Thread: THE NAU: IT'S THE ELEVENTH HOUR - GET BUSY

I have a severe problem with the entity - INTERNATIONAL LAW.

This is my block as I do not, cannot remember where the people of this nation declared their will to be lumped into "international law." Is the order/law {I've not researched it} binding on the American people? This is an interesting question. Furthermore, I could give a damn about international law considering they've never had the welfare of the United States of America in mind during their follies.

Also, my perception of the legality of "agreements" {many are NOT treaties} is very different. Agreements are not binding, if I'm not mistaken, by the Constitution. Bush has signed many AGREEMENTS, not all are treaties.
I'm no Constitutional lawyer, however, I do believe that this might be accurate.

And most importantly, there will never be a consensus in Congress to impeach a toad let alone bush AND cheney. It will never come to fruition.
Futile attempt and wasted time. That's the most important thing to consider, wasted time.

.

And, Yes Judy, I very much understand the following...I've not been completely hidden under a bushel

And what you fail to recognize is that a great many people already think the merger is a good thing ... expanded markets, growth in population, more transactions, open borders, free migration, cheaper labor, increased commerce, more highways, increased real estate values.

And what you may also fail to recognize is that many corporations are already investing billions in this merger literally enjoining all the arteries of the three countries .. power, energy, communications, security, intelligence, defense, trade, transportation and distribution. Undoing it even now will cost them fortunes. They will be the ones at the International Court defending the Merger ... our own multi-national corporations that invested in good faith relying upon the validity of these international agreements executed by our President under the authority granted him by the US Congress with the Consent of the American People.

However, bush did NOT sign all of the "agreements" with Congress' consent.

.

Originally Posted by CrocketsGhost

We could opt out of NAFTA tomorrow if we had leadership that was prepared to follow through. We can "buy back" the Federal Reserve for a paltry sum pursuant the legislation that created if someone had the cajones to double-cross the international bankers.

NAFTA is only one of many Free Trade Agreements now. NAFTA is already an antique and obsolete.

Both NAFTA (Mexico) and GATT (Canada) are being replaced by this President with the SPP and NAU with the full authority granted him by the US Congress in 2002 with the Informed Consent of the American People every day he remains in office.

It's no longer about "cajones". It's about international business agreements, their legal validity, their binding nature according to World Courts ... not what you and I think ... not what Congressmen think ... what the World Courts think ... according to the Rule of Law .. not the Rule of American Law ... but the Rule of International Law.

Sure ... I still have the spirit. I'll write, call, email and fax. I'll go down screamin' and hollerin' like everyone else.

2ndamendsis .. every agreement and regulation that Bush and the US Trade Representative and the Secretary of Commerce have signed has been authorized by the US Congress under the Trade Promotion Authority passed by the US Congress in 2002 and the Trade and Development Act of 2000. Every Free Trade Agreement required ratification by the US Congress and has been so ratified. The others didn't require further approval from Congress, only to keep them in the loop and Bush has done that.

Under the Trade Promotion Authority Act, the US Congress gave this President, whether they all knew it or not, the authority to execute every agreement and regulation he's signing and implementing through the SPP to form the NAU.

In fact the committee to which Bush and the US Trade Representative report is a committee that both Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo serve on.

http://www.internationalrelations.house.gov/

Committee on International Relations, US House of Representatives

http://www.internationalrelations.house ... esthem.asp

Subcommittee of Committee on International Relations, Western Hemisphere, US House of Representatives.

This is why Ron Paul knows so much about what is transpiring but can't stop it.

One of the mistakes people have made, in my judgment, is believing that Bush is stupid, incompetent and a dummy.

He isn't. He's shrewd. He's clever. He's deceptive. And ... quite brilliant in the capacity to end our nation, because he's done it legally right under our noses and the noses of our Best Patriots like Paul and Tancredo.

The Plan was Masterful and Treachery At Its Best.



On the subject of International Law ... as soon as two heads of states or their authorized designees execute an agreement ... it is binding on the people of the two nations. To challenge it ... a party takes it to an International Court to settle the dispute.

International Law has long been the controlling law of international border disputes, international trade disputes, treaty disputes, international business disputes.

In fact all the Free Trade Agreements executed by this President since 2004 with full authority of Congress granted him in 2002 and all subsequently ratified by the US Congress specifically defer any disputes to the World Trade Organization tribunals to decide the matter. That's why Ron Paul tried to get legislation passed to withdraw the United States from membership in the World Trade Organization. He lost that battle last year.

That's why you constantly hear Vincente Fox whining about taking the border disputes with Mexico to International Courts. That's why the fence will never be built as a real physical barrier. That's why they are using the "virtual fence" technology ... not to stop it but to surveil and count the people coming in so they can forecast the number of new transactions so our business community can be ready for them when they arrive.



Republicans in Congress were beginning to understand the magnitude of our situation.

That's why they no longer control the US Congress.

That's why Nancy Pelosi came right out front and made it absolutely clear that "impeachment was off the table" and instead had Tea and Crumpets with the President and toasted a "spirit of cooperation and bipartisan".

Democratic Leadership of the US Congress supports Open Borders. They support the SPP and NAU.

As of January 2007 ... 6 weeks from now ... the US Congress will be in full tandem with the White House to fast track final implementation of SPP and NAU before the next election. Most of what they needed to do has already been accomplished during the past 18 months, so there really isn't that much left to do at this point anyway.



It's a very grim situation.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases ... 806-4.html

Here is the Treachery Announcement in 2002 when Bush signed the Trade Promotion Authority into Law.

http://www.gibsondunn.com/practices/pub ... temId=6469

Some more on the Trade Promotion Authority Act.

http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/new/html/Mo ... _2000.html

Here is an example of the authority of the President by Executive Order ... under Title V of the Trade and Development Act of 2000.

"Signing orders" on trade are binding without any approval from Congress.

Look at Clinton's long list on his way out the door in December 2000.

We are soooo screwed.

http://clinton4.nara.gov/WH/New/html/20000531_28.html

More on the Trade and Development Act of 2000.

Note: "Other Provisions"