Voter Fraud Information Thread

[AirborneSapper7]

[AirborneSapper7]

http://www.alipac.us/f9/redstate-stu...icient-313570/

[AirborneSapper7]

The Federalist Papers

What do you think about this? Will Democrats be able to stave off defeat through cheating?



CHEATERS: Democrat Election Officials Give Liberals Special Voting Advantage At Polling Place
Democrats know they're losing so they, of course, cheat!
thefederalistpapers.org

Democrat Election Officials Give Liberals Special Voting Advantage At Polling Place

By Steve Straub - 28 Comments · In US, Video



Democrats know they’re losing so they, of course, cheat!



Via the Daily Caller:

Early voting is underway in Wisconsin and progressive activists have their sights set on defeating Gov. Scott Walker.

The group “Wisconsin Jobs Now” is running shuttle vans to retrieve voters and bring them to the polls so they can vote early. A Milwaukee polling station is seeing a steady stream of those vans pulling up, parking, and unloading voters. But they’re parking in a “No Parking Zone” right in front of the door. The zone is blocked off by traffic cones that Jobs Now activists move when the van approached.This special parking arrangement was originally reported by the MacIver Institute, a free market group in Wisconsin.

Media Trackers has more:

After inquiring with both the City of Milwaukee Election Commission and the head poll worker at the early voting location, Media Trackers was told by Denise Walton, who oversees the early voting poll, that the spots were available to anyone who wanted to vote early or drop someone off to vote early. Contrary to what a Wisconsin Jobs Now staff member told us, the parking spaces, although marked “No Parking” were not just reserved for the liberal group’s use.

Watch this video that shows what happened when Media Trackers tested the City of Milwaukee’s claim that any voter – not just Wisconsin Jobs Now – could use those parking spaces.




What do you think about this? Will Democrats be able to stave off defeat through cheating?

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/u...-polling-place

[April]

CHEATERS: Democrat Election Officials Give Liberals Special Voting Advantage At Polling Place
Democrats know they're losing so they, of course, cheat!

They know it is the only way the communist agenda will progress....they have turned voter fraud into their winning strategy.....

[AirborneSapper7]

Conservative Daily

Watch out, now...




Maryland Election 'Funny Business': What Voting Machines are Doing Should Get Everyone's Attention
Thus far, nine counties have reported this problem...
ijreview.com|By Kara Pendleton

Maryland Election ‘Funny Business': What Voting Machines are Doing Should Get Everyone’s Attention

By Kara Pendleton (10 hours ago) | Elections, Politics, Technology



Referred to as a “calibration error,” voting machines in Maryland were reported to be switching votes from Republican to Democrat. Thus far, nine counties have investigated this problem and taken effected machines out of service.
This is far from the first time such “calibration errors” have been reported. In one case in Illinois the Republican candidate‘s own vote for himself was switched by the machine to a vote for his Democrat opponent.
These errors have also been reported in prior election cycles, with the majority being switches from Republican to Democrat, although 2010 saw some Texas votes switched to the Green Party.
In 2012, voters complained about votes for Mitt Romney being switched to votes for Barack Obama in Ohio, Nevada, Kansas, North Carolina, Missouri and Colorado. Some have suggested that voting should be more transparent – with public access to video monitoring of election counting and machine or electronic counting of votes being done away with altogether.
Additional safeguards against election fraud could include a voter ID system (like has been implemented in India, among other countries). A forthcoming report summarized at the Washington Post estimated that as much as 14% of non-citizens are illegally registered to vote in the United States, and that an estimated 6.4% and 2.2% voted in the 2008 and 2011 elections.
While it seems small, when taken out of a universe of non-citizens in the United States running above 11 million, such percentages translate to several hundred thousands voters – more than enough to swing elections in certain districts and therefore, even nationally.


http://www.ijreview.com/2014/10/1934...s-to-democrat/

[Jean]

http://www.alipac.us/f9/obama-may-ha...8/#post1443385

[Newmexican]

http://www.alipac.us/f9/xpert-confir...ocrats-313642/

[Newmexican]

http://www.alipac.us/f9/democrats-ac...3/#post1443500

[AirborneSapper7]

The Not So Silent Majority By Proliferocks.com and The Federalist Papers shared a link.



MORE CHEATING: Democrats Accused Of Massive Voter Fraud Attempt In Colorado
Once again, Democrats know they're losing so they resort to cheating, this time in Colorado. This is exactly why they can't be trusted to govern.
thefederalistpapers.org

MORE CHEATING: Democrats Accused Of Massive Voter Fraud Attempt In Colorado

By Steve Straub - 185 Comments · In US



Once again, Democrats know they’re losing so they resort to cheating, this time in Colorado. This is exactly why they can’t be trusted to govern.
Via the Daily Caller News Foundation:

