Page 565 of 573 FirstFirst ... 65465515555561562563564565566567568569 ... LastLast
Results 5,641 to 5,650 of 5729
Like Tree97Likes

Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #5641
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    WND EXCLUSIVE

    Obama eligibility case lives!

    Supreme Court's own precedent cited in new demand for resolution

    Published: 10 hours ago Bob Unruh



    The question of Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office under the Constitution’s “natural born” citizen requirement is once again being appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has refused to hear a number of previous cases.

    Judges have ruled Obama’s eligibility is a political question that is not for the courts to decide. They have argued the plaintiffs didn’t have “standing,” the requirement that they have sustained or will sustain direct injury or harm that can be redressed by a court.

    Now, however, a plaintiff has surfaced who claims he has suffered a specific and individual injury – the $90 he is seeking to have returned by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.

    The president’s eligibility is being questioned in a friend-of-the-court brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court by the constitutional experts at William J. Olson, P.C. and the United States Justice Foundation.

    They are asking the high court to take up the case of Christopher John Rudy, a registered patent attorney who paid to the Patent and Trademark Office “fee increases” totaling $90 under the America Invents Act, “purportedly enacted into law in September 2011 by Congress and the president.”

    Rudy sued for a refund “on the ground that the AIA was invalid, having been signed into law by Barack Obama, a person who … was not a ‘natural born citizen,’ and thus, was ineligible to hold the office of president of the United States.”

    The courts rejected his claim, insisting they had no authority to look into Obama’s eligibility.

    The law firms’ brief explained Rudy’s argument.

    “Until now, the question of President Obama’s qualifications as a ‘natural born citizen’ has been dodged by the judiciary because those challenging his eligibility had not suffered any personal injury compensable by a court – and thus lacked ‘legal’ standing. There is no such barrier in this case because the patent attorney suffered an out-of-pocket loss of $90 because of the new law signed by President Obama.”

    Read all the arguments in the birth certificate controversy, in “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” and check out the special reports, banners and bumper stickers on the subject.

    The brief also argues that until now, “no one has questioned the validity of a law signed by the president.”

    “Rather, previous cases have sought the removal of President Obama from the presidential ballot or from office altogether. In this case, however, the complaining patent attorney is not seeking President Obama’s removal from office, but simply a refund of his $90 and a declaration that, unless he is a ‘natural born citizen,’ President Obama does not have the constitutional authority to sign a bill into law. Yet, the courts are attempting to avoid declaring that the law is based on the judge-made expedient of labeling the issue a ‘political question,’” the attorneys said in their statement.

    ‘Constitutional eligibility’ ruling already out
    They also note that the dispute is arising again only two months after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on a question of constitutional eligibility. That came in a case in which an order of the National Labor Relations Board was invalidated because members were appointed by Obama in an unconstitutional manner.

    That made them constitutionally ineligible to be on the board.

    “Our amicus brief in Rudy argued that if the U.S. Supreme Court can decide whether members of the NLRB meet the constitutional requirements of their office, it can also decide whether the president of the United States meets the constitutional requirements of his office,” the attorneys said in their statement.

    “Further, as our brief demonstrated, the requirement that a president be a ‘natural born citizen’ is a fixed legal principle prescribed by the Constitution, with the purpose to insulate the office from foreign influences that would compromise the president’s sworn oath to ‘defend, preserve, and protect’ the Constitution of the United States,” they said.

    In the Supreme Court’s NRLB ruling, Justice Stephen Breyer noted the Federalist Papers “make clear that the Founders intended th[e] method of appointment, requiring Senate approval, to be the norm … because … the need to secure Senate approval provides ‘an excellent check upon a spirit of favoritism in the president, and would tend greatly to preventing the appointment of unfit characters from state prejudice, from family connection, from personal attachment, or from a view to popularity.”

    Justice Antonin Scalia argued that when questions “involving the Constitution’s government-structuring provisions are presented in a justiciable case, it is the solemn responsibility of the judicial branch ‘to say what the law is.’”

    The attorneys acknowledged the subject may be unpopular.

    “Many object to any challenge to the eligibility of a president, or presidential aspirant, but if the law is to apply equally to every person, presidents cannot be deemed to be above the law based on vague tests such as whether the case presents ‘political question.’ Indeed, demonstrating that the term ‘natural born citizen’ is a constitutional requirement that has continuing political significance which needs resolution are questions not just about President Obama, but also about Republicans Marco Rubio, Rick Santorum, Ted Cruz, and others,” they explained
    Nevertheless, they said, “the executive appointments clause of Article II, Section 2, the presidential eligibility provision of Article II, Section 1 – especially its ‘natural born citizen’ requirement – is part of the ‘enduring structure’ of the federal government established by the U.S. Constitution.”

    ‘Judicially enforceable standards’
    They argue in their brief: “This court unanimously decided that there are judicially enforceable standards limiting the president’s recess appointment power [in the NLRB case.] In the instant case, the question before the court is whether there are judicially enforceable limits governing the exercise of the powers of the presidency by a person who allegedly does not meet the eligibility requirement that he be a ‘natural born citizen,’ or whether that question is nonjusticiable, enforceable only at the discretion of the Congress.”

    The most recent court decision on Obama’s eligibility, in March, ended similarly to previous challenges. The majority in a 7-2 Alabama Supreme Court decision had no opinion on the eligibility issue itself.

    However, the dissenting minority of Justice Tom Parker and Chief Justice Roy Moore concluded the case has serious constitutional significance, warranting an investigation of the qualifications of 2012 presidential candidates by Alabama’s secretary of state.

    Moore wrote in his dissent that the circuit court should have granted the plaintiffs’ request to order the state secretary of state “to implement the natural-born-citizen requirement of the presidential-qualifications clause in future elections.”

    “Although the removal of a president-elect or a president who has taken the oath of office is within the breast of Congress, the determination of the eligibility of the 2012 presidential candidates before the casting of the electoral votes is a state function,” Moore argued.

    He said the case was of “great constitutional significance in regard to the highest office in our land.”

    “Should he who was elected to the presidency be determined to be ineligible, the remedy of impeachment is available through the United States Congress, and the plaintiffs in this case, (Hugh) McInnish and (Virgil) Goode, can pursue this remedy through their representatives in Congress.”

    Two judges wanted eligibility confirmed

    Parker agreed with Moore’s reasoning, except that he would call for the secretary of state to investigate eligibility issues once she “has received notice that a potential candidate may lack the necessary qualifications to be placed on an Alabama election ballot.”

    Both justices earlier had expressed concern about the issue.

    Parker had filed a special, unpublished concurrence arguing plaintiff Hugh McInnish’s charge of “forgery” was legitimate cause for concern.
    “Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public,” he wrote.

    Moore, in an interview with WND in 2010, defended Lt. Col Terrence Lakin’s demand that Obama prove his eligibility as commander in chief as a condition of obeying deployment orders.

    Lakin was stripped of his rank and removed from the military when he demanded to see evidence that Obama was a legitimate commander-in-chief of the military before carrying out deployment orders. He reasoned the orders would be illegal if Obama was not eligible to be president.
    At the time, Moore said Lakin “not only has a right to follow his personal convictions under the Constitution, he has a duty.”

    Read all the arguments in the birth certificate controversy, in “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” and check out the special reports, banners and bumper stickers on the subject.

    “And if the authority running the efforts of the war is not a citizen in violation of the Constitution, the order is unlawful,” he said.

    In the 2010 interview with WND, Moore said he had seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and considerable evidence that suggests he is not.

    “This is the strangest thing indeed,” he said. “The president has never produced [evidence] in the face of substantial evidence he was not born in our country. People are accepting it blindly based on their feelings, not on the law.”

    That case was brought on behalf of 2012 Constitution Party presidential nominee Virgil Goode and Alabama Republican Party leader Hugh McInnish, who asked Alabama’s highest court to force Secretary of State Beth Chapman to verify that all candidates on the state’s 2012 ballot were eligible to serve.

    The only formal law enforcement investigation of Obama’s birth certification, done by a Cold Case Posse assembled by Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Arizona, found evidence the birth certificate presented by the White House as “proof positive” of Obama’s eligibility actually is fraudulent, created on a computer and not representative of any official document.

    Arpaio’s investigator have raised the possibility of fraud and forgery committed against American voters.

    ‘You tell me about eligibility’
    Among the skeptics about Obama’s eligibility is billionaire Donald Trump.

    video at link below

    Trump said he can’t be certain that Obama is eligible to be president, and he pointedly noted that a reporter who was poking fun at the issue admitted he can’t, either.

    At one point, he offered $5 million to the charity or charities of Obama’s choice if he would release his passport records and authorize the colleges he attended to release his applications and other records.

    Trump argues those documents would show whether or not Obama ever accepted scholarship or other aid as a foreign student, which could preclude him from being a “natural-born citizen.”

    A conversation with ABC’s Jonathan Karl started with Karl stating that Trump took on the “not serious” issue of eligibility.

    “Why does that make me not serious?” Trump demanded. “I think that resonated with a lot of people.”

    Karl replied: “You don’t still question he was[n't] born in the United States, do you?”

    “I have no idea,” Trump said. “I don’t know. Was there a birth certificate? You tell me. You know some people say that was not his birth certificate. I’m saying I don’t know. Nobody knows, and you don’t know either. Jonathan you’re a smart guy, and you don’t know.”

    When Karl admitted he was “pretty sure,” Trump jumped on the statement.

    “You just said you’re pretty sure. … You have to be 100 percent sure,” he said. “Jonathan, you said you’re pretty convinced, so let’s just see what happens over time.”

    Read all the arguments in the birth certificate controversy, in “Where’s the Birth Certificate?” and check out the special reports, banners and bumper stickers on the subject

    Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/08/obama-eli...CM6KHqrmfe3.99






    Last edited by kathyet2; 08-16-2014 at 08:22 AM.

  2. #5642
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Unruh for WorldNetDaily
    The question of Barack Obama’s eligibility to occupy the Oval Office under the Constitution’s “natural born” citizen requirement is once again being appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, which has refused to hear a number of previous cases.

    Judges have ruled Obama’s eligibility is a political question that is not for the courts to decide. They have argued the plaintiffs didn’t have “standing,” the requirement that they have sustained or will sustain direct injury or harm that can be redressed by a court.
    It appears to me (and some others) that the unstated reasoning of at least one conservative U.S. Supreme Court Justice is this. To bring a case specifically for judicial interpretation of the "natural born Citizen" clause would make that interpretation "whatever Justice Anthony Kennedy says it is." His interpretation would then replace the existing interpretation, "one born in the country of parents who were citizens," from dicta in the U.S. Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Minor v. Happersett (1875) and in several other U.S. Supreme Court decisions.

    To date, only three Justices have been willing to take that risk so as to accept an nbC-defining case for oral arguments. As Justice Scalia has said, "It takes four."
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 08-16-2014 at 01:03 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  3. #5643
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Visiting priest at New Orleans church
    calls Obama, Kenya’s “native son”


    Posted on August 8, 2013 by Dr. Eowyn


    This wall calendar is proudly displayed in the Kenyan home of
    Obama’s paternal [step-]grandmother, Sarah Oyango Obama.


    The dictionary defines “native son” as a person born in a particular place,” as in “The delegation from Iowa nominated a native son.”

    It is curious, to say the least, that “native son” is the term used by a visiting priest from Kenya in reference to Barack Hussein Obama. The latter continues to insist he was born in Honolulu, Hawaii, U.S.A.

