Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Originally Posted by BetsyRoss

Just to caution everybody concerning any pending court action: this might be the equivalent of a real estate "quiet title" action. In other words, the court may accept the action, then rule against the plaintiffs just to settle matters.

It would only settle matters if the docs are produced.

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-163145.html
Related


From WorldNetDaily

The Department of Defense has compelled a private employer to fire a U.S. Army Reserve major from his civilian job after he had his military deployment orders revoked for arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office.

According to the CEO of Simtech Inc., a private company contracted by the Defense Security Services, an agency of the Department of Defense, the federal government has compelled the termination of Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook.

Cook's attorney, Orly Taitz, wrote in her blog that Simtech CEO Larry Grice said he would try to find another position within the company for Cook, but nothing is currently available.

Originally Posted by jamesw62

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-163145.html
Related


From WorldNetDaily

The Department of Defense has compelled a private employer to fire a U.S. Army Reserve major from his civilian job after he had his military deployment orders revoked for arguing he should not be required to serve under a president who has not proven his eligibility for office.

According to the CEO of Simtech Inc., a private company contracted by the Defense Security Services, an agency of the Department of Defense, the federal government has compelled the termination of Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook.

Cook's attorney, Orly Taitz, wrote in her blog that Simtech CEO Larry Grice said he would try to find another position within the company for Cook, but nothing is currently available.

I do believe that the firing is illegal.

Threats and intimidation by government entities are illegal, are probably in direct violation of existing contracts with the government, and any actions performed under threat and duress are null and void.

But, thinking about it, when has illegality stopped the government from doing anything recently?

Having said that, and looking further into the dirty mess, I do believe the Major has suffered at the hands of his government and a Title 42 lawsuit would be a proper response.

Major Cook is being discussed on Hannity

Sean Hannity is going to discuss the Cook matter tonight. Tune in or record the show.

sounds like a multi billion dollar law suit to me..... I hope it is directly aimed at those involved and Implicate the crook from Chi Town

Deleted because some things are better left unsaid

Anti-Obama GI's Afghan Orders Revoked
July 15, 2009
Military.com | by Bryant Jordan
http://www.military.com/news/article/an ... 6032369115

The attorney representing an Army major fighting deployment to Afghanistan because he believes Barack Obama is not legally his commander-in-chief is declaring victory after the Soldier's orders were revoked yesterday.

California lawyer Orly Taitz says any service member may now refuse any order by questioning Obama's legitimacy.

"Do you know what this means?" Taitz asked in a telephone interview with Military.com Tuesday, about an hour after hearing from Maj. Stefan Cook, the officer fighting his deployment to Afghanistan. "It means the Obama administration has blinked. They have no cards to play with. The moment I filed a lawsuit, they didn't even fight!"

"Can you imagine what are the consequences? This is disastrous" for the administration, she said. "We'll have no military. Because anytime any Soldier, any Sailor, any Airman does not want to follow any orders, all he has to do is call an attorney and say 'I don't want to follow this order because I question the legitimacy of the commander in chief.' "

U.S. Army Maj. Stefan Frederick Cook, the reserve soldier who says he shouldn't have to go to Afghanistan because he believes Barack Obama was never eligible to be president, has had his deployment orders revoked, Army officials said.

Lt. Col. Maria Quon, a spokeswoman for the U.S. Army Human Resources Command-St. Louis, said Cook was no longer expected to report today to MacDill Air Force Base, Fla., for mobilization to active duty, according to a report in the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer of Georgia.

The paper said Cook, as an Individual Mobilization Augmentee, had volunteered for a year's deployment to Afghanistan on May 8 and his orders were issued June 9. Quon told the paper that IMAs who volunteer may ask for a revocation up until their reporting date, but that Cook had not asked for this. Quon also told the paper she could not say why the Army had revoked his orders, citing the Privacy Act.

Taitz has been leading an effort to have Obama release a so-called "vault copy" of his birth certificate showing he was born in Hawaii. While the birth certificate that Obama released previously showed he was born in Hawaii, Taitz and others -- who have been dubbed "birthers" for their passionate doubt of Obama's citizenship -- believe it's a phony.

Taitz claims she has 170 service members who have joined her legal battle against Obama.

Taitz filed Cook's case in U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Georgia on July 8, according to the Columbus Ledger-Enquirer. In the lawsuit, she told the court that Cook does not believe Obama is a natural-born U.S. citizen, and so cannot serve as president and commander-in-chief.

To follow Obama's orders, she argued, would put Cook in violation of international law because he'd be taking part in military operations outside the president's command, the paper reported Tuesday. A hearing was scheduled for July 16 on the complaint.

In February, Taitz took up the cause of Army 1st Lt. Scott Easterling, who is deployed to Iraq. Easterling, in a letter published on the Web site Defendourfreedoms.com, called Obama "a usurper to the Office -- an imposter."

Army officials told Military.com at the time they were aware of Easterling's statements but offered no further comment.

Taitz said Easterling is still in Iraq but she believes he will be returning home in August. She is attempting to have his case heard by the U.S. Supreme Court, which has already kicked it back once.

On Tuesday's "Countdown" show on MSNBC, host Keith Olbermann named both Taitz and Cook as his "Worst Person in the World" for the case they have brought in Georgia.

Olbermann criticized Taitz for the various "birther" lawsuits she has brought against Obama, calling her a "con woman." But he reserved his harshest words for Cook, who he argues is just using the birth certificate flap as an excuse to get out of duty in Afghanistan.

Recalling his own determination in the 1960s that, if drafted, he would oppose it because he didn't want to get shot and killed, he said: "too bad Maj. Cook doesn't have the guts to say that. Then he might be deserving of his rank rather than an embarrassment to all those who served without cowardice."

(HJ - Olbermann is clearly a non-thinking, immature jerk)

Poll: What do you think about the anti-Obama GI?
http://www.military.com/pollresults?pol ... results.do

(At this time, 52% of the military votes want to see the birth certificate, and there were 280 online comments to the article from military personnel - a very high number)

As far as the conduct of the "anti-Obama GI" goes . . .

. . . I'd need to see the long-form birth certificate before I followed any of Obama's orders too.
50%
. . . he should be discharged for dereliction of duty. And the Army should be ashamed to have him wearing the uniform.
37%
. . . it's obviously a lot of political posturing, as usual. Wake me up when something important happens.
13%

The question still remains, why wasn't he brought up on charges?

Originally Posted by TexasBorn

The question still remains, why wasn't he brought up on charges?

I would suggest because he has broken no laws.