Page 482 of 574 FirstFirst ... 382432472478479480481482483484485486492532 ... LastLast
Results 4,811 to 4,820 of 5732
Like Tree97Likes

Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

  1. #4811
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by 2wolves Farker, commenting at WND
    ...the Birther argument? I see White Pride, I see anti-Semites, I see racist bushwa, I see calls for violence, I see fear mongering. What do you see?
    It probably depends upon the locus of one's point of observation,
    from where one views a phenomenon or an event.

    I see tens upon tens of millions of U.S. citizens sworn to support and defend
    the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

    Do you consider it "racism" to support and defend the U.S. Constitution?
    Or would you prefer that I throw the Constitution under the bus in order to
    open up the Presidency to a Constitutionally ineligible candidate of color?

    "No person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President;"
    - the U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5.

    A natural born Citizen is
    a citizen
    born in the country
    of parents who are citizens.

    According to Minor v. Happersett (1875), the governing U.S. Supreme Court decision on nbC:

    "The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens.
    Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the
    nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was
    never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens
    became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or
    natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

    Some authorities go further and include as citizens [but not as natural born
    Citizens] children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the
    citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts [about
    their citizenship], but never as to the first."


    - Chief Justice Morrison Remick Waite in Minor v. Happersett
    (1875)

    Trip at Hannity Forums, to whom I yield the floor, states it well:

    ...there are more than 100 years of Supreme Court opinion clearly indicating the definition of natural born citizen, and even indicating a reference consulted by our founders as they authored the Constitution in Carpenter's Hall, that reference being Emerick de Vattel's [The] Law of Nations.

    ► 1759 E. de Vattel, The Law of Nations, book 1, c. 19, sec. 212 (1758; 1759 first English translation);

    ► 1814 The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253, 289 (1814) (Marshall, C.J., concurring) (cites Vattel’s definition of natural born citizens);

    ► 1830 Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242, 245 (1830) (same definition without citing Vattel);

    ► 1875 Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167-68 (1875) (same definition without citing Vattel);

    ► 1879 Ex parte Reynolds, 5 Dill., 394, 402
    (1879) (same definition and cites Vattel);

    ► 1890 United States v. Ward, 42 F.320 (C.C.S.D.Cal. 1890) (same definition and cites Vattel);

    ► 1898 U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (189 (WKA only declared under the Fourteenth Amendment a child born on U.S. soil to foreign parents and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States a “citizen of the United States” and not an Article II “natural born Citizen;” in his dissent, [Chief Justice] Fuller confirmed Vattel’s definition of a “natural born Citizen”);

    ► 1899 Keith v. U.S., 8 Okla. 446; 58 P. 507 (Okla. 1899) (common law rule that the offspring of free persons followed the condition of the father was applied to determine the citizenship status of a child).

    [I could continue with Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), The Slaughterhouse Cases (1873), Elk v. Wilkins (1884), Perkins v. Elg (1939), and so on. But, dear reader, lest I be penalized for piling on, I spare you. - ED.]

    Vattel's definition of natural born citizen, as cited in the 1759 English translation of that treatise, The Law of Nations, and referenced in more than 100 years of this country's Supreme Court decisions, is the following:

    "§ 212. Citizens and natives.

    "The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights."

    This definition is nowhere undermined by any legal authority at any time in this country's history, though some have argued that it should no longer be applicable. Some have argued that the 14th Amendment created some new form of citizen and even modified "natural born citizen" as a result. However the 14th [Amendment] never references "natural born citizen" at all. The 14th [Amendment]'s reference to "born or naturalized" merely groups those achieving citizenship upon birth (born), by both statute and natural born status, with those achieving citizenship after birth (naturalized).
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-08-2012 at 08:20 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  2. #4812
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp accepts Judge Malihi's ruling.
    Attorney Orly Taitz files appeal; Van Irion and Mark Hatfield to follow.

