Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

On WRKO radio, veteran reporter Howie Carr states that, regardless of whatever you may think,
"That is an incontrovertible fact that he wrote down that he was born in Kenya."

Upon the occasion of W. Neil Eggleston's appointment as White House Counsel, Atty. Orly Taitz apprised him of the facts concerning the man he represents, leaving him no excuse for complicity in major fraud, forgery, and treason.

Originally Posted by Atty. Orly Taitz

Dr. Orly Taitz ESQ
President
Defend Our Freedoms Foundation
29839 Santa Margarita, ste 100
Rancho Santa Margarita, CA 92688
Ph. 949-683-5411 fax 949-766-7603
Orly.taitz@hushmail.com

W. Neil Eggleston
Kirkland and Ellis LLP
neil.eggleston@kirkland.com

04.24.2014

Notification

Dear Mr. Eggleston,

0n 03.22.2014 it was announced that you will be the fourth White House counsel serving in [the] Obama administration. This letter is to put you on notice in regards to the legal actions against Mr. Obama and evidence against Mr. Obama which might have been the reason for early resignations of three of your predecessors.

Please see an attached file that shows that on April 15 2010 Mr. Obama posted his tax returns on line on Whitehouse.gov. He made a mistake and did not “flatten” the PDF file, so the full, unredacted CT Social Security number [nnn-nn]-4425, that he is using, became widely available to the public . When the number was checked, it failed both E-verify and SSNVS. This number was later traced to one, Harry Bounel, born in 1890, presumed to be deceased. Similarly, attached 170 page file provides a sworn affidavit of the former Chief nvestigator of the Special Investigations unit of the US Coast Guard, Stephan Jeffrey Coffman, who attested to the fact that Obama’s selective service certificate is a fabricated document, which contains a fabricated 1980 cancellation US stamp. Attached file also provides multiple affidavits and official records showing that Obama’s alleged birth certificate is a crude forgery and the only official who allegedly confirmed this forgery, Director of Health of Hawaii Loretta Deliana Fuddy, recently died, the only fatality of the forced water landing of a small Cessna plane. Her death and the airplane crash that killed her are still being investigated by the NTSB.

As such you were put on notice that Mr. Obama is using a stolen Social Security number, fabricated IDs, last name not legally his and fraudulently asserting his US citizens[hip] and legitimacy for the US Presidency. Your work as a White House counsel for Mr. Obama, while knowing all of [these] facts, might be seen as an ethical violation as well as criminal complicity to major fraud, forgery and treason.

I believe that knowing all of the facts and evidence provided in the attached file should lead you to refuse to take the position of the White House Counsel for citizen of Indonesia Barry Soetoro aka Barry Soebarkah, aka Barack Obama.

Should you have any questions in relation to this file, you are welcome to contact me at 949-683-5411 or by e-mail at orly.taitz@hushmail.com

Sincerely,

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

Attached: 170 pp., court documents, personal affidavits, copies of documents, etc.
www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/Letter-to-Neil-Eggleston.pdf

CO Gubernatorial Candidate Tom Tancredo: Impeach Obama & Holder

Colorado gubernatorial candidate Tom Tancredo says that U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and President Obama should be impeached.
Tancredo said impeachment would avoid setting a precedent for the next “dictator in chief,” according to comments reported by Red Dirt Report, an Oklahoma news website.

The former congressman spoke at a rally in Oklahoma City Thursday protesting Holder’s planned appearance at a police cadet graduation ceremony. Holder abruptly canceled his appearance, “an outcome this right-wing crowd viewed as a victory,” the website reported.
In comments after his public speech, Tancredo said Obama should be impeached because he “trashes the Constitution,” according to Red Dirt Report.
“Nobody should be surprised we have someone who is destroying the Constitution, step-by-step, methodically, because he promised us he would do that when he ran,” Tancredo told the website. “Obama said that he would fundamentally transform America.”
“Well, how the hell do you do that?” he continued. “How he does it is that he destroys the Constitution, creates a socialist system and so we shouldn’t be surprised by him and we shouldn’t be surprised by Eric Holder, who refuses to uphold the law and trashes the Constitution.”
While Tancredo was in Oklahoma, three other contenders for the GOP nomination held a televised debate in Denver. Tancredo has sworn off primary debates, saying it hurts the eventual nominee to engage in attacks on other Republicans.
Tancredo was in Oklahoma for a fundraiser, campaign manager Brian Dotterer told us, not specifically to attend the Holder protest rally.
It’s not the first time Tancredo has called for the president’s impeachment. In February, he wrote an op-ed in the World Net Daily advocating impeachment and in 2010, he said Obama should be impeached because he is a “more serious threat than Al Qaeda,” which Fox News’s Megyn Kelly called “ridiculous.”

Republican Oklahoma state Rep. Mike Turner told the Washington Free Beacon that Holder’s appearance at a law enforcement ceremony was “inappropriate” because of Holder’s involvement in the Operation Fast and Furious scandal.
“A lot of people just felt that it was very inappropriate for this man, with his track record, to speak to law enforcement officers that demand and expect to be backed up by the government working on behalf of the citizens, not against the citizens,” Turner told the Beacon.
Tancredo said Congress should impeach Obama.
“[T]he problem is, if you don’t impeach him, if you don’t impeach both the president and the attorney general, what you have done is you have established precedence for the next ‘dictator-in-chief,’” he’s quoted as saying in the Red Dirt Report.
“Because how could you hold the next guy more accountable than the former, if no one had the guts to bring impeachment because he’s the first black president — which is certainly one reason why it has not happened — then you cannot be surprised if the next one and the next one and the next one just carries it one more step and we truly lose our freedom,” he continued. “It’s actually that serious.”
Source
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/co...a5WZ1Fo8toF.99

Is this Evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham is not Barack Obama's Real Mother?

Dean Garrison 28 mins ago

Most of us have heard the conspiracy theories about Barack Obama, Sr. not being our president's real father. We have heard names like Frank Marshall Davis, Malcolm X and Mohammed Subud.

It is difficult to ascertain which reports might be credible and which are fabrication. But one thing we do know for certain is that Barack Obama, to this day has not been able to produce a birth certificate. That statement will immediately draw the ire of some, but it is true. I didn't say that he has not provided a real birth certificate. He has not produced a birth certificate–period. A "certificate of live birth" is not the same as a birth certificate. An official birth certificate would include footprints, among other things.

A former Hawaii state official, Tim Adams, is on record in a sworn affidavit stating that no "long form" birth certificate exists.

Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division further told me on multiple occasions that Hawaii State government officials had made inquiries about Sen. Obama's birth records to officials at Queens Medical Center and Kapi'olani Medical Center in Honolulu and that neither hospital had any record of Senator Obama having been bom there, even though Governor Abercrombie is now asserting and various Hawaii government officials continue to assert Barack Obama, Jr. was born at Kapi'olani Medical Center on Aug. 4, 1961.

This alleged cover up was again in the limelight a short time ago when a small passenger plane crash took the life of Loretta Fuddy. Since that time, we have found that Fuddy was also involved in the Subud Cult that Ann Dunham was involved with. When you combine that with the fact that it was Fuddy who finally delivered the "Certificate of Live Birth" to The White House, the theories are readily abundant.

In the end, many of us don't know what to think but we are fairly certain that we have not been told the truth.

Michael Shrimpton was recently a guest on Mark Gillar's Tea Party Power Hour, and just added to the birther buzz when he revealed that Ann Dunham is not Barack Obama's biological mother. I will post the audio below, but I can sum up the entire premise of the argument in a couple of sentences.

Shrimpton says that the CIA is in possession of a photograph that proves that Dunham could not be Obama's birth mother. Why? Because the photo was taken of her at the beach just one month before Barack Obama's birth and she was not pregnant at the time. The audio below touches upon other issues as well, like the Barack Obama book biography that mentioned his Kenyan birth:

Team Arpaio: Sources Inside Kapiolani Hospital Dispute Claim 1961 Hospital Records Don't Exist

This is not the first accusation of Stanley Ann Dunham being a fake. In June of 2013 John Gaultier posted a photo that could prove that her social security number is fraudulent. Basically, the application was submitted in 1959 on a form that was revised in 1965.


You can read that entire report here.

Keep this in mind… The internet is full of photoshopped graphics that are truth one day and fraud the next. The world is full of people who create stories in their heads and share them far and wide. We have lots of those types in Washington D.C., but a lot of these conspiracy theories end up being the same. People will gladly create a lie to gain their 15 minutes of fame. I have learned (the hard way) that you cannot put too much faith into any of these accounts or graphics. Sometimes we want them to be true, whether we acknowledge it or not, and we sell out to even more lies. In order to keep an open mind, it must be accessible by both sides of any story.

I try not to get too wrapped up in the Obama birth conspiracy because I, like many Americans, feel like my best chance at the truth is waiting for Sheriff Joe and the Cold Case Posse to release their findings. They are the professionals.

For those of you who are unaware, there was supposed to be an announcement last month and more time is needed. No one knows why, but we have been told that more information has been uncovered. Word has it that the birth certificate information is ready to go but that more "criminal" information has been uncovered. It's a bit hyped up in the accounts I have heard and read. It is supposed to be "earth shattering" or something. I can't remember what term they used.

In the end, it is very possible that it won't matter what they have found because it likely won't lead anywhere. They could find that Barack Obama was a KGB plant, armed with absolute proof, and most of America either would not care or not believe it.

Face it. We are a brainwashed nation.

We will believe what we are told to believe by the establishment media.

With that said, I find these twists and turns fascinating and I want the truth.

I have to wonder if this is part of what the Cold Case Posse is going to reveal to us, hopefully, in the near future.

Is Stanley Ann Dunham the biological mother of Barack Obama?

I don't know. Michael Shrimpton says she's not.
Source

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/04/ev...tQrXyHobiwG.99

LMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!READ THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Benghazi Emails Show White House Effort to Protect Obama

Staff attempted to insulate president’s policies from criticism ahead of election

BY: Adam Kredo

April 29, 2014 1:10 pm







Previously unreleased internal Obama administration emails show that a coordinated effort was made in the days following the Benghazi terror attacks to portray the incident as “rooted in [an] Internet video, and not [in] a broader failure or policy.”

Emails sent by senior White House adviser Ben Rhodes to other top administration officials reveal an effort to insulate President Barack Obama from the attacks that killed four Americans.

Rhodes sent this email to top White House officials such as David Plouffe and Jay Carney just a day before National Security Adviser Susan Rice made her infamous Sunday news show appearances to discuss the attack.

The “goal,” according to these emails, was “to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure or policy.”

Rice came under fierce criticism following her appearances on television after she adhered to these talking points and blamed the attack on a little-watched Internet video.

The newly released internal White House e-mails show that Rice’s orders came from top Obama administration communications officials.
“[W]e’ve made our views on this video crystal clear. The United States government had nothing to do with it,” Rhodes wrote in the email, which was released on Tuesday by the advocacy group Judicial Watch.

“We reject its message and its contents,” he wrote. “We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence. And we are working to make sure that people around the globe hear that message.”
Rhodes also suggested that Rice tout Obama’s reputation as “steady and statesmanlike.”

“I think that people have come to trust that President Obama provides leadership that is steady and statesmanlike,” he wrote. “There are always going to be challenges that emerge around the world, and time and again, he has shown that we can meet them.”

Also contained in the 41 pages of documents obtained by Judicial Watch is a Sep. 12, 2012 email from Payton Knopf, the former deputy spokesman at the U.S. Mission to the United Nations.

In this communication, Knopf informs Rice that senior officials had already dubbed the Benghazi attack as “complex” and planned in advance. Despite this information, Rice still insisted that attacks were “spontaneous.”

The newly released cache of emails also appear to confirm that the CIA altered its original talking points on the attacks in the following days.
Then-CIA Deputy Director Mike Morell is identified as the person who heavily edited the critical fact sheet.

“The first draft apparently seemed unsuitable … because they seemed to encourage the reader to infer incorrectly that the CIA had warned about a specific attack on our embassy,” states one email. “Morell noted that these points were not good and he had taken a heavy hand to editing them. He noted that he would be happy to work with [then deputy chief of staff to Hillary Clinton] Jake Sullivan and Rhodes to develop appropriate talking points.”

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said that the emails show the White House was most concerned with insulating Obama.

“Now we know the Obama White House’s chief concern about the Benghazi attack was making sure that President Obama looked good,” Fitton said in a statement. “And these documents undermine the Obama administration’s narrative that it thought the Benghazi attack had something to do with protests or an Internet video.”

“Given the explosive material in these documents, it is no surprise that we had to go to federal court to pry them loose from the Obama State Department,” Fitton said.

http://freebeacon.com/national-secur...protect-obama/

Benghazi emails suggest White House aide involved in prepping Rice for ‘video’ explanation



By Catherine Herridge

Published April 29, 2014



By Catherine Herridge
Published April 29, 2014FoxNews.com







Newly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances -- where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video.
More than 100 pages of documents were released to the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Among them was a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications.
The Rhodes email, with the subject line: "RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET," was sent to a dozen members of the administration's inner circle, including key members of the White House communications team such as Press Secretary Jay Carney.
In the email, Rhodes specifically draws attention to the anti-Islam Internet video, without distinguishing whether the Benghazi attack was different from protests elsewhere.
The email lists the following two goals, among others:
"To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy."
"To reinforce the President and Administration's strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges."
The email goes on to state that the U.S. government rejected the message of the Internet video. "We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence," the email stated.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the documents read like a PR strategy, not an effort to provide the best available intelligence to the American people.
"The goal of the White House was to do one thing primarily, which was to make the president look good. Blame it on the video and not [the] president's policies," he said.
The Rhodes email was not part of the 100 pages of emails released by the administration last May -- after Republicans refused to move forward with the confirmation of John Brennan as CIA director until the so-called "talking points" emails were made public.
The email is also significant because in congressional testimony in early April, former deputy CIA director Michael Morell told lawmakers it was Rice, in her Sunday show appearances, who linked the video to the Benghazi attack. Morell said the video was not part of the CIA analysis.
"My reaction was two-fold," Morell told members of the House Intelligence Committee, regarding her appearances. "One was that what she said about the attacks evolving spontaneously from a protest was exactly what the talking points said, and it was exactly what the intelligence community analysts believed. When she talked about the video, my reaction was, that's not something that the analysts have attributed this attack to."
Incidentally, three leading Republicans on Monday night sent letters to the House and Senate foreign affairs committees asking them to compel the administration to explain who briefed Rice in advance of the Sunday talk shows and whether State Department or White House personnel were involved.
"How could former Ambassador to the United Nations Susan Rice, during the five Sunday talk shows on September 16, 2012, claim that the attacks on our compounds were caused by a hateful video when Mr. Morell testified that the CIA never mentioned the video as a causal factor," said the letter, from Sens. Lindsey Graham, of South Carolina; Kelly Ayotte, of New Hampshire; and John McCain, of Arizona.
The Sept. 14 Rhodes email does not indicate whether there was a "prep call" for Rice, as it suggests. If the call went ahead, it does not indicate who briefed her. Fox News has asked the White House if Rhodes prepped Rice for the Sunday shows, and, if he didn't, who did -- as well as what intelligence Rhodes relied upon.

The newly released emails also show that on Sept. 27, 2012 a Fox News report -- titled "US officials knew Libya attack was terrorism within 24 hours, sources confirm" -- was circulated at the most senior levels of the administration. This included going to then-deputy national security adviser Denis McDonough; then-White House counterterrorism adviser John Brennan; Morell; and Rhodes, among others, but the comments were redacted, citing "personal privacy information."
Catherine Herridge is an award-winning Chief Intelligence correspondent for FOX News Channel (FNC) based in Washington, D.C. She covers intelligence, the Justice Department and the Department of Homeland Security. Herridge joined FNC in 1996 as a London-based correspondent.

video at link below

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2014/04/29/benghazi-emails-suggest-white-house-aide-involved-in-prepping-rice-for-video/

April 29, 2014

The 'Don't Worry, Be Happy' President

By Ed Lasky
Presidents have been known for slogans that came to symbolize their agendas. There were the New Deal, Great Society, and New Frontier presidents. There was the president who spoke softly but carried a big stick.
Then there is the president who should be known from now on as the “Don’t Worry, Be Happy” president: Barack Obama.
Very few of our presidents have ever been truly prepared to handle the rigors of the presidency, but most of them have risen to the challenge. The time period for Obama to do so expired long ago. His leadership has been consistently and willfully obtuse and oblivious to the duties and responsibilities of the presidency.
He has routinely dismissed massive problems and threats to Americans as being trivial -- beneath his God-like goal to halt the rise of the oceans. Instead, he has portrayed his stewardship as being exemplary -- one of the top four presidencies in history -- and conveyed in various ways we should not worry and be happy, if not be thankful to have him.
If ignorance is bliss, Barack Obama is one of the most blissful leaders in our nation’s history.

