Page 77 of 574 FirstFirst ... 276773747576777879808187127177 ... LastLast
Results 761 to 770 of 5732
Like Tree97Likes

Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #761
    Senior Member HighlanderJuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    1,054
    Quote Originally Posted by armbruster512
    As WND also reported, DHS has awarded a $385 million contract to Houston-based KBR, Halliburton's former engineering and construction subsidiary, to build temporary detention centers on an "as-needed" basis in national emergency situations.
    KBR is the same contractor accused of faulty wiring in American military base showers in Iraq that resulted in a number of U.S. soldier deaths by electrocution. Good company.

    http://www.military.com/news/article/sa ... 6032310810

    Separately, I think that not many of our elected officials wants to give up the trappings of their public office, including their royal positions as our rulers (opposed to their being our public servants), and so the fights we face getting them to obey the law are going to require increasing determination, stamina, and smarts on our parts. Maybe our fortunes also.

    This lawless government problem didn't happen over night, and it won't get fixed over night either. We allowed it to happen, and we have to fix it.

    This might be a good time to study American history and constitutional law on a personal basis. One of the New England governor's big complaints to King George was that everyone in the colonies knew the law. We need to get that way again.

    On an individual basis, if you haven't explored The Committees of Safety, now would be a good time to do so. http://www.committeesofsafety.org/
    In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. -- Mark Twain

  2. #762
    Senior Member HighlanderJuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    1,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayday
    I had my TV on for background noise today and The View happened to be on and I just happened to catch this. Barbara Walters was talking i.e. gossiping about the Alfalfa Awards event that she went to. You guys may find it interesting that she said Supreme Court Justice Roberts was sitting on Obama's left at this event. Conflict of interest here??
    More likely an indication of how NOT separated our three branches of government are during this period when we allow our government to run as lawless as it does now.

    Now is NOT the time for us to be compassionate and understanding. Now is the time for us to be pi$$ed off and angry.

    Time for change all right. Change caused by us over our own government. They don't follow the law - they're gone or in jail.
    In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. -- Mark Twain

  3. #763
    Senior Member HighlanderJuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    1,054
    I have been concerned by the removal of Obama related material found via Google for some time. This is a huge discredit to Google as a search engine service, and a huge red flag for us, telling us that we are very deeply immersed in an era of misinformation, promulgated by members of our government and at least one of our major political parties.

    The problem seems to be getting much worse lately (since Obama's election), and in addition to missing information, the implantation of misleading and false information intended to misinform and manipulate the information seeker is becoming more widespread.

    Dr. Orly seems to be having problems with this, and comments accordingly on her blog site: http://www.drorly.blogspot.com/

    If this problem is as large as I suspect, we will have to become much smarter in our information searches, and rely more completely on actual written records. The era of free and accurate information via the Internet may be passing, thanks to certain government interference and control.

    Is this what we asked from our government and from our elected officials?

    I don't think so.
    In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. -- Mark Twain

  4. #764
    Senior Member HighlanderJuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    1,054
    Pursuing my earlier thoughts on disinformation and data removal from the Internet, I just became aware of this company (ReputationDefender) and felt that the company information worth passing along.

    "ReputationDefender was created in 2006 to defend your good name on the Internet. Today, ReputationDefender has grown to be the world's first comprehensive online reputation management and privacy company. We're the most experienced and most technologically innovative company of our kind. With customers in over 35 countries, ReputationDefender is proud to serve a global customer base throughout the world's largest community - the Internet.

    Our goal is straightforward:
    * To SEARCH out all information about you and your family throughout the Internet and present it to you in a clear, easy-to-understand fashion
    * To provide DESTROY assistance, helping to remove, at your request, inaccurate, inappropriate, hurtful, and slanderous information about you and your family using our proprietary in-house methodology. This same mission extends to your personally identifiable information, like name, address, and phone number.
    * To deliver CONTROL over how others are able to perceive you on the Internet"

    http://www.reputationdefender.com/

    =================

    This company's techniques are probably the very same techniques Obama's legal teams use to remove all private information about Obama from the Internet.

    Good thing for us all to understand. Now you can do it too.
    In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. -- Mark Twain

  5. #765
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    " The era of free and accurate information via the Internet may be passing, thanks to certain government interference and control. "

    I didn't think that anyone ever thought that the info that is on the internet was accurate or believable.