    Last Sunday, August 4, 2013, Saint Pius X Catholic Church in New Orleans hosted a visitor, Fr. Augustine Kipkemei, who spoke on behalf of the Diocese of Nakuru in Kenya, East Africa. The Roman Catholic Diocese of Nakuru is a diocese located in the city of Nakuru in metropolitan Nairobi in Kenya. The diocese’s cathedral is Christ the King.

    You can verify for yourself Fr. Kipkemei’s visit to Saint Pius X on page 2 of the church’s Bulletin. Click here.


    A reader of FOTM sent us the following email about what Fr. Kipkemei said to the congregation:

    "Yesterday during Mass at Saint Pius X Catholic Church in New Orleans, we had a visiting priest from Kenya. His name was Father Augustine Kipkemei.


    He began his sermon with some light hearted ‘facts’ about his country: ‘Kenyans are known to Americans for two main reasons — for our speed and because our native son is your President Obama.’

    Although Fr. Kipkemei’s accent was very thick, I was in the front row and heard him very clearly. As I looked around in astonishment to see if anyone else had heard this, Fr. Kipkemeithe said, referring to Obama, ‘We are very proud of our son in Kenya.’


    At this point, those in the congregation who had heard the priest, all looked baffled and probably thought the priest had misspoken. But Fr. Kipkemei clearly called Obama ‘Kenya’s native son,’ stating it as if it were fact and everyone knew this!


    I had read your post from May titled ‘Kenyans say Obama was born in Kenya.’The attitude of the Kenyans described in your article is exactly that of Fr. Kipkemei — ‘as if it were common knowledge’ that Obama was born in Kenya.”

    Now why would, Fr. Augustine Kipkemei, a humble Catholic priest from Kenya, lie?


    Dr. Eowyn is the Editor of Fellowship of the Minds and a regular contributor to The D.C. Clothesline.

    www.dcclothesline.com/2013/08/08/visiting-priest-at-new-orleans-church-calls-obama-kenyas-native-son/
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 08-16-2014 at 01:32 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  4. #5644
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    British National Archives show a son
    was born to Obama Sr. in 1961 in Kenya


    Posted on August 24, 2012 by Dr. Eowyn | 213 Comments



    The [British] National Archives
    (BNA) is an executive agency of the government of the United Kingdom. Based in Kew in southwest London, the BNA is the UK government’s official archive, containing 1,000 years of history from Domesday Book to the present, with records from parchment and paper scrolls to digital files and archived websites, including Foreign Office and Colonial Office correspondence and files. The collections held by the BNA can be searched using their online catalogue. Entrance to the Archives is free.

    On April 18, 2012, the BNA released the first batch of thousands of “lost” colonial-era files believed to have been destroyed, including files on Britain’s former colony of Kenya. Reporters at the UK’s The Guardian were among the first who looked at some of the newly released colonial files. They found that the name of Barack Obama (henceforth, Obama Sr.), the father of the [fraudulent usurper] in the White House, is on the top of a list of names revealed in a hitherto secret British colonial file of Kenyans studying in the United States.

    But it’s not just UK journalists who can access the British National Archives; anyone can. In May 2012, someone conducted a search of the Archives using the search term “Obama” and found that an unnamed son of Obama Sr. was born in Kenya in 1961. Since the [fraudulent usurper] in the White House is the only known son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before 1963 when Kenya became officially independent from the UK, it is reasonable for us to conclude that the [fraudulent usurper] is that unnamed son of Obama Sr. born in Kenya in 1961. And in fact, the claimed birth date of the [fraudulent usurper] is August 4, 1961.

    Barack Hussein Obama Sr. (l); Stanley Ann Dunham (r).

    Below are excerpts from Dan Crosby’s on-site report from Kew for The Daily Pen, “Obama’s Kenya Birth Records Discovered in British National Archives,” July 18, 2012:


    Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives. [...]

    It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.

    Recall, investigative journalists working for Breitbart.com have already discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama’s literary agent in which he claimed he was born in Kenya. Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly. Since then information on Obama’s ties has been curtailed by government officials as the Obama administration has coincidentally paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya.

    Also, the presence of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted for from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama, until three weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961, when she allegedly applied for college courses at the University of Washington. Theories about her whereabouts have included that she participated in the Air Lift America project as an exchange student and traveled to Nairobi as one of many recent high school graduates (see AASF Report 1959-1961).

    The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.


    The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama [Sr.] are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama [Sr.] is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.

    To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.

    A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).

    The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives. According to researchers, Obama [Sr.]’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama [Sr.] birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.

    However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.

    www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/access-to-public-records.pdf

    Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clinton’s arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.

    For someone who wanted to remain in America, it’s difficult to imagine any reason why Barack Obama’s alleged father, Barack the elder, would omit the birth of an “anchor baby” son on an application to extend his visa, just days after the birth occurred, unless…

    The American people were told by Barack Obama, unequivocally, that his father was a former goat herder from Kenya. However, INS documents filed in the very same month after Obama’s birth suggest the goat herding elder Obama didn’t “get the memo” that he was a daddy.

    On August 31st, 1961, just weeks after Obama’s birth was allegedly registered in a regional office of the Hawaiian Health Department, Obama the elder neglected to name his newborn son on an application for extension of his temporary visa to stay in the U.S..

    Obama’s omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical given the fact that the acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama’s application for an extension. The INS has long been more willing to extend the visa of a foreign parent of children born in the U.S., especially when the other parent is an American citizen.

    Despite the recent release of a documentary film “Dreams From My Real Father” presenting evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not the biological father of the younger Obama, the elder Obama is the man named as the father on the digital image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” which was posted to the internet by the administration in April of 2011. The document image has since been forensically examined by law enforcement investigators and determined to be a digitally fabricated forgery using Adobe software.

    [...], in 2011, it was reported by The Daily Pen after an investigation of the State of Hawaii’s birth statistics collection protocols and vital records history that birth certificates are often amended after the birth while the original paper document is sealed under strict confidentiality rules when the identity of the father is either determined after birth or when the father named on the new version of the certificate has adopted or assumed paternal responsibility for the child.

    In the latter case, the original birth record may not contain the biological father’s name because the mother does not provide it, or it may list paternity as “unknown”, but this version is kept confidential under HRS 571. [...] Therefore, the paternity of the child at the actual time of the birth is not disclosed while the new amended certificate is upheld as the original version displaying the name of the newly identified or adoptive father as indistinguishable if different from the biological father. This law is meant to protect the child from stigmas resulting from illegitimacy, rape, incest or adultery. Under these circumstances it is not possible to know the paternal status of a child at birth unless the original birth record is made accessible by authorized persons under Hawaiian law.

    [...] If Obama [Sr.] is not the biological father, or if paternal information is listed on the original certificate as “unknown”, the state of Hawaii keeps this information secret until a court orders the documents to be released for discovery purposes in determining Obama’s eligibility. Thus far, courts have lacked courage to uphold the Constitution thereby propagating the greatest political fraud in American history. Judges are simply washing their hands of the issue by refusing to even consider actual evidence against Obama, denying citizens of justice and their Constitutional right to a redress of grievances, because they simply do not have the courage to face the legal crisis such a revelation would cause.

    [...] Despite evidence indicating that Obama was simultaneously married to a woman in Kenya, it is suspected that he claimed to be married to Dunham in order to use the marriage as leverage to remain in the U.S. There is no evidence or testimony that Obama [Sr.] ever loved Dunham or that the two had ever been engaged. The two did not live together before or after being married and there were no letters, no ring, no announcement or, most importantly, no legal marriage registration with the State of Hawaii.

    Despite a complete void of documented proof of the marriage, it appears Dunham was granted a statutory divorce from Obama in 1964. However, images posted of the court documents from the decree contain no original documented proof of a marriage or legal documents showing that Obama was the father of Dunham’s child. A review of the court documents shows that at least one document, perhaps an original birth certificate for baby Obama, was missing from the numbering sequence.

    Being legitimately married to a U.S. citizen would be a benefit toward allowing a foreign spouse to remain the U.S. However, no marriage license application or public announcement has ever been found to indicate that Obama and Dunham were ever married or that Obama [Sr.] had even divorced his Kenyan wife prior to an alleged wedding with Dunham. This fact supports the contents of memos from college and INS officials who expressed doubts about the legitimacy of Obama’s relationship with Dunham, even questioning the motive of such a union between a teenage woman and a foreign student facing visa expiration just days after the birth of her child.

    [...] Government officials in Hawaii, including Governor Neil Abercrombie, Lt. Governor Brian Schatz and former Hawaiian elections official, Tim Adams have all indicated that they could find no original record of Obama’s alleged birth in any hospital in Hawaii in the course of their duties to verify his eligibility. The absence of verifiable birth documentation was so apparent that Schatz, serving as the chairman of the Democrat Party of Hawaii in 2008, refused to certify that Obama was indeed constitutionally eligible to hold the office of president when he submitted the Official Certification of Nomination of Obama. Schatz deferred the responsibility to Nancy Pelosi and DNC, and then Chair of the Hawaiian Elections Commission, Kevin Cronin. Cronin resigned suddenly after controversy surrounding his decision began to strain his relationship with the commission.

    [...] Liars and abettors in media and government, drudging on behalf of the Obama administration, have anchored their Alinsky-style ridicule of those questioning Obama’s eligibility in a delusion that he must be legitimate because his birth was announced in two Hawaiian newspapers.

    [...] Hawaii has a long history of allocating foreign births to the mother’s claimed Hawaiian residence regardless of the actual location of the birth, which was in compliance with guidelines established by the National Center for Health Statistics in order to accurately attribute data from births with decadal Census figures.

    [...] The impact of population figures on the Hawaii’s economy and agency resources was very significant in 1961. The accuracy of the Census takes precedence over the accuracy and veracity of vital statistics in the U.S. [...]


    UPDATE (Aug. 25, 2012):

    According to Dan Crosby, the specific sources of information pertaining to births of Kenyan nationals under British jurisdiction can be researched in the following BNA files (Courtesy: British National Archives):
    General Register Office
    SERIES RG36
    Registers and Returns of Births, Marriages and Deaths in the Protectorates etc of Africa and Asia

    Legal status: Public Record(s)
    Language: English
    Creator names: General Register Office, 1836-1970
    Covering Birth Registration dates: 1895-1965
    Physical description: 15 volume(s)
    Access conditions: Available in microform only
    Held by: The National Archives, Kew
    Scope and content: Notifications forwarded by officials responsible for civil registration under administrative ordinances in Nyasaland, Kenya, Somaliland, Uganda, Sudan, Palestine, Sarawak, Malaya, including Johore and Selangor, and British North Borneo, commencing at varying dates.
    Publication note: Geoffrey Yeo ‘The British Overseas, A Guide to Records of Their Births, Baptisms, Marriages, Deaths and Burials Available in the United Kingdom’, London, 2nd edn, 1988.
    Related material: Some earlier returns from the East African territories in the period during which they were under Foreign Office control are in the consular registers retained in the custody of the registrar general.
    Place: Kenya, Africa (Territory Thereof): 1920 – 1963
    Subjects: Birth: registration
    H/t Obama Release Your Records for
    Shock Claim: Obama's Kenyan Birth Records
    Discovered In British National Archives


    ~Eowyn
    kathyet2 and Ratbstard like this.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  5. #5645
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    [ED.: The Dan Crosby article quoted above deserves a full rendering here. Keep in mind that this article is over two years old, and a few details may have changed.]

