Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Originally Posted by TexasBorn

Why isn't the print media being used by those who claim to have vital information on Obama's illegitimacy? Full page ads? There are SOME newspapers, etc. that are not yet in Obama's pocket. We all know that none of these lawsuits will get their day in court. NONE! We hang on to this thread of hope but deep down we know that our courts and judges won't walk that plank. We are in deep.

You are aware of Mario Apuzzo's latest ad, aren't you?

http://www.scribd.com/doc/25786596/Obam ... -Wkly-pg-5

Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan

Originally Posted by TexasBorn

Why isn't the print media being used by those who claim to have vital information on Obama's illegitimacy? Full page ads? There are SOME newspapers, etc. that are not yet in Obama's pocket. We all know that none of these lawsuits will get their day in court. NONE! We hang on to this thread of hope but deep down we know that our courts and judges won't walk that plank. We are in deep.

You are aware of Mario Apuzzo's latest ad, aren't you?

http://www.scribd.com/doc/25786596/Obam ... -Wkly-pg-5

Thanks Highlander, I checked it out. Comments have been disabled for some reason. I guess I want to see the big newspapers with an ad stating this information but I know it will never happen. I want people to wake up in the morning, read their newspaper and see this ad.

Orly Taitz Quo warranto Case 1:10-cv-00151-RCL document with exhibits, filed 1-27-10.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26037475/Orly ... ts-1-27-10

Very interesting development in Texas, where Pelosi failed to sign the DNC eligibility certificate (which says nothing about Constitutional qualification) at all.

http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/re ... the-alamo/

Click the link to read about this, and to view the Complaint of Election Fraud lodged with the TX Attorney General just yesterday.

Originally Posted by FreedomFirst

Very interesting development in Texas, where Pelosi failed to sign the DNC eligibility certificate (which says nothing about Constitutional qualification) at all.

http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/re ... the-alamo/

Click the link to read about this, and to view the Complaint of Election Fraud lodged with the TX Attorney General just yesterday.

Thanks again FreedomFirst. I've put a copy of the formal complaint of election fraud against Boyd L. Richie, Chair of the Texas State Democratic Party, up on Scribd.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26047965/Jbjd ... d-in-Texas

Originally Posted by FreedomFirst

Very interesting development in Texas, where Pelosi failed to sign the DNC eligibility certificate (which says nothing about Constitutional qualification) at all.

http://jbjd.wordpress.com/2010/01/26/re ... the-alamo/

Click the link to read about this, and to view the Complaint of Election Fraud lodged with the TX Attorney General just yesterday.

I agree Freedom...VERY interesting. We need some heavy weights behind this effort. This may turn out to be a major chink in their armor.

jbjd has also produced other useful discussion and documents on his/her site, including the following '3-card Monte' explanation of Bob Bauer's manipulation of the federal court system.

=======================

COUNSEL for DNC SERVICES CORPORATION PERFORMS 3 CARD MONTE for FEDERAL COURT

Jbjd blog page at: http://tinyurl.com/ykehc8q
posted on Monday, November 23rd, 2009

Bob Bauer, currently White House Counsel, was formerly the Counsel to DNC Services Corporation and Obama for America, Barack Obama’s Presidential campaign. (BOB BAUER BIOGRAPHY - http://tinyurl.com/yfx8n7r ) In January 2009, he defended Mr. Obama in Hollister v. Soetoro ( http://tinyurl.com/yepbugg ), a lawsuit aimed at exposing his client was Constitutionally unqualified for POTUS. HOLLISTER v. SOETORO (Mr. Hollister was represented by Attorney Phil Berg.) Mr. Bauer submitted his usual Motion to Dismiss – this was not the first lawsuit aimed at reaching his client’s eligibility – but this time, seeking to take advantage of the opportunity provided by this lawsuit to end the barrage of eligibility based challenges both inside and outside of the courtroom, he added something new: a footnote asking the judge to take judicial notice of certain facts, which notice he would recycle to construct the fiction, his client was Constitutionally qualified to be POTUS.

“Judicial noticeâ€

For those who watched the Obama SOTU message, you already know that Obama took at least one cheap shot at the Supreme Court. Jon Christian Ryter has fired off a rebuttal, including a copy of the video with Justice Alito shaking his head in disapproval of Obama's comments.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/26059568/Jon- ... reme-Court

D.C. court case demands Obama explain eligibility

Contends president's allegiance is to Britain, Kenya, Indonesia

Posted: January 29, 2010
12:20 am Eastern
By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily

A prominent attorney who has shepherded a number of high-profile legal cases challenging Barack Obama'seligibility to be president has brought a "Quo Warranto" case to district court in Washington, D.C., alleging his allegiances have included Britain, Kenya and Indonesia.

A Quo Warranto action, first recorded some 800 years ago, essentially is a demand to know by what authority a public figure is acting. The case, brought by California attorney Orly Taitz on behalf of herself, was assigned to Chief Judge Royce Lamberth.

Taitz told WND that in a separate action she has filed a notice of appeal with the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals of the dismissal of a case she brought on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes and dozens of other individuals in California challenging Obama's eligibility.

She previously attempted Quo Warranto cases on behalf of government officials, without response. This time she filed the action directly with the court on her own behalf.

"The case revolves around the federal question of eligibility of the president under Quo Warranto," she wrote.

An online constitutional resource says Quo Warranto "affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents."

John Eidsmoe, an expert on the U.S. Constitution now working with the Foundation on Moral Law, an organization founded by former Alabama Supreme Court Chief Justice Roy Moore, previously told WND the demand was a legitimate course of action.

Demand the truth by joining the petition campaign to make President Obama reveal his long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate!

"She basically is asking, 'By what authority' is Obama president," he told WND when the issue first arose. "In other words, 'I want you to tell me by what authority. I don't really think you should hold the office.'"

Eidsmoe said it's clear that Obama has something in the documentation of his history, including his birth certificate, college records and other documents that "he does not want the public to know."

According to the online Constitution.org resource: "The common law writ of Quo Warranto has been suppressed at the federal level in the United States, and deprecated at the state level, but remains a right under the Ninth Amendment which was understood and presumed by the Founders, and which affords the only judicial remedy for violations of the Constitution by public officials and agents."

Taitz' claim states Obama, whom she identifies as "Acting President of the United States," has refused "to present in any court of law or to the public any vital records that would show his eligibility as for U.S. presidency based on Article 2, section 1 of the Constitution, as one born in the United States to two citizen parents without allegiance to any other sovereignties. From birth and until now Mr. Obama had citizenship and allegiance to three other nations: Great Britain, Kenya and Indonesia."

WND has reported on the multiple legal cases challenging Obama's eligibility in addition to efforts to raise the question at the state and national levels.

Several state legislatures are working on proposals that would require presidential candidates to submit proof of their eligibility. And a similar proposal has been introduced in Congress by Rep. Bill Posey, R-Fla.

The claims are that Obama does not meet the U.S. Constitution's requirement that a president be a "natural born citizen." The lawsuits have asserted he either was not born in Hawaii as he claims or was a dual citizen because of his father's British citizenship at the time of his birth.

The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

However, none of the cases filed to date has been successful in reaching the plateau of legal discovery, so that information about Obama's birth could be obtained.

Taitz previously submitted the request to Attorney General Eric Holder and Jeffrey Taylor, the U.S. attorney for D.C., but did not get a response.

Taitz told WND shes's been a victim of propaganda, intimidation and threats because of her efforts to uncover information about the president.

Her website also has been subjected to repeated hacking attacks, and she informed WND the only reliable way to reach her is her mailing address at: 29839 Santa Margarita Parkway, Rancho Santa Margarita, Calif., 92688.

Her filing in Washington asks:

* What is Respondent Obama's standard and burden of proof of his birthplace under Quo Warranto and ethical duties? – Considering Obama's first cousin Raila Odinga, Prime Minister of Kenya, sealed alleged records of Obama's birth in Mombasa; while the state of Hawaii holds Obama's 'original' sealed birth records, allows registration of births out of state, allows registration based on a statement of one relative only without any corroborating evidence and seals original birth records.

* Does the state of Hawaii's withholding Respondent Obama's original birth records by privacy laws breach the U.S. Constitution by obstructing [people who want to] challenge, validate and evaluate qualifications of presidential candidates based on legally acceptable … records.

* Does the restrictive qualification for president of 'natural born citizen' over 'citizen' include allegiance to the U.S.A. from birth without any foreign allegiance, as required of the commander in chief in time of war to preserve the Republic, including birth within the jurisdiction of the U.S.A. to parents who both had U.S. citizenship at that birth, and having retained that undivided loyalty?

* Does birth to or adoption by a non-citizen father or mother incur foreign allegiance sufficient to negate being a 'natural born citizen' and disqualify a candidate from becoming president?

Other questions relate to a candidate's responsibility to provide documentation of their qualifications under the Constitution's requirements.

"The ex-relators assert that respondent Obama has indeed usurped the franchise of the president of the United States and the commander in chief of the United States military forces due to his ineligibility and non-compliance with the provision of the Article 2, Section 1, Clause 5 of the Constitution of the United States that provides that the president of the United States has to be a natural born citizen," the case states.

Taitz told WND the summonses in the case already have been forwarded to Obama, and his response could determine the next steps.

The White House has not replied to numerous requests for comment.

Besides Obama's actual birth documentation, the still-concealed documentation for him includes kindergarten records, Punahou school records, Occidental College records, Columbia University records, Columbia thesis, Harvard Law School records, Harvard Law Review articles, scholarly articles from the University of Chicago, passport, medical records, his files from his years as an Illinois state senator, his Illinois State Bar Association records, any baptism records, and his adoption records.

Another significant factor is the estimated $1.7 million Obama has spent on court cases to prevent any of the documentation of his life to be revealed to the public.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123428

AirborneSapper7,

Do you or anyone else on this site really believe this will go anywhere?