Thread: Aliens, Naturalization & Congress’ powers vs. State po

BTTT

BTTT, for those that may have missed this thread, or are new.

For the life of me, I just can't understand why the states don't sue the feds.... Can anyone tell me WHY?

CHECK THIS OUT:


ACLU And Civil Rights Groups Ask Court To Block Implementation Of Arizona's Racial Profiling Law During Legal Battle

June 5, 2010
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

aclu.org


[b][i]“Last month the coalition filed a lawsuit challenging the extreme law and charging that it invites the racial profiling of people of color, violates the First Amendment and interferes with federal law. Friday's filing seeks to halt implementation of the law while the case is litigated. The coalition expects that the court will rule on its request before SB 1070's effective date, July 29, 2010.â€

BTTT For those that are looking at the proposals coming from Arizona concerning anchor babies and their status.

BTTT for those newer members or anybody else for that matter.

Obama proves once again to be un-American and a threat to America‘s future!

See: Widow of Houston Officer Killed by Illegal Immigrant 'Shocked' at ICE Appointment

In case you haven’t heard, Obama’s pick to head the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agency’s Office of State and Local Coordination (OSLC) is former Houston Police Chief Harold Hurtt, who blatantly ignored and defied TITLE 8, CHAPTER 12, SUBCHAPTER II, Part VIII, Sec. 1327.

Any person who knowingly aids or assists any alien inadmissible under section 1182(a)(2) (insofar as an alien inadmissible under such section has been convicted of an aggravated felony) or 1182(a)(3) (other than subparagraph (E) thereof) of this title to enter the United States, or who connives or conspires with any person or persons to allow, procure, or permit any such alien to enter the United States, shall be fined under title 18, or imprisoned not more than 10 years, or both.

JWK


[b][i]“He has erected a multitude of new offices (Washington‘s existing political plum job Empire) , and sent hither swarms of officers, to harass our people, and eat out their substanceâ€

This I have heard several times brought up by Andrew Wilkow on his radio show. If the Arizona 1070 law is being challenged by the commie administration because it feels that the state has overstepped their authority and wish to claim complete rights to illegal immigration laws, then why is it that the administration is not prosecuting the sanctuary cities that have popped up all over the country? Are they not trying to preempt federal authority as well?

Originally Posted by roundabout

... then why is it that the administration is not prosecuting the sanctuary cities that have popped up all over the country? Are they not trying to preempt federal authority as well?

Well, to answer that question let us first consider what is actually going on between Barrack Hussein Obama, his racist AG Eric the-Black-Panther-lover Holder, and how the federal government is, or is not, involved as laid out in our Constitution.

Our Constitution states in crystal clear language that Congress shall have power to …repel Invasions. I think there is no question that we now have an armed invasion of our borders taking place.

In addition to Congress’s power, the executive is required by the word “shall“, to protect against an invasion:

The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence

The state of Arizona has repeatedly requested the executive to honor its mandatory requirements as listed under Art. 4, Section 4, and the failure to do so is reasonable cause to indicate the executive is giving aid and comfort to an armed invading force.

Our Constitution defines treason as : Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. It seems reasonable to say that those who are now armed and invading our borders are enemies of the united states as they have breached our borders, flaunt our laws, murder and kidnap our citizens, an engage in a variety of other misdemeanors and felonies. And so, our executive’s actions, in not protecting against an ongoing invasion, borders on Treason, but what is irrefutable is, our executive is obviously guilty of malfeasance and misfeasance, and those crimes fall within the definition of high Crimes and Misdemeanors as in Article 2, Section 4:

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

The bottom line is, we have a federal government acting in rebellion to our written Constitution and the documented intentions and beliefs under which it was adopted.


JWK




At the close of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia on September 18, 1787, a Mrs. Powel anxiously awaited the results and as Benjamin Franklin emerged from the long task now finished asked him directly, `Well, Doctor, what have we got? A republic or a monarchy?' `A republic, if you can keep it,' responded Franklin.

BTTT