Thread: ID Card for Workers Is at Center of Immigration Plan

Originally Posted by Sinthea

I was once a proponent of said Biometric ID card and now have decided against it. Thank you for enlightening me with this article and comments.

I'm also new here and am looking for a spell check to use as my typing is atrocious. Thanks for any help

Your typing looks fine to me.

Thank you for the welcome, I had been growing very disheartened lately regarding illegal immigration and now see such support, it renews me.

I think you'll all be in for quite the entertainment regarding my typing, let's just say keyboards are not my friend! I'll take any heat for it in stride... :P

Originally Posted by Richard

. Maybe we should have an ID card but it should be used against the people who have already violated us too not exempt them.

+1

Originally Posted by Sinthea

I was once a proponent of said Biometric ID card and now have decided against it. Thank you for enlightening me with this article and comments.

I'm also new here and am looking for a spell check to use as my typing is atrocious. Thanks for any help

Welcome to ALIPAC, Sinthea! I'm so glad our thread helped you on the issue of Biometric ID. As to spell check, there is one and when you make a post the misspelled words should be underlined in red within the text in the box before you hit the submit button.

But don't worry. We're not interested in your spelling, we're interested in your thoughts, comments and support to help us stop illegal immigration.

Originally Posted by Sinthea

I was once a proponent of said Biometric ID card and now have decided against it. Thank you for enlightening me with this article and comments.

I'm also new here and am looking for a spell check to use as my typing is atrocious. Thanks for any help

Hello Sinthea and welcome.

The spell checker at the following link has been recommended and used by others so perhaps you could give it a try:
http://www.iespell.com/

I support biometric Id as an effective and efficient tool to Identify illegal ailens. Sorry I dont share the parinoia. Getting them to use it will be the trick.

Originally Posted by Jrhino

I support biometric Id as an effective and efficient tool to Identify illegal ailens. Sorry I dont share the parinoia. Getting them to use it will be the trick.

Why would you want to give an illegal alien a national ID to be in the United States when most Americans want them deported?

This national ID is in the legislation that gives amnesty to illegal aliens. We don't want amnesty, we're opposed to it, so we don't want to pass a bill that a) legalizes them b) gives them proof of legalization c) requires Americans to have a national ID who oppose a) and b).

If at some time in the future after illegal aliens have all been deported and if there is some benefit to US to have a national ID, then we can debate that issue within the confines of a national ID for US citizens, but we should never ever discuss it within the context of illegal immigration and legislation designed to legalize it which is what the Schumer-Graham bill does.

I don't want a national ID. I don't want a biometric ID. I don't want an RFID ID. I don't want a Chip ID. I don't want any ID other than my non RFID driver's license issued by a state and/or a US passport issued by the US State Department.

Originally Posted by Judy

[This national ID is in the legislation that gives amnesty to illegal aliens. We don't want amnesty, we're opposed to it, so we don't want to pass a bill that a) legalizes them b) gives them proof of legalization c) requires Americans to have a national ID who oppose a) and b).

I figured this was some kind of Trojan horse by Graham and Schumer to get illegals amnesty while appearing to be against illegal immigration. This explains everything.

Originally Posted by LAPhil

Originally Posted by Judy

[This national ID is in the legislation that gives amnesty to illegal aliens. We don't want amnesty, we're opposed to it, so we don't want to pass a bill that a) legalizes them b) gives them proof of legalization c) requires Americans to have a national ID who oppose a) and b).

I figured this was some kind of Trojan horse by Graham and Schumer to get illegals amnesty while appearing to be against illegal immigration. This explains everything.

"Trojan horse"

Exactly! That's precisely what it is, LAPhil, a Trojan Horse. Great analogy.

Originally Posted by Richard

E-verify has already been proven to be only half effectivre due to identity fraud and lack of biometric controls and cross referencing opposed by privacy advocates. What do you expect us to do give up enforcement?

E-verify has been very effective, about 97%. It has a flaw regarding the use of stolen social security numbers (SSNs). This is old news. It's been fairly well advertized someone using a stolen SSN vz a fictious number may pass the screening 50% of the time.

To eliminate this flaw in the system, E-verify has been downloading the data from a state's BMV, including the DL photo. If done for all 50 states, E-very would have your home address and a recent photo.