. In addition to the irregularities in the electronic layering and in the vertical and horizontal spacings in the typewritten entries on the form, other unexpected features suggesting forgery are evident. Individual probabilities will be assigned to the most serious of these further irregularities.

39. A halo of white space is evident around the black [typewritten] portions of the White House document. The use of Unsharp Mask – a feature in the Adobe Photoshop software suite that also appears to a more limited extent in Adobe Illustrator, and whose purpose is to clean and sharpen the image – is one of many possible causes of the problematic halo effect. However, none of these causes apply where an original document is copied on to a photocopier, nor where that photocopy is in turn photocopied.

40. The Governor of Hawaii has said the original document was copied and given to Mr Obama’s attorneys. The White House Press Office has said the copy birth certificates it circulated on April 27, 2011, were taken from the copies received from Hawaii the previous afternoon. At neither end[, supposedly,] was anything done that could have caused a white halo around the typewritten entries on the form. The existence of the white halo effect, illustrated in an image marked “M of B 2”, annexed and signed as relative hereto, accordingly appears contrary to the course of events described by Mr Abercrombie and the White House Press Office, which do not mention any processing or alteration of the image that could have caused [the white haloes around typewritten characters].. I have assigned a probability of 1 in 10 to an inadvertent occurrence of the white halo.

41. The website copy of the birth certificate exhibits no chromatic aberration – the refraction of light when the lens of a scanner or camera comes across contrasts between colours (such as text against background). According to the investigators, this phenomenon arises from established physics. The aberration displays as a blue tint to the top and left edges of any black text character, and a reddish tint to the right and bottom edges. It can be seen in a genuine document if the viewer zooms in closely to a text area for observation, but it is absent in the White House document, though it is present in the printed copies of that image that were given to members of the White House press corps, indicating that the fabricated electronic file [which is posted on the White House website] was printed out and then photocopied, creating the expected chromatic aberration, which is illustrated in the image marked “M of B 3”, annexed and signed as relative hereto. Accordingly, the account of events given by the Governor of Hawaii and the White House Press Office cannot be correct. Since forensic specialists have told me that the absence of chromatic aberration is definitive evidence that that version could not have been photocopied, scanned or photographed from a paper birth certificate, I have cautiously assigned a low probability of 1 in 100, rather than the more realistic zero probability, to the actually-impossible inadvertent absence of chromatic aberration in the White House document.

42. A further irregularity is that no photocopied, scanned or photographed document would have incorporated a “clipping mask” that had the effect of truncating the display of certain data forming part of the document image. Yet the White House document has a clipping mask path that conceals the safety paper pattern within [outside?] the margins [of the printed form]. The investigators have told me this can only occur by deliberate manipulation and cannot result from any legitimate processing. Automated processing such as optimization can produce a clipping mask, but a genuine mask will only define the size of the layers and will never prevent display of data or parts of the image. The security paper in the White House document contains a white margin that conceals not only part of the pattern of the security paper but also some data coding numbers in pencil that are relevant to determining whether that document is forged. A genuine electronic image of the pattern on security paper would bleed to the edge of the document. However, I have taken no account of this irregularity, for those creating a genuine file may have wished to trim the security paper to minimize the data file size.

43. Mr Obama’s short-form birth certificate, when first published in 2008, had its certificate number blacked out. It is not easy to discern any legitimate reason why this should have been done. Indeed, a certificate number appears openly on Mr Obama’s long-form birth certificate. However, the number is out of sequence, and it is possible that the original blacking-out of the number on the short-form certificate was an attempt to conceal this irregularity. The certificate appears to be stamped as having been registered on Tuesday, August 8, 1961, on which date the number 10641 was assigned to it. However, the Vital Statistics for 1961 issued by the US Department of Health & Human Services show that 17,578 births occurred that year in Hawaii: an average of 48 births per day. Therefore, Mr Obama’s certificate should have been about 3 x 48 = 144 numbers less than the numbers issued to two girls, the Nordyke twins, whose certificates were registered three days later, on Friday, August 11, as 10637 and 10638. It should certainly not have had a number greater than theirs. An automated sequential numbering stamp was used, and batches of birth certificates were collected monthly, ordered by date and time of birth and then sequentially number-stamped in a special room by a single clerk trained for the purpose, precisely to minimize numbering errors. However, for caution I have assumed that 1 number in 25 might inadvertently be out of sequence.