The Colorado secretary of state is investigating allegations that some Boulder County Republican election judges are actually Democrats in disguise.
Boulder County GOP Chairwoman Ellyn Hilliard initially raised the alarm when visiting polling locations where she didn’t recognize some of the GOP judges who are tasked with comparing voter signatures on mail ballots to protect against vote fraud.
She became alarmed when she noticed some ballots whose signatures clearly didn’t match those on file for the voter being accepted.
Deputy Secretary of State Suzanne Staiert began investigating and confirmed to the Daily Camera that she found “some troubling inconsistencies with some election judges.”
“One of them was a Democrat who had changed party affiliation on Oct. 10, so we are concerned that Boulder didn’t follow the list, then resorted to advertising for these positions,” she told the paper.
Hilliard submitted a list of 95 potential Republican election judges to the Boulder County election coordinator after the GOP caucus earlier in the year. The coordinator is supposed to appoint a roughly equal number of judges from the major parties to ensure a fair election.
But according to the Camera, if not enough judges agree to participate from a certain party, the law allows the county clerk some leeway in filling the vacancies with judges from other parties.
Molly Tayer, Boulder County elections coordinator, said that’s what happened in this case.
“[Hilliard’s] original list was 95, and only five have joined this year’s workforce,” Tayer told the Camera. “We performed repeated outreach to the Republicans’ list: emails, notes, calls. We exhausted the list and as much as we reached out to them, people did not come. After that, we just moved on to getting people to do this work.”
Prior to a rally for Republican Senate candidate Cory Gardner Tuesday, Hilliard made what the Camera called an “emotional” plea for more Republicans to volunteer to oversee the election, telling attendees that elections officials are currently helping “the Democrats steal the election.”
She cited instances in which she said she saw judges accept ballots with signatures that clearly did not match those on file for the voter. At one point, the Camera reported, Hilliard had tears in her eyes.

What do you think about the fact that Democrats are masquerading as Republican election judges to facilitate widespread cheating? Should these people spend time in prison?

http://www.thefederalistpapers.org/u...es-in-colorado

[kathyet2]

Voter Fraud: How Democrats Intend to Win on Election Day


The Common Constitutionalist

With the midterms less than a week away, we are being bombarded with campaign ads. The radio, TV, Internet – they're everywhere.

We are also being deluged with stories of campaign fraud. Yesterday, I wrote of Colorado's new all mail balloting and the potential for massive fraud in that state.
But, in fact, the fraud doesn't need to be widespread or massive for Democrat hacks to claim victory. The Wall Street Journal reported, "In 2014, 16 local races in Ohio were decided by one vote or through breaking a tie. In 2013, 35 local races in Ohio were that close," and the Obama rubberstamp, Al Franken, won his Senate seat by 312 votes.
Many local, state, and even national races often decided by 500 votes had less of a majority. Various types of Democrat fraud could more than tip the scales.
The Journal also reported that, "A Mississippi grand jury indicted seven individuals for voter fraud in the 2013 Hattiesburg mayoral contest, which featured voting by ineligible felons and impersonation fraud. A woman in Polk County Tennessee was indicted on a charge of vote buying – a practice that the local district attorney said had too long 'been accepted as part of life' there."
They added: "In the US Supreme Court's 2008 ruling that upheld Indiana's voter ID law, Justice John Paul Stevens acknowledged 'flagrant examples of such fraud' throughout the nation's history and observe that 'not only is the risk of voter fraud real' but also that 'it could affect the outcome of a close election'."
In January 2012 the Virginia Voter Alliance reported that eight Democrats were arrested for absentee voter fraud in Madison County Florida and in April 2012 four more Democrats were arrested in Indiana. The four in Indiana were St. Joseph County Democrat officials.
Now, thanks to Katie Pavlich at Townhall.com, we hear that voting machines in Illinois and Maryland are just "magically" switching Republican votes to Democrat. Huh – imagine that.
Pavlich wrote of a quote from Watchdog.org attributed to a Maryland voter. "When I first selected my candidate on the electronic machine, it would put an 'x' on the candidate I chose – a Republican – but it would put the 'x' on the Democrat candidate above it," Donna Hamilton said. "This happen multiple times with multiple selections. Every time my choice flipped from Republican to Democrat. Sometimes it required four or five tries to get the 'x' to stay on my real selection."

I guess it's a good thing states are adopting early voting. It may take that long just to make sure your ballot is correct.
It's funny how what election officials call "calibration errors" never seem to flip the Democrat vote to Republican. Of course, Democrats either flatly deny any fraud exists, which is absurd, or they say the number is so small as to be virtually meaningless.
But, as I stated earlier, the fraud doesn't have to be massive or widespread to garner victories – and I wonder, if polled, how many voters wouldn't mind their votes being canceled out by fraud? My guess is about … None!
I find it interesting that the NSA can track every word we utter and keystroke we type – that the IRS can track every dime we spend – but various election commissions can't (or won't) find the rampant fraud we know is being perpetrated every election cycle.
The argument of the nanny state for gun control laws, seatbelts, motorcycle and bicycle helmets, baby car seats, smoking, secondhand smoke, and umpteen more examples has always been, "If we can save one life, it (meaning draconian legislation or regulation) will be worth it."
So I ask: If we can save one vote – your vote – would it not be worth it?
Don't forget to Like Freedom Outpost on Facebook, Google Plus, Tea Party Community & Twitter.

Read more at http://freedomoutpost.com/2014/10/vo...V5LAID6ajfx.99