    --------------------------------------------------------
    Wednesday, July 18, 2012

    OBAMA’S KENYAN BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES

    WHERE LIES GO TO DIE – Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives.

    (D. Pen Editor's note: The records alluded to in this story were discovered through a May, 2012, search through BMD Registers, a BNA partner site, using the search term "Obama". Corroborating evidence through public sources only implicates the identity of those involved but does not explicitly prove their identity [without the] original documents.)

    [ED.: But in a normal, American judicial process, the identities so implicated would merit a subpoena to get the original documents and to enter them into evidence, which should suffice to prove identity. However, this process is neither normal, nor confined to America, nor even judicial, given that every judge treats it like a hot potato or a live hαnd grεnαdε.]

    By Dan Crosby
    of The Daily Pen

    (Updated 7/23/2012)

    KEW, SURREY, GB – The last place anyone would think to look for a birth record of someone claiming to be a “natural born” U.S. citizen is Great Britain. The very inclusion of the Article II eligibility mandate in the U.S. Constitution was explicitly intended by the founding fathers of America to prevent a then British-born enemy usurper from attaining the office of the U.S. presidency and thereby undermining the sovereignty of the newly formed nation.

    In the absence of honor, courage and justice on the part of those serving in the U.S. Congress and Federal Judiciary, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case investigative group has concluded the only law enforcement analysis of the image of Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth” posted to a government website in April, 2011 and found it to be the product of criminal fraud and document forgery.

    The seeming endless evidence against Obama has now taken investigators to the foreign archives of Great Britain wherein it has been discovered that vital events occurring under the jurisdiction of the British Colony in the Protectorate of East Africa prior to 1965 were recorded and held in the main office of the British Registrar in England until 1995 before being archived in the BNA.

    It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.

    Recall, investigative journalists working for Breitbart.com have already discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama’s literary agent in which he claimed he was born in Kenya. Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly. Since then information on Obama’s ties has been curtailed by government officials as the Obama administration has coincidently paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya.

    Also, the presence of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted for from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama, until three weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961 when she allegedly applied for college courses at the University of Washington. Theories about her whereabouts have included that she participated in the Air Lift America project as an exchange student and traveled to Nairobi as one of many recent highschool graduates (see AASF Report 1959-1961).

    The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.

    Based on procedures defined in Britain’s Births & Deaths Registration Act of 1953, The British Foreign & Commonwealth Office states the following:


    Registering A Birth

    If your child is born outside the United Kingdom you can register the birth with the nearest consulate (Local British Foreign & Commonwealth Regional Registrar Office), or with our consular department in London if you’ve returned to the United Kingdom...

    The standard of birth registration in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, Republic of Ireland, Africa and Overseas Territories is similar to the standard of birth registration of the UK.”

    The British Registration Service Act of 1953 (UK Revised Statutes) states that the Queen appoints one Registrar General for the registration of vital records. His or her name would appear the same on all birth certificates of children born under British common law in 1961 until the end of their service. Article 1 of the Registration Service Act of 1953 states:

    “1 Registrar General…Her Majesty may from time to time under the Great Seal of the United Kingdom appoint a Registrar General…and any person so appointed shall exercise the powers and perform the duties conferred or imposed by or under any enactment on the Registrar General, whether described by that title alone or with any additional description, and shall hold office during Her Majesty’s pleasure.”
    . . .
    Recall, on August 1, 2009, Dr. Alan Keyes, Pamela Barnett and 42 other plaintiffs filed evidence in a lawsuit challenging Obama eligibility which included a copy of an image of an alleged Kenyan Copy of Certification of Registration of Birth (CCRB). In the hours after the image appeared on the internet, MSNBC and other liberal mainstream, pro-Obama networks went ballistic attempting to debunk the idea that such a document exists.

    The liberal media went out of its way to discredit the image, protesting too much, going as far as to claim that the Kenyan CCRB image was forged based on an Australian birth certificate which was miraculously discovered by an unnamed blogger for a man named Bomford.

    On August 2, Keith Olbermann led the deranged effort on his now defunct "Countdown" show to lie and propagandize the CCRB using insults and baseless criticism of unknown "birthers" who he claimed "attempted and failed to pass off a forgery."

    Strangely, however, no one in the mainstream liberal media would address the question now answered by the recent discovery at the BNA. The Bomford document and the Kenyan CCRB would indeed appear the same under British birth registration processes and documentation formats because both municipalities in Kenya and Australia, in 1961, operated under the Registrar General of the British government.

    It is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA that the Bomford document image from Australia was accessed and used by pro-Obama operatives as a template to alter the image of the Kenyan CCRB image in order to make it appear that "birthers" had created a bad counterfeit of a Kenyan birth record for Obama. This was done by Obama's forgers to create "shell game" confusion among the public and misdirect media attention from the truth that an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB, which was never allowed to be publicly seen in its original form before Obama's forgers were able to access and change it, was actually an image of a legitimate document posted by unknown individuals who were known by Obama to possess the document before hand.

    Essentially, the Bomford affair was just another coverup to hide Obama's foreign birth records.

    The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.


    To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.


    A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).

    The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives. According to researchers, Obama’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.


    However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.

    www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/access-to-public-records.pdf

    Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clintons arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.

    OBAMA’S FATHER FAILED TO INCLUDE BIRTH OF “SON” ON INS APPLICATION

    For someone who wanted to remain in America, it’s difficult to imagine any reason why Barack Obama’s alleged father, Barack the elder, would omit the birth of an “anchor baby” son on an application to extend his visa, just days after the birth occurred, unless…

    The American people were told by Barack Obama, unequivocally, that his father was a former goat herder from Kenya. However, INS documents filed in the very same month after Obama’s birth suggest the goat herding elder Obama didn’t “get the memo” that he was a daddy.

    On August 31st, 1961, just weeks after Obama’s birth was allegedly registered in a regional office of the Hawaiian Health Department, Obama the elder neglected to name is newborn son on an application for extension of his temporary visa to stay in the U.S.

    Obama’s omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical given the fact that the acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama’s application for an extension. The INS has long been more willing to extend the visa of a foreign parent of children born in the U.S., especially when the other parent is an American citizen.


    Despite the recent release of a documentary film “Dreams From My Real Father” presenting evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not the biological father of the younger Obama, the elder Obama is the man named as the father on the digital image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” which was posted to the internet by the administration in April of 2011. The document image has since been forensically examined by law enforcement investigators and determined to be a digitally fabricated forgery using Adobe software.


    THE UGLY TRUTH


    However, the sad and pathetic truth about Obama’s covert natal history and his illegitimacy lies at the bottom of a sordid pit of lies surrounding the paternity of his birth. Doubts about his identity, his eligibility, his intentions, his honesty and his honorability as a man stem from what appears to be an ugly truth about his mother’s probable sexual involvement with multiple men associated with the radical socialist movement in 1960’s Hawaii.


    Obama and his horde of abettors defend an improbable narrative about his identity. The veracity of this narrative has been damaged under the weight of a steady stream of crushing evidence demonstrating more than 180 disparities and contradictions to Obama’s claims of natal legitimacy as president.


    If Obama’s cause as a usurper of power is to avenge his father’s culture, he made the worst possible error in lying about who he is. Vintage America is on to him. Their instincts are slowly turning Obama’s fantasy of a socialist utopia for those he believes are humanity’s offended into a laughingstock. By building his vision for America on clay feet of lies about his who he is, he has undermined any intention of doing something good and right. He is not to be trusted.


    Moreover, Obama is learning the painful lesson that a message of “Hope and Change” means something vastly different to vintage America, the most powerful and affluent culture in human history, when that message has been proven to come from someone as audaciously dishonest and deceptively calculating as this son of otherness.


    Recall, in 2011, it was reported by The Daily Pen after an investigation of the State of Hawaii’s birth statistics collection protocols and vital records history that birth certificates are often amended after the birth while the original paper document is sealed under strict confidentiality rules when the identity of the father is either determined after birth or when the father named on the new version of the certificate has adopted or assumed paternal responsibility for the child.


    In the latter case, the original birth record may not contain the biological father’s name because the mother does not provide it, or it may list paternity as “unknown”, but this version is kept confidential under HRS 571. In some cases, the biological father may not even know he is the father if the mother has had more than one sexual partner prior to the pregnancy. There was no DNA test in 1961, however the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report shows there were more than 1000 such “illegitimate” births reported in the state of Hawaii during that year, about 1 in 17.


    Therefore, the paternity of the child at the actual time of the birth is not disclosed while the new amended certificate is upheld as the original version displaying the name of the newly identified or adoptive father as indistinguishable if different from the biological father. This law is meant to protect the child from stigmas resulting from illegitimacy, rape, incest or adultery. Under these circumstances it is not possible to know the paternal status of a child at birth unless the original birth record is made accessible by authorized persons under Hawaiian law.


    However, notations indicating that a certificate contains updated paternal information would be typed or printed in the lower margin of the new certificate, below the signature section. This lower margin of the image of Obama’s certificate has been shown by computer experts to be concealed by forgers using a “clipping mask”. A clipping mask is a feature available in Adobe software which limits the viewable area on a document image through which only selected information can be seen. In the case of Obama’s forged certificate, the information we have been allowed to see within the frame of the clipping mask may merely reflect an amended birth record while concealing notations of the amendments which exists in the lower margin outside the frame of the clipping mask.


    Regardless of any level of truth about any individual piece of information in the image, overall, the final image is the product of criminals and liars.

    If Obama is not the biological father, or if paternal information is listed on the original certificate as “unknown”, the state of Hawaii keeps this information secret until a court orders the documents to be released for discovery purposes in determining Obama’s eligibility. Thus far, courts have lacked courage to uphold the Constitution thereby propagating the greatest political fraud in American history. Judges are simply washing their hands of the issue by refusing to even consider actual evidence against Obama, denying citizens of justice and their Constitutional right to a redress of grievances, because they simply do not have the courage to face the legal crisis such a revelation would cause.

    Cowardly judges refuse to allow any exposure Obama’s actual natural born identity and, in their dereliction, have conjured a legal fantasy filled with pressurizing wrath in which a candidate’s eligibility for president is not only declared legally uncontestable but is also automatically preeminent. In allowing this, judges have allowed a dangerous precedent in which any foreign invader can covertly usurp the power of the U.S. government simply by lying about their citizenship status and hiding documentation with the help of the American media and a complicit legal system.


    THE MARRIAGE SHAM


    On his application, when asked the name and address of his spouse, it appears Obama may have first written the name of his actual wife in Kenya before blacking it out and writing “Ann S. Dunham”.


    Despite evidence indicating that Obama was simultaneously married to a woman in Kenya, it is suspected that he claimed to be married to Dunham in order to use the marriage as leverage to remain in the U.S. There is no evidence or testimony that Obama ever loved Dunham or that the two had ever been engaged. The two did not live together before or after being married and there were no letters, no ring, no announcement or, most importantly, no legal marriage registration with the State of Hawaii.


    Despite a complete void of documented proof of the marriage, it appears Dunham was granted a statutory divorce from Obama in 1964. However, images posted of the court documents from the decree contain no original documented proof of a marriage or legal documents showing that Obama was the father of Dunham’s child. A review of the court documents shows that at least one document, perhaps an original birth certificate for baby Obama, was missing from the numbering sequence.