    Quote Originally Posted by Bob Unruh for WorldNetDaily
    'Judge Malihi's ruling is ... contrary to the ruling of U.S. Supreme Court'
    Tuesday, February 7, 2012

    by Bob Unruh

    An administrative law judge in Georgia who held hearings on citizens’ complaints that Barack Obama isn’t eligible to be president, and so shouldn’t be on the 2012 presidential ballot in the state, failed to follow U.S. Supreme Court precedent, according to one of the attorneys representing clients bringing the complaints.

    Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp today adopted without elaboration the recommendation from Judge Michael Malihi, who concluded without evidence from Obama that ["]he was born in Hawaii, which makes him native born, which is the same as the 'natural born' required by the Constitution of presidents.["]

    Appeals of the decision already are in the works, the attorneys say. One, J. Mark Hatfield, representing Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, told WND he had expected Kemp to rubber-stamp whatever Malihi wrote.

    He did. His determination today, without mentioning any of the controversy or questions that remain, said he “formally adopts the initial decision of the ALJ.”

    Hatfield said the good thing about the decision is that it came quickly, and the attorneys can escalate the arguments to the appellate level now well in advance of the March 6 Super Tuesday primaries, in which Georgia takes part.

    He said he wrote to Kemp as the process was developing, outlining several failings on the part of the ALJ, and he confirmed some of those issues now are being prepared for presentation to the appellate level.

    “I will be filing that on behalf of Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell just as soon as I can get it drafted,” he told WND.

    Citizens raising concerns include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Thomas Malaren and Laurie Roth, represented by Orly Taitz; David Welden, represented by attorney Van R. Irion of Liberty Legal Foundation; and Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell, represented by J. Mark Hatfield. Cody Judy is raising a challenge because he also wants to be on the ballot.

    Hatfield’s letter raised a series of issues with Malihi’s ruling. He noted that the cases brought by different plaintiffs had been ordered separated by Malihi, yet he issued only one decision for all of them.

    “The adverse impact … is immediately apparent when one reviews certain alleged ‘facts’… Malihi found as ‘fact’: 1) that defendant Obama was born in the United States; and 2) that defendant Obama’s mother was a citizen of the United States at the time of defendant’s birth.”

    “A review of the record in my clients’ above-captioned cases reveals no evidence of defendant’s place of birth and no evidence of defendant’s mothers’ citizenship at the time of defendant’s birth,” he wrote. “My clients did not enter into evidence any copy of defendant Obama’s purported birth certificate in these case.”

    He noted, since Obama and his lawyer “failed to appear” and “failed to submit any evidence,” the determination by Malihi in the cases brought by his clients appears to be unsubstantiated.

    Hatfield also explained that Malihi failed to decide the burden of proof.

    “The defendant and his lawyer failed to attend trial and failed to offer any evidence, and such failures were intentional … If the defendant did, as plaintiffs contend, bear the burden of proof in these cases, then defendant can in no way be said to have satisfied his burden, and plaintiffs are entitled to [a default] judgment.”

    He also noted that Malihi based his opinion of an Indiana Court of Appeals ruling from 2009, when, in fact, the U.S. Supreme Court also has spoken on the issue.

    While Malihi said he believed Obama was born in the U.S. and that automatically conferred “natural born citizenship” on him, that “is an incorrect statement of the applicable law,” Hatfield said.

    “The ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett … is binding authority for the proposition that the Article II phrase, ‘natural born citizen,’ refers to a person born in the United States to two (2) parents who were then (at the time of the child’s birth) themselves United States citizens.”

    He said since Obama’s father never was a U.S. citizen, Obama [II] then is disqualified.

    Hatfield also noted that Malihi simply ignored the plaintiffs’ request for a ruling of contempt against Obama for refusing to participate in the court proceedings.

    While Georgia procedures allow for a response to such “contemptuous” behavior, “Malihi did not even acknowledge the existence of the plaintiffs’ citation for contempt.”

    Malihi said Obama could be on the state’s ballot because he was born in Hawaii, is “native born,” and thus also is “natural born,” as required by the Constitution.

    He cited the little-known determination by an Indiana judge [in Ankeny v. Daniels (2009), State of Indiana Appeals Court].

    “The Indiana court determined that a person qualifies as a natural born citizen if he was born in the United States, because he became a United States citizen at birth,” wrote Malihi last week.

