Thread: Ron Paul on the Issues

Public Notice: "Attention To All Gun-Grabbing Politicians - The Jig Is Up!" - "Govern Yourselves Accordingly"

Submitted by The South on Fri, 07/27/2012 - 19:08
2nd Amendment

Here's the Beef!

Do you people really think every 2nd Amendment Loving American isn't onto your statutory scheme by now? Well, you're correct, a large number of them are not, but some of us are and the word is getting out.

Better shut down the internet quick before people actually learn the truth!

Your internal corporate so called 'gun laws', which are NOT laws, but rather statutes that only apply to employees of the corporation known as the UNITED STATES, do not apply to the average American who is not on the government payroll.

How many times has the Supreme Court struck down you power hungry politicians and your so called 'gun laws' to date? Yet, you continue to enforce your statutory codes (internal rules) on every and all Americans who have not awaken to the con.

Why? Because most Americans do not understand the difference between statutory rules and Law of the Land - Laws. The two are mutually exclusive of each other.

The united States Constitution is the Law of the Land and USC code is not. That code is for the corporate UNITED STATES located in the District of Columbia and it's few Territories.

One is the Law of the Land; the other is the law of a corporation, such as Wal-Mart's own-internal, statutory rules and codes that only apply to Wal-Mart employees.

And redefining a word such as person(s)/federal person(s)/individual/corporation/office/elected official cannot and does NOT define the living man/woman unless you have in your possession an employment contract and current payroll records for said "person(s)"... proving that individual agreed to be that 'person/individual/corporation/office', because government agreed to pay them to operate in that capacity.

Remember: Slavery is illegal in the United States, but voluntary servitude is not. But what we are dealing with in respect to government is known as Involuntary Servitude, in my humble opinion.

You cannot arbitrarily codify/define every living-breathing man/woman within the borders from sea to shining sea (not the District of Columbia and it's Territories), as being a federal employee without proof of employment by way of employment contract and current payroll records to back up your claims of jurisdiction over every living man/woman's life.

If we were to look up Title 18 USC ss 921 ourselves, we could very easily see who your internal-statutory codes ACTUALLY do apply to:

Title 18: USC ss 921:
(a) As used in this chapter—
(1) The term “person” and the term “whoever” include any individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, or joint stock company.
Source: 18 USC § 921 - Definitions | LII / Legal Information Institute

2nd Amendment Lovers of Liberty, ask yourself this question:

Are you an individual, corporation, company, association, firm, partnership, society, or joint stock company? Or are you flesh in the blood-living people with a pulse that can actually fog a mirror; a man or woman?

Now, look up those definitions, and remember: Whatever definition of a word they scrabble together in an attempt to define YOU into their legislation, does NOT apply to you unless at the time of the complaint (gun possession, high capacity mag possession, etc.), you were actually Performing A Function Of Government, and they have an employment contract and current payroll records on file for you, to prove at the time of the complaint, you actually were operating in the capacity of and getting paid to operate in the capacity of an government agent/employee.

These codes, rules, regulations, and statutes do NOT apply to anyone other than government employees/agents.

That includes any and all gun restriction laws (I mean statutes) on the books, past-present and future.

Where in the US Constitution does it say you cannot have a pistol with a laser sight, or a shotgun with an 12" barrel? Where does it say you must register your firearms with state or ask permission (gun carry permit) to actually carry it?

Law of the Land v.s Statutory Codes of the Corporation.

NOTE: If you do not know if you are a government employee/agent, then you more than likely are not. If you were in fact an government employee/agent, you would probably have in your possession several-previous payroll receipts or check stubs, and proof of bi-weekly EFT deposits from the government on your banking statements.

Definitions to words have meanings, and THEIR definitions and ours are not the same.

Ex: In the world of government, the definition of "person(s)" might be - 'a corporation, lawnmower, sno-cone stand, jelly doughnut, kitchen sink, and any other word we may some day decide to add to this list to hoodwink the average American into believing we have jurisdiction over their lives'

In our world, the definition of "person(s)" means: A Human Being; a living Man or Woman that is nothing but a living man or woman.

Why are our definitions so simple and self explanatory, and governments definitions so vague and misleading?

Because no one wants to work for their corporation (most people anyway), and the only way they can "hoodwink" us into becoming government employees who are bound by their statutory BS, rules, regulation, and codes, is to make up a broad sweeping definition to a word, hence the above aforementioned examples.

Government is out of control because the average American has not forced them to cough up and employment contract and current payroll records proving said government is their master.
Always remember: No Contract = No Jurisdiction.

Know your God Given Inherent Birth Rights and how to enforce them, or someday you will be governed by your inferiors.

If someone from the Government claims Social Security or a Drivers License is the contract, perhaps this may change their mind?

Social Security or a Drivers License is not a contract:
http://www.dailypaul.com/243164/social-security-is-not-a-con...

If they don't believe that, perhaps they will believe what's written on their own website:

Quote:
"There has been a temptation throughout the program's history for some people to suppose that their FICA payroll taxes entitle them to a benefit in a legal, contractual sense. That is to say, if a person makes FICA contributions over a number of years, Congress cannot, according to this reasoning, change the rules in such a way that deprives a contributor of a promised future benefit."

Source: Social Security Online History Pages

There is no consideration and there is no obligation. This was already decided by the Supreme Court in Helvering v. Davis.

Now, what if a government official claims the 14th Amendment gives them the power to rule over you?
http://www.dailypaul.com/244553/they-created-the-14th-amendm...

How about what a former State Senator had to say about the 14th Amendment?
http://www.dailypaul.com/240866/arizona-state-senator-wayne-...

What if the STATE wants to bring charges against you for breaking one of their internal-statutory codes?
http://www.dailypaul.com/243521/can-the-state-be-an-injured-...

Are you aware the courts are operating under Trust Law, and their method of madness is the art of presumptions?
http://www.dailypaul.com/243090/trust-law-your-rights-and-ho...

What if the STATE insists you MUST hire an attorney? Did you know by doing so, you are considered a ward of the STATE?
http://www.dailypaul.com/242260/this-is-why-you-should-never...

Why do their internal statutory gun laws (I mean rules) apply to the average American?

Because the average American hasn't learned to tell government to kiss their A$$, and if they expect him/her to follow some internal rule, code, or regulation, then government needs to start coughing up some weekly cash that would entice or obligate said American to follow said gun laws (I mean internal rules).

No Contract = No Jurisdiction

At the time of the complaint, were you performing a function of government and getting paid to do so? Surely they do not allow non-employees to perform functions of government, do they?
If we were all government employees, then any one of us could walk onto an Air Force Base and fire up an F-16 or AH-64 Apache and take it to pick up a pizza, right?

Wait!

The only ones who can do that are people who have signed into an employment contract; went through the proper training; and are receiving pay from the government right?

If anyone with a social security number or drivers license is considered to be an government agent/employee, then why is the lady working at the DMV getting a government check and you are not?

Are we hiring on a sliding scale? Some get pay and others don't?

Doesn't the lady working at the DMV have a social security number and a drivers license? What about the person working at the state capitol as a receptionist?

Under this insane logic of government, that lady at the DMV could come to my Concrete business and jump in a Class A or B concrete truck and start driving it, just because she had a social security card and drivers license, which led her to believe she were entitled to do so.
Hopefully this serves as an educational tool for politicians as well as ordinary-everyday Americans who work at the gas station or Wal-Mart.

Remember: We have not had a legitimate government since 1871 when the 41st Congress walked out and the corporate actors guild took over.

Supreme Court Justice Marshall Harlan (Downes v. Bidwell, 182, U.S. 244 1901)gave the following dissenting opinion: “Two national governments exist; one to be maintained under the Constitution, with all its restrictions; the other to be maintained by Congress outside and Independently of that Instrument.”

Govern Yourselves or Be Governed.

Peace.

Disclaimer: Everything below and above this line is my opinion, and not meant to be taken as legal advice. Do your own due diligence and educate yourselves and your family. Not knowing your rights is the equivalent of not having any at all. And do not expect anyone from government to explain your rights, for if they did, there would be no more government to control you

Public Notice: "Attention To All Gun-Grabbing Politicians - The Jig Is Up!" - "Govern Yourselves Accordingly" | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Revolution

---

SoCal NPR: Why Ron Paul and Mark Spitznagel will not go quietly into the Republican night

Submitted by AnCapMercenary on Fri, 07/27/2012 - 19:31
Ron Paul 2012
California

Why Ron Paul and Mark Spitznagel will not go quietly into the Republican night

By Matthew DeBord

Mitt Romney may be the presumptive GOP presidential nominee, but Texas congressman Ron Paul never planned to go away quietly before the Republican National Convention in Tampa in August — and neither did one of his staunchest supporters, L.A. hedge fund investor Mark Spitznagel.

