Thread: Paul Not Co-sponsor of SAVE ACT

Originally Posted by CitizenJustice

I wonder what the reason is that Ron Paul has not signed on as a sponsor of the SAVE ACT?

There is one sponsor and 145 co-sponsors.

This is one of the most important pieces of legislation in our lifetime......to SAVE AMERICA.

Do you have a link for this??? I would like to post this on other sites and ask the same question as you.

Originally Posted by Dolly3275

In other words..........Paul believes that the employers should be able to hire as many illegals as they want-----and take jobs and lower wages in many occupations.

Someone who believes in original intent, like Paul, will say that defining who an employer can and cannot hire is an unconstitutional breach of power by the U.S. Congress. Giving the central government this power treads dangerously close to socialism. In fact, that IS socialism. The Founders did not intend for the federal government to make dictates to employers. That particular right was left to the state and/or the people.

What deal will you make with the Devil?

Hereeesss......Johnnnnyyyyyyy! :P

BearFlagRepublic wrote:

MW wrote:
From what I've seen and heard, Ron Paul has never shown an interest in going after the employers of illegal immigrants.

Exactly. You and I have done our darndest to try to tell people exactly this, for what.....8-10 months?

Yep.

You people have never supported Ron Paul. Why even question anything about him? You are never going to vote for him. You just do not understand the constitution. Have fun with Hellary, Hussein, or McSlain!! I am so over this! Where is your precious Romney now! Yeah, right!!

Originally Posted by CitizenJustice

I wonder what the reason is that Ron Paul has not signed on as a sponsor of the SAVE ACT?

There is one sponsor and 145 co-sponsors.

This is one of the most important pieces of legislation in our lifetime......to SAVE AMERICA.

Yep, you are right........

Here is the list of names who signed for SAVE and Paul is not on there!!

http://www.numbersusa.com/interests/attrition.html#s2

Where is Lou Dobbs! That is your choice, someone who isn't even in the race at ALL!! He is not stating that he wants to run. Who do you have left? Guess it looks like AMNESTY with the other three! I will tell you I told you so. Ron Paul 2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Originally Posted by alexcastro

You people have never supported Ron Paul. Why even question anything about him? You are never going to vote for him. You just do not understand the constitution. Have fun with Hellary, Hussein, or McSlain!! I am so over this! Where is your precious Romney now! Yeah, right!!

I never supported RP because I always had questions about his strength on the immigration issue. It is false to assume that simply because one does not support RP that they do not understand the Constitution. This inductive reasoning leads some to believe that if Paul says so, then the Constitution says so. Or, if Paul opposes SAVE, it must be bad. Or, if Paul opposes the border fence, then we must not need it. I have independently read through much of the Constitution, and I am unconvinced that RP is always in-line the intentions of the founders. If he opposes SAVE because it is against the intent of the founders, then why did he vote in favor of what NumbersUSA considers amnesty, and in favor of several guest worker programs Were those rights reserved to the federal government in strict aderhence to the Constitution? I have been amazed several times here that some don't even understand Paul's views on trade.

Originally Posted by alexcastro

Where is Lou Dobbs! That is your choice, someone who isn't even in the race at ALL!! He is not stating that he wants to run. Who do you have left? Guess it looks like AMNESTY with the other three! I will tell you I told you so. Ron Paul 2008!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Paul is just as bad as Hillary, Obama and McCain in regard to the illegals.

If you do not take away the main reason that the illegals come here---which is JOBS----nothing else matters. Paul does NOT want to take away the ability for the illegals to get jobs. In other words, he wants to make sure that the employers are able to continue to screw US citizens/workers by hiring illegals!!

If Paul does not want a fence, it is because he wants the employers to be able to have a continual flow of cheap, illegal labor---no matter how it is hurting US citizens/workers.

Originally Posted by alexcastro

You people have never supported Ron Paul. Why even question anything about him? You are never going to vote for him. You just do not understand the constitution. Have fun with Hellary, Hussein, or McSlain!! I am so over this! Where is your precious Romney now! Yeah, right!!

This information can be evaluated by others who "thought" that Paul was a good candidate in regard to stopping the illegals and associated problems-----as this information PROVES that Paul is NOT a good candidate to solve the problems in this country regarding illegals.