Results 141 to 150 of 152
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
10-01-2010, 11:36 PM #141Originally Posted by roundabout
Equal justice is just the point.
You don't arrest someone and haul them in front of a judge until you have evidence that they have committed a crime.
I'm not saying she's innocent.
I'm simply saying that there is a proper way that this should be handled and the people running this organization have total disregard for that procedure.
If I lived in California I would be upset that there wasn't a better choice to be made than between Whitman and Brown.
For cryin' out loud, Whitman probably wouldn't even have a chance if the dems hadn't decided to recycle that flower power freak Jerry Brown, but the public call for her arrest at this point by this organization is irresponsible and will prejudice the race and at this "lat date" there is no way to undo the damage if the investigation finds no grounds for an arrest.
-
10-01-2010, 11:47 PM #142Originally Posted by mkfarnam
Neither Brown or Whitman support full enforcement of our immigration laws.
How are you going to feel if she loses and then the investigation finds that she did not break the law?
Will it make you feel good to think that this organization helped (even in some small way) to influence public opinion and elect Governor Jerry Brown?
How does that help the cause?
The most important point in all of this is that the people in charge of this "honorable" site claim to be all about enforcing our laws, but then want to leap frog from accusation to arrest with no time in between for the proper investigation and gathering of evidence.
Sloppy, risky, irresponsible and self-serving.
Mob mentality.
-
10-02-2010, 12:43 AM #143"JackMcIntosh" wrote:Well, it's not like anyone in California is going to have much of a choice is it?
Neither Brown or Whitman support full enforcement of our immigration laws.
How are you going to feel if she loses and then the investigation finds that she did not break the law?
Will it make you feel good to think that this organization helped (even in some small way) to influence public opinion and elect Governor Jerry Brown?
How does that help the cause?
The most important point in all of this is that the people in charge of this "honorable" site claim to be all about enforcing our laws, but then want to leap frog from accusation to arrest with no time in between for the proper investigation and gathering of evidence.
Sloppy, risky, irresponsible and self-serving.
Mob mentality.
Fine, don't answer my question.
But I'll answer yours.
How are you going to feel if she loses and then the investigation finds that she did not break the law?The most important point in all of this is that the people in charge of this "honorable" site claim to be all about enforcing our laws, but then want to leap frog from accusation to arrest with no time in between for the proper investigation and gathering of evidence.
Diaz has already stated that Whitman knew she was in this country illegaly.
That is what is called "probable cause", which in the Laws eyes is enough to sustain an arrest.and then let the court decide on the innocense.------------------------
-
10-02-2010, 01:45 AM #144Originally Posted by mkfarnamThe most important point in all of this is that the people in charge of this "honorable" site claim to be all about enforcing our laws, but then want to leap frog from accusation to arrest with no time in between for the proper investigation and gathering of evidence.
Diaz has already stated that Whitman knew she was in this country illegaly.
That is what is called "probable cause", which in the Laws eyes is enough to sustain an arrest.and then let the court decide on the innocense. [/quote:1femb7u2]
No, that is what is called an accusation.
It may be enough to prompt an investigation, but not an arrest.
Diaz says yes, Whitman says no.
One persons word against another and in America, the real America, without evidence to give one persons word more weight than the other we don't simply arrest people because someone accuses them of a crime.
I could say that you stole my bubble gum, but without some sort of evidence...some reason for law enforcement to believe you did in fact steal my bubble gum...you're not going to be arrested.
-
10-02-2010, 01:46 AM #145
JackMcIntosh is banned for failing to honor our rules regarding personal attacks on the boards.
WJoin our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)
-
10-02-2010, 02:01 AM #146
This was getting to be like City-Data's illegal immigration forum. Trolls and pro illegals would argue whether Arizona was a border state or not.
------------------------
-
10-02-2010, 02:48 AM #147
Meg Whitman - 9 Años
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4wMeJ51h ... r_embedded
Meg Whitman - "Dos Caras" (TWO FACE )
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEwgpqs_hWc&NR=1
-
10-02-2010, 09:54 AM #148Originally Posted by Skip
-
11-01-2010, 11:00 PM #149
mkfarnam wrote:
rebart wrote:
"This is over the top. Diaz gave her forged papers. Whitman got Diaz from an employment agency with all the "correct" papers. Whitman has a copy of those papers. Whitman was the victim, not the perpetrator.
