Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

http://forums.wnd.com/index.php?page...lShowResults=1
WorldNetDaily poll: "What does 'natural-born citizen' actually mean?"

Of 2167 votes so far, 89% say nbC requires two citizen parents.
1% of voters say nbC requires one citizen parent.

Atty. Leo Donofrio has a new, watershed article about nbC and
Minor v. Happersett as a precedent, not just dicta. Truly a must-read.
http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress....-be-president/

Originally Posted by RAJ at forums.hannity.com

http://web.archive.org/web/200806141325 ... /birthcert

It preserved an initial Obama campaign statement about Barry's citizenship and questions raised about the latter. The campaign site originally stated that Barry received his US citizenship by virtue of THE FOURTEENTH AMENDMENT!

They then must have realized that a candidate needs to be a NBC. So they then scrubbed the "14th" statement and substituted "native born" citizen in its stead.

[quote="Fight the Smears"][size=117]The truth about Barack's birth certificate

Lie:

Obama Is Not a Natural Born Citizen

Truth:

Senator Obama was born in Hawaii in 1961, after it became a state on August 21st, 1959. Obama became a citizen at birth under the first section of the 14th Amendment

“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.â€

Lame Cherry claims that Mr. Obama's handlers, the globalists behind the teleprompter, consider him to be of little value since the U.S. House changed hands on Jan. 5, 2011, and that they are sabotaging him, for example, with the obvious forgery of a Certificate at whitehouse.gov .

Originally Posted by [url=http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2011/06/forgery-never-blinks.html

Lame Cherry[/url]] [Grammar edited]

Mr. Obama knows there are several birth abstracts floating about in Hawaii for his various reentries into America incarnations. [However,] he TRUSTED his operatives that they would produce a COLB which would pass inspection in 2012, as he smugly knew [that what he released] "would not satisfy all."

In this, Dan Rather and Barack Obama are equally trusting dupes, as THEIR PEOPLE WHO PUT THEM IN POWER assured them that they would handle this, that the documents were real, and the story would back up the document.

Focus on that point as it is vital in this. Obama and Rather both were certain they were sitting on solid ground and had no idea a house of cards had been set up for them. This is why Rather went to the mat and why Obama was smug before America. Just like in all of his other crimes, Barack Obama knew the power elite had "fixed this," so he could go before the world and taunt the Birthers by daring them to look at something which Obama was told was a forgery so complete that anyone who questioned it would be called........... a kook, as Rush Limbaugh keeps calling Tea Party people.

If you observed Barack Obama in his Afghanistan retreat speech, you once again saw an Obama with that wild look in his eyes. He is on shaky ground, and if you noticed, there was no American Flag in that speech behind him. Remember now that Rahm Emanuel was running the show when Obama gave that ghastly speech before America when he looked like lurch.... Obama was set up for that to look bad FROM INSIDE THE WHITE HOUSE BY CLINTON PEOPLE, who were later slapped down by the cartel.

Obama's Afghanistan speech was of the same quality, made to make him look bad........ that falls to Bill Daley who is now part of the "take Obama down group." The propaganda says that Bill Daley was surprised over the Obama abstract being a forgery........... I would observe that Bill Daley, in taking down Val-erie Jarrett and cracking the whip on the Obamas, is not [so much] surprised as he is spreading the word.

This is now the Watergate type trap which Barack Obama smugly strode into. HIS PEOPLE told him this abstract would be a sound forgery, yet everything about it was so amateurish. It was meant from the beginning to be so bad that it would blow up on Obama in the same exact way that the forgery blew up on Dan Rather.

It is the same operation, and the same power elite operatives on the two sided money coin who instigated all of this.

http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2011/...er-blinks.html

Originally Posted by [url=http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=315069

For WorldNetDaily, Bob Unruh[/url]]Eligibility returns to Supremes' conference agenda
Meeting this fall to consider – again – Obama's status
Posted: June 25, 2011

By Bob Unruh © 2011 WND

The U.S. Supreme Court, which has refused even to consider the issue of Barack Obama's eligibility – and at one point was reported by one justice to be avoiding the issue – has put the question on its schedule for a conference this fall.

That means the issue of Obama's eligibility, which dogged the candidate during the 2008 race and has plagued his administration with questions ever since, could be looking at the nation's highest court reviewing the controversy even as the 2012 election race heats up.

The court has announced that the case Alan Keyes, et al., v. Debra Bowen, California Secretary of State, et al., will be heard in conference Sept. 26.

A conference is a meeting at which the justices consider which cases to accept. The court has had numerous other similar cases before the justices in conference and routinely has rejected requests to hear them without any explanation.

Continued . . .

In Keyes v. Bowen, Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice Foundation is the prosecuting attorney, and Mark Eric Elias of Perkins Coie is the defense attorney. This case must be different from Keyes et al v. Obama et al, prosecuted by Atty. Orly Taitz. Mr. Kreep is also representing Phil Berg, Lisa Liberi, and Lisa Ostella in their lawsuits against Mrs. Sharon Rondeau's Post & Email and against Orly Taitz, who describes Berg's lawsuit as harassment.

The preponderance of evidence that we have a usurper to the WH is staggering. I am disappointed however, that my prediction of June as the month that O will fall may have been too early.

Originally Posted by Atty. Orly Taitz

...this is akin to [a] criminal enterprise taking over the nation.

That is equivalent to calling the 9/11 attacks "criminal acts," deserving of police actions and trials in criminal courts.

Dr. Taitz, this is not a crime. This is a coup d'état by enemies, both foreign and domestic, of the United States and the Constitution. The overthrow of the Constitution, Art. ii, § 1, ¶ 5, constitutes SEDITION. Mr. Obama's new wars destabilizing strong-man governments in the Middle East will lead to the Mus|im Brotherhood filling the vacuum. Assisting the Mus|im Brotherhood constitutes TREASON against the U.S. and her ally, Israel.

The usurpation is an OVERTURNING of the duly-elected, tri-partite, Constitutional U.S. government. By subterfuge, intimidation, coercion, and force of arms, the fraudulent impostor in the White House has overpowered the system of checks and balances, making himself a dictator in what is rapidly becoming a totalitarian communist oligarchy... which SUBVERTS our Constitutional republic of democratically elected representatives.

That is NOT A CRIME.

That is WAR AGAINST THE UNITED STATES, THE FREE WORLD, AND FREEDOM ITSELF. An act of war requires an equal or greater response --- NOT A LAWSUIT.

THIS IS IS|_AM at war against Dar al'Harb. This desert raider ideology declared war upon Israel in 1948, upon the United States in 1979, and has not made a true peace with either since.

I agree with Joseph Farah that Mr. Obama is not positioning himself to run for President of the U.S. in 2012. He is aiming for something bigger, and our defensive actions must take into account his larger agenda in collusion with globalist communist networks and Dar al'Is|am.

I recognize globalist communism and Is|am as the two future world empires or realms which Bible prophecy exposes in Revelation 13, called the Beast and the False Prophet. Although few will agree with me, and most will consider the idea doctrinally unorthodox, to put it kindly, the scriptural vision has matched the situation on the ground for nearly a century now.

Please consider the current events in the light of Biblical prophecy and see the bigger picture. It may give you insight as to how to proceed in the fight against the coup in WDC. This is bigger than we think.

That statement reminds me of something I heard awhile back about the Muslims...
"They were at War against us, but we were not at war with them."
If people would wake up and see what THIER Govt. has been doing to them, maybe things would change quicker?

Just think of all the problems we wouldn't have if we had a time machine and could go back and kick King Richards butt and make him finish the crusades he started...

We are returning this post to a free floating discussion instead of a sticky post that stays at the top.

Special thanks to each person that helped make this lively, and occasionally intense, discussion the most active discussion in the history of ALIPAC's online community.

W

Do Citizens Now Have Standing to Challenge Obama’s Eligibility?
62Share 0digg
RECENT SUPREME COURT RULING AFFIRMS INDIVIDUAL AND STATE SOVEREIGNTY

by Sharon Rondeau

The Tenth Amendment states, "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

(Jun. 27, 2011) — A recent U.S. Supreme Court ruling stated that a defendant who claimed that a federal law had rendered her injured due to “disregard of the federal structure of the Governmentâ€