44. The birth date of Mr Obama’s alleged father is two years out. It not impossible that the child’s mother did not know his father’s date of birth, or that the date was incorrectly entered. I have assigned a 1 in 40 probability to this event.

45. The alleged father’s race is described as “African” some 28 years before the term “African” or “African American” first came into general usage. In 1961, written rules forbade the use of such generalized racial descriptors, the term “African” being specifically barred. Ms Verna K. Lee, the registrar a simulacrum of whose signature appears on the White House document, drew the investigators’ attention to the list of codings that were used for statistical returns to the Federal Government: 1 White; 2 Negro; 3 Indian (includes Aleuts and Eskimos); 4 Chinese; 5 Japanese; 6 Hawaiian (includes part-Hawaiian); 7 Other Nonwhite; Unknown or not stated (Race of parents only). The word “African” is not listed. I have assigned a 1 in 25 probability to the occurrence of the explicitly-prohibited and then-uncommon use of the word “African” to describe the alleged father’s race. [ED.: Even today, the term "African" does not specify a race, but rather a place of origin or residence.]

46. Coding numbers added to the form in pencil adjacent to various of the typed data entries on the form are incompatible with the data that had been entered. Box 9 on the form, “Race of Father”, has “African” typed in it. Yet the coding is “9”, which stands for “Unknown or not stated”. Likewise, Box 12b, “Kind of Business or Industry”, has “University” typed in it, but is also assigned the empty-box code “9”. Since these two events may have been connected even if they were inadvertent, and bearing in mind Ms. Lee’s statement to investigators to the effect that mistakes were not made on her watch, I have assigned a single 1 in 25 probability to these events taken as one.

47. There are many further irregularities in the White House document, but I have not assigned probabilities to them. [ED.: Among these further irregularities are the breaks in the wire frame of the counterfeit certificate of birth, which are apparent under 3X magnification. The fabricator(s) who copied-and-pasted pieces from multiple certificates did not take care to precisely line up the wire frame on the pasted pieces with the wire frame on the counterfeit document. There are several such breaks in the wire frame on the counterfeit document*, and each break has zero possibility of occurring on a genuine printed form.] Had I done so, the probability that the document is genuine would have been still smaller than it is. Those irregularities to which I have assigned probabilities are as follows:

Independent event Probability

Multiple layers of 1-bit quality ) ┐
No 1-bit-quality layer represents black ) 1 in 60 (combined)
One 8-bit-quality color layer ) ┘

Registrar’s signature-stamp on its own layer 1 in 100 (actually impossible)
Registrar’s date-stamp on its own layer 1 in 100 (actually impossible)
Line spacing irregularities 1 in 10
Letter spacing irregularities 1 in 20
White halo effect around black text 1 in 10
Chromatic aberration absent 1 in 100 (actually impossible)
Certificate number out of sequence 1 in 25
Father’s birth date two years out 1 in 40
Use of “African” against written rules 1 in 25
Miscoding of Federal statistical data 1 in 25
Probability that all errors were inadvertent 1 in 75 quadrillion

[ED.: The probability of even one break or misalignment, much less ten*, in the wire frame on
a genuine State of Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth, a printed government form, is zero or nil.]

48. As the table shows, the probability that the White House document is genuine (in that each of the irregularities identified by the investigators occurred by inadvertence), is the product of the individual probabilities that the mutually independent irregularities were accidental: that is, 1 in 75,000,000,000,000,000.

49. Since there are 13 distinct irregularities to which probabilities below unity are assigned, even if per impossible the probabilities that each irregularity evident in the White House document was present by accident were as great as 1 in 2, the probability that the document might naturally exhibit all 13 irregularities at once and is accordingly genuine would still be as small as 1 in 213, or less than 1 in 8000. This demonstrates a relevant general result in probability theory: if many independent irregularities even with substantial individual probabilities come to light during forensic examination of a suspect document, the probability that the document is genuine must be small.

50. Likewise, even where there are as few as two defects in a forged document, each with a low probability of innocent occurrence, the probability that the document is genuine must be small. For instance, given that the isolation not only of the electronic data representing the registrar’s signature stamp but also of the data representing his date-stamp on distinct data layers are occurrences that forensic specialists in the examination of electronic documents consider could not possibly have occurred naturally, if the probability of each irregularity is taken as being small (say, 1 in 100 for each of the two irregularities, though the probabilities are likely to be much less than this), the probability that the two defects both occurred by inadvertence and that thus the document is genuine is 1 in 10,000.

51. It follows that if – as here – there are multiple irregularities in a document, most of which possess low probabilities of innocent occurrence, the probability that the document is genuine must be vanishingly small. In my experience, I have never found a document which, when this probabilistic technique is applied, is determined to be so very nearly certain to be a forgery as the White House document.

52. One might also legitimately assign probabilities no greater than 1 in 100 to each of three irregularities in other identification documents pertaining to Mr Obama. First, there are numerous irregularities in the short-form abstract of his birth record published in the run-up to his 2008 candidacy, including an inconsistency between the text of the abstract and the form of words in use at the time when it was, on its face, issued. Secondly, the selective-service record signed by him carries a two-digit year stamp contrary to written rules issued by the Department of Defense specifying a four-digit stamp, which, as far as the investigators could discover, was invariably used on all other selective-service registration records at that time. [ED.: U.S. Postal Service regulations also required USPS date stamps to represent the year with four digits.] Thirdly, his social security number carries a three-digit Connecticut prefix even though he had never lived there[,] and all adjacent social security numbers with the same three-digit prefix that the investigators could trace were issued to residents of Connecticut. Taking these three additional irregularities together with the 13 irregularities in the White House document, the probability that Mr Obama’s identity documentation is true falls from 1 in 75 quadrillion to 1 in 75 sextillion.

53. Even if each of the 16 irregularities were assigned a probability no less than 1 in 2, implying that each irregularity is at least as likely as not to occur in a genuine document, the probability that the documentation is genuine would be 1 in 2^16, or below 1 in 65,000. Further, in this analysis I have cautiously left out of account several irregularities – such as the indication that Mr Obama’s social security number fails the official online “e-verify” check – each of which ought to be assigned probabilities no greater than 1 in 2, reducing the probability of genuineness still further. Whichever way the analysis is done, that probability cannot be other than vanishingly small.

54. In this analysis I have relied upon the published results of the Cold Case Posse’s investigation. To the extent that the investigators’ results are reliable and robust, and to the extent that the probabilities I have assigned to each individual irregularity that the investigators have identified are considered reasonable, my conclusion that the probability that the White House document is genuine is vanishingly different from zero necessarily follows. Even if the probabilities I have chosen were to be considered excessively low, the fact that there are so many independent irregularities, even if absurdly high probabilities such as 1 in 2 were assigned to each irregularity, would be sufficient to demonstrate beyond reasonable doubt that the White House document is a forgery.

55. The images marked “M of B 1”, “M of B 2”, and M of B 3”, annexed and signed as exhibits relative hereto, are the images referred to herein.

Executed this Seventh day of November, 2012, in London, England

_________________________________ Viscount Monckton of Brenchley

Sworn to and subscribed before me this Seventh day of November, 2012

************______________________________________ ___________ Solicitor

M of B 1

Click to enlarge

Click to enlarge

Upper panel: A regularly line-spaced and letter-spaced specimen typewritten form created by forensic specialists.
Lower panel: Irregularities of both line spacing and character spacing are evident on the White House document. Horizontal red rules indicate double-spaced lines aligned to the first and last typed lines on each form. The vertical blue rules [or lines] occur every five character spaces, aligned to the “K” of “Kapiolani” & “pi” of “Hospital” using an accurate architectural-geometry program. In the lower panel, lines containing the word “Honolulu” are visibly misaligned: the red rules [or lines] strike through the text rather than underlining it. Character spacing to the right of the form, where blue rules [or lines] pass through the centers of characters rather than between them, is also misaligned with that to the left.

M of B 2

Click to enlarge

This is the illustration of the unnatural white halo effect around the black portions of the image on the White House website. The top left image is enlarged from the White House document. In the top right image, the halo has been removed to show how a genuine document should have appeared. The lower images have been artificially darkened to show the halo still more clearly. The presence of the halo effect is an indication that the document may be forged.

M of B 3

Click to enlarge

This is an image, with blue-tinted and red-tinted chromatic aberration, of part of the stamped signature of Dr. Alvin Onaka that appears on the copy of the White House document that was given to members of the Press Corps April 27, 2011. Chromatic aberration should also appear, but does not appear, on the electronic version posted at the White House website. Its absence is a compelling indication that the White House document [was not photocpied but rather] may be forged.

Notice that in this affidavit, Lord Monckton even includes some very important questions as to why are some places “changed”? Maybe this is why Barack Obama sealed all his records back on January 21, 2009, the very First Executive Order he wrote. [ED.: Executive Order 13489 of January 21, 2009, concerns Presidential, not personal, documents and records. It does not shield or conceal Mr. Obama's birth documents, college applications, Selective Service registration, Social Security documentation, or any other records that existed before his inauguration on Jan. 20, 2009.] Now, this EO is not exclusive to Barack Obama[,] since many former Presidents have also issued similar executive order[s], though we should question why, especially in light of the fact that he claimed he would be the most transparent President in history. However, as it relates to Lord Monckton’s testimony, Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse investigation and other relevant testimony as to the validity of the document, the executive order should be concerning to all Americans.

Why did Obama make this EO, (Executive Order)? Did he do this to “cover up” his background? Did Obama do this just to hide his association with Frank Marshal Davis, the man who was on the FBI watch
[list] due to his very close association and membership in the Communist Party? Did Obama do this to hide his college records that may well have shown him to be a “Foreign Student,” thus proving he is not eligible to hold the office of President of the United States? Or did he do this to hide his real Birth Certificate that has been manipulated to show he was born in Hawaii? Or did he execute this order to cover up more than this? Yet again[,] questions few true reporters ask[,] much less answer. Yet we know that Obama did go to Occidental College and that he did in fact get “tutoring” from Frank Marshal Davis for 8 years[,] and one must ask if maybe he was taught all about the Communist[s] during those 8 years[,] and that is why Obama went to the Marxist meetings held under a huge picture of Karl Marx and held an idea that to have the people of the United States accept Socialism or Marxism, he would have to have the United States either fail or the people revolt.

It seems that not only did Lord Monckton sign an affidavit, along with Sheriff Arpaio, but also a Professor of Mathematics from Louisiana State [University] in Baton Rouge, named, Charles Neal Delzell. These men signed an affidavit that testifies to what they think about this birth certificate and what Lord Monckton has shown using his in depth knowledge of mathematics to state the information given to him by Sheriff Arpaio’s investigators and Mr. Delzell as he stated under [¶]9 of his affidavit.

Here a mathematics professor lays down an affidavit stating that based just upon the information shown to him, Obama is not a true natural born citizen according to this “forged” Birth Certificate. This does bring into question a lot of items that Obama has done since being elected as President. If by chance Obama is not qualified for the position of President, according to the Constitution, it would be fair to say that Obama has presented a huge falsehood to the people of the United States and should be removed from office.

We have a lot more information to bring forward from Lord Monckton, but [we] will have to lay out what Lord Monckton has published in his book, “Is The President The President?”. In the next article, we will explore this book and lay the theory out about the Birth Certificate of Barack Hussein Obama to allow you to determine its validity.

Read more: Lord Monckton: Obama Is An Illegal President
______________________________________________

* ED.: The original pre-printed form has a wire frame in a uniform shade of black, with lines that are evenly thin and crisp, without splotches or overspray, even at 8X magnification. Patches copied-and-pasted onto the form have lines that are thick and blurry by comparison, in varying shades of black, with irregular splotches and breaks in the lines which are apparent even at only 2X magnification.

"Line is rough" indicates that the fabricator copied-and-pasted an alteration on top of the normally smooth line of the wire frame on the pre-printed government form, leaving a pasted patch with a line that is noticeably less smooth and regular than the original pre-printed line. The following is a list of just the misalignments, breaks, and apparent alterations of the wire frame on the counterfeit Hawaii Certificate of Live Birth posted on the whitehouse.gov website. (Some of the ragged lines are the result of the very slight rotation of the form in the image, such that a straight line is one pixel lower at the right margin than near the left margin.)

Coordinates - location on the wire frame

360,132 - above "4. If Twin or Triplet,"
487,132 to 548,132 - above "5a. Birth Date"
549,174 - below "5a. Birth Date"
724,175 to 748,175 - line below "`1961" is rough
798,175 to 911,176 - line below "7:24 P.M." is rough
83,192 - above "2. Sex"
473,217 - horizontal line above "street address)" is rough
582,217 - one pixel misalignment above "6d. Is Place of Birth"
812,218 to 847,219 - line above "Town Limits" is rough
100,258 to 899.260 - almost the entire horizontal line above "7a", "7b", and "7c" is rough
95,301 to 245,301 - line is intermittent above "7d. Street Address"
245,301 to 449,301 - line above "Kalanianaole Highway" is faint
551,301 to 566,301 - horizontal line above "7e." is rough
766,302 to 899,302 - horizontal line above "Town Limits" is rough
568,344 to 582,345 - line is rough before a one pixel misalignment
641,344 to 684,344 - line is rough below the "No" checkbox
803,344 to 824,344 - line is rough above "Farm"
427,428 to 467,428 - line is intermittent above "12a. Usual Occupation"
859,429 to 888,429 - line above "Industry" is rough
463,470 to 524,470 - line below "Student" is rough
600,470 to 636,470 - line above and at the end of box "13. Full Maiden Name of Mother" is rough
370,512 to 427,512 - line above "Country) 17a." is rough
152,531 and 152,546 - vertical line before "16. Birthplace"
213,553 to 239,553 - line above "18a. Signature" is rough
439.553 to 448.553 - line above "Informant" is rough
516,553 to 592,553 - line above "Dunham" is rough
345,596 to 425,596 - line below "Dunham" is rough
773,596 to 861,596 - line below "8-7-61" is rough
762,609 to 762,644 - vertical line beside "M.D." checkbox is jagged
215,624 to 215,676 - vertical line before "19a. Signature" and "21, Signature" is faint and intermittent
703,693 - vertical line has a 1 pixel misalignment
214,698 - vertical line extends past horizontal line above "23. Evidence for Delayed Filing or Alteration"

This list of wire frame breaks and misalignments on the counterfeit Certificate does not begin to list all the errors, such as, for example, in the pre-printed text of Box 1a, the forger(s) misspelled "Child's" as "ChLid's".

No biggie... it's just not misspelled on the genuine government forms, which are pre-printed on paper.

**MinutemanCDC_SC** · 01-05-2013, 02:37 AM

Congress certifies Obama Electoral College win

By Sean Lengell - The Washington Times
January 4, 2013, 02:36PM
Follow @SeanLengell

Video:

Raw: Electoral College Count Affirms Obama's Win

Vice President Joseph R. Biden watches at left as Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., center, shakes hands with House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio, right, in the House Chamber during the counting of Electoral College votes on Capitol Hill in Washington, Friday, Jan. 4, 2013. Biden presided over a Joint Session of Congress Friday as four members of the House and Senate took turns announcing the votes that had been tallied in state capitals last month affirming the re-election of Barack Obama as President of the United States. (AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

Video:

Raw: Electoral College Count Affirms Obama's Win

It's official: President Obama won re-election.

While the TV news networks called the presidential race in his favor hours after the polls closed Nov. 6, Mr. Obama wasn't officially declared the winner until Friday afternoon, when a joint session of Congress convened to count and certify the electoral votes.

Law requires the House and Senate meet to do this on Jan. 6 following an election. But since that date falls on a Sunday this year, Congress passed a law allowing it to happen two days earlier.

Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr., in his constitutional role as Senate president, presided over the vote count in the House chamber, which took about 24 minutes.

Mr. Obama received 332 electoral votes, easily exceeding the 270 needed to win. Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney nabbed 206 votes. Those numbers haven't changed since the president narrowly was declared the winner in Florida four days after the election.

While Friday's results were undisputed . . .

(Continued at Congress certifies Obama Electoral College win - Washington Times )

One man's Terrorist-in-Chief is another man's undocumented President.

**MinutemanCDC_SC** · 01-09-2013, 05:29 PM

U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts schedules Noonan et al v. Bowen, regarding Obama’s forged IDs, to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court on Feb. 15, 2013.

[ED.: Note that Justice Roberts' announcement follows close on the heels of the failure on Jan. 4th by the U.S. Congress to voice any objection to confirming a Constitutionally ineligible candidate for the Office of President.]

Posted on | January 9, 2013 |

Noonan referred for full conference by the Supreme Court

Press release!

Law offices of Orly Taitz

Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States John Roberts scheduled a case by attorney Orly Taitz dealing with Barack Hussein Obama’s use of forged IDs to be heard in conference before the full Supreme Court. The case, titled Noonan, Judd, MacLeran, Taitz v Bowen, provides a mountain of evidence of Barack Obama using a last name not legally his, forged Selective Service application, forged long form and short form birth certificate and a Connecticut Social Security number 042-nn-nnnn, which was never assigned to him according to E-Verify and SSNVS. Additionally, this case provides evidence of around one and a half million invalid voter registrations in the state of California alone.

Please keep in mind [that] Richard Nixon was reelected and sworn in but later was forced to resign as a result of Watergate. Over 30 high ranking officials of the Nixon administration, including the Attorney General of the United States and the White House Counsel, were indicted, convicted, and went to prison. ObamaForgerygate is a hundred times bigger then Watergate. More corrupt high ranking officials, US Attorneys, AGs, and judges were complicit, committed high treason by allowing a citizen of Indonesia, and possibly still a citizen of Kenya, Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barack (Barry) Soebarkah, aka Barack (Barry) Soetoro, to usurp the U.S. Presidency by use of forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number.

The docket for Noonan (below) is posted at the U.S. Supreme Court website.

No. 12A606

Title:

Edward Noonan, et al., Applicants

v.

Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State

Docketed:

December 13, 2012

Lower Ct:

Supreme Court of California

Case Nos.:

(S20707

~~~Date~~~	~~~~~~~Proceedings and Orders~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dec 11 2012	Application (12A606) for a stay, submitted to Justice Kennedy.
Dec 13 2012	Application (12A606) denied by Justice Kennedy.
Dec 26 2012	Application (12A606) refiled and submitted to The Chief Justice.
Jan 9 2013	DISTRIBUTED for Conference of February 15, 2013.
Jan 9 2013	Application (12A606) referred to the Court.

~~Name~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~~~~~~Address~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~	~~Phone~~~
Attorneys for Petitioner:
Orly Taitz	29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy	(949) 683-5411
	Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Party name: Edward Noonan, et al.
Attorneys for Respondent:
Kamala Harris	Attorney General	(916) 445-9555
	P. O. Box 944255
	Sacramento, CA 94244-2550
Party name: Deborah Bowen, California Secretary of State

--

Dr Orly Taitz ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688

orlytaitzesq.com

Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

LinkBack

Thread Tools

Display

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

Number of American teens being arrested for HUMAN SMUGGLING on...

Twitter just suspended Ad account on X

Watch: Paul, Hawley Torch Mayorkas To His Face On Laken Riley's...

INVASION OF 37,000 CHINESE NATIONALS ARRESTED AT US-MEXICO...

Oklahoma House passes bill making illegal immigration a state...

Mike Johnson betrays border security for more foreign aid

Mayorkas Refuses To Answer Whether He Lied Under Oath About...

Homeland Security Paroled Laken Riley Murder Suspect Into...

Illegal Alien Arrested in Crash That Killed Staffer of Democrat...

New poll shows rising Latino support for border wall, mass...