Thread: PLEASE HELP!!!! I GOTTA KNOW...IS THERE REALLY ANY

I'm just curious..........

Are you Paul and Hunter followers more concerned with supporting your candidates-----that DO NOT have a chance----then you are trying to put someone into office who ACTUALLY has a chance of winning and is now in the lead-----someone who has a CHANCE and will actually help us to stop this invasion???

Paul and Hunter have NO CHANCE OF WINNING!!!

Romney is currently leading----and we are having a hard time making sure that he wins----let alone someone who is not liked by a large majority (Paul) and someone who is not known by a large majority (Hunter).

Originally Posted by Populist

And I would add that we want a candidate with a business & private sector background. NOT a professional politician/hack who has been in public office collecting taxpayer-funded paychecks for decades.

I think I would take a businessman any day over a professional politican

Originally Posted by Populist

And I would add that we want a candidate with a business & private sector background. NOT a professional politician/hack who has been in public office collecting taxpayer-funded paychecks for decades.

Dr. Paul has been an OB-GYN and delivered over 4,000 babies, so trying to paint him as a 'professional politician' won't wash. Besides that he's NEVER voted for a Congressional pay raise, he DOESN'T participate in the Congressional pension program and he returns unused office money EVERY YEAR to the CBO.

NO OTHER politician can make those claims, NONE!

Originally Posted by PinestrawGuys

Originally Posted by Populist

And I would add that we want a candidate with a business & private sector background. NOT a professional politician/hack who has been in public office collecting taxpayer-funded paychecks for decades.

Dr. Paul has been an OB-GYN and delivered over 4,000 babies, so trying to paint him as a 'professional politician' won't wash. Besides that he's NEVER voted for a Congressional pay raise, he DOESN'T participate in the Congressional pension program and he returns unused office money EVERY YEAR to the CBO.

NO OTHER politician can make those claims, NONE!

I don't think anyone is arguing about his credentials
I think they are arguing about his electability at this point

Huck and McCain are getting the big bump by the msm
Thats who we have to stop

Originally Posted by CaliforniaDreamer

Hey sendthemback, if you're in Michigan, then you've gotta be looking at Mitt Romney. After my candidate, Tom Tancredo, decided to pull the plug and endorse Mitt, I've done my own investigation of his issues and so far I like what I've seen. Especially after last Saturday night's ABC debate, I feel like he would be an awesome President.

Then Fred Thompson had a great showing at the South Carolina debate. He really knocked down Huckabee a peg or two. Loved it.

Right now my favorite combination is a Romney/Thompson ticket.

www.mittromney.com

www.Fred08.com

I see on Fred's website that he's currently trying to fill up the red truck with donations to reach $1 million by the 14th. So far he's raised $848,890. Looks like he'll probably make it.

I heard on talk radio that Mitt raised $5 million in one day this week.

I could stomach Romney/Hunter. Romney would have to either pick someone whose strong where he's weak. Or, maybe he'd pick someone that the independents would find tolerable. I know it won't be McCain.

Originally Posted by ymeoru

Originally Posted by CaliforniaDreamer

Hey sendthemback, if you're in Michigan, then you've gotta be looking at Mitt Romney. After my candidate, Tom Tancredo, decided to pull the plug and endorse Mitt, I've done my own investigation of his issues and so far I like what I've seen. Especially after last Saturday night's ABC debate, I feel like he would be an awesome President.

Then Fred Thompson had a great showing at the South Carolina debate. He really knocked down Huckabee a peg or two. Loved it.

Right now my favorite combination is a Romney/Thompson ticket.

www.mittromney.com

www.Fred08.com

I see on Fred's website that he's currently trying to fill up the red truck with donations to reach $1 million by the 14th. So far he's raised $848,890. Looks like he'll probably make it.

I heard on talk radio that Mitt raised $5 million in one day this week.

I could stomach Romney/Hunter. Romney would have to either pick someone whose strong where he's weak. Or, maybe he'd pick someone that the independents would find tolerable. I know it won't be McCain.

The Romney/Thompson ticket would be VERY strong!!! We could beat the Dems with this!!!

Thompson does not seem to want to put in the effort/sacrifices necessary to be president------but he is very intelligent and would be a great VP (which would require less effort and sacrifices).

Originally Posted by usanevada

Originally Posted by PinestrawGuys

Originally Posted by Populist

And I would add that we want a candidate with a business & private sector background. NOT a professional politician/hack who has been in public office collecting taxpayer-funded paychecks for decades.

Dr. Paul has been an OB-GYN and delivered over 4,000 babies, so trying to paint him as a 'professional politician' won't wash. Besides that he's NEVER voted for a Congressional pay raise, he DOESN'T participate in the Congressional pension program and he returns unused office money EVERY YEAR to the CBO.

NO OTHER politician can make those claims, NONE!

I don't think anyone is arguing about his credentials
I think they are arguing about his electability at this point

Yep

Originally Posted by Bren4824

I'm just curious..........

Are you Paul and Hunter followers more concerned with supporting your candidates-----that DO NOT have a chance----then you are trying to put someone into office who ACTUALLY has a chance of winning and is now in the lead-----someone who has a CHANCE and will actually help us to stop this invasion???

Paul and Hunter have NO CHANCE OF WINNING!!!

Romney is currently leading----and we are having a hard time making sure that he wins----let alone someone who is not liked by a large majority (Paul) and someone who is not known by a large majority (Hunter).

MOD EDIT Romney will never get my vote. He is to childish to run this country. Did you see him in SC??

Keep buying all that media hype and you'll get a media candidate.

If everyone who said they wouldn't support him only because he's unelectable voted for him, he'd win in a landslide!!

Originally Posted by ymeoru

Originally Posted by usanevada

Originally Posted by PinestrawGuys

Originally Posted by Populist

And I would add that we want a candidate with a business & private sector background. NOT a professional politician/hack who has been in public office collecting taxpayer-funded paychecks for decades.

Dr. Paul has been an OB-GYN and delivered over 4,000 babies, so trying to paint him as a 'professional politician' won't wash. Besides that he's NEVER voted for a Congressional pay raise, he DOESN'T participate in the Congressional pension program and he returns unused office money EVERY YEAR to the CBO.

NO OTHER politician can make those claims, NONE!

I don't think anyone is arguing about his credentials
I think they are arguing about his electability at this point

Yep

I like Ron Paul. But, I don't think he has a chance of being president. His supporters are loyal but few compared to the supporters of McCain, Romney and Huckabee. So, everytime someone votes for him, they're not voting for someone who is electable. Now, of course people should vote for who they want to. Ron Paul has become somewhat like a 3rd party candidate spoiler within the republican party.

I'm the biggest Hunter fan in the world, but I have got to face the facts. Hunter isn't going to be president. Ron Paul needs to face a few facts too. He needs to back out AND endorse someone else. As much as I like him, I'll blame him if we end up with McCain.