    “For the purposes of this analysis, this court considered that President Barack Obama was born in the United States. Therefore, as discussed in [the case], he became a citizen at birth and is a natural born citizen.”

    Malihi’s decision came without any evidence being presented by Obama or his lawyer after they refused to participate in the required hearing under a state law that mandates all candidates qualify for the office they seek.

    The law also allows any voter to raise a challenge, and several did. A hearing was held on their evidence on Jan. 26.

    Malihi essentially tossed all of the information the plaintiffs and their attorneys presented.

    “The court finds the testimony of the witnesses, as well as the exhibits tendered, to be of little, if any, probative value, and thus wholly insufficient to support plaintiffs’ allegations,” he said.

    He was miffed at Obama but decided the case on the merits, as requested by the plaintiffs.

    “Neither defendant nor his counsel, Michael Jablonski, appeared or answered. Ordinarily, the court would enter a default order against a party that fails to participate in any stage of a proceeding. … Nonetheless, despite the defendant’s failure to appear, plaintiffs asked this court to decide the case on the merits of their arguments and evidence. … By deciding this matter on the merits, the court in no way condones the conduct or legal scholarship of defendant’s attorney, Mr. Jablonski,” he said.

    The decision followed a hearing last week on concerns raised by citizens of Georgia under a state law that allows voters to challenge the eligibility of candidates on the state’s ballot. It is the states that run elections in the U.S., and national elections are just a compilation of the results of the 50 state elections.

    The state law requires “every candidate for federal” office who is certified by the state executive committees of a political party or who files a notice of candidacy “shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought.”

    State law also grants the Secretary of State and any “elector who is eligible to vote for a candidate” in the state the authority to raise a challenge to a candidate’s qualifications, the judge determined.

    The Constitution requires Presidents to be “natural-born citizens,” and experts say that the Founders regarded [nbc] as the offspring of two U.S. citizens.

    Top constitutional expert Herb Titus contends that a “natural-born citizen” is born of parents who were U.S. citizens at the time of the birth. The argument also is supported by a 19th-century U.S. Supreme Court decision, Minor vs. Happersett in 1875. The case includes one of very few references in the nation’s archives that addresses the definition of “natural-born citizen.”

    That case states: “The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

    (Continued
    on WorldNetDaily.com, at Georgia eligibility challenge returns!)
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  3. #4813
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by Jerome R. Corsi, Ph.D., for WorldNetDaily
    The sheriff [Joe Arpaio] said that if the DOJ "wants to debate the facts instead of
    fixing the problems stated in our findings, we will do so by way of litigation.”
    THE COURTS ARE BROKEN, PEOPLE!

    Litigation in a coerced, compromised, corrupt court system is a waste of time and money, with a 100% failure rate in over 76 trials to date.

    There has to be a better way... perhaps by using the Cold Case Posse findings:

    to motivate and mobilize America's sheriffs to restore law and order from this chaos, to reestablish legitimate governance from this illegal seizing of power, and eventually, to bring this man of lawlessness to pay the penalty for his high crimes, for example:

    sedition against the U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, and otherwise changing the meaning of the Constitution without amendment by 2/3 of Congress and ratification by 3/4 of the States,

    t-----n,

    identity theft and fraud,

    election fraud,

    document fraud,

    Social Security fraud,

    Selective Service registration fraud,

    passport fraud,

    perjury before the Illinois bar in the matter of denying having any aliases,

    possible property tax fraud in re 5046 S. Greenwood Ave., Chicago, Ill.,

    ► perjurious false swearing of the presidential oath of office to preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution of the United States, while in the act of violating it,

    impersonation of an officer of the United States,

    misappropriation of government funds under false pretenses,

    declaring and executing private wars and foreign assassinations
    under the color of authority fraudulently obtained,
    etc.,

    to put the fraudulent usurpation before the people in a recall or no confidence vote, both at the regular polling places and
    by secure Internet polling;

    to bring about and mobilize massive demonstrations at strategic points around D.C.;