    Just look at all of the accusations that McCain and Obama weren't born in the U.S. and couldn't be president.
    It's hard to imagine that people actually believed all of that stuff.
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

  6. #766
    FreedomFirst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
    Pursuing my earlier thoughts on disinformation and data removal from the Internet, I just became aware of this company (ReputationDefender) and felt that the company information worth passing along.

    "ReputationDefender was created in 2006 to defend your good name on the Internet. Today, ReputationDefender has grown to be the world's first comprehensive online reputation management and privacy company. We're the most experienced and most technologically innovative company of our kind. With customers in over 35 countries, ReputationDefender is proud to serve a global customer base throughout the world's largest community - the Internet.

    Our goal is straightforward:
    * To SEARCH out all information about you and your family throughout the Internet and present it to you in a clear, easy-to-understand fashion
    * To provide DESTROY assistance, helping to remove, at your request, inaccurate, inappropriate, hurtful, and slanderous information about you and your family using our proprietary in-house methodology. This same mission extends to your personally identifiable information, like name, address, and phone number.
    * To deliver CONTROL over how others are able to perceive you on the Internet"

    http://www.reputationdefender.com/

    =================

    This company's techniques are probably the very same techniques Obama's legal teams use to remove all private information about Obama from the Internet.

    Good thing for us all to understand. Now you can do it too.
    For Obama, it probably doesn't even require a ReputationDefender outfit. The CEO of Google, Eric Schmidt, has been a long-time Obama backer and supporter. Likewise, the firm has made no bones about its willingness to kowtow to "cleansing" Google searches in China in ways that are "approved" by that regime. A recent report about Eric's chummy ways with Obama is linked below.

    http://foxforum.blogs.foxnews.com/2009/ ... rd_google/

    What's interesting about that tight relationship has a tie-back to the fall when all the bad news about Blago was hitting the fan. There was a local TV station in Illinois that reported on its website about how Obama's early denial of any contact with Blago (which was phrased generically as "no contact" after the election and not just about "contacts" to discuss who would fill his vacated Senate seat) was in error and pointed to their being photographed together at a Governor's Association gathering and also to what Obama's own "main man" had been quoted as saying on TV, to the effect that "President Elect Obama has been in touch with the Governor ...." about the seat and that they both had lists of "favorite names" for the vacancy. A remark that the aide had to quickly retract as a misstatement once Blago imploded. The TV station took down its "honest" report not too long after the honest reporting was put up. Probably facing "heat" from Obama aides in so doing. Some enterprising bloggers saved screen shots which Drudge put to good effect. What was truly interesting is that somebody must have had a hotline to the Google Cache Commissar because even the "cache memory" screenshots -- which Google policy states is to keep available online for up to 18 months, even though it wants to shorten the period to 6 months if all other search engine services come to agreement on it -- were deleted.

    99 out of 100 politicians lie. McCain got a Washington Post reporter to "lie" for him by claiming that the campaign had furnished the bozo (ahem ... reporter) with a bona fide BC and that the bozo could "verify" it stated that McCain was born ON THE COCO SOLO NAVAL BASE. Poof! That story reported in April and May 2008 by WaPo went up in flames in June 2008 when the honest-to-goodness original BC was obtained directly from the Panamanian government and showed the city hospital in Colon, Panama -- decidedly OFF THE BASE -- was the true birthplace. And a different doctor's name was on the original, not the military doctor that the "bozo" reported as having signed the document he viewed.

    Even though Professor Chin's law review article had made short work of any claim that the Zone was "U.S. soil" prior to the 1937 law which made it so, the proof of the pudding in that original BC only fortified what the earnest law professor had concluded about McCain's ineligibility.

    Bottom line: If 99 out of 100 lie, then those 99 are looking for any way they can to exert leverage to get media or Internet outlets to "help" them lie. Schmidt was so tight with Obama that he was the earliest frontrunner mentioned for the Commerce post.

  7. #767
    FreedomFirst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    457
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayday
    I had my TV on for background noise today and The View happened to be on and I just happened to catch this. Barbara Walters was talking i.e. gossiping about the Alfalfa Awards event that she went to. You guys may find it interesting that she said Supreme Court Justice Roberts was sitting on Obama's left at this event. Conflict of interest here??
    Good catch about that Alfalfa Club gathering. During the time that there is any pending litigation, it is considered an "ex parte communication" for one of the litigants or their lawyers to be in contact with the presiding judge(s) ....... it's a violation of of lawyer ethics and judicial ethics both. It makes for a "bad appearance" in general. Taitz has demanded any record of what transpired when the 8 Justices met "ex parte" with Obama/Biden and with the new White House Counsel, Greg Craig, whom some might remember as Clinton's lead attorney during impeachment.

  8. #768
    Senior Member cayla99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
    Posts
    4,889
    Quote Originally Posted by FreedomFirst
    Quote Originally Posted by Mayday
    I had my TV on for background noise today and The View happened to be on and I just happened to catch this. Barbara Walters was talking i.e. gossiping about the Alfalfa Awards event that she went to. You guys may find it interesting that she said Supreme Court Justice Roberts was sitting on Obama's left at this event. Conflict of interest here??
    Good catch about that Alfalfa Club gathering. During the time that there is any pending litigation, it is considered an "ex parte communication" for one of the litigants or their lawyers to be in contact with the presiding judge(s) ....... it's a violation of of lawyer ethics and judicial ethics both. It makes for a "bad appearance" in general. Taitz has demanded any record of what transpired when the 8 Justices met "ex parte" with Obama/Biden and with the new White House Counsel, Greg Craig, whom some might remember as Clinton's lead attorney during impeachment.
    Ahhh but now for the loophole, they have now dismissed all cases that had been before the court without comment. The newer cases have not arrived at the court yet, so technically he is no longer a presiding judge in a case against Obama at the moment.

    However, he was at the time of the meeting of the 8.
    Proud American and wife of a wonderful LEGAL immigrant from Ireland.
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797) Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  9. #769
    Senior Member AirborneSapper7's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    South West Florida (Behind friendly lines but still in Occupied Territory)
    Posts
    117,696


    AN OPEN LETTER TO THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

    By Lynn Stuter
    February 3, 2009
    NewsWithViews.com

    The Honorable Chief Justice John G Roberts
    Honorable Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr
    Honorable Justice Stephen G. Breyer
    Honorable Justice Ruth B. Ginsburg
    Honorable Justice Anthony M. Kennedy
    Honorable Justice Antonin Scalia
    Honorable Justice David H. Souter
    Honorable Justice John Paul Stevens
    Honorable Justice Clarence Thomas
    United States Supreme Court
    1 First Street N.E.
    Washington, DC 20543

    On January 20, 2009, Chief Justice John G Roberts administered the presidential oath of office to a man who has failed to provide one iota of evidence that he is, indeed, a natural born citizen of the United States as required by Article II, Section 1, United States Constitution. To the contrary, overwhelming evidence indicates this man to be a citizen, to this day, of Indonesia; that he owes no allegiance and has proven no allegiance to the United State of America, its Constitution and Bill of Rights, or its people.

    Application after application, asking for injunctive relief to stop the forward march to what would result in a Constitutional crisis, was requested of the United States Supreme Court, only to be denied to the last one, irrespective of merit, irrespective of the impending Constitutional crisis that would result were this impostor sworn in as president of the United States.

    The people ask, “Is the Constitution not important to the United States Supreme Court that it would so easily deny these applications for injunctive relief?â€
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  10. #770
    Senior Member JohnDoe2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    PARADISE (San Diego)
    Posts
    99,040
    Supreme Court justices will discuss challenge to Obama's citizenship Friday

    Though it writes that the legal action has "little chance of succeeding," the Chicago Tribune notes that Supreme Court justices will sit down tomorrow to "take up a lawsuit challenging President-elect Barack Obama's U.S. citizenship."

    At issue is the contention of some Obama opponents that he either wasn't born a U.S. citizen or that at one point as a child he gave up his citizenship. The arguments have been dismissed by lower courts and well as by Obama and his aides.

    The nonpartisan FactCheck.org reported earlier this year that its researchers "have now seen, touched, examined and photographed the original birth certificate. We conclude that it meets all of the requirements from the State Department for proving U.S. citizenship."

    Another nonpartisan fact-checking outfit, PolitiFact.com, reached the same conclusion.


    Justice Clarence Thomas submitted the case, Donofrio v. Wells, for the court's consideration.

    Posted by Mark Memmott at 01:58 PM/ET, December 04, 2008 in Election law

    USA TODAY Online

    http://blogs.usatoday.com/onpolitics/
    NO AMNESTY

    Don't reward the criminal actions of millions of illegal aliens by giving them citizenship.


    Sign in and post comments here.

    Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •