Thread: why I hate liberal illegal alien friendly media

Originally Posted by rickesteves

dman1200-that's why I feel Terri Schiavo would've stood a better legal chance had the poor woman been an illlegal.

You know I've been saying that for weeks. I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks the way I do. Makes me feel like I have hope that I'm not the one who's totally insane. I'm sure Jorge Bush would have stormed the hospital with armed guards, guns ablazing had Terri Schiavo been an illegal alien especially of Mexican dissent. Instead since she's white Jorge Bush sits on his butt and gives some half hearted speech about being pro life, but he can't do anything because of the courts. What a phony piece of work he is. Instead of having a true American hero as a president like a Roosevelt, Eisenhower or a Reagan, we instead have a limp wristed pansy who bows to the interest of those who will stab him in the back anyway while he spits in the face of those who support him.

It makes me wish in a strange way that Kerry would have won the last election. I hated him too, but at least it would have been someone I could feel good about hating and the sheepish Republicans would have finally stood up and denounced the same policies that are getting past by Bush now. At least then the Republicans would pretend to care about us. It's a shame. People voted for Bush to avoid Kerry and yet ironically they end up getting Kerry with an R in front of his name anyway. Unbelieveable.

Some Republicans with a backbone tried to save Terri Schiavo like Tom Delay, James Sensenbrenner and Dave Weldon, but unfortunately they were thwarted by the radical bums on the left and the fake Republicans on the right.

dman1200-Hard to believe with close proximity to DC that Virginia has such a problem with illegals,especially gangs.I guess that really shows how much the politicians actually care about the problem.One of my ancestors several generations ago was a Virginian (a Scotsman named Rev.Richard Larimore).

Ummm, I hate to break bad news but Reagan gave three million illegal immigrants amnesty during his term in office and that was like writing an invitation to the millions who followed, hoping for similar amensty. I wouldn't hold him up as such a great example of someone who's interests were all for Americans.

Ummm, I hate to break bad news but Reagan gave three million illegal immigrants amnesty during his term in office and that was like writing an invitation to the millions who followed, hoping for similar amensty. I wouldn't hold him up as such a great example of someone who's interests were all for Americans.

The majority of these people were from El Salvador and Nicaragua,not Mexico.

Originally Posted by JuniusJnr

Ummm, I hate to break bad news but Reagan gave three million illegal immigrants amnesty during his term in office and that was like writing an invitation to the millions who followed, hoping for similar amensty. I wouldn't hold him up as such a great example of someone who's interests were all for Americans.

That was with a Democratically controlled congress and with the promise that it would be a one time amnesty and then the borders would be shut, the laws would be enforced and the employers who hired illegals would be punished. Not to mention that the phony neocon George Bush Sr pressured Reagan into signing it. Reagan later admitted that it was the biggest mistake of his presidency. At least Reagan learned from his mistake and I highly doubt he would have done it again. His mistake was that he trusted the rats in Congress to fulfill their promises.

Jorge Bush and his cronies however haven't learned from the repeated mistakes of the past and continue to be bold in the face of the majority. That's the thing. Reagan made a mistake and learned from it. I don't want to nor should we be in the business of punishing people for making one misguided mistake. Now repeating it over and over again (even intentionally repeating it) like Bush is doing is what I have a beef with.

So Reagan made a mistake and I can excuse his mistake, also alot of people didn't know what was going on at the time. Bush knows what he's doing and alot of people are against what he's doing, but despite that he stubbornly continues to push on and that's why I'm outraged at him.

BTW not that I'm for this, but if you were promised that there was truly 100 percent without a shadow of a doubt going to be a one time amnesty and then the borders would truly be shut and our immigration laws were going to be enforced to the T and their would be no more future amnesties period, no exceptions, I tend to think most people would take that deal. I probably wouldn't because I'm a hardliner, but I think most people would though. That is if everything was guaranteed to happen along those lines.

At this time, dataman, I think you're wrong. There are too many here, causing too much expense and too much havoc ( I read somewhere that the violent gangs in this nation (most illegals) outnumber law enforcement nationwide.

I wouldn't go for that at all. It's a BAD thought.

RR

Originally Posted by rickesteves

Ummm, I hate to break bad news but Reagan gave three million illegal immigrants amnesty during his term in office and that was like writing an invitation to the millions who followed, hoping for similar amensty. I wouldn't hold him up as such a great example of someone who's interests were all for Americans.

The majority of these people were from El Salvador and Nicaragua,not Mexico.

They were supposed to be from El Salvador and the surrounding areas, which was declared a disaster due to weather and earthquakes. EVERYBODY tagged along, swarming accross the border faster than the speed of light. And that includes many many people from Mexico.
I remember it well. And I remember their ungrateful attitudes. Again, America's generosity was taken advantage of.

They were supposed to be from El Salvador and the surrounding areas, which was declared a disaster due to weather and earthquakes. EVERYBODY tagged along, swarming accross the border faster than the speed of light. And that includes many many people from Mexico

Originally it was because of their civil wars (FMLN/SANDANISTAS,Etc.) not natural disasters.That was when Central Americans out numbered Mexicans here in SF.I went to school with and knew hundreds of them.

Let's face it:unless you know or are Latino most people can't tell the difference between a Mexican on any other non-Black Latino.

Originally Posted by rickesteves

Let's face it:unless you know or are Latino most people can't tell the difference between a Mexican on any other non-Black Latino.

Well, well. Is that what you really think? Then how did you figure out that the lady 'that had it in for my family' was Puerto Rican, if you think Latino people all look alike? I'm just curious.