    to bring about and mobilize standing and continuing demonstrations at stateside home offices of Congress persons, so as to persuade them to derecognize "the pretender to the throne" and to discourage their continuing cooperation with the illegitimately contrived executive branch;

    to once and for all convince the Joint Chiefs of Staff that it is in their best interests, and those of the country, not to support or empower the lawless and unlawful Communist-in-Chief;

    to convince the member banks of the Fed, along with the Chinese, the Saudis, the IMF, and others, that they are dangerously at risk loaning money to an illegitimate government under illegitimate authority, because its days are numbered;

    to convince many foreign governments to officially cease to recognize the usurpation as a legitimate government and its ambassadors as legitimate representatives of the United States;

    to persuade America's churches to stop the pretense of praying for "the President" and get busy praying for the country to be delivered from a foreign and domestic enemy of the Constitution, a bully who seized control of the country in a coup d'état, a communist dictator who is actively dismantling, redistributing, and dissolving the United States . . . no, that would be too much to expect. But God always has a remnant: leading Christians who haven't been neutered and neutralized by dependence upon 501(c)3 tax exemptions.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-13-2012 at 06:41 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  4. #4814
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    I'm looking for news of Walter F. Fitzpatrick's release from the Monroe Co. jail in Madisonville, Tennessee.

    He was scheduled to be released at 9:45 pm on Feb. 9
    th.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  5. #4815
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    LCDR Walter F. Fitzpatrick, III (USN-ret.), was released last night
    from the Monroe Co., Tenn., jail, according to Mrs. Sharon Rondeau,
    editor of The Post & Email.

    She has a story posted there about Walter's release from the gulag.

    James David Manning reports on Walter's release
    on the Feb. 9th Manning report (beginning at 17:00).
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 02-11-2012 at 07:29 PM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  6. #4816
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by The Hill
    Santorum leads Mitt Romney 38 percent to 23 percent...
    while Gingrich is in third place with 17 percent.
    Ron Paul comes in last with 13 percent.
    IMHO, if anyone more conservative than Mitt Romney is the candidate opposing Mr. Obama, the probability of civil disruption and the imposition of martial law, and thence suspension of the elections, escalates radically... so Radically as to consider it a Rule.

    Has any pollster, even one, taken a poll:

    "Will there be - manifestly and verifiably - free, fair, and honest elections this Nov. 6th?"
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  7. #4817
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207