    THE INS’ PERSPECTIVE


    Being legitimately married to a U.S. citizen would be a benefit toward allowing a foreign spouse to remain the U.S. However, no marriage license application or public announcement has ever been found to indicate that Obama and Dunham were ever married or that Obama had even divorced his Kenyan wife prior to an alleged wedding with Dunham. This fact supports the contents of memos from college and INS officials who expressed doubts about the legitimacy of Obama’s relationship with Dunham, even questioning the motive of such a union between a teenage woman and a foreign student facing visa expiration just days after the birth of her child.


    From the perspective of an INS agent, the circumstances surrounding Obama’s relationship with Dunham would have raised suspicions. Immigration fraud was rampant during Hawaii’s foreign birth accommodation era in the 1960’s.


    Since Obama was a foreigner wanting to extend his temporary visa, the INS certainly understood that by claiming a marriage to Dunham, it would promote INS approval of an extension, but in Dunham’s case there was an added risk to the relationship for Obama…she was pregnant.


    It appears, from the contents of documents in Obama’s INS file, when pressed by INS agents and school officials on the actual validity of his relationship to Dunham and baby Obama, having certainly been advised of legal ramifications for lying, he refused to name Obama as his child but maintained that he was married to Dunham. This indicates that Obama was either not certain if he was the biological father, or that he knew he wasn’t.


    Under child protection laws in many states, including Hawaii, when the biological father is deceased or unidentified by the mother, the man who is married to the mother at the time she gives birth automatically becomes the father named on the official birth certificate until it is proven in court that he is not the biological father. “Mandatory Legitimacy” applies even if the birth is the result of adultery, when the mother is married at the time of birth, until paternity is successfully contested. Today, DNA testing allows for conclusive determinations about paternity, but in 1961, it was more difficult to determine paternity. Hawaii’s child welfare statutes indicate the “statutory” father’s name on the certificate may be removed by court order, if paternity is successfully contested, after a judge has decided the case in the interest of the child’s welfare. This law is intended to protect the child if the mother dies.


    DELUSIONS OF LEGITIMACY


    Government officials in Hawaii, including Governor Neil Abercrombie, Lt. Governor Brian Schatz and former Hawaiian elections official, Tim Adams have all indicated that they could find no original record of Obama’s alleged birth in any hospital in Hawaii in the course of their duties to verify his eligibility. The absence of verifiable birth documentation was so apparent that Schatz, serving as the chairman of the Democrat Party of Hawaii in 2008, refused to certify that Obama was indeed constitutionally eligible to hold the office of president when he submitted the Official Certification of Nomination of Obama. Schatz deferred the responsibility to Nancy Pelosi and DNC, and then Chair of the Hawaiian Elections Commission, Kevin Cronin. Cronin resigned suddenly after controversy surrounding his decision began to strain his relationship with the commission.


    Ignorance, lies and lack of understanding about the difference between a medically verified birth and a legal registration of birth has confused the public about Obama’s natal history and eligibility.


    Liars and abettors in media and government, drudging on behalf of the Obama administration, have anchored their Alinsky-style ridicule of those questioning Obama’s eligibility in a delusion that he must be legitimate because his birth was announced in two Hawaiian newspapers.


    The elder Obama’s name appears as the father of a newborn son in images of two birth announcements appearing in two Honolulu newspapers on August 13th and 14th, 1961. Birth announcements in Hawaii in 1961 were published automatically from a birth registration list provided directly to the papers by the Hawaiian Department of Health. The notifications of births provided to the Health Department, however, were not only the product of information provided by hospitals and doctors, alone.


    The distinction between the information used by the hospital to create a “Certificate of Live Birth” and the information used by the Department of Health to create a birth registration is that information used to create birth registrations were allowed to be submitted from anyone possessing credible information about the birth, including family members, witnesses or attendants, regardless of the actual location of the birth. Contrarily, the information on a “Live Birth” record must be verified and attested by a licensed medical doctor qualified to determine the characteristics of a live birth event. This is important in cases when a distinction was needed between a “still birth” and a baby that may have been born alive but then died upon delivery. In the latter case, both a birth certificate and a death certificate are required while a still birth requires only a death certificate because of the definition of a live birth under HRS 338-1.


    Hawaii has a long history of allocating foreign births to the mother’s claimed Hawaiian residence regardless of the actual location of the birth, which was in compliance with guidelines established by the National Center for Health Statistics in order to accurately attribute data from births with decadal Census figures. Unfortunately, these vital statistics reporting guidelines are not conducive with determining the natural born status of the child.


    For example, the Bureau of Census in 1961 counted all residents by county regardless of their temporary absence at the time of the Census when the Census worker was able to identify residents of a county through the information provided by others. This applies even today.


    Therefore, beginning in as early as 1933, it was determined that births must be accounted the same way for all usual residents regardless of the mother’s location at the time of the event when that resident mother intended to return to that county. In Hawaii, if a child did not have an official certificate prior to the mother’s return, the local Health Department was obligated to provide one under the Model State Vital Statistics Act of 1942, Section 8 of Hawaii’s Public Health Regulations and HRS 338.


    The impact of population figures on the Hawaii’s economy and agency resources was very significant in 1961. The accuracy of the Census takes precedence over the accuracy and veracity of vital statistics in the U.S. Vital statistics are reported annually, but the Census only occurs every ten years which means there is large volume of population which goes untracked between Census years. If births and deaths were not allocated to the residents of each county, regardless of the location of the vital event, the results would cause large disparities when compared with the Census data.


    Posted by Penbrook One at 3:03 PM


    a few of the 159 comments:

    Shawny July 18, 2012 at 9:01 PM

    At that time, the British National Archives was located at St. Catherines House in London. I learned that while doing the genealogy for some Manx ancestors. Isle of Man was also a British Protectorate, so all of the birth, death, and Christening records were filed in London. And even as a back up to that, the Mormon church (Latter Day Saints) microfilmed most of the records in London, so references to those births should be found on index reels from which to order copies of the actual microfilmed document. Sheriff Arpaio has asked for microfilm from Hawaii, but nowhere else.


    Sam Sewell July 19, 2012 at 12:08 AM

    If the ineligibility movement [were] not scoring significant victories, why would the Democratic Party and Obama’s supporters be trying so hard to silence the issue? Why not encourage the legal establishment to rule on the evidence and the law, rather than avoiding the facts? Why not encourage the Supreme Court to rule, rather than evade? Why not encourage a public open discussion of the ineligibility issue? Why not have public debates on national television? Why not release the many documents that reveal Obama’s history? Why not give millions of citizens the information they want? Or, why not simply ignore it? Why indeed? I know why. The “birthers” are winning, and Obama can’t afford to give them any more ammunition!

    Evidence Obama Ineligibility Movement is Winning

    thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2012/07/evidence-obama-ineligibility-movement.html

    Exposing Obama’s PSYOPS Agents and Tactics
    thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/05/exposing-obamas-psyops-agents-and.html


    cfkerchner July 19, 2012 at 11:01 AM

    Keep up the good work. CDR Kerchner (Ret), ProtectOurLiberty.org


    Gene July 20, 2012 at 11:02 AM

    The silence concerning the elimination of the natural born eligibility requirement is deafening. There is a bi-partisan coup that is ongoing and you will not [know] it, if you watch TV or read the NYT.

    See wp.me/p2i3SD-6 which analyzes the serial hypocrisy of the GOP regarding this issue. You likely notice how quiet they are. The reasons are: George [not Mitt] Romney, Sen Rubio, Gov. Jindal, and even Sen McCain. None of these people are natural born. So, while being angry at the "President", be sure to vote out anyone who says natural born is the same as native born.


    lazarus2 July 21, 2012 at 7:27 AM

    Had Barack Hussein Obama robbed a bank, or raped someone, or even murdered somebody, these would have been LESSER crimes than the crime he has knowingly and willingly committed. He isn't a victim, he is a criminal along with Nancy Pelosi and all those others holding high government offices who helped perpetrate this treasonous act. The damage Obama has done to not only the 300 million plus Americans who "elected" him under false pretenses, but the entire world, cannot be undone. Consider the choices he has made, the executive orders he has issued, and the general lack of regard for the people who trusted him, and you should come to the conclusion that he must be removed from office immediately and tried for treason. There is no other choice. Had he committed the much lesser crimes mentioned above, he could still legally serve out his term of office. However, considering the magnitude of this crime... the biggest fraud in U.S. history... and the damage he's already done, he must go immediately and all... ALL... those who helped him must be placed on trial as co-conspirators.


    Sam Sewell July 21, 2012 at 10:08 PM

    POLL: Only 9% Believe Obama Has Documented His Eligibility
    thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2012/07/poll-only-9-believe-obama-has.html

    Many of the national opinion polls show that a large segment of the citizens still have questions about Obama’s questionable history, and they still want answers! In a July 2012 poll 45% of the general public and 69% of Republicans have doubts about Obama’s birthplace. Many voters have been influenced away from voting for Obama because of the obvious cover up of Obama’s past. Just type these search words into Google and see for yourself: obama eligible poll. The ineligibility movement has educated the voters beyond the circumstances of Obama’s birth and the citizenship of his father. Now people are aware that Obama’s history of education, medical history, travel and passport history, the history of his parent’s marriage and divorce, adoption records, the records of the Illinois bar, Illinois State Senate records, his beliefs, past associates, personal behavior and many other mysteries still remain unresolved. The uncertainty created by Obama’s cover up will significantly affect voting outcome. Most presidential elections are decided by a very narrow margin. Given that about half the American people are uncertain about Obama’s history, the 2012 vote will be more influenced by the ineligibility movement than any demographic group. That is a victory of the “think for themselves” citizens over the ambiguous cover ups offered by the ruling elite! Yet another clear victory for the birthers!



    Eugene Pilcher July 22, 2012 at 7:08 AM

    Thank you Sam. I would like to include his fraudulent Conn. SS number [issued to a Connecticut resident - ED.]. There is the murder of two of his gay lovers in Chicago. His Chicago mansion was purchased without paying the correct taxes, at a below market price. The empty lot next door was purchased from the same owner at an inflated price by a Chicago mobster, and then he did nothing with it. A law firm where he worked and the mobster were both paid large sums of federal housing money after he became Senator.


    Tulsa Jack July 23, 2012 at 2:46 PM

    So Hillary "Mz. Bill" Clinton, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of State, visited London, England, and induced the British government to withhold its documentary, archival evidence that Obama is a criminal fraud from public scrutiny. That makes Hillary "Mz. Bill" Clinton a co-conspirator, aiding and abetting a set of circumstances that have the malicious intent to place, and to keep in place, a foreigner in the office of President of the United States. The word for that ultimately disloyal act is treason. HillyBilly knows this, as do Reid and Pelosi, and the lying, complicit subversives in the Hawaiian government. That is why they are so desperate to bury the truth of The Kenyan's real identity. They will not succeed. I look forward to the day when everyone associated with this outrage, including the disgraced judges, is sent to jail for life.


    Gabriel Almendarez July 23, 2012 at 9:08 PM

    Are those British shredders I'm hearing?


    Mr Baggins July 27, 2012 at 6:20 AM

    The depth and breadth of corruption in our federal government is unprecedented. It is well established in BOTH Parties, and the crimes being committed daily have been ongoing for DECADES. A concerted effort to destroy this nation has been ongoing since it's inception, and it has made a great deal of headway, mostly through subversive means, through manipulation and infiltration of the federal government.

    The idea that we truly have a say in choosing our elected leaders through the voting process is a complete farce at the federal level, and there is vast manipulation at the lower levels as well, most of it funded by the same factions that have infiltrated our nation's capital.