It’s partly Spitznagel’s doing that Paul held out for delegates at one of the campaign's final acts, the Nebraska state Republican Party Convention, which took place a week and half ago, more than a month after the state's primary. (Paul failed to gain a plurality, dooming his chances at speaking in Tampa.) All along, the hedge funder helped keep Paul in the race, both by raising money and by providing the campaign with intellectual oomph.

Spitznagel, who runs Universa Investments, which he founded in 2007, lives in Bel Air and operates out of an office in Santa Monica. Why is the Michigan native so far out west, anyway? After all, hedge funds are supposed to be in Connecticut.

Or at the very least, Manhattan. That wasn't Spitznagel's scene. "I wanted to get out of that groupthink of Wall Street," he said on the phone recently. "Everyone there is crammed into a handful of blocks." But it's perhaps more than just the non-NYC quality of L.A. that has made it a comfortable place for Spitznagel.

SoCal NPR: Why Ron Paul and Mark Spitznagel will not go quietly into the Republican night | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Revolution

Mitt Romney Profits from Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity and Savage because Bain Capital Owns and Controls Clear Channel

Submitted by GBAmerica on Sun, 05/06/2012 - 21:31



[INFOGRAPHIC] Mitt Romney Profits from Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity and Savage because Bain Capital Owns and Controls Clear Channel | U.S. Judicial Corruption


Mitt Romney Profits from Limbaugh, Beck, Hannity and Savage because Bain Capital Owns and Controls Clear Channel | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Ron Paul 2012

There is NO Differance between the Blue Team and the Red Team; there never was

Blue Team - Elite Democrat Politicians
Red Team - Elite Republican Politicians

Looking at the dead America Carcus .. the Red Team waits until the Blue Team get's it's fill

That will come after the Election of 2012;

The Blue Team will then stand idle while the Red Team gorge's on the Carcus

Rinse and Repeat

Both Team Blaming the Other while muscle tissue is ripped from the American fiber

America is too screwed in the head to stop it and too drugged up on Prescription / Illegal Drugs to even know what is happening

Turn on Dancing with the Stars; pop a couple more pills, fall to sleep in the recliner America... It's almost over

Ron Paul’s Mega Crowds… No Media Coverage!

Ron Paul’s mega crowds… no Media coverage!

by Jacque Fresco


Did you honestly think the Ron Paul revolution would be televised? Here’s a check on reality as to who is really the #1 presidential nominee for 2012.

Whilst the supposed front runner Romney barely gets over 100 people to a rally, Gingrich and Santorum after talking to empty rooms of 30 people, one man has been pulling in the masses. That man is Ron Paul.Ron Paul is the only one in polls who can and would beat Obama, the NWO puppet.

“Freedom is popular” – Ron Paul

His message of individual liberty and freedom to all is growing a worldwide following.
People are taking heed to the liberty movement as Ron Paul and others expose the criminality of our governments and institutions that have enslaved us for so long.
He has the #1 support from not only the troops who no longer wish to be at war, he also has the support of the youth. The intellectual revolution has begun…
Ron Paul Rallies Feb-Apr 2012:








































SOURCE: HANG THE BANKERS

Ron Paul’s Mega Crowds… No Media Coverage! | Veterans Today

Rally count: Romney vs Paul

Submitted by phubner on Sun, 05/06/2012 - 03:11
Ron Paul 2012

Mitt needs a fair shake! Here are three views of his April 30 South Carolina event. The first pic should be familiar, its been posted before. The previous post said somewhere "A ladder was removed so press couldn't take a picture showing the actual crowd".

Alleged Nominee Mitt Romney Draws Small, Sleepy Crowd : Deadline Live With Jack Blood

Second is...(wait for it) a pic from the Ladder

Mitt Romney's Desperate Attempt to Show He Has Real Supporters Too - YouTube



Lastly is a 360deg panorama that shows everything in the room.

360 Panorama

So see? Mitt has rallies too

Rally count: Romney vs Paul | Peace . Gold . Liberty | Revolution

the GOP is in TROUBLE with this WEAK Candidate ... WAKE UP AMERICA - I beg you wake up

Most Inspiring Ron Paul Video - rEVOLution ON FIRE!



Ron Paul has been invigorating liberty supporters by the thousands in state GOP conventions and at his massive rallies. Join the Revolution! Spread the word! Now is the time for action if you care about the welfare of your country and its citizens.

Ron Paul IS BEATING Romney/ The media LIES! Watch This!