Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Originally Posted by FreedomFirst

Interesting development reported here about the Advertorial in the Times. A few things in the write-up are probably off-track as pointers, but overall not a bad effort. Client Kerchner paid for the ad.

http://yannone.blogspot.com/2009/07/why ... s-out.html

For the purpose of maintaining documentation inline...
http://www.yannone.org/BlogDocs/KerchnerAdvertorial.pdf

11 / MONDAY, JULY 6, 2009 // THE WASHINGTON TIMES
ADVERTISEMENT
Obama is NOT an Article II Natural Born Citizen
and therefore is NOT Eligible to be President

The President and CINC of the USA Must be a "Natural Born" Citizen --- U.S. Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;"

The Law of Nations, Vattel, 1758, Chapter 19, Section 212:
"natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are citizens"

Obama's Father Was Not a U.S. Citizen, nor Was He an Immigrant to the USA, nor Was He Even a Permanent Resident of the USA

Article II "Natural Born Citizen" Means
Unity of Citizenship At Birth

Article II of our Constitution has a lot
to say about how a would-be President
is born. .Natural born Citizen. status
requires not only birth on U.S. soil but also
birth to parents who are both U.S. citizens
by birth or naturalization. This unity of
jus soli (soil) and jus sanguinis (descent)
in the child at the time of birth assures
that the child is born with sole allegiance
(obligation of fidelity and obedience to
government in consideration for protection
that government gives (U.S. v. Kuhn, 49
F.Supp.407, 414 (D.C.N.Y)) and loyalty to
the United States and that no other nation
can lay any claim to the child's (later an
adult) allegiance and loyalty. Indeed,
under such birth circumstances, no other
nation can legally or morally demand
any military or political obligations from
that person. The child, as he/she grows,
will also have a better chance of not
psychologically struggling with conflicted
allegiance and loyalty to any other nation.
Unity of citizenship is based on the
teachings of the law of nature (natural law)
and the law of nations, as confirmed by
ancient Greek and Roman law; American,
European, and English constitutions,
common and civil law, and statutes;
and Vattel's, The Law of Nations, all of
which the Founding Fathers read and
understood. These sources have taught
civilizations from time immemorial that
a person gains allegiance and loyalty
and therefore attachment for a nation
from either being born on the soil of the
community defining that nation or from
being born to parents who were also born
on that same soil or who naturalized as
though they were born on that soil. It is
only by combining at birth in the child
both means to inherit these two sources
of citizenship that the child by nature and
therefore also by law is born with only one
allegiance and loyalty to and consequently
attachment for only the United States.
Our Constitution requires unity of U.S.
citizenship from birth only for the Office
of President and Commander in Chief of
the Military, given the unique nature of
the position, a position that empowers
one person to decide whether our national
survival requires the destruction of or a
nuclear attack on or some less military
measure against another nation or group.
It is required of the President because such
a status gives the American people the
best Constitutional chance that a would-be
President will not have any foreign
influences which because of conflict of
conscience can most certainly taint his/
her critical decisions made when leading
the nation. Hence, the special status is
a Constitutional eligibility requirement
to be President and thereby to be vested
with the sole power to decide the fate
and survival of the American people.
Of course, the status, being a minimum
Constitutional requirement, does not
guarantee that a would-be President will
have love and fealty only for the United
States. Therefore, the final informed and
intelligent decision on who the President
will be is left to the voters, the Electors,
and Congress at the Joint Session, to
whom hopefully responsible media and
political institutions will have provided
all the necessary vetting information
concerning the candidate's character and
qualifications to be President.
Through historical development, unity of
citizenship and sole allegiance at birth is
not required for U.S. born citizen Senators,
Representatives, and regular citizens under
the 14th Amendment and Congressional
enactments. In contradiction and which
confirms the Founding Fathers. meaning
of what a .natural born Citizen. is,
naturalized citizens, since 1795, before
becoming such must swear an oath that
they renounce all other allegiances to
other nations. During the Washington
Administration, the First Congress
passed the Naturalization Act of 1795 in
which it provided that new citizens take
a solemn oath to support the Constitution
and .renounce. all .allegiance. to
their former political regimes. This is
during the time that most of the Framers
were alive and still actively involved in
guiding and forming the new national
government and Constitutional Republic.
Today, we still require that an alien upon
being naturalized must give an oath that
he/she renounces all former allegiances
and that he/she will .support and defend
the Constitution and laws of the United
States of America against all enemies,
foreign and domestic.. Hence, allegiance
is not simply a thing of the past but very
much with us today. It is important to
also understand that naturalization takes
an alien back to the moment of birth and
by law changes that alien.s birth status.
In other words, naturalization, which by
legal definition requires sole allegiance to
the United States, re-creates the individual
as though he were a born Citizen but only
does it by law and not by nature. This
is the reason that the 14th Amendment
considers a naturalized person to be a
.citizen. of the United States and not
a .natural born Citizen. of the United
States. This recreation of birth status
through naturalization which also existed
under English common law also probably
explains why John Jay underlined the
word .born. when he recommended to
General Washington that only a .natural
born Citizen. (as to say born in fact, by
nature, and not by law) be allowed to
be President. Consequently, naturalized
citizens stand on an equal footing with
born Citizens (who are so recognized and
confirmed by the 14th Amendment or by
an Act of Congress and who can be but
not necessarily are also .natural born
Citizens.) except that they cannot be
President or Vice President, for they were
born with an allegiance not owing to the
United States and acquire that allegiance
only after birth. Surely, if a naturalized
citizen, even though having sole allegiance
to the United States, is not Constitutionally
eligible to be President, we cannot expect
any less of someone who we are willing
to declare so Constitutionally eligible.
The Founding Fathers emphasized
that, for the sake of the survival of the
Constitutional Republic, the Office of
President and Commander in Chief of the
Military be free of foreign influence and
intrigue. It is the .natural born Citizen.
clause that gives the American people the
best fighting chance to keep it that way for
generations to come. American people do
not have the Constitutional right to have
any certain person be President. But for
the reasons stated above, minimally they
do have a Constitutional right to protect
their liberty by knowing and assuring
that their President is Constitutionally
qualified to hold the Office of President
and Commander in Chief of the Military.
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