Jerry Brown is a career politician who has fed at the public trough all his life. He even got an allowance from his parents until he was in his 50s. He has gone around from Sacramento to Oakland and anywhere he can to get a political job. In the sixties we called him "Governor Moonbeam" or "Jerry the Fairy", or other good nicknames.
Your ill-thought campaign to prosecute an innocent Whitman could give Jerry the governorship, and CA can't take that. STOP before you do something stupid because you let political mudslinging influence you.
It looks like the race for California Governor is a no-win situation.........either way.
It doesn't surprise me one bit.
No, it is not a no win situation either way. Whitman has much better ideas for California than Arnold ever did and of course has better ideas than Brown. Whitman isn't my lesser of two evil candidates.
I don't appreciate people who don't live in California trying to help Brown win over something they clearly do not have all of the information on to be making such a ridiculous demand for her arrest.
I can see the headlines now - ALIPAC supports Brown, demanding Whitman's arrest.
I can also see ALIPAC going bye bye within about six months due to membership drop after this."
It HAS to be the lesser of two evils because that is usually the only choices we are given! It does MORE harm to pre-determine Meg's guilt when Jerry Brown is the only one who will benefit. William, if you want to press this issue on principle, you will be doing more harm than good. YOU don't know that she is guilty so leave it alone! Which is worse? Jerry Brown, or Meg Whitman, who might be guilty. I don't think you would have many legal Californians on your side. Should we have every RINO arrested because they might have a skeleton in their closet, thereby giving the Democraps the election?
I was hoping that the Tea Party would actually form a new party. Instead, they want to take the Republican party over, but to do this they say we will have to vote for some RINOS who are the only ones running against a Democrap. I would have preferred a NEW party. I was out-voted because they said it would give the Democraps the election. Every poli-tic says what they think will get them elected. Including Meg, who is reaching out to Latinos, but she isn't a Democrap!
If we listen to all political mud-slinging we wouldn't vote at all! By the time they are done with each other we feel we have no one to vote FOR, only to vote AGAINST. This is the case here.<div>All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men and women do nothing!</div>
-
11-01-2010, 11:36 PM #150Originally Posted by [b
"This is over the top. Diaz gave her forged papers. Whitman got Diaz from an employment agency with all the "correct" papers. Whitman has a copy of those papers. Whitman was the victim, not the perpetrator.
Jerry Brown is a career politician who has fed at the public trough all his life. He even got an allowance from his parents until he was in his 50s. He has gone around from Sacramento to Oakland and anywhere he can to get a political job. In the sixties we called him "Governor Moonbeam" or "Jerry the Fairy", or other good nicknames.
Your ill-thought campaign to prosecute an innocent Whitman could give Jerry the governorship, and CA can't take that. STOP before you do something stupid because you let political mudslinging influence you.
It looks like the race for California Governor is a no-win situation.........either way.
It doesn't surprise me one bit.
No, it is not a no win situation either way. Whitman has much better ideas for California than Arnold ever did and of course has better ideas than Brown. Whitman isn't my lesser of two evil candidates.
I don't appreciate people who don't live in California trying to help Brown win over something they clearly do not have all of the information on to be making such a ridiculous demand for her arrest.
I can see the headlines now - ALIPAC supports Brown, demanding Whitman's arrest.
I can also see ALIPAC going bye bye within about six months due to membership drop after this."
It HAS to be the lesser of two evils because that is usually the only choices we are given! It does MORE harm to pre-determine Meg's guilt when Jerry Brown is the only one who will benefit. William, if you want to press this issue on principle, you will be doing more harm than good. YOU don't know that she is guilty so leave it alone! Which is worse? Jerry Brown, or Meg Whitman, who might be guilty. I don't think you would have many legal Californians on your side. Should we have every RINO arrested because they might have a skeleton in their closet, thereby giving the Democraps the election?
I was hoping that the Tea Party would actually form a new party. Instead, they want to take the Republican party over, but to do this they say we will have to vote for some RINOS who are the only ones running against a Democrap. I would have preferred a NEW party. I was out-voted because they said it would give the Democraps the election. Every poli-tic says what they think will get them elected. Including Meg, who is reaching out to Latinos, but she isn't a Democrap!
If we listen to all political mud-slinging we wouldn't vote at all! By the time they are done with each other we feel we have no one to vote FOR, only to vote AGAINST. This is the case here.[/quote:2x8qoaj1]
Patrioticpatti, would you mind having my name removed from your last post..........I never posted that.------------------------
Michigan Republicans want to ban sanctuary cities after homicide
03-29-2024, 07:19 AM in illegal immigration News Stories & Reports