    They are in complete control of the DNC and largely of the GOP. Manipulation of the 2008 primaries by the DNC includes multiple murders (see Bettina Viviano's expose on the 2008 election) and threats to murder Chelsea Clinton, if Bill Clinton revealed what he knew about Obama's ineligibility for office.

    While "posing" as our President and under the guise of "Commander in Chief", he has sent our troops to die. Since he is fraudulently holding office, this is murder. Those who placed him in in office (not the voters), his "handlers" and those in the DNC who knew that he was ineligible, are complicit in his crimes.

    Both Bush presidencies set the stage for the final act in bring about the "New World Oder" that Obama was "selected" to usher in. He is a complete fraud, his whole life story is a fabrication. He IS the Manchurian Candidate, and his "assignment" is to destroy this nation and establish a totalitarian state, and if he succeeds, America is "OVER"!

    Many have been "asleep", and that is largely due to an incredible and sustained effort by those in power, largely "behind the scene," through a vast array of control devices which undermine our ability to think and reason for ourselves {google: The Brookings Institute and The Tavistock Institute, Chemtrails, Vaccinations, Fluoridation, GMO, The Rothschild Dynasty, The Svali Documents, The Men Who Killed Kennedy, The Federal Reserve, Subliminal Advertising, the documentary: America: From Freedom to Fascism (Aaron Russo was killed because of this documentary)}. Discover the truth for yourselves. These searches will lead you to much, much more. See the new movie, "Runaway Slave." Stop believing the lies!

    The vast conspiracy - YES, I said CONSPIRACY - is slowly but surely being exposed, and more and more people are beginning to see what is going on. PLEASE open your eyes! WAKE UP. Look at the mountains of evidence that point to the "power behind the power" that is [lake of fire] bent on ruling the world and making all of us their slaves.



    Debbie aka FoxieNews August 25, 2012 at 12:59 PM

    The Passport and Travel records for August 1961 to AND from Kenya are MISSING. Do your homework!

    [ED.: Whether or not that is the case, it wouldn't matter. In August of 1961, Anna Obama, with her newborn, did not reenter the U.S. through New York - or Honolulu. She could not have brought her newborn through Customs without a passport, a copy of the Consular Report of Birth (State Dept. Form FS-240), or possibly
    a Form DS-1350, a short form Certification of Birth abstracted from the Form FS-240, which shows only the name and gender of the child, the date and place of birth, and the date of recording.

    To confer her U.S. citizenship upon her foreign-born child with an alien, she had to be at least 19 (at least 5 years a resident after age 14) when the child was born, according to the INA of 1952 then in effect. She was 117 days shy of 19 when Barack II was born, so the U.S. Consulate did not - could not - issue a Form FS-240 for her baby. Without a passport or an FS-240, she could not openly, legally, bring her baby into the U.S..

    No problem. She did not need a passport or an FS-240 to travel within the United Kingdom and Colonies (UKC). She almost certainly flew from Nairobi, Kenya, to London or Glasgow, Scotland, then to Toronto, Canada, and from there to Vancouver. One of her Mercer Island buddies in Seattle almost certainly picked her up in Vancouver and smuggled her into Washington state on some backwoods road with no Border Patrol presence. She did not set foot in Hawaii until Obama Sr. left the Islands, ten months later. Meanwhile, she took night classes for three quarters at the Univ. of Washington.

    I can't prove her flight itinerary without the airline records, except by deduction: how else could she have brought her undocumented, "unanchored baby" from Nairobi to Seattle?]



    Boss RJ August 25, 2012 at 10:38 AM

    Obama is an American citizen even if he was not born here. Why? Because both of his parents were high level CIA agents. [ED.: Actually, Anna Obama, born Stanley Ann Dunham, was a radical revolutionary hippie chick, a cheerleader for Ché Guevara and Malcolm X, who read Fanon and Marx for breakfast.] The CIA has it's own rules which supercede the US constitution. If a CIA agent is working deep cover in a foriegn country and gives birth, then the baby is automatically a US citizen. It is against the law to reveal the identity of a CIA agent; that is why so many public figures claim to have seen his birth certificate rather then reveal the truth, which is that Obama is CIA from a CIA family. Most people think his mom was a hippie who liked men of color. Actually his mom was in the third world doing banking... setting up buisness loans for for third world people.
    [ED.: even if all that were so, he would only be a U.S. citizen, not a natural born Citizen.]



    Debbie aka FoxieNews August 25, 2012 at 12:56 PM

    Here is what I do not understand. My step dad adopted me when I was a little girl. My last name changed to his last name, and I was issued a new birth certificate bearing his name, just as if he were present when I was born. Since then, I have never, ever been allowed to request or receive a birth certificate with my original birth last name on it. That person no longer exists. So HOW did Obama, if he was later adopted by [Lolo] Soetero, get his Obama birth name birth certificate anyway? I don't believe for one minute that he was born in Hawaii, or that he's even who he claims he is. I also know many people know the truth and have aided him in keeping his secrets safe, as well as the millions he's paid to hide his entire life!


    CM F September 25, 2012 at 12:13 AM

    The thing that still gets me the most about all of this is that he didn't immediately provide the birth certificate - I always come back to that. A man with nothing to hide would have got it out there immediately to stop the rumors. Perhaps a man with something to hide would take his time and/or attempt to keep it hidden at all costs.

    Is Obama legit?? Apparently, only he knows the truth, and he'll never tell.
    [ED.: we know the truth, and we're telling anyone who will listen.]


    cachick1111 December 6, 2012 at 8:08 AM

    Obama caused this controversy himself. Conservatives or Republicans did not cause it. The incredible amount of secrecy over his college records, his birth records, his past, his history, the millions of dollars he has spent to keep them all secret is the problem. Better that he had paid those millions to someone else's Presidential campaign that he liked. This controversy over his legitimacy to be the President of the United States of America will never go away. 100 years from now, people will still be asking the questions.

    He brought it upon himself, and as in most investigations,
    "People don't hide the Truth, unless they have something to hide."




    Spencer Renosis December 21, 2012 at 5:30 PM

    What I don't understand is, why? Why would they choose a candidate for the presidency who wasn't born in the country? It just doesn't make sense to me. It is not like Obama was the ONLY person who could have possibly been the candidate. It is not like they HAD to use Obama, so they had to lie to get him in. I really don't think there is some shortage of viable politicians, that they would be forced to use Obama fully knowing that he is ineligible. It wasn't like he was well known or popular with the common citizen before he was nominated. Basically, he was presented to the country as a nominee, they could have presented ANYONE! That is why this whole "birther" thing doesn't make sense to me.

    [ED.: Christ is the "Logos" Who makes sense of His entire creation. The mystery of iniquity and evil never makes sense in the long run - only for the moment.

    Why Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack Obama II?

    Because he is "The One;" groomed from birth to be the anti-president, the counterfeit messiah who would disestablish the United States top-down from within, and anointed as the future king by the King-makers
    :
    • from Anna Dunham Obama, Stanley Armour and Madelyn Dunham, and CPUSA member Frank Marshall Davis in Honolulu, to George Soros, John Podesta, and the Center for American Progress, fifth column Soviet influencer Alice Palmer, an Executive Board member of the Soros-funded U.S. Peace Council and co-founder of the Black Press Institute in Chicago, a communist propaganda outlet, and Robert Malley, Program Director for the Soros-funded International Crisis Group, who obtained an endorsement of Mr. Obama from Hamas;
    • from Zbigniew Brzezinski of Columbia Univ., CFR member and U.S. National Security Adviser to Pres. Carter, to convicted Pentagon bomber William Ayers (Alice Palmer introduced Barack Obama II to Ayers), ACORN, the SEIU, and the New Party in Chicago, which advocated for European-style socialism and also endorsed New Party member Barack Obama II for Illinois State Senator;
    • from Percy Sutton, Malcolm X's attorney, whose recommendation got Barack Obama II into Harvard Law School, to the man who paid for Mr. Obama's Harvard experience and his J.D. degree, Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, advisor to Saudi Prince al-Waleed bin Talal;
    • from the mujahideen in the Hindu Kush and the Mus1im Brotherhood in Egypt, to Nihad Awad, founder and director of CAIR in Chicago, and Prof. Edward Said of Columbia Univ., a member of the PLO's Palestinian National Council and an advisor to Yassar Arafat.

      (Courtesy, Debbie Schlussel, "Obama's NOI Staffers, Edward Said, etc.")

    For support of the NWO and the OIC, no one else even comes close to his heritage, pedigree, upbringing, indoctrination, and worldview.

    His political family which shaped and influenced his agenda includes:

    • "Uncle Joe" Stalin, who between 1929 and 1953 murdered between 20,000,000 and 43,000,000, depending upon "who counts the deaths;"
    • "Brother Saul" Alinsky, who dedicated his Rules for Radicals to Lucifer;
    • Minister of Black Liberation Theology (Marxist), the Rev. Jeremiah "God, DON'T bless America!" Wright;
    • "the Long-legged Mack Daddy" daddy, Malcolm X;
    • Mr. Obama's play pals of the Down Low Club (DLC), Man's Country, and the Chi-town bathhouse scene, including:
      Donald Young (executed in a gangland-style shooting),
      Larry Bland (executed in another gangland-style shooting), and
      Nate Spencer (died of septicemia and pneumonia
      as complications of AIDS);
    • his muscle, Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Is1am (NOI), and the south Chicago Mob;
    • and his homies, the Chicago Machine, Rahm Emmanuel, Eric Holder, & Co..

    Then there are his communist White House advisers: Valerie Jarrett, David Axelrod, John Podesta, Leon Panetta, Cass Sunstein, Donald Berwick, Ron Bloom, Mark Lloyd, Elizabeth Warren, John Holdren, and the rest of Mr. Obama's 45 Communist Czars -
    not that they made him what he is, but
    they do represent what he has become:

    the anti-president.



    sirwilliam January 27, 2013 at 5:25 AM

    The request by Clinton as Sec. of State of the USA to [the] British Archives to make this information unavailable is traitorous.
    [ED.: and probably treasonous as well.]
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 08-21-2014 at 01:27 PM.
    HAPPY2BME and kathyet2 like this.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  6. #5646
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Document not found, i.e., cartoon deleted, at
    scontent-a-atl.xx.fbcdn dot net/hphotos-xfp1/t1.0-9/10301456_708143592565216_30908740585605705_n.jpg

    Wayback Machine cannot recover it because of robots.txt. My apologies for not archiving it on Scribd or hosting it elsewhere.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-01-2015 at 09:06 PM.
    kathyet2 likes this.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  7. #5647
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546

  8. #5648
    Senior Member HAPPY2BME's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    17,895
    The evidence overwhelmingly, with concrete proof reveals that Barack Hussein Obama was born in Kenya to a goat herder ..

    Join our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & to secure US borders by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  9. #5649
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    8,546
    Quote Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC View Post
    [ED.: The Dan Crosby article quoted above deserves a full rendering here. Keep in mind that this article is over two years old, and a few details may have changed.]

    --------------------------------------------------------
    Wednesday, July 18, 2012

    OBAMA’S KENYAN BIRTH RECORDS DISCOVERED IN BRITISH NATIONAL ARCHIVES

    WHERE LIES GO TO DIE – Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives.

    (D. Pen Editor's note: The records alluded to in this story were discovered through a May, 2012, search through BMD Registers, a BNA partner site, using the search term "Obama". Corroborating evidence through public sources only implicates the identity of those involved but does not explicitly prove their identity [without the] original documents.)

    [ED.: But in a normal, American judicial process, the identities so implicated would merit a subpoena to get the original documents and to enter them into evidence, which should suffice to prove identity. However, this process is neither normal, nor confined to America, nor even judicial, given that every judge treats it like a hot potato or a live hαnd grεnαdε.]

    By Dan Crosby
    of The Daily Pen

    (Updated 7/23/2012)

    KEW, SURREY, GB – The last place anyone would think to look for a birth record of someone claiming to be a “natural born” U.S. citizen is Great Britain. The very inclusion of the Article II eligibility mandate in the U.S. Constitution was explicitly intended by the founding fathers of America to prevent a then British-born enemy usurper from attaining the office of the U.S. presidency and thereby undermining the sovereignty of the newly formed nation.

    In the absence of honor, courage and justice on the part of those serving in the U.S. Congress and Federal Judiciary, Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s Cold Case investigative group has concluded the only law enforcement analysis of the image of Obama’s alleged “Certificate of Live Birth” posted to a government website in April, 2011 and found it to be the product of criminal fraud and document forgery.

    The seeming endless evidence against Obama has now taken investigators to the foreign archives of Great Britain wherein it has been discovered that vital events occurring under the jurisdiction of the British Colony in the Protectorate of East Africa prior to 1965 were recorded and held in the main office of the British Registrar in England until 1995 before being archived in the BNA.

    It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons before 1963.

    Recall, investigative journalists working for Breitbart.com have already discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama’s literary agent in which he claimed he was born in Kenya. Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly. Since then information on Obama’s ties has been curtailed by government officials as the Obama administration has coincidently paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital projects in Kenya.

    Also, the presence of Obama's mother, Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted for from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama, until three weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961 when she allegedly applied for college courses at the University of Washington. Theories about her whereabouts have included that she participated in the Air Lift America project as an exchange student and traveled to Nairobi as one of many recent highschool graduates (see AASF Report 1959-1961).

    The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth.

    Based on procedures defined in Britain’s Births & Deaths Registration Act of 1953, The British Foreign & Commonwealth Office states the following:



    Recall, on August 1, 2009, Dr. Alan Keyes, Pamela Barnett and 42 other plaintiffs filed evidence in a lawsuit challenging Obama eligibility which included a copy of an image of an alleged Kenyan Copy of Certification of Registration of Birth (CCRB). In the hours after the image appeared on the internet, MSNBC and other liberal mainstream, pro-Obama networks went ballistic attempting to debunk the idea that such a document exists.

    The liberal media went out of its way to discredit the image, protesting too much, going as far as to claim that the Kenyan CCRB image was forged based on an Australian birth certificate which was miraculously discovered by an unnamed blogger for a man named Bomford.

    On August 2, Keith Olbermann led the deranged effort on his now defunct "Countdown" show to lie and propagandize the CCRB using insults and baseless criticism of unknown "birthers" who he claimed "attempted and failed to pass off a forgery."

    Strangely, however, no one in the mainstream liberal media would address the question now answered by the recent discovery at the BNA. The Bomford document and the Kenyan CCRB would indeed appear the same under British birth registration processes and documentation formats because both municipalities in Kenya and Australia, in 1961, operated under the Registrar General of the British government.

    It is now supported by the evidence discovered in the BNA that the Bomford document image from Australia was accessed and used by pro-Obama operatives as a template to alter the image of the Kenyan CCRB image in order to make it appear that "birthers" had created a bad counterfeit of a Kenyan birth record for Obama. This was done by Obama's forgers to create "shell game" confusion among the public and misdirect media attention from the truth that an original, unaltered Kenyan CCRB, which was never allowed to be publicly seen in its original form before Obama's forgers were able to access and change it, was actually an image of a legitimate document posted by unknown individuals who were known by Obama to possess the document before hand.

    Essentially, the Bomford affair was just another coverup to hide Obama's foreign birth records.

    The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to Obama are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a birth in 1961. Barack Obama is said to have died in 1982 and had married at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British colonial rule in 1963.


    To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963.


    A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were recorded in the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 2010).

    The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed in the archives. According to researchers, Obama’s line records were discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958.


    However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great Britain during her trip to Africa that year.

    www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/access-to-public-records.pdf

    Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency expressed surprise at Clintons arrival since she did not announce her intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to Africa.

    OBAMA’S FATHER FAILED TO INCLUDE BIRTH OF “SON” ON INS APPLICATION

    For someone who wanted to remain in America, it’s difficult to imagine any reason why Barack Obama’s alleged father, Barack the elder, would omit the birth of an “anchor baby” son on an application to extend his visa, just days after the birth occurred, unless…

    The American people were told by Barack Obama, unequivocally, that his father was a former goat herder from Kenya. However, INS documents filed in the very same month after Obama’s birth suggest the goat herding elder Obama didn’t “get the memo” that he was a daddy.

    On August 31st, 1961, just weeks after Obama’s birth was allegedly registered in a regional office of the Hawaiian Health Department, Obama the elder neglected to name is newborn son on an application for extension of his temporary visa to stay in the U.S.

    Obama’s omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical given the fact that the acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama’s application for an extension. The INS has long been more willing to extend the visa of a foreign parent of children born in the U.S., especially when the other parent is an American citizen.


    Despite the recent release of a documentary film “Dreams From My Real Father” presenting evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not the biological father of the younger Obama, the elder Obama is the man named as the father on the digital image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” which was posted to the internet by the administration in April of 2011. The document image has since been forensically examined by law enforcement investigators and determined to be a digitally fabricated forgery using Adobe software.


    THE UGLY TRUTH


    However, the sad and pathetic truth about Obama’s covert natal history and his illegitimacy lies at the bottom of a sordid pit of lies surrounding the paternity of his birth. Doubts about his identity, his eligibility, his intentions, his honesty and his honorability as a man stem from what appears to be an ugly truth about his mother’s probable sexual involvement with multiple men associated with the radical socialist movement in 1960’s Hawaii.


    Obama and his horde of abettors defend an improbable narrative about his identity. The veracity of this narrative has been damaged under the weight of a steady stream of crushing evidence demonstrating more than 180 disparities and contradictions to Obama’s claims of natal legitimacy as president.


    If Obama’s cause as a usurper of power is to avenge his father’s culture, he made the worst possible error in lying about who he is. Vintage America is on to him. Their instincts are slowly turning Obama’s fantasy of a socialist utopia for those he believes are humanity’s offended into a laughingstock. By building his vision for America on clay feet of lies about his who he is, he has undermined any intention of doing something good and right. He is not to be trusted.


    Moreover, Obama is learning the painful lesson that a message of “Hope and Change” means something vastly different to vintage America, the most powerful and affluent culture in human history, when that message has been proven to come from someone as audaciously dishonest and deceptively calculating as this son of otherness.


    Recall, in 2011, it was reported by The Daily Pen after an investigation of the State of Hawaii’s birth statistics collection protocols and vital records history that birth certificates are often amended after the birth while the original paper document is sealed under strict confidentiality rules when the identity of the father is either determined after birth or when the father named on the new version of the certificate has adopted or assumed paternal responsibility for the child.


    In the latter case, the original birth record may not contain the biological father’s name because the mother does not provide it, or it may list paternity as “unknown”, but this version is kept confidential under HRS 571. In some cases, the biological father may not even know he is the father if the mother has had more than one sexual partner prior to the pregnancy. There was no DNA test in 1961, however the 1961 Vital Statistics of the U.S. Report shows there were more than 1000 such “illegitimate” births reported in the state of Hawaii during that year, about 1 in 17.


    Therefore, the paternity of the child at the actual time of the birth is not disclosed while the new amended certificate is upheld as the original version displaying the name of the newly identified or adoptive father as indistinguishable if different from the biological father. This law is meant to protect the child from stigmas resulting from illegitimacy, rape, incest or adultery. Under these circumstances it is not possible to know the paternal status of a child at birth unless the original birth record is made accessible by authorized persons under Hawaiian law.


    However, notations indicating that a certificate contains updated paternal information would be typed or printed in the lower margin of the new certificate, below the signature section. This lower margin of the image of Obama’s certificate has been shown by computer experts to be concealed by forgers using a “clipping mask”. A clipping mask is a feature available in Adobe software which limits the viewable area on a document image through which only selected information can be seen. In the case of Obama’s forged certificate, the information we have been allowed to see within the frame of the clipping mask may merely reflect an amended birth record while concealing notations of the amendments which exists in the lower margin outside the frame of the clipping mask.


    Regardless of any level of truth about any individual piece of information in the image, overall, the final image is the product of criminals and liars.

    If Obama is not the biological father, or if paternal information is listed on the original certificate as “unknown”, the state of Hawaii keeps this information secret until a court orders the documents to be released for discovery purposes in determining Obama’s eligibility. Thus far, courts have lacked courage to uphold the Constitution thereby propagating the greatest political fraud in American history. Judges are simply washing their hands of the issue by refusing to even consider actual evidence against Obama, denying citizens of justice and their Constitutional right to a redress of grievances, because they simply do not have the courage to face the legal crisis such a revelation would cause.

    Cowardly judges refuse to allow any exposure Obama’s actual natural born identity and, in their dereliction, have conjured a legal fantasy filled with pressurizing wrath in which a candidate’s eligibility for president is not only declared legally uncontestable but is also automatically preeminent. In allowing this, judges have allowed a dangerous precedent in which any foreign invader can covertly usurp the power of the U.S. government simply by lying about their citizenship status and hiding documentation with the help of the American media and a complicit legal system.


    THE MARRIAGE SHAM


    On his application, when asked the name and address of his spouse, it appears Obama may have first written the name of his actual wife in Kenya before blacking it out and writing “Ann S. Dunham”.


    Despite evidence indicating that Obama was simultaneously married to a woman in Kenya, it is suspected that he claimed to be married to Dunham in order to use the marriage as leverage to remain in the U.S. There is no evidence or testimony that Obama ever loved Dunham or that the two had ever been engaged. The two did not live together before or after being married and there were no letters, no ring, no announcement or, most importantly, no legal marriage registration with the State of Hawaii.


    Despite a complete void of documented proof of the marriage, it appears Dunham was granted a statutory divorce from Obama in 1964. However, images posted of the court documents from the decree contain no original documented proof of a marriage or legal documents showing that Obama was the father of Dunham’s child. A review of the court documents shows that at least one document, perhaps an original birth certificate for baby Obama, was missing from the numbering sequence.


    THE INS’ PERSPECTIVE


    Being legitimately married to a U.S. citizen would be a benefit toward allowing a foreign spouse to remain the U.S. However, no marriage license application or public announcement has ever been found to indicate that Obama and Dunham were ever married or that Obama had even divorced his Kenyan wife prior to an alleged wedding with Dunham. This fact supports the contents of memos from college and INS officials who expressed doubts about the legitimacy of Obama’s relationship with Dunham, even questioning the motive of such a union between a teenage woman and a foreign student facing visa expiration just days after the birth of her child.


    From the perspective of an INS agent, the circumstances surrounding Obama’s relationship with Dunham would have raised suspicions. Immigration fraud was rampant during Hawaii’s foreign birth accommodation era in the 1960’s.


    Since Obama was a foreigner wanting to extend his temporary visa, the INS certainly understood that by claiming a marriage to Dunham, it would promote INS approval of an extension, but in Dunham’s case there was an added risk to the relationship for Obama…she was pregnant.


    It appears, from the contents of documents in Obama’s INS file, when pressed by INS agents and school officials on the actual validity of his relationship to Dunham and baby Obama, having certainly been advised of legal ramifications for lying, he refused to name Obama as his child but maintained that he was married to Dunham. This indicates that Obama was either not certain if he was the biological father, or that he knew he wasn’t.


    Under child protection laws in many states, including Hawaii, when the biological father is deceased or unidentified by the mother, the man who is married to the mother at the time she gives birth automatically becomes the father named on the official birth certificate until it is proven in court that he is not the biological father. “Mandatory Legitimacy” applies even if the birth is the result of adultery, when the mother is married at the time of birth, until paternity is successfully contested. Today, DNA testing allows for conclusive determinations about paternity, but in 1961, it was more difficult to determine paternity. Hawaii’s child welfare statutes indicate the “statutory” father’s name on the certificate may be removed by court order, if paternity is successfully contested, after a judge has decided the case in the interest of the child’s welfare. This law is intended to protect the child if the mother dies.


    DELUSIONS OF LEGITIMACY


    Government officials in Hawaii, including Governor Neil Abercrombie, Lt. Governor Brian Schatz and former Hawaiian elections official, Tim Adams have all indicated that they could find no original record of Obama’s alleged birth in any hospital in Hawaii in the course of their duties to verify his eligibility. The absence of verifiable birth documentation was so apparent that Schatz, serving as the chairman of the Democrat Party of Hawaii in 2008, refused to certify that Obama was indeed constitutionally eligible to hold the office of president when he submitted the Official Certification of Nomination of Obama. Schatz deferred the responsibility to Nancy Pelosi and DNC, and then Chair of the Hawaiian Elections Commission, Kevin Cronin. Cronin resigned suddenly after controversy surrounding his decision began to strain his relationship with the commission.


    Ignorance, lies and lack of understanding about the difference between a medically verified birth and a legal registration of birth has confused the public about Obama’s natal history and eligibility.


    Liars and abettors in media and government, drudging on behalf of the Obama administration, have anchored their Alinsky-style ridicule of those questioning Obama’s eligibility in a delusion that he must be legitimate because his birth was announced in two Hawaiian newspapers.


    The elder Obama’s name appears as the father of a newborn son in images of two birth announcements appearing in two Honolulu newspapers on August 13th and 14th, 1961. Birth announcements in Hawaii in 1961 were published automatically from a birth registration list provided directly to the papers by the Hawaiian Department of Health. The notifications of births provided to the Health Department, however, were not only the product of information provided by hospitals and doctors, alone.


    The distinction between the information used by the hospital to create a “Certificate of Live Birth” and the information used by the Department of Health to create a birth registration is that information used to create birth registrations were allowed to be submitted from anyone possessing credible information about the birth, including family members, witnesses or attendants, regardless of the actual location of the birth. Contrarily, the information on a “Live Birth” record must be verified and attested by a licensed medical doctor qualified to determine the characteristics of a live birth event. This is important in cases when a distinction was needed between a “still birth” and a baby that may have been born alive but then died upon delivery. In the latter case, both a birth certificate and a death certificate are required while a still birth requires only a death certificate because of the definition of a live birth under HRS 338-1.


    Hawaii has a long history of allocating foreign births to the mother’s claimed Hawaiian residence regardless of the actual location of the birth, which was in compliance with guidelines established by the National Center for Health Statistics in order to accurately attribute data from births with decadal Census figures. Unfortunately, these vital statistics reporting guidelines are not conducive with determining the natural born status of the child.


    For example, the Bureau of Census in 1961 counted all residents by county regardless of their temporary absence at the time of the Census when the Census worker was able to identify residents of a county through the information provided by others. This applies even today.


    Therefore, beginning in as early as 1933, it was determined that births must be accounted the same way for all usual residents regardless of the mother’s location at the time of the event when that resident mother intended to return to that county. In Hawaii, if a child did not have an official certificate prior to the mother’s return, the local Health Department was obligated to provide one under the Model State Vital Statistics Act of 1942, Section 8 of Hawaii’s Public Health Regulations and HRS 338.


    The impact of population figures on the Hawaii’s economy and agency resources was very significant in 1961. The accuracy of the Census takes precedence over the accuracy and veracity of vital statistics in the U.S. Vital statistics are reported annually, but the Census only occurs every ten years which means there is large volume of population which goes untracked between Census years. If births and deaths were not allocated to the residents of each county, regardless of the location of the vital event, the results would cause large disparities when compared with the Census data.


    Posted by Penbrook One at 3:03 PM


    a few of the 159 comments:

    Shawny July 18, 2012 at 9:01 PM

    At that time, the British National Archives was located at St. Catherines House in London. I learned that while doing the genealogy for some Manx ancestors. Isle of Man was also a British Protectorate, so all of the birth, death, and Christening records were filed in London. And even as a back up to that, the Mormon church (Latter Day Saints) microfilmed most of the records in London, so references to those births should be found on index reels from which to order copies of the actual microfilmed document. Sheriff Arpaio has asked for microfilm from Hawaii, but nowhere else.


    Sam Sewell July 19, 2012 at 12:08 AM

    If the ineligibility movement [were] not scoring significant victories, why would the Democratic Party and Obama’s supporters be trying so hard to silence the issue? Why not encourage the legal establishment to rule on the evidence and the law, rather than avoiding the facts? Why not encourage the Supreme Court to rule, rather than evade? Why not encourage a public open discussion of the ineligibility issue? Why not have public debates on national television? Why not release the many documents that reveal Obama’s history? Why not give millions of citizens the information they want? Or, why not simply ignore it? Why indeed? I know why. The “birthers” are winning, and Obama can’t afford to give them any more ammunition!

    Evidence Obama Ineligibility Movement is Winning

    thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2012/07/evidence-obama-ineligibility-movement.html

    Exposing Obama’s PSYOPS Agents and Tactics
    thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2009/05/exposing-obamas-psyops-agents-and.html


    cfkerchner July 19, 2012 at 11:01 AM

    Keep up the good work. CDR Kerchner (Ret), ProtectOurLiberty.org


    Gene July 20, 2012 at 11:02 AM

    The silence concerning the elimination of the natural born eligibility requirement is deafening. There is a bi-partisan coup that is ongoing and you will not [know] it, if you watch TV or read the NYT.

    See wp.me/p2i3SD-6 which analyzes the serial hypocrisy of the GOP regarding this issue. You likely notice how quiet they are. The reasons are: George [not Mitt] Romney, Sen Rubio, Gov. Jindal, and even Sen McCain. None of these people are natural born. So, while being angry at the "President", be sure to vote out anyone who says natural born is the same as native born.


    lazarus2 July 21, 2012 at 7:27 AM

    Had Barack Hussein Obama robbed a bank, or raped someone, or even murdered somebody, these would have been LESSER crimes than the crime he has knowingly and willingly committed. He isn't a victim, he is a criminal along with Nancy Pelosi and all those others holding high government offices who helped perpetrate this treasonous act. The damage Obama has done to not only the 300 million plus Americans who "elected" him under false pretenses, but the entire world, cannot be undone. Consider the choices he has made, the executive orders he has issued, and the general lack of regard for the people who trusted him, and you should come to the conclusion that he must be removed from office immediately and tried for treason. There is no other choice. Had he committed the much lesser crimes mentioned above, he could still legally serve out his term of office. However, considering the magnitude of this crime... the biggest fraud in U.S. history... and the damage he's already done, he must go immediately and all... ALL... those who helped him must be placed on trial as co-conspirators.


    Sam Sewell July 21, 2012 at 10:08 PM

    POLL: Only 9% Believe Obama Has Documented His Eligibility
    thesteadydrip.blogspot.com/2012/07/poll-only-9-believe-obama-has.html

    Many of the national opinion polls show that a large segment of the citizens still have questions about Obama’s questionable history, and they still want answers! In a July 2012 poll 45% of the general public and 69% of Republicans have doubts about Obama’s birthplace. Many voters have been influenced away from voting for Obama because of the obvious cover up of Obama’s past. Just type these search words into Google and see for yourself: obama eligible poll. The ineligibility movement has educated the voters beyond the circumstances of Obama’s birth and the citizenship of his father. Now people are aware that Obama’s history of education, medical history, travel and passport history, the history of his parent’s marriage and divorce, adoption records, the records of the Illinois bar, Illinois State Senate records, his beliefs, past associates, personal behavior and many other mysteries still remain unresolved. The uncertainty created by Obama’s cover up will significantly affect voting outcome. Most presidential elections are decided by a very narrow margin. Given that about half the American people are uncertain about Obama’s history, the 2012 vote will be more influenced by the ineligibility movement than any demographic group. That is a victory of the “think for themselves” citizens over the ambiguous cover ups offered by the ruling elite! Yet another clear victory for the birthers!



    Eugene Pilcher July 22, 2012 at 7:08 AM

    Thank you Sam. I would like to include his fraudulent Conn. SS number [issued to a Connecticut resident - ED.]. There is the murder of two of his gay lovers in Chicago. His Chicago mansion was purchased without paying the correct taxes, at a below market price. The empty lot next door was purchased from the same owner at an inflated price by a Chicago mobster, and then he did nothing with it. A law firm where he worked and the mobster were both paid large sums of federal housing money after he became Senator.


    Tulsa Jack July 23, 2012 at 2:46 PM

    So Hillary "Mz. Bill" Clinton, in her official capacity as U.S. Secretary of State, visited London, England, and induced the British government to withhold its documentary, archival evidence that Obama is a criminal fraud from public scrutiny. That makes Hillary "Mz. Bill" Clinton a co-conspirator, aiding and abetting a set of circumstances that have the malicious intent to place, and to keep in place, a foreigner in the office of President of the United States. The word for that ultimately disloyal act is treason. HillyBilly knows this, as do Reid and Pelosi, and the lying, complicit subversives in the Hawaiian government. That is why they are so desperate to bury the truth of The Kenyan's real identity. They will not succeed. I look forward to the day when everyone associated with this outrage, including the disgraced judges, is sent to jail for life.


    Gabriel Almendarez July 23, 2012 at 9:08 PM

    Are those British shredders I'm hearing?


    Mr Baggins July 27, 2012 at 6:20 AM

    The depth and breadth of corruption in our federal government is unprecedented. It is well established in BOTH Parties, and the crimes being committed daily have been ongoing for DECADES. A concerted effort to destroy this nation has been ongoing since it's inception, and it has made a great deal of headway, mostly through subversive means, through manipulation and infiltration of the federal government.

    The idea that we truly have a say in choosing our elected leaders through the voting process is a complete farce at the federal level, and there is vast manipulation at the lower levels as well, most of it funded by the same factions that have infiltrated our nation's capital.

    They are in complete control of the DNC and largely of the GOP. Manipulation of the 2008 primaries by the DNC includes multiple murders (see Bettina Viviano's expose on the 2008 election) and threats to murder Chelsea Clinton, if Bill Clinton revealed what he knew about Obama's ineligibility for office.

    While "posing" as our President and under the guise of "Commander in Chief", he has sent our troops to die. Since he is fraudulently holding office, this is murder. Those who placed him in in office (not the voters), his "handlers" and those in the DNC who knew that he was ineligible, are complicit in his crimes.

    Both Bush presidencies set the stage for the final act in bring about the "New World Oder" that Obama was "selected" to usher in. He is a complete fraud, his whole life story is a fabrication. He IS the Manchurian Candidate, and his "assignment" is to destroy this nation and establish a totalitarian state, and if he succeeds, America is "OVER"!

    Many have been "asleep", and that is largely due to an incredible and sustained effort by those in power, largely "behind the scene," through a vast array of control devices which undermine our ability to think and reason for ourselves {google: The Brookings Institute and The Tavistock Institute, Chemtrails, Vaccinations, Fluoridation, GMO, The Rothschild Dynasty, The Svali Documents, The Men Who Killed Kennedy, The Federal Reserve, Subliminal Advertising, the documentary: America: From Freedom to Fascism (Aaron Russo was killed because of this documentary)}. Discover the truth for yourselves. These searches will lead you to much, much more. See the new movie, "Runaway Slave." Stop believing the lies!

    The vast conspiracy - YES, I said CONSPIRACY - is slowly but surely being exposed, and more and more people are beginning to see what is going on. PLEASE open your eyes! WAKE UP. Look at the mountains of evidence that point to the "power behind the power" that is [lake of fire] bent on ruling the world and making all of us their slaves.



    Debbie aka FoxieNews August 25, 2012 at 12:59 PM

    The Passport and Travel records for August 1961 to AND from Kenya are MISSING. Do your homework!

    [ED.: Whether or not that is the case, it wouldn't matter. In August of 1961, Anna Obama, with her newborn, did not reenter the U.S. through New York - or Honolulu. She could not have brought her newborn through Customs without a passport, a copy of the Consular Report of Birth (State Dept. Form FS-240), or possibly
    a Form DS-1350, a short form Certification of Birth abstracted from the Form FS-240, which shows only the name and gender of the child, the date and place of birth, and the date of recording.

    To confer her U.S. citizenship upon her foreign-born child with an alien, she had to be at least 19 (at least 5 years a resident after age 14) when the child was born, according to the INA of 1952 then in effect. She was 117 days shy of 19 when Barack II was born, so the U.S. Consulate did not - could not - issue a Form FS-240 for her baby. Without a passport or an FS-240, she could not openly, legally, bring her baby into the U.S..

    No problem. She did not need a passport or an FS-240 to travel within the United Kingdom and Colonies (UKC). She almost certainly flew from Nairobi, Kenya, to London or Glasgow, Scotland, then to Toronto, Canada, and from there to Vancouver. One of her Mercer Island buddies in Seattle almost certainly picked her up in Vancouver and smuggled her into Washington state on some backwoods road with no Border Patrol presence. She did not set foot in Hawaii until Obama Sr. left the Islands, ten months later. Meanwhile, she took night classes for three quarters at the Univ. of Washington.

    I can't prove her flight itinerary without the airline records, except by deduction: how else could she have brought her undocumented, "unanchored baby" from Nairobi to Seattle?]



    Boss RJ August 25, 2012 at 10:38 AM

    Obama is an American citizen even if he was not born here. Why? Because both of his parents were high level CIA agents. [ED.: Actually, Anna Obama, born Stanley Ann Dunham, was a radical revolutionary hippie chick, a cheerleader for Ché Guevara and Malcolm X, who read Fanon and Marx for breakfast.] The CIA has it's own rules which supercede the US constitution. If a CIA agent is working deep cover in a foriegn country and gives birth, then the baby is automatically a US citizen. It is against the law to reveal the identity of a CIA agent; that is why so many public figures claim to have seen his birth certificate rather then reveal the truth, which is that Obama is CIA from a CIA family. Most people think his mom was a hippie who liked men of color. Actually his mom was in the third world doing banking... setting up buisness loans for for third world people.
    [ED.: even if all that were so, he would only be a U.S. citizen, not a natural born Citizen.]



    Debbie aka FoxieNews August 25, 2012 at 12:56 PM

    Here is what I do not understand. My step dad adopted me when I was a little girl. My last name changed to his last name, and I was issued a new birth certificate bearing his name, just as if he were present when I was born. Since then, I have never, ever been allowed to request or receive a birth certificate with my original birth last name on it. That person no longer exists. So HOW did Obama, if he was later adopted by [Lolo] Soetero, get his Obama birth name birth certificate anyway? I don't believe for one minute that he was born in Hawaii, or that he's even who he claims he is. I also know many people know the truth and have aided him in keeping his secrets safe, as well as the millions he's paid to hide his entire life!


    CM F September 25, 2012 at 12:13 AM

    The thing that still gets me the most about all of this is that he didn't immediately provide the birth certificate - I always come back to that. A man with nothing to hide would have got it out there immediately to stop the rumors. Perhaps a man with something to hide would take his time and/or attempt to keep it hidden at all costs.

    Is Obama legit?? Apparently, only he knows the truth, and he'll never tell.
    [ED.: we know the truth, and we're telling anyone who will listen.]


    cachick1111 December 6, 2012 at 8:08 AM

    Obama caused this controversy himself. Conservatives or Republicans did not cause it. The incredible amount of secrecy over his college records, his birth records, his past, his history, the millions of dollars he has spent to keep them all secret is the problem. Better that he had paid those millions to someone else's Presidential campaign that he liked. This controversy over his legitimacy to be the President of the United States of America will never go away. 100 years from now, people will still be asking the questions.

    He brought it upon himself, and as in most investigations,
    "People don't hide the Truth, unless they have something to hide."




    Spencer Renosis December 21, 2012 at 5:30 PM

    What I don't understand is, why? Why would they choose a candidate for the presidency who wasn't born in the country? It just doesn't make sense to me. It is not like Obama was the ONLY person who could have possibly been the candidate. It is not like they HAD to use Obama, so they had to lie to get him in. I really don't think there is some shortage of viable politicians, that they would be forced to use Obama fully knowing that he is ineligible. It wasn't like he was well known or popular with the common citizen before he was nominated. Basically, he was presented to the country as a nominee, they could have presented ANYONE! That is why this whole "birther" thing doesn't make sense to me.

    [ED.: Christ is the "Logos" Who makes sense of His entire creation. The mystery of iniquity and evil never makes sense in the long run - only for the moment.

    Why Barry Soetoro, a.k.a. Barack Obama II?

    Because he is "The One;" groomed from birth to be the anti-president, the counterfeit messiah who would disestablish the United States top-down from within, and anointed as the future king by the King-makers
    :
    • from Anna Dunham Obama, Stanley Armour and Madelyn Dunham, and CPUSA member Frank Marshall Davis in Honolulu, to George Soros, John Podesta, and the Center for American Progress, fifth column Soviet influencer Alice Palmer, an Executive Board member of the Soros-funded U.S. Peace Council and co-founder of the Black Press Institute in Chicago, a communist propaganda outlet, and Robert Malley, Program Director for the Soros-funded International Crisis Group, who obtained an endorsement of Mr. Obama from Hamas;
    • from Zbigniew Brzezinski of Columbia Univ., CFR member and U.S. National Security Adviser to Pres. Carter, to convicted Pentagon bomber William Ayers (Alice Palmer introduced Barack Obama II to Ayers), ACORN, the SEIU, and the New Party in Chicago, which advocated for European-style socialism and also endorsed New Party member Barack Obama II for Illinois State Senator;
    • from Percy Sutton, Malcolm X's attorney, whose recommendation got Barack Obama II into Harvard Law School, to the man who paid for Mr. Obama's Harvard experience and his J.D. degree, Dr. Khalid al-Mansour, advisor to Saudi Prince al-Waleed bin Talal;
    • from the mujahideen in the Hindu Kush and the Mus1im Brotherhood in Egypt, to Nihad Awad, founder and director of CAIR in Chicago, and Prof. Edward Said of Columbia Univ., a member of the PLO's Palestinian National Council and an advisor to Yassar Arafat.

      (Courtesy, Debbie Schlussel, "Obama's NOI Staffers, Edward Said, etc.")

    For support of the NWO and the OIC, no one else even comes close to his heritage, pedigree, upbringing, indoctrination, and worldview.

    His political family which shaped and influenced his agenda includes:

    • "Uncle Joe" Stalin, who between 1929 and 1953 murdered between 20,000,000 and 43,000,000, depending upon "who counts the deaths;"
    • "Brother Saul" Alinsky, who dedicated his Rules for Radicals to Lucifer;
    • Minister of Black Liberation Theology (Marxist), the Rev. Jeremiah "God, DON'T bless America!" Wright;
    • "the Long-legged Mack Daddy" daddy, Malcolm X;
    • Mr. Obama's play pals of the Down Low Club (DLC), Man's Country, and the Chi-town bathhouse scene, including:
      Donald Young (executed in a gangland-style shooting),
      Larry Bland (executed in another gangland-style shooting), and
      Nate Spencer (died of septicemia and pneumonia
      as complications of AIDS);
    • his muscle, Louis Farrakhan's Nation of Is1am (NOI), and the south Chicago Mob;
    • and his homies, the Chicago Machine, Rahm Emmanuel, Eric Holder, & Co..

    Then there are his communist White House advisers: Valerie Jarrett, David Axelrod, John Podesta, Leon Panetta, Cass Sunstein, Donald Berwick, Ron Bloom, Mark Lloyd, Elizabeth Warren, John Holdren, and the rest of Mr. Obama's 45 Communist Czars -
    not that they made him what he is, but
    they do represent what he has become:

    the anti-president.



    sirwilliam January 27, 2013 at 5:25 AM

    The request by Clinton as Sec. of State of the USA to [the] British Archives to make this information unavailable is traitorous.
    [ED.: and probably treasonous as well.]

    There is a wealth of information in the message thanks for sharing

  10. #5650
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    The Second Law of Thermodynamics * is never suspended or repealed, no matter who occupies the White House or the Office of the Attorney General.
    * Things run down, not up. In the absence of external input or force, any system tends to decay, not to greater order.
    In a closed system, the capacity to do work only decreases, never increases.

    Quote Originally Posted by joepotato, commenting at Freedom Outpost
    No one wants to admit that this post turtle (puppet) POTUS is a foreigner at the worst and anti-American at best...
    The Romans probably thought they were reasonably secure too... Not only does the USA have enemies at the gate, we have enemies within the gates... That spells disaster...
    @joepotato, we have enemies not only within the gates, but within the Oval Office, a few within the Supreme Court, and a multitude within the Senate and the House, within the CIA, the NSA, the DOJ, and the IRS, within the State Dept., being citizens of the world while acting as Officers of the United States, and even within the U.S. Armed Forces, if Mr. Obama is allowed to continue purging flag and senior officers who would stand in his way.

    And then we have the Fed. The borrower becomes the lender's slave. (Proverbs 22:7b)

    We have foreign enemies of every stripe passing through our open southwest border, and enemies troubleshooting U.S. financial databases and confidential medical records remotely from India and Pakistan;
    enemies paying attention while driving the cabs and disposing of confidential documents, cleaning hotel rooms in order to compromise key government figures, waiting tables inside the Beltway while pretending not to understand English, performing as chefs and butlers with urbane sophistication by day, and by night passing along what they overheard.

    We have enemies, and countless persons with loyalties to other than the U.S., teaching in high schools and graduate schools, all the while molding malleable minds into compliance, creating militant anti-U.S. ideologues, or dumbing down useful idiots.

    E pluribus unum . . . or ab uno, multis.

    Enemies don't have to blσw µp tall buildings to bring a nation down to rubble.


    Allow me to
    correlate enemies of the nation
    to sin from the tempter, the enemy of the soul.

    "God is calling us to remain unstained
    In the rising flood of sin,
    And it's easier to keep it out
    If we don't invite it in."

    From "Build on Higher Ground,"
    as sung by Steve Green.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 08-27-2014 at 04:53 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •