Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

MEDIA

YAHOO! NEWS SAYS OBAMA WAS BORN IN…KENYA!

Jun. 22, 2013 12:34pm Madeleine Morgenstern

Yahoo! News had to issue a correction Friday after publishing an article about President Barack Obama that called Kenya “the country of his birth.”

The article, about Obama’s upcoming trip to Africa, stated:

President Barack Obama makes the first extended trip to Africa of his presidency next week — but he won’t be stopping at the country of his birth.

Image source: Huffington Post

The story was revised to say Obama “won’t be stopping in his ancestral homeland” and a correction was posted stating, “An earlier version of this story incorrectly identified the president’s birthplace.”

Image source: Yahoo! News

The so-called “birther” movement has repeatedly cast doubt on whether the president was born in the United States, despite confirmation from officials and the release of Obama’s birth certificate stating he was born in Hawaii.

–

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013...born-in-kenya/

Originally Posted by AirborneSapper7

EXPOSED!! OBAMA’S MOMMA ALSO HAS A FAKE SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER; THEY ARE ALL FRAUDS !!! WE ARE BEING SNOOKERED.... WHO IS BEHIND THIS MASSIVE FRAUD?

. . . What is more disturbing though is THIS FAKE WAS POSSIBLY PLACED INTO HER RECORD IN THE SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATIONS FILES. WHO DID THIS ?

For additional details concerning the letter and graph Orly Taitz received from the Social Security Administration under the FOIA read here.

Bridgette's article at "We the People of the United States" dated July 6, 2011, with comments, is a most definitive discussion of the Stanley Ann Dunham fraudulent SSN, which her mother may have taken from a deceased person's documents at the Honolulu Co. Judge of Probate Office, where she worked as a volunteer.

Or maybe that entry was inserted into the Social Security Administration database more recently.

If [Mr.] Obama keeps giving our enemies arms, logistics, and money...

That seems to be the crux of the matter.

Treason is giving aid and comfort to the enemy, but does arming the enemy of our ally (Israel) constitute treason, if that enemy of our ally has not officially declared war on the U.S.? Iran declared war on the U.S. in 1979 and continues to be at war with the U.S. to this day. Syria, whether under Assad or the M.B. rebels, is an enemy of Israel and an ally of Iran, but Syria has not officially declared war upon the U.S. as has Iran.

Syria is a destination on the State Dept. official weapons embargo list, which denies export (or import) of arms, munitions, defense articles, and defense services. The embargo specifies the sovereignty, "Syria", not the Assad government. This was meant to limit the firepower of the Assad regime, but the Syrian rebels of the Mus|im Brotherhood may be even more dangerous than Assad, both to Israel and the U.S..

Obviously Mr. Obama interprets the embargo differently, but I would argue that any U.S. weapons exported to Syria, even to rebels fighting Assad, would almost certainly fall into the hands of violent enemies of the U.S. who are equally as dedicated to the destruction of "the Great Satan" as they are to the destruction of "the Little Satan."

[ED.: Mr. Obama's attorneys reached a new low in displaying contempt of court, although their no-show before U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth is the same stunt they pulled before Deputy Chief Judge Michael Malihi in the Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings a year and a half ago. The big difference is that Judge Malihi covered for their snubbing the court and Judge Lamberth did not.]

Originally Posted by Atty. Orly Taitz

After the government failed to file a response in Obama stolen SSN case, the government is asking the judge [in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia] to allow them to file a late response. The Department of Justice is asking Judge [Royce] Lamberth to allow them to file a late answer after the notice of failure to respond was docketed because they were confused and did not understand that they need[ed] to answer the motion.

I kid you not, read the pleading. This is just unbelievable. Do you think they can be that stupid, or are they suddenly [getting] worried that Judge Lamberth might rule to release [Harrison J.] Bounel’s SS5, SSN application, and the whole world will see that Obama is using a stolen Social Security number[?]

Activity in Case 1:11-cv-00402-RCL TAITZ v. ASTRUE Motion for Leave to File [Requires Pacer access and 10¢ per page]

I am posting both a request to file a late opposition and the opposition they want to file. I did not do research on it yet, as it was just posted, but after 3 seconds of looking at it, I already know that this is a total %$ and a sign of dishonesty [or bad faith] by the defendant and the Department of Justice.

a. They are late with filing an opposition, and they claim that my motions are late. If the judge were to rule based on lateness, then he should not consider their late opposition claiming that I am late.

b. It was filed under 2 rules: 60(b)(2) and 60(b)(6). Motion under 60(b)(6) can be filed any time as long as it serves justice, 2 years from the ruling [or] 100 years after the ruling, so the whole argument is %$. Moreover, the final decision came from the Court of Appeal in August of 2012, less than 1 year [ago], so it is good under both 60(b)(2) and 60 (b)(6).

c. The feds had a duty to advise the court that the new 120 year rule [allowing release of Social Security records after 120 years] was instituted and that [Harrison J.] Bounel falls under this rule. They flagrantly and maliciously defrauded the court by hiding this rule, hiding Bounel’s identity and his DOB in 1890, and lying to Judge Lamberth that the SS-5 [Social Security registration] cannot be released under the privacy rules. They now want to be rewarded for lying [and] for fraud on the court. Not only they should not be rewarded, they should be severely sanctioned.

Originally Posted by K,T,

While all these paper court battles are going on and being delayed, continued, and dismissed, Obama is arming all Federal Departments, and raising a huge army of millions, and getting ready to bring Russian Troops here… His Military Combat assets are in place to attack the American Citizens….

Sworn Military, Constitutional Sheriffs, sworn Police and Civil Servants, and all U.S. Militias must arrest Obama and All the Federal Corporation Department heads...

Originally Posted by I. BarKahn

[The following is] pure speculation:
If [U.S. District Judge] Lamberth, who has already shown his desire to protect Obama, has been intimidated by Obama agents – and/or he is congenitally corrupt, Lamberth will do or has done the following:
He will privately (secretly/ex parte) get in touch with AG Holder or his Deputy using a non-government third party. Lamberth will use this link to tell Holder that the Justice Department’s failure to timely file a Response to the Taitz Motion has put him (Lamberth) in a bad and dangerous position, because unless the AG files a response to Taitz’s Motion, he (Lamberth) will be forced to enter a default judgement against the Justice Dept., which would compel the [Social Security] Administration to provide Taitz with a copy of the Bounel SS Application and SS number – the number that Obama is illegally using. Lamberth will, or more likely, already has told Holder to ask the Court for permission to file a Response after the legal deadline, and that he (Lamberth) will grant the Justice Dept. permission. Moreover, Lamberth has already told Holder what the Response should be in order for Lamberth to find a way to rule against Taitz. We know that the Response will not claim Executive Privilege to refuse to give the Bounel SS Aplication to Taitz, because a claim of Executive Privilege would directly tie Obama to Bounel’s SS Application.

So Holder’s response will consist of whatever Lamberth thinks he needs to rule against Taitz. Lamberth, effectively, will write the Justice Department’s Response for them. No matter what Lamberth concocts, his ruling against Taitz will be outrageous. But Taitz’s Appeal to SCOTUS will be denied. Taitz is so close to completely unraveling Obama that Lamberth and the AG will do anything to stop her.

Originally Posted by Atty. Orly Taitz

I hope this is not the case. Plus Lamberth knows that [Rep. Darrell] Issa[, chairman of the House Oversight Committee,] and [Rep. Bob] Goodlatte[, chairman of the House Committee on the Judiciary,] are watching him like a hawk, particularly in light of [the] James Rosen debacle. I hope he does not do anything so stupid.

Don't leave America. Don't leave. Don't leave.

Rep. Marchant On Impeachment: Obama Investigations Underway In House, Senate & FBI

Investigator: Many Nationally Syndicated Radio Hosts Warned Not To Talk Obama Background



http://patriotaction.net/video/video...sg_share_video

Don't know how many have seen the meeting minutes of the Kenyan Parliament in Nov 2008 but it has some very hair raising comments that everyone should know about. It starts on page two, and has very telling comments by parliament members throughout.

Title of the minutes:


NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
OFFICIAL REPORT
Wednesday, 5th November, 2008
The House met at 9.00 a.m.
[Mr. Deputy Speaker in the Chair]
PRAYERS
NOTICE OF MOTION
ABILL TO AMEND THE NSSF ACT
TO PROTECT WORKERS' SAVINGS


3259


Dr. Khalwale: On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir. You have heard none other than the Leader of Government Business acknowledge that because of Obama's win in the United States of America(USA),the House is crippled. Could we allow him to move a Motion for Adjournment so that we could also continue the celebrations of having a Kenyan ruling the USA? I humbly request!

Well, it looks like the discussion at ALIPAC about Obama's citizenship has now been viewed almost a half a million times! wow.

W

Surprise! Obama's eligibility suddenly resurrected

After a yearlong virtual silence about the eligibility of Barack Obama to be president of the United States, the issue is suddenly breaking its way through the political mire and back into the light.

Look what the top investigator handling the probe is now doing with Congress ...

WND Exclusive

Eligibility resurrected: Congress pays attention

Investigator who has documented White House fraud says interest surging

Published: 3 hours ago
Bob Unruh

The dispute over Barack Obama’s eligibility was headline material in his first term, as lawsuits reached as high as the U.S. Supreme Court and the president released his purported “original” birth certificate from Hawaii in an attempt to silence the doubters.

But there’s been a lot of silence over the past year, with the exception of a couple of diehard, truth-seeking individuals and websites.

That might change soon, according to the lead investigator for Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case Posse in Arizona, which was assigned to do a thorough investigation of the document posted by the White House as Obama’s birth certification.

Lt. Mike Zullo told WND there is interest being expressed in Congress about the investigation’s conclusion that the White House document is fraudulent – an image created on a computer.

A contingent of citizens in Maricopa County had asked Arpaio to look into the issue because they were concerned an ineligible candidate would be on their 2012 presidential election ballot.

Zullo previously has contributed evidence to a court case – now pending before the state Supreme Court in Alabama – on the dispute. He has testified that the White House computer image of Obama’s birth certificate contains anomalies that are unexplainable unless the document had been fabricated piecemeal by human intervention, rather than being copied from a genuine paper document.

“Mr. Obama has in fact not offered any verifiable authoritative document of any legal significance or possessing any evidentiary value as to the origins of his purported birth narrative or location of the birth event,” he explained earlier.

“One of our most serious concerns is that the White House document appears to have been fabricated piecemeal on a computer, constructed by drawing together digitized data from several unknown sources.”

Zullo also has noted that the governor of Hawaii was unable to produce an original birth document for Obama, and it should have been easy to find.

See some of Zullo’s evidence:

1st Video at the Page Link: http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/eligibili...3yD5wuEZeGD.99

Most recently, Grace Vuoto of the World Tribune reported that among the experts challenging the birth certificate is certified document analyst Reed Hayes, who has served as an expert for Perkins Coie, the law firm that has been defending Obama in eligibility cases.

“We have obtained an affidavit from a certified document analyzer, Reed Hayes, that states the document is a 100 percent forgery, no doubt about it,” Zullo told the World Tribune.

“Mr. Obama’s operatives cannot discredit [Hayes],” the investigator told the news outlet. “Mr. Hayes has been used as the firm’s reliable expert. The very firm the president is using to defend him on the birth certificate case has used Mr. Hayes in their cases.”

The Tribune reported Hayes agreed to take a look at the documentation and called almost immediately.

“There is something wrong with this,” Hayes had said.

Hayes produced a 40-page report in which he says “based on my observations and findings, it is clear that the Certificate of Live Birth I examined is not a scan of an original paper birth certificate, but a digitally manufactured document created by utilizing material from various sources.”

“In over 20 years of examining documentation of various types, I have never seen a document that is so seriously questionable in so many respects. In my opinion, the birth certificate is entirely fabricated,” he says in the report.

At the heart of the dispute is the constitutional requirement that a president be a “natural born citizen,” which at the time the nation was founded was considered to be the offspring of two citizens of the country.

But Zullo notes that the re-creation of an official document or the creation of an image represented as an official document is a crime itself. And the facts surrounding Obama’s case suggests there’s either no original or something in the original is being concealed.

Zullo told WND that there have been inquiries about the evidence from members of Congress, and he’s met with a few to answer their questions. His hundreds of pages of reports also are being forwarded to those who ask.

Carl Gallups, a former deputy sheriff in Florida and now a pastor and talk-show host, told the Tribune, “It was Barack Obama who said for 16 years, along with his publisher that he was ‘Kenyan born.’”

He was referring to the literary agency Dystel & Goderich, which published a brochure that said Obama was “born in Kenya and raised in Indonesia.”

When Obama ran for president, it was changed to say he was born in Hawaii.

Zullo also recently made a public presentation at the annual convention of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association in St. Charles, Mo. He then held a closed-door session for police officers, elected officials and others.

2nd Video at the Page Link: http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/eligibili...3yD5wuEZeGD.99

He elicited audible gasps and shock when he showed evidence that Obama’s document is fraudulent.

He later told Gallups that Sheriff Arpaio wants the issue investigated in Congress.

The argument over Obama’s eligibility first was raised by Hillary Clinton’s campaign when she was ran for the Democratic nomination for president in 2008.

Zullo said Obama has raised further questions by refusing to release the marriage license of his father (Barack Sr.) and mother (Stanley Ann Dunham), name change records (Barry Soetero to Barack Hussein Obama), adoption records, records of his and his mother’s repatriation as U.S. citizens from Indonesia, baptism records, Noelani Elementary School (Hawaii) records, Punahou School financial aid or school records, Occidental College financial aid records, Harvard Law School records, Columbia senior thesis, Columbia College records, record with Illinois State Bar Association, files from his terms as an Illinois state senator, his law client list, medical records and passport records.

Christopher Monckton, who writes a column for WND, said Zullo’s sworn affidavit in the case provides much information, and a sworn mathematical analysis demonstrates the near-zero probability that the White House “birth certificate” is genuine.

Monckton also noted the recalcitrant attitude on the part of authorities in Hawaii to the official law enforcement questions about the document’s validity.

And he cited the fact that in 1961, state law permitted Hawaiian parents of children born anywhere in the world to register them as Hawaiian-born, a legalized backdoor to U.S. citizenship.

“Neil Abercrombie, Hawaii’s governor, said he was present at Obama’s birth. Then he changed his story,” Monckton wrote.

“The posse has reported to the sheriff that two crimes have been committed:

first, fraudulently creating a forgery that the White House had characterized, knowingly or unknowingly, as an officially produced governmental birth record;

and secondly, fraudulently presenting to the residents of Maricopa County and to the American public at large a forgery that the White House had represented as ‘proof positive’ of Obama’s authentic 1961 Hawaiian long-form birth certificate.”

Zullo repeatedly has explained that if the records are there, and they show what the White House says they show, what could possibly be a reason for keeping them concealed?

And if they do not show what has been alleged publicly, he asks, what do they show?

Join in support of the critical investigation.

http://www.wnd.com/2013/07/eligibili...ing-attention/