If you would like to help with
this lawsuit, please contact
Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
185 Gatzmer Avenue
Jamesburg NJ 08831
Email: apuzzo@erols.com
TEL: 732-521-1900
FAX: 732-521-3906
BLOG: http://puzo1.blogspot.com

Paid for by: Charles F. Kerchner, Jr., CDR USNR Retired, Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner et al vs. Obama & Congress et al.

Big mistake to claim that naturalization takes a person's citizenship "back in time" to the moment of birth "as if" he was always a citizen. Legally, it's not the case. Not sure if the ad had sloppy writing or sloppy thinking.

Meanwhile, a new case with some urgency as a military officer asks for a Temporary Restraining Order on his own orders to report for Afghanistan.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17266905/05311066823

Originally Posted by FreedomFirst

Meanwhile, a new case with some urgency as a military officer asks for a Temporary Restraining Order on his own orders to report for Afghanistan.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/17266905/05311066823

Interesting. I've been waiting to see greater involvement against Obama from the military, and this appears to be one more log on that fire.

But I'm also wondering why the major didn't file a quo warranto with AG Holder at the same time. I recognize that the filing prayer includes the statement:

(3) such time as the constitutional qualifications and eligibility of Barack Hussein Obama to serve as President and Commander and Chief have been established by clear and convincing evidence (which standard of proof benefits a constitutional requirement, especially in light of the confusing and conflicting circumstantial evidence set forth in Exhibits B and C).

Is the strategy to get the Columbus, Georgia District Court to make a ruling on eligibility disclosure, rather than rely on the DC court? Maybe because there is a greater chance of success in Georgia?

What would Donofrio say about this tactic? Would he agree?

Can anyone confirm or verify the following "Travel Advisory?"

An Obot claimed the following was a State Dept. Travel Advisory from the summer of 1981, around the time that Barack Obama II traveled to Pakistan.

"Wahington, D.C. 205__" is obviously incorrect, but that could be a typo from key entry of hard copy.

"NO. 81-33A

Travel Advisory

Passport Services/Bureau of Consular Affairs
Department of State/Wahington. D.C. 205__

August 17, 1981

Travel to Pakistan


Before traveling to Pakistan, American citizens should be aware of the following updated visa requirements: 30 day visas are available at Pakistani airports for tourists only. As these visas are rarely extended beyond the 30 day time period, tourists planning to stay longer should secure visas before coming to Pakistan. Any traveler coming into Pakistan overland from India must repeat must have a valid visa, as 30 day visas are not repeat not issued at the overland border crossing point at Wagha.

Any non-official American who is in Pakistan for more than 30 days must register with the government's foreigner registration office. Exit permits are required for those who have stayed longer than 30 days before they are allowed to leave the country. All Americans traveling to Pakistan on official business or for private employment are required to have a visa before arrival, and, as the government of Pakistan's clearance process is often quite lengthy, we would urge those coming to apply at the nearest Pakistani embassy or consulate as far in advance of their scheduled arrival as possible.



This superseded requirements set forth in Department Publication M-264, "Visa Requirements of Foreign Governments."

Expiration date: indefinite.

[They must be worried that Dr. Orly Taitz's case in California on Monday morning could result in discovery, and thus expose their own false testimony and obstruction of justice at FighttheSmears.com.]

"FighttheSmears" website scrubbed, even from Google cache and Way Back Machine archive.

Obama 'smear' site vanishes from Web
Statements scrubbed on birth certificate, Bill Ayers, ACORN
Posted: July 09, 2009 11:50 pm Eastern

By Chelsea Schilling
© 2009 WorldNetDaily

Saturday, July 11, 2009
Obama Scrubs the Web of All Birth Docs
by Pamela Geller

It was a little over a year ago that Atlas broke the story that Obama's certification of live birth was a "horrible forgery". I ran a 28 page forensic digital analysis meticulously prepared by a forensic digital examination specialist exposing the fraud. Obama hired five law firms to fight the release of the vault copy. It has never seen the light of day, despite numerous calls by hundreds of thousands of concerned Americans to release it.

Interestingly, in the past week, Obama's secret police have been massively scrubbing the net of any and all copies of the COLB. Even vaporizing the copies on the "wayback machine". You can see the documents he has erased here. Mighty strange. Or not.

Just last week I was reviewing them online for a piece I was researching. So this is very new.

Check out all the Atlas birth documentation coverage going back to June 10th here.
Kapi'olani Hospital Scrubs Their Website The Obama File
What a difference a day makes. Just yesterday, I posted a page (cursor down) from the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children that featured a letter from the White House affirming the hospital as Obama's birthplace (see next item).

Well, today, the letter is gone -- scrub-a-dub-dub!

Why would they remove the letter? This is getting absurd.
Bogus POTUS 7/9/09

Massive Internet Scrub In Progress

Yesterday's item, "Fight the Smears Disappears," documented the changes that have recently been made to Obama's high-profile Internet site, "Fight the Smears," and also to the Internet Archive, also known as the "WayBackMachine.com" -- Obama has removed his bogus Certification of Live Birth from the Internet -- at the same time, the Internet Archive just happened to "lose" its archived copy.

What's really ironic is that FactCheck.org is so invested in their defense of Obama's bogus bona fides, that they just can't dig themselves out of the hole they dug themselves into. FactCheck now stands alone as a defender of the indefensible.

In the last 24 hours, further evidence of an, organized, massive scrubbing of the Internet has been discovered.

Evidence of this extraordinary campaign was posted on this site on June 18th. Sometime between June 8, 2009, and June 18, 2009, the Department of Hawaiian Home Lands (DHHL) changed the requirements for identification that they maintained for over 100 years. All of a sudden, Hawaii will now accept Certifications of Live Birth (COLB) as proof of identification and residency, and will no longer require the certified "Certificates of Birth" -- although Hawaii says that they will still take the traditional birth certificates.

On June 7th, this website reported that the Kapi'olani Medical Center for Women and Children in Honolulu posted on its website a letter on White House stationery dated January 24th (since scrubbed), in which Obama wrote, "As a beneficiary of the excellence of Kapi'olani Medical Center -- the place of my birth -- I am pleased to add my voice to your chorus of supporters" -- even though Obama himself has previously claimed to have been born at Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu, a claim backed up by his sister Maya.

Until June 7th, even United Press International (UPI) and Snopes.com contained statements that Obama was born at the Queen's Medical Center in Honolulu. Here is a screen capture from Snopes.com that says, "[Barack Hussein Obama was born at the Queen's Medical Center." Today, Snopes.com claims that "Barack Hussein Obama, was born on 4 August 1961 at the Kapiolani Medical Center." Snopes claims they made the change because Wikipedia made the change.

Here is the UPI screen capture that claims Obama was born at Queens -- but now the UPI claims Kapiolani. Remember, Obama, himself, told UPI that he was born at Queens.

So, because someone at the White House sent a letter to Kapiolani, all the websites that have been covering for Obama are now scrambling to scrub content that they have claimed as accurate for the last couple of years.

Over one year ago, I wrote the following for the "Biography" page:

On the Internet, there is an organized, systematic cleansing of Obama-related content.

Every couple of days I get an email telling me this link, or that link, connects to a "Page not found -- 404 error." The extensive body of Obama web-knowledge, that has evolved over the last 20 years, is shrinking. Stuff that's considered an Obama smear or unflattering is sent to the Obama '08 cyber shredding machine. And the campaign is getting help from some really big web service providers.

A good example is Kristof's famous New York Times article, in which Kristof quotes Obama saying that the Muslim call to prayer is "one of the prettiest sounds on Earth" and in which Obama recited the Muslim call to prayer, the Adhan, "with a first-class [Arabic] accent" -- that's gone -- from The New York Times -- but it's here though.

And, the Trinity UCC website has completely changed. Now, it's all sweetness and light. Gone are all those great Rev. Wright "God ... America" videos and anti-Israeli Trumpet magazine excerpts.

There's less on the web every day. In time, the entire Obama body of knowledge will consist of Obama's 3 bogus novels -- "Dreams From My Father" -- "The Audacity of Hope" -- and the latest -- "Change We Can Believe In" -- all written by Barack Hussein Obama or his "ghost-writers."

Obama has lived for almost 50 years without leaving any footprints -- none! There is no Obama documentation -- no bona fides -- no paper trail -- nothing. Just Obama's ... story.
Original, vault copy birth certificate -- Not released (lawyers' fees = $2,000,000 ~ birth certificate = $15 [$10 if you pick it up at the office])
Certification of Live Birth -- Released -- Counterfeit
and here and here
Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released (if one exists)

Obama/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators)

Kindergarten records -- Records lost (this is a big one -- see here -- read two frames)

Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released
Soetoro adoption records -- Not released

Fransiskus Assisi School School application -- Released (by independent investigators)
Punahou School records -- Not released
Soetoro/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators)

Selective Service Registration -- Released -- Counterfeit
Occidental College records -- Not released
Passport -- Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama's [subsequent] terrorism and intelligence adviser.
Columbia College records -- Not released
Columbia thesis -- "Soviet Nuclear Disarmament" -- Not released
Harvard College records -- Not released
Harvard Law Review articles -- None

Illinois Bar Records -- Not released.
Baptism certificate -- None
Medical records -- Not released
Illinois State Senate records -- None
Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost
Law practice client list -- Not released
University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None

And the political Left and the press, the supporters of the Usurper-in-Chief, have the gall to attack anyone that questions this EVIDENCE of a conspiracy as a kook, a nut -- as a "Birther."

images.dailykos.com/images/user/3/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg

What makes the Daily Kos image so important? It is the original from which FactCheck, FightTheSmears, Politfact, etc., derived the images they published later. The Daily Kos image has random dust specks at specific locations, for example, below the first "E" in the "CERTIFICATION OF LIVE BIRTH" heading, at (x,y) = (893,185). Those random dust specks appear at the same locations on the other images, showing that they are copies of the first Daily Kos image.
________________________

FATHER'S RACE
AFRICAN

This is an anachronism. It is out of place on a 1961 document. The term used then was "Negro", or perhaps "Colored". "African-American" was an unknown term forty or fifty years ago.

Besides, "African" is not a race; it is a native or resident of the continent of Africa. "African" includes significant populations which are Negro, Caucasian or white, Mongoloid or Mongolian, Polynesian, Hispanic, Semitic (Arab or Hebrew), Aryan or Hindu, penguins, and probably anything else except Eskimo and Native American.
________________________

DATE FILED BY REGISTRAR
AUGUST 8,1961

The forger made a mistake and left out the space between the comma and "1961". "AUGUST 8, 1961" (note the additional space) is how this date should appear, and that is how the date does appear on other Hawaiian Certifications of Live Birth.
________________________

At the upper right of the form, the Certificate No. is redacted or blacked out. The warning at the bottom reads,

ANY ALTERATIONS INVALIDATE THIS CERTIFICATE

This Certification is invalid or VOID; it cannot be used for any legal purposes. (Although it does seem to have been used for illegal purposes.)
________________________

Genuine Certifications are horizontally centered on the paper, with no more than 15 pixels variation. This forgery of a Certification was "printed" 75 pixels off center toward the left, more than 5 times the high side variation for the genuine article.
________________________

The printed security border is not like real security borders printed between 2006 and 2008. The forged copy is not one continuous border, but a patchwork of pieces, each 240 pixels long, cut-and-pasted together to simulate an authentic 2007 security border, so as to match the "JUN 6 - 2007" date stamp.

Originally Posted by Dr. Ron Polarik (pseudonym)

However, both the embossed Seal and the State Registrar's Signature stamp do not match the same elements found on a real 2007 COLB, but perfectly match those found on a real 2008 COLB; or, in other words, something that would never happen in real life.

________________________

The Daily Kos image has dimensions, 2427 x 2369. The printed security border has dimensions, 2372 x 2312. So the image is nearly square, 97½% square, to be more exact. But the printed security border is skewed on the paper, 15 pixels higher on the right side than on the left, and 3 pixels further left at the top than at the bottom. A vertical difference of 15 pixels in the right and left sides would normally indicate a paper misfeed by the printer, normally resulting in a paper jam, or at least wrinkling of the paper.

If the border were 97½% square like the image, it would be skewed 3.077 pixels higher and 3 pixels further left, 15 pixels higher and 14 5/8 pixels further left, or anywhere between, proportionately. But it isn't. The skew is 15 and 3. Therefore, this printed image does not have right angled corners, not even in the computer program that supposedly generated it for Hawaii Vital Records. In the real world, programmers do not create trapezoidal official documents. This document is not the real world, folks. It is fantasy world.
________________________

The Hawaii Div. of Vital Records policy is to release Certifications only as laser printer hard copy. But "printed" above is in quotes because this image did not originate as a paper copy printed on a laser printer. Rather, the forger generated it, or at least manipulated it, as an image in Photoshop. Opening the image file in a text editor reveals that the image file header has the following characters of EXIF identification data:

[Software ] = Adobe Photoshop CS3 Macintosh

[DateTime ] = 2008: 06:12 08:42:36

In other words, the image was filed on a Macintosh computer using Adobe Photoshop CS3 software at 8:42 AM on 6/12/08, the date that Daily Kos published the computer image on their website. It is no longer the original scanner file scanned from an Hawaii Div. of Vital Records paper copy.
________________________

The Hawaii Div. of Vital Records policy also is to only release Certifications with a date stamp, the Registrar's signature stamp, and the embossed seal of the State of Hawaii Department of Health, all on the reverse side. For whatever reason, Daily Kos did not provide an image of the reverse side. I shall not presume to know why they didn't; you can draw your own conclusions.

Normally, there is bleed-through of the date stamp; the Daily Kos image has JUN - 6 2007 from the reverse side plainly visible on the front. Sometimes, but not always, there is some slight bleed-through of the Registrar's signature stamp; there is none on the Daily Kos image, and that is OK. Often, but not always to cursory examination, the seal embossed on the reverse side is noticeable on the front; not so on the Daily Kos image.

However, under sufficient magnification and with edging enhancement to bring out the embossing, an imaging professional can show up the deformations of the anti-counterfeiting green bars in the front side background, caused by the embossing on the back. This green paper is very thin by design, and any embossing on the back inevitably causes some deformation on the front. I do not see any crimping whatsoever at 3X magnification, and that is suspicious. Even with edging enhancement, those bits of a seal that can be brought out are fuzzy and look like a blurred 3rd or 4th generation copy, not crisp like an original.
________________________

It is also Hawaii Div. of Vital Records policy to only release Certifications that are folded twice horizontally for mailing in a standard letter envelope. The Daily Kos image has a horizontal crease through the State Seal as evidence of the upper fold. There should be a horizontal crease near "MOTHER'S RACE CAUCASIAN" as evidence of a lower fold. Maybe you can find it; I couldn't. That's because it's not there, and it's not anywhere else, either.

Couldn't this copy - just this one - have left Vital Records without a second fold? Not possible, says Vital Records. Every Certification is double-folded and placed in a letter envelope. Every one. Without exception.

Unless it didn't come from Vital Records.
________________________

The image has other flaws and errors.

The seal of the State of Hawaii at the top is not a sharp original printing, but a blurry, pixelated copy from another COLB.

Text is overlaid by cut-and-paste rather than printed on the anti-counterfeiting green patterned background. The result is pattern mismatches, stray pixels, "halos" of pixelation around the cut-and-pasted letters, and between letters, white space where the green pattern should be.
________________________

Originally Posted by TechDude on AtlasShrugs.com

Upon very close inspection portions of the security border also repeat every 240 pixels. By mapping this repeating pattern it becomes apparent that the pattern is laid out as a 240 x 240 pixel square that can be accurately extrapolated to the next position by simply counting 240 pixels. This type of tiling effect is commonly seen when an image has been modified by filling an area using an image editing application's tile or pattern fill function.
. . .
The (Daily) KOS image security border pattern does not match any known specimen from any known year. It does not match the pre-2006 nor does it match the post-2006 certificate patterns. The placement of the text in all of the pre-2006 and post-2006 certificates are almost identical pixel location matches while the image's text placement does not match any known specimen from any known year. The shape and kerning of the fonts used in the 2006 through 2008 certificates are identical while the shape and kerning of the fonts used in the image does not match any known specimen. The KOS image shows clear signs of tampering such as the mismatch in RGB and error levels, visible indications of the previous location of the erased security border, easily detectable patterns of repeating flaws around the new security border, EXIF data that says the image was last saved with Photoshop CS3 for Macintosh, and finally a technician from Hawaii who confirms it just looks wrong.

atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

Match donation challenge!

http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-162707.html

On Monday, July 13, 2009, at 3:49 PM EDT, Debra3401 posted:

Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits!!

GREAT NEWS ALERT!!

Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits !!
Please distribute everywhere.

Just got off the phone with Orly Taitz, the attorney in Keyes v. Obama.

At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, [California,] [U.S. District] Judge [David O.] Carter said the following:
1. There will be a trial.
2. It will be heard on the merits.
3. Nothing will be dismissed on procedural issues. [Mr. Obama's 3 law firms have used "lack of standing to bring suit" to get 48 previous lawsuits dismissed without presentation or hearing on the merits.]
4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.
6. Judge stated that if Obama isn't Constitutionally qualified he needs to leave the White House.

The DOJ will be involved with the case also. I wasn't clear if they would be trying to get to the truth or they would just be blindly representing Obama.

Orly will be adding members of the military from California as plaintiffs also. This is from my interpretation of our conversation. Orly asked me to disseminate this information out for her, she will be doing a posting later after she gets some sleep.

Please say a prayer of protection for Orly, her family, and Judge Carter.

Please also pray that the truth will come to light regarding Obama and justice will be done.

Dr Orly Taitz, Esq site here!

WOOHOO!!!

HALLELUJAH!!!

WND.com has more about this wonderful breakthrough.

Minuteman posted this at EXACTLY the same moment I posted!!!!!!!!!!!!...I don't know how to delete....sorry!!!!!!!!!!

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/
http://vrwcgrapevine.blogspot.com/2009/ ... rd-on.html
Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits!!
GREAT NEWS ALERT!!

Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits !!
Please distribute everywhere.

Just got off the phone with Orly Taitz, the attorney in Keyes v. Obama.

At the hearing today at the Federal Court building in Santa Ana, Judge Carter said the following:
1. There will be a trial.
2. It will be heard on the merits.
3. Nothing will be dismissed on proceedural issues.
4. The trial will be expeditious, and the judge pledged to give case priority.
5. Being a former Marine he realizes the importance of having a Constitutionally qualified POTUS/CINC.
6. Judge stated that if Obama isn’t Constitutionally qualifed he needs to leave the White House.

The DOJ will be involved with the case also…. I wasn’t clear if they would be trying to get to the truth or they would just be blindly representing Obama.

Orly will be adding members of the military from California as plaintiffs also.This is from what my interpretation of our conversation.Orly, asked me to disseminate this information out for her, she will be doing a posting later after she gets some sleep.

Please say a prayer of protection for Orly, her family, and Judge Carter. Please also pray that the truth will come to light regarding Obama and justice will be done.
Dr Orly Taitz, Esq site here!

WOOHOO!!!

WorldNetDaily has a YouTube of Dr. Alan Keyes breathing more fire into the warriors pursuing the usurper to justice.

Well worth the four minutes.

http://www.youtube.com/v/lqkMfToY9Pk
(removed)
______________________________________

Dr. Orly Taitz wrote, "A report on Cook v Good et al was printed in [the Columbus, Georgia,] Ledger-Enquirer, but there are numerous mistakes in reporting."

[ED.: those are not mistakes. That is historical revisionism at the news source of record.]