Results 761 to 770 of 5732
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
02-03-2009, 07:42 AM #761Originally Posted by armbruster512
http://www.military.com/news/article/sa ... 6032310810
Separately, I think that not many of our elected officials wants to give up the trappings of their public office, including their royal positions as our rulers (opposed to their being our public servants), and so the fights we face getting them to obey the law are going to require increasing determination, stamina, and smarts on our parts. Maybe our fortunes also.
This lawless government problem didn't happen over night, and it won't get fixed over night either. We allowed it to happen, and we have to fix it.
This might be a good time to study American history and constitutional law on a personal basis. One of the New England governor's big complaints to King George was that everyone in the colonies knew the law. We need to get that way again.
On an individual basis, if you haven't explored The Committees of Safety, now would be a good time to do so. http://www.committeesofsafety.org/In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. -- Mark Twain
-
02-03-2009, 07:57 AM #762Originally Posted by Mayday
Now is NOT the time for us to be compassionate and understanding. Now is the time for us to be pi$$ed off and angry.
Time for change all right. Change caused by us over our own government. They don't follow the law - they're gone or in jail.In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. -- Mark Twain
-
02-03-2009, 08:34 AM #763
I have been concerned by the removal of Obama related material found via Google for some time. This is a huge discredit to Google as a search engine service, and a huge red flag for us, telling us that we are very deeply immersed in an era of misinformation, promulgated by members of our government and at least one of our major political parties.
The problem seems to be getting much worse lately (since Obama's election), and in addition to missing information, the implantation of misleading and false information intended to misinform and manipulate the information seeker is becoming more widespread.
Dr. Orly seems to be having problems with this, and comments accordingly on her blog site: http://www.drorly.blogspot.com/
If this problem is as large as I suspect, we will have to become much smarter in our information searches, and rely more completely on actual written records. The era of free and accurate information via the Internet may be passing, thanks to certain government interference and control.
Is this what we asked from our government and from our elected officials?
I don't think so.In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. -- Mark Twain
-
02-03-2009, 12:57 PM #764
Pursuing my earlier thoughts on disinformation and data removal from the Internet, I just became aware of this company (ReputationDefender) and felt that the company information worth passing along.
"ReputationDefender was created in 2006 to defend your good name on the Internet. Today, ReputationDefender has grown to be the world's first comprehensive online reputation management and privacy company. We're the most experienced and most technologically innovative company of our kind. With customers in over 35 countries, ReputationDefender is proud to serve a global customer base throughout the world's largest community - the Internet.
Our goal is straightforward:
* To SEARCH out all information about you and your family throughout the Internet and present it to you in a clear, easy-to-understand fashion
* To provide DESTROY assistance, helping to remove, at your request, inaccurate, inappropriate, hurtful, and slanderous information about you and your family using our proprietary in-house methodology. This same mission extends to your personally identifiable information, like name, address, and phone number.
* To deliver CONTROL over how others are able to perceive you on the Internet"
http://www.reputationdefender.com/
=================
This company's techniques are probably the very same techniques Obama's legal teams use to remove all private information about Obama from the Internet.
Good thing for us all to understand. Now you can do it too.In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. -- Mark Twain
-
02-03-2009, 01:20 PM #765
" The era of free and accurate information via the Internet may be passing, thanks to certain government interference and control. "
I didn't think that anyone ever thought that the info that is on the internet was accurate or believable.
Just look at all of the accusations that McCain and Obama weren't born in the U.S. and couldn't be president.
It's hard to imagine that people actually believed all of that stuff.NO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
02-03-2009, 06:24 PM #766Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/ ... rd_google/
What's interesting about that tight relationship has a tie-back to the fall when all the bad news about Blago was hitting the fan. There was a local TV station in Illinois that reported on its website about how Obama's early denial of any contact with Blago (which was phrased generically as "no contact" after the election and not just about "contacts" to discuss who would fill his vacated Senate seat) was in error and pointed to their being photographed together at a Governor's Association gathering and also to what Obama's own "main man" had been quoted as saying on TV, to the effect that "President Elect Obama has been in touch with the Governor ...." about the seat and that they both had lists of "favorite names" for the vacancy. A remark that the aide had to quickly retract as a misstatement once Blago imploded. The TV station took down its "honest" report not too long after the honest reporting was put up. Probably facing "heat" from Obama aides in so doing. Some enterprising bloggers saved screen shots which Drudge put to good effect. What was truly interesting is that somebody must have had a hotline to the Google Cache Commissar because even the "cache memory" screenshots -- which Google policy states is to keep available online for up to 18 months, even though it wants to shorten the period to 6 months if all other search engine services come to agreement on it -- were deleted.
99 out of 100 politicians lie. McCain got a Washington Post reporter to "lie" for him by claiming that the campaign had furnished the bozo (ahem ... reporter) with a bona fide BC and that the bozo could "verify" it stated that McCain was born ON THE COCO SOLO NAVAL BASE. Poof! That story reported in April and May 2008 by WaPo went up in flames in June 2008 when the honest-to-goodness original BC was obtained directly from the Panamanian government and showed the city hospital in Colon, Panama -- decidedly OFF THE BASE -- was the true birthplace. And a different doctor's name was on the original, not the military doctor that the "bozo" reported as having signed the document he viewed.
Even though Professor Chin's law review article had made short work of any claim that the Zone was "U.S. soil" prior to the 1937 law which made it so, the proof of the pudding in that original BC only fortified what the earnest law professor had concluded about McCain's ineligibility.
Bottom line: If 99 out of 100 lie, then those 99 are looking for any way they can to exert leverage to get media or Internet outlets to "help" them lie. Schmidt was so tight with Obama that he was the earliest frontrunner mentioned for the Commerce post.
-
02-03-2009, 06:42 PM #767Originally Posted by Mayday
-
02-03-2009, 08:26 PM #768Originally Posted by FreedomFirst
However, he was at the time of the meeting of the 8.Proud American and wife of a wonderful LEGAL immigrant from Ireland.
The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797) Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
02-03-2009, 09:38 PM #769
- Join Date
- May 2007
- Location
- South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
- Posts
- 117,696
AN OPEN LETTER TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT
By Lynn Stuter
February 3, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
The Honorable Chief Justice John G Roberts
Honorable Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr
Honorable Justice Stephen G. Breyer
Honorable Justice Ruth B. Ginsburg
Honorable Justice Anthony M. Kennedy
Honorable Justice Antonin Scalia
Honorable Justice David H. Souter
Honorable Justice John Paul Stevens
Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas
United States Supreme Court
1 First Street N.E.
Washington, DC 20543
On January 20, 2009, Chief Justice John G Roberts administered the presidential oath of office to a man who has failed to provide one iota of evidence that he is, indeed, a natural born citizen of the United States as required by Article II, Section 1, United States Constitution. To the contrary, overwhelming evidence indicates this man to be a citizen, to this day, of Indonesia; that he owes no allegiance and has proven no allegiance to the United State of America, its Constitution and Bill of Rights, or its people.
Application after application, asking for injunctive relief to stop the forward march to what would result in a Constitutional crisis, was requested of the United States Supreme Court, only to be denied to the last one, irrespective of merit, irrespective of the impending Constitutional crisis that would result were this impostor sworn in as president of the United States.
The people ask, “Is the Constitution not important to the United States Supreme Court that it would so easily deny these applications for injunctive relief?â€Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
02-03-2009, 09:42 PM #770
Supreme Court justices will discuss challenge to Obama's citizenship Friday
Though it writes that the legal action has "little chance of succeeding," the Chicago Tribune notes that Supreme Court justices will sit down tomorrow to "take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship."
At issue is the contention of some Obama opponents that he either wasn't born a U.S. citizen or that at one point as a child he gave up his citizenship. The arguments have been dismissed by lower courts and well as by Obama and his aides.
The nonpartisan FactCheck.org reported earlier this year that its researchers "have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship."
Another nonpartisan fact-checking outfit, PolitiFact.com, reached the same conclusion.
Justice Clarence Thomas submitted the case, Donofrio v. Wells, for the court's consideration.
Posted by Mark Memmott at 01:58 PM/ET, December 04, 2008 in Election law
USA TODAY Online
http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/NO AMNESTY
Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.
Sign in and post comments here.
Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
72 Hours Till Deadline: Durbin moves on Amnesty
04-28-2024, 02:18 PM in illegal immigration Announcements