When David Letterman once asked Obama about the rapidly growing national debt Obama didn’t have the faintest clue regarding its size (Romney would have known to the penny). His budgets are not only repeatedly late but larded with even more spending, heedless of dire debt warnings from the Congressional Budget Office.
In the throes of the recession with many millions unemployed and businesses failing across America, he said private businesses were doing just fine (the only problem were there were too few government workers). But weren’t the trillion dollar stimulus boondoggle and those multitude of green schemes peddled by Democratic cronies supposed to create millions of jobs and lower the unemployment rate? One more promise down the drain, but it sure was grist for laughter when Obama later joked that it turns out there were no such things as “shovel-ready jobs.” Real people with real jobs will be paying for this disaster for decades.
Don’t worry, be Happy.
But will future taxpayers be so happy?
How did Obama address the IRS scandal? At first, outrage suitable to the public mood. But as the stonewalling continued and the media served its block and tackle role for him, he dismissed its importance and declared there was not even a “smidgen of corruption” involved in that scandal -- even before the investigation was complete /.
Move on, the debate is over, be happy.
His signature achievement, ObamaCare (how Democrats refer to the Affordable Care Act depends on the audience), was “working the way it should,” Obama boasted and claims that it is hurting people have been “completely debunked.”
President Obama certainly seemed in fine fettle when he declared the debate is over when final (and very suspect) initial enrollment numbers were released. Those people who have lost their insurance, doctors, preferred hospitals, cheaper premiums, and jobs might beg to differ (even though they are all liars, according to Senate Majority Leader (dirty) Harry Reid).
But Obama seems not to be worry and is happy since the program in his mind is working as it should, leading America towards nationalized health care.
Obama confidently and blithely declared America can absorb another terror attack (tell that to the victims and their families). This perspective is part and parcel of downplaying all violence committed by Islamic extremists -- hence the Fort Hood Massacre was an act of “workplace violence” despite the perpetrator screaming “Allahu Akbar” as he murdered Americans serving their country. Lest we forget at a press conference shortly thereafter Obama issued cheerful shout-outs to friendly journalists before deigning to mention the Texas tragedy. Benghazi was blamed on a video critical of Islam not on the terrorists themselves. While the attack was occurring, Obama took a break from the rigors of responsibility to rest up for his mega-donor fundraiser in Las Vegas the next day.
Obama has touted Al Qaeda’s demise at least 32 times and it is not on the path to defeat (it controls more territory than ever before). Yes, Osama Bin Laden is dead -- and Obama played cards with his body man, Reggie Love (how does one get a body man?) while our soldiers were risking their lives to bring him down.
Why worry? Be happy.
Iran is dismissed as a tiny country that poses no threat to America -- did our geographically challenged president (57 states, Hawaii is not in Asia, they don’t speak “Austrian” in Austria) ever look at a map? Did the self-declared student of history not comprehend all the Americans killed by Iran and its proxies (Beirut barracks bombing, Khobar Towers, Iraq)? He also said that Iran was not seeking to carry out terror attacks in America -- despite the plot to kill the Saudi and Israeli Ambassadors in Washington, D.C. that was widely covered in the news and had been uncovered just a few weeks before . True, he routinely skips daily economic, national security, and Cabinet meetings but even his close friend Eric Holder knew this was an Iranian assassination plot.
Obama’s television addiction has been widely commented upon but his fare runs to fluff such as Mad Men, SportsCenter, Real Housewives, Jersey Shore, tons of HBO, and not, say, the actual news (to the extent he takes his news, it is “fake news” with a liberal slant via The Daily Show, where, White House spokesman Jay Carney recently informed us, he had his toughest interview.) He is glued to the Boob Tube -- video Chooming. Wallowing in popular culture certainly beats dealing with crises and being entertained pleases Obama -- he even feels entitled for advance copies of hit shows.
His insular presidency (he doesn’t like people) is shielded from bad news by ego-protector Valerie Jarrett who buffers him from “critics and complainers who might deflate his ego” with bad news or reports of problems that might actually require him to work -- he has a problem with his work ethic, after all. It is far better for his mood to surround himself with a Team of Idolizers, as even the New York Times liberal columnist Roger Cohen notes has been done .
Don’t worry, be happy.
Russian invades Crimea (violating a twenty-year treaty) -- or as the White House politely describes it “uncontested arrival” (Roget’s Thesaurus must be the most useful book for the administration, so addicted to euphemisms -- too bad George Orwell missed this opportunity).
What does Barack Obama do in response? Emits some pabulum fed to him by his handlers and then moves on to a Democratic Party fundraiser where he declares before a cheering crowd, “Well, it’s Friday, it’s after 5:00. So this is officially happy hour with the Democratic Party” .
After all, Obama told a crowd, ”We never need an excuse for a good party” and and they certainly throw a lot of them-especially private musical concerts in the East Room. Imagine the blowout party when Iran detonates its first nuclear weapon.
Don’t worry, be happy!