    state Secretary of State email list

    state Secretary of State email list

    "Hon. Beth Chapman, Secretary of State of Alabama" <Beth.chapman@sos.alabama.gov>;
    "Hon. Mead Treadwell, Lieutenant Governor of Alaska" <lt.governor@alaska.gov>;
    "Hon. Ken Bennett, Secretary of State of Arizona" <sosadmin@azsos.gov>;
    "Hon. Mark Martin, Secretary of State of Arkansas" <arsos@sos.arkansas.gov>;
    "Hon. Debra Bowen, Secretary of State of California" <secretarybowen@sos.ca.gov>;
    "Hon. Scott Gessler, Secretary of State of Colorado" <secretary@sos.state.co.us>;
    "Hon. Denise Merrill, Secretary of State of Connecticut" <denise.merrill@ct.gov>;
    "Hon. Jeffrey Bullock, Secretary of State of Delaware" <Monique.hampton@state.de.us>;
    "Hon. Cynthia Brock-Smith, Secretary of the District of Columbia" <secretary@dc.gov>;
    "Hon. Kurt Browning, Secretary of State of Florida" <dossecretaryofstate@dos.myflorida.com>;
    "Hon. Brian Kemp, Secretary of State of Georgia" <sos@sos.ga.gov>;
    "Hon. Brian Schatz, Lieutenant Governor of Hawaii" <ltgov@hawaii.gov>;
    "Hon. Ben Ysursa, Secretary of State of Idaho" <secstate@sos.idaho.gov>;
    "Hon. Jesse White, Secretary of State of Illinois" <jessewhite@ilsos.net>;
    "Hon. Jerold Bonnet, Interim Secretary of State of Indiana" <deputy@sos.in.gov>;
    "Hon. Matt Schultz, Secretary of State of Iowa" <sos@sos.state.ia.us>;
    "Hon. Kris Kobach, Secretary of State of Kansas" <sos@sos.ks.gov>;
    "Hon. Alison Lundergan Grimes, Secretary of State of Kentucky" <alison.lundergangrimes@ky.gov>;
    "Hon. Tom Schedler, Secretary of State of Louisiana" <admin@sos.la.gov>;
    "Hon. Charles Summers, Secretary of State of Maine" <sos.office@maine.gov>;
    "Hon. John McDonough, Secretary of State of Maryland" <mdsos@sos.state.md.us>;
    "Hon. William Galvin, Massachusetts Secretary of Commonwealth" <cis@sec.state.ma.us>;
    "Hon. Ruth Johnson, Secretary of State of Michigan" <secretary@michigan.gov>;
    "Hon. Mark Ritchie, Secretary of State of Minnesota" <secretary.state@state.mn.us>;
    "Hon. C. Delbert Hosemann, Jr., Secretary of State of Mississippi" <delbert.hosemann@sos.ms.gov>;
    "Hon. Robin Carnahan, Secretary of State of Missouri" <SOSMain@sos.mo.gov>;
    "Hon. Linda McCulloch, Secretary of State of Montana" <sos@mt.gov>;
    "Hon. John Gale, Secretary of State of Nebraska" <secretaryofstate@nebraska.gov>;
    "Hon. Ross Miller, Secretary of State of Nevada" <sosmail@sos.nv.gov>;
    "Hon. William Gardner, Secretary of State of New Hampshire" <kladd@sos.state.nh.us>;
    "Hon. Kim Guadagno, Lieutenant Governor of New Jersey" <lt.governor@gov.state.nj.us>;
    "Hon. Dianna Duran, Secretary of State of New Mexico" <diannaj.duran@state.nm.us>;
    "Hon. Cesar Perales, Secretary of State of New York" <hwilbard@dos.state.ny.us>;
    "Hon. Elaine Marshall, Secretary of State of North Carolina" <emarshal@sosnc.com>;
    "Hon. Alvin A. Jaeger, Secretary of State of North Dakota" <sos@nd.gov>
    "Hon. Jon Husted, Secretary of State of Ohio" <jhusted@ohiosecretaryofstate.gov>;
    "Hon. Glenn Coffee, Secretary of State of Oklahoma" <webmaster@sos.ok.gov>;
    "Hon. Kate Brown, Secretary of State of Oregon" <oregon.sos@sos.or.us>;
    "Hon. Carol Aichele, Acting Secretary of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania" <ST-PRESS@state.pa.us>;
    "Hon. A. Ralph Mollis, Secretary of State of Rhode Island" <armollis@sos.ri.gov>;
    "Hon. Mark Hammond, Secretary of State of South Carolina" <rdaggerhart@sos.sc.gov>;
    "Hon. Jason Gant, Secretary of State of South Dakota" <jason.gant@state.sd.us>:
    "Hon. Tre Hargett, Secretary of State of Tennessee" <tre.hargett@tn.gov>;
    "Hon. Esperanza Hope Andrade, Secretary of State of Texas" <secretary@sos.state.tx.us>;
    "Hon. Greg Bell, Lieutenant Governor of Utah" <gbell@utah.gov>;
    "Hon. Jim Condos, Secretary of State of Vermont" <jim.condos@sec.state.vt.us>;
    "Hon. Janet Polarek, Virginia Secretary of Commonwealth" <Socmail@governor.virginia.gov>;
    "Hon. Sam Reed, Secretary of State of Washington" <sam.reed@sos.wa.gov>;
    "Hon. Natalie Tennant, Secretary of State of West Virginia" <wvsos@wvsos.com>;



    "Hon. Faoa Sunia, Lieutenant Governor of American Samoa" <administrator@asg-gov.net>;
    "Hon. Ray Tenorio, Lieutenant Governor of Guam" <webmaster@guamletgovernor.net>;
    "Hon. Kenneth McClintock, Secretary of State of Puerto Rico" <kenneth.mcclintock@yahoo.com>;
    "Hon. Gregory Francis, Lieutenant Governor of the Virgin Islands" <sonia.boyce@lgo-vi.gov>
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  8. #4818
    Senior Member florgal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,386
    Did Judge Malihi Base Eligibility Decision On Sharia Law?

    February 13, 2012 By Suzanne Eovald

    “This is an outrage, an absolute outrage,” Attorney Orly Taitz told a radio audience in Western New York. She believes Judge Michael Malihi, a Clinton era appointee, is from Iran which could have a bearing if he is steeped in Sharia Law. When he brought down a favorable decision for Obama’s appearing on state ballots, Taitz sent by overnight courier a 23 page appeal to Georgia Secretary of State Brian Kemp pleading with him to ignore the judge’s advisory decision – to no avail.

    Kemp rubber stamped the Malihi decision, and now the appeal process begins in earnest. Plaintiff attorney J. Mark Hatfield will escalate this case to the appellate level immediately. With emergency appeals well in place before Georgia’s March 6 Super Tuesday, Hatfield told World Net Daily: ”I will be filing that on behalf of Carl Swensson and Kevin Richard Powell just as soon as I can get it drafted!”
    Taitz told her listeners: “It was abundantly clear…that Judge Malihi was under an outside pressure to rush the case.” Her appeal contains three key procedural points. First, Malihi refused to allow her to properly present her opening statement. Secondy, he rushed plaintiff witnesses. Finally, throughout the case he would allow only the Natural Born Citizen argument. But what Malihi did was unprecedented because he based his decision on the Arkeny [sic] v. Daniels case out of Indiana which was never cited by the defense! “A presiding judge cannot suddenly pull out of a hat some case,” Taitz fumed.



    Trying to follow up on the Malihi Iranian angle proved very frustrating. Another blogger trying to trace Judge Michael Malihi’s background found virtually NO information on him, although other judicial search subjects presented much biographical data. She was able to find names of Malihi’s relatives, namely Mehdi Malihi, Masoud M. Malihi, Malie S. Malihi, Mahzad Malihi, and Lia E. Malihi. The street address given for his Westport, CT estate appears to list a house number higher than official records enumerate, so this is just another facet of the Georgia mystery judge.
    The Taitz presentation revealed that our current president’s name on his mother’s passport was SOEBARKAH, yet in his Indonesian school records his last name is Soetoro! She said on appeal: “Obama never presented admissible competent evidence showing Obama to be born in this country, yet the judge considered Obama to be born here.”
    She also appealed for consideration the fact that there is “no valid Social Security number, and that the E verify test failed” for the number commonly given. But in spite of his verdict, the judge for the first time allowed evidence pertaining to the challenge of Barack Obama’s eligibility to run for U.S. President to be admitted into open court, thus paving the way for the appeals process. Obama’s Malihi victory may be a Pyrrhic one indeed!
    Arizona Sheriff Joe Arpaio is announcing the findings of his cold case posse research on March 1; he told reporter Jerome Corsi in an exclusive story that some will find the results “Shocking!”
    To contact your Congressional Representative use this link: Contacting the Congress: A Citizen's Congressional Directory
    To read more use these links:
    http://str8talk,wordpress.com/
    www.orlytaitzesq.com/
    Georgia eligibility challenge returns!
    http://www.intangiblesoul.com/2012/0...michael-malihi

    Did Judge Malihi Base Eligibility Decision On Sharia Law? | Western Journalism.com

  9. #4819
    working4change
    Guest
    Last edited by working4change; 02-14-2012 at 02:42 PM.

  10. #4820
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center blog (although I doubt they will publish it):

    Birthers racists? No, I see tens upon tens of millions of U.S. citizens sworn to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

    Do you consider it "racism" to support and defend the U.S. Constitution, including Amendment XIV?
    Or would you prefer that I throw the Constitution under the bus in order to open up the Presidency to a Constitutionally ineligible candidate of color?

    "No person except a natural born Citizen... shall be eligible to the Office of President;"
    - the U.S. Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5.

    A natural born Citizen is
    a citizen
    born in the country
    of parents who are citizens,

    according to over 2400 years of common usage in Western Civilization, dating back to Herodotus and Plato in the 5th c. and 4th c. B.C. (except in Great Britain during the
    18th c., when the tyrant King George III was grasping for subjects);

    and according to correspondence among the Framers of the Constitution: John Jay, Geo. Washington, John Adams, Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Jefferson, David Ramsay, and others.

    According to Minor v. Happersett (1875), the governing U.S. Supreme Court decision on nbC:

    "The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.

    Some authorities go further and include as citizens [but not as natural born Citizens] children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts [about their citizenship], but never as to the first."
    - Chief Justice Morrison Remick Waite, writing the unanimous decision in Minor v. Happersett (1875).

    Trip at Hannity Forums, to whom I yield the floor, states it well:

    ...there are more than 100 years of Supreme Court opinion clearly indicating the definition of natural born citizen, and even indicating a reference consulted by our founders as they authored the Constitution in Carpenter's Hall, that reference being Emerich de Vattel's [The] Law of Nations.

    ► 1759 E. de Vattel, The Law of Nations, book 1, c. 19, sec. 212 (1758; 1759 first English translation);

    ► 1814 The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253, 289 (Marshall, C.J., concurring) (cites Vattel’s definition of natural born citizens);

    ► 1830 Shanks v. Dupont, 28 U.S. 242, 245 (same definition without citing Vattel);

    ► 1875 Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162, 167-68 (same definition without citing Vattel);

    ► 1879 Ex parte Reynolds, 5 Dill., 394, 402 (same definition and cites Vattel);

    ► 1890 United States v. Ward, 42 F.320 (C.C.S.D.Cal. 1890) (same definition and cites Vattel);

    ► 1898 U.S. v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (WKA only declared {by the Fourteenth Amendment} a child born on U.S. soil to foreign parents and subject to the jurisdiction of the United States a “citizen of the United States” and not an Article II “natural born Citizen;” in his dissent, [Chief Justice] Fuller confirmed de Vattel’s definition of a “natural born Citizen”);

    ► 1899 Keith v. U.S., 8 Okla. 446; 58 P. 507 (Okla. 1899) (common law rule that the offspring of free persons followed the condition of the father was applied to determine the citizenship status of a child).

    [I could continue with Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857), The Slaughterhouse Cases (1873), Elk v. Wilkins (1884), Perkins v. Elg (1939), and so on. But, dear reader, lest I be penalized for piling on, I spare you. - ED.]

    The following is de Vattel's definition of natural born citizen, as cited in the 1759 English translation of his treatise, The Law of Nations, and referenced in more than 100 years of this country's Supreme Court decisions.
    Quote Originally Posted by Emerich de Vattel
    § 212. Citizens and natives.

    "The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. The natives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens. As the society cannot exist and perpetuate itself otherwise than by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights.
    This definition is nowhere undermined by any legal authority at any time in this country's history, though some in Congress have argued that it should no longer be applicable. Some have argued that the 14th Amendment created some new form of citizen and even modified "natural born citizen" as a result. However the 14th [Amendment] never referenced "natural born citizen" at all. The 14th [Amendment]'s reference to "born or naturalized" merely grouped those achieving citizenship UPON birth (born), either natural born or by statute (A14, WKA), with those achieving citizenship AFTER birth (naturalized).

    Now, one can argue against the Constitution, one can argue against common sense, and one can CERTAINLY argue against conservative principles and the precedent-proven meanings of legal idioms and terms of art. But one who argues against his Creator, Who placed him where He made him and gave him inalienable rights to life and liberty, just because his Maker did not make him a natural born citizen, born in the country to citizen parents, and so grant him the arguable privilege to become the President or Vice President - such a one is following the devil, who through pride acknowledged not his place and counted himself eligible to replace Yahweh, the Lord God, as Sovereign of the universe, earning damnation in eternal fire as his just reward. For such a one there is even less hope than for a fool, because a fool may yet learn wisdom from painful experience and obedience from that which he suffers. But the proud never have that chance to learn, for their pride goes before destruction, and that without remedy.

    Lord Jesus, have mercy upon Mr. Obama's soul, for he knows not what he is doing.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •