Thread: Ron Paul = No Amnesty

Originally Posted by Bren4824

No, they have not been explained and resolved.

NOTHING has been posted about RP's plans to go after employers or hold employers accountable for hiring illegals!!!

And, today was the first day that there were ever so many Romney threads---on previous days, the majority of threads were for RP.

Bren,

I posted it in 3 different places today and you STILL insist on parroting this LIE!!! What part of 'ENFORCE CURRENT LAW' can you not understand??

Originally Posted by Bren4824

Originally Posted by sturmruger

I counted at least eight Romney thread while scrolling down the "General Discussion" section yet two Romney supporters continue to attack Ron Paul threads with issues that have been explained and resolved over and over again!

They claim Ron Paul has low numbers and they do not need the Ron Paul supporters yet they continue to attack Ron Paul threads even after W called for a cease fire!

No, they have not been explained and resolved.

NOTHING has been posted about RP's plans to go after employers or hold employers accountable for hiring illegals!!!

And, today was the first day that there were ever so many Romney threads---on previous days, the majority of threads were for RP.

In the opinion of Ron Paul supporters the issue has been explained over and over again in many different ways. You have an opinion that is persuasive for Romney.

Spamming Ron Paul threads with a dead issue as far as Ron Paul supporters are concerned shows your disrespect for us and W who requested a cease fire!

Paul's immigration TV ad is the strongest on the subject.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T-iJKwskH4

Welcome aboard Enchilada_Non_Grada.

Interesting ad. Appears pretty solid to me:

Originally Posted by PhredE

Welcome aboard Enchilada_Non_Grada.

Interesting ad. Appears pretty solid to me:

Yes welcome aboard!!!

Hey thank you, guys.

Originally Posted by Enchilada_Non_Grada

Paul's immigration TV ad is the strongest on the subject.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2T-iJKwskH4

Thank you for that video. I don't think Ron Paul's stance on the illegal alien invasion can get any clearer than that and that's what I'm talking about.

Yes if you watch this video and say he is not tough on immigration then you are just not paying attention to the video.

Originally Posted by Balboa

Yes if you watch this video and say he is not tough on immigration then you are just not paying attention to the video.

That's good, because he has picked up quite a bit of grief from the Libertarians supporting him. It is a bit of internal conflict between the paleoconservatives supporting him and the Libertarians supporting him.

Particularly over the point of "No more visas from Terrorist countries".

But, many polls have shown that illegal immigration is the #1 issue for Republicans, so we shall see how it turns out.

Of course this has long been his position.

From 2003:
http://www.house.gov/paul/press/press2003/pr030503.htm
Paul Introduces Legislation to Restrict Student Visas

[i]Washington, DC- Congressman Ron Paul recently introduced legislation that will make it more difficult for terrorists and potential terrorists to enter the United States using student visas. Paul’s bill will require the State department to apply close scrutiny to student and diversity visa applications submitted by individuals from Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, and other terror-sponsoring nations.

HR 488, the “Terror Immigration Elimination Act of 2003,â€

USPatriot wrote:

Thank you for that video. I don't think Ron Paul's stance on the illegal alien invasion can get any clearer than that and that's what I'm talking about.

A candidate should not be judged solely on his or her campaign rhetoric. IMO, the voter should look much deeper than the surface clutter (campaign rhetoric) which is being presented. when deciding on a president, we have a personal responsibility to reconcile differences between the now with the then (campaign rhetoric and voting history). this applies to all candidates, not just Ron Paul. Actually, I tune out a lot of the garbage the candidates (all of them) are saying now and look to their past voting record for a true reading of how they would act as President of the United States.