Who is worrying? Ukrainians and people throughout Europe and the world who fear the run of the dictators has a long way to go. Who is happy? Vladimir Putin, Barack Obama, and that party of cheering democrats.
Well, why should Obama worry? After all, Obama tells us that Russia is a “regional power” and its successful invasion of the Ukraine was “acting out of weakness,” and Ukraine is “not some Cold War chessboard” because the Cold War has been over for decades. When fighting erupted in the Ukraine, Obama immediately called the…coaches of the University of Connecticut basketball team to congratulate them on their championship.
Obama is still sticking with his wrong claim that Russia is not our number one geopolitical foe because to admit otherwise would be to confess that Obama was wrong and Romney was right, Barack Obama does not accept responsibility for mistakes so he routinely dismisses or downplays them. He ignores reality and lives in a personal, palatial Wonderland. He is happier there.
Not sure Vlad the Impaler or his victims would view it in the same way. By dismissing the threat, he absolves himself of responsibility. Even when he was compelled to draft some sanctions on Russia they were all but toothless and he went about the rest of his day being…happy.
Meanwhile, Russia violated the nuclear arms control treaty America had with it and the White House smothered the news and remained silent (if a tree falls in the forest…), while accelerating the hollowing out of our own military and speeding up the de-commissioning of our own nuclear weapons.
Obama has broken many promises to Americans but kept one promise -- to Putin: he would be flexible if he won reelection. Indeed, Barack Obama has shown the spineless flexibility of Gumby and our enemies have taken note.
The poker-playing President does not even try to bluff anymore (what red lines in Syria?). Geopolitical strategy 101 preaches the value of strategic ambiguity -- keep the other side guessing. Our foes don’t need to calculate Obama’s response to provocative actions on their part -- he gives them advance notice that military help for the beleaguered Ukrainians is not in the offing (he will send them snacks they can eat as they watch their nation, whose independence we had guaranteed, be dismembered); any sanctions will be weak and not a “threat or meant in a personal way” (via Obama’s proxy, John Kerry); “send the troops” has been replaced by send the tweets, and Obama even there is being punked by Putin.
After all, it is in Obama’s interest to ignore treaty violations by our adversaries-just as he ignores Iran’s nuclear program, the breaking of our immigration laws, IRS scandals, Fast and Furious, the burgeoning entitlement crisis and myriad other problems on the horizon. If he acknowledged them he would have to work and work does not make him a happy camper.
How does Obama get away with all this feel good palaver? His most fervent supporters, millenials, get their news from Facebook and other social media. Tweets are the length of the attention span of many of them. And many of those tweets come from the White House and Obama’s own Organize for Action. Fox News is denigrated constantly.
While their fathers might have relied on Huntley and Brinkley, Reasoner, and, before them, Edgar Murrow and Eric Sevareid, they now get their news from comedians such as Stewart, Colbert, and Letterman. With the former, there was an obligation to report the news as faithfully as possible -- that was the standard anyway. But with our modern-day newscasters/comedians, the obligation seems to be to mock Republicans, get laughs and ratings and display proper servility to Democrats. The vast wasteland has arrived.
The traditional media has been (willingly) coopted. Most journalists are liberal and give the vast majority of their political donations to Democrats. Recently, the media has been in overdrive to hype the good news about ObamaCare while burying the bad news
-copying the Obama playbook.
And this servile behavior by the media suits Obama’s “Don’t Worry, Be Happy” approach to the presidency.
Why work? After all, he seemingly has no problem creating a nation of loafers and he most assuredly knows the appeal of such a life, as opposed to, say, working.
Far more enjoyable to play golf, live it up in the lap of luxury, fulfill the dream of every adolescent sports fan to tee off and play hoops with legends, be serenaded by music stars. Even the funeral of Nelson Mandela’s became an opportunity to smile and yuck it up for yet another selfie. This is a president who completely lacks self-awareness and respect for solemn occasions and the office of the presidency.
When the chickens come home to roost, as his moral compass Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Junior might put it, he will be long gone from the White House and they will be someone else’s problem -- as well as the problem of every American.
Famed literary agent Andrew Wylie has said that Obama’s memoirs could command $20 million and Michelle’s memoir (reportedly she is at work on it now) could ring the bell at $12 million. Round it up with speaking fees, board memberships, sweetheart investment deals, and the like and one can wonder why he just can’t build his own presidential library and not saddle Illinois taxpayers with the due bill.
No wonder Obama could tout that he is not worried about the future of their daughters who are on the path of success: “they’re on a path that is going to be successful, even if the country as a whole is not successful.” Nice to know at least they will be happy as Americans struggle to pay off the record debt and deficits racked up during the Obama era.
Come to think of it, why shouldn’t Barack Obama be happy? He has succeeded in his goal of fundamentally transforming America. And the rest of America will be left cleaning up the mess from his party.

http://www.americanthinker.com/2014/...m_medium=email