Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Columbia Trial to begin Friday

CITIZENS’ GRAND JURY TRIAL SCHEDULED FOR MAY 14-19, 2010

by Sharon Rondeau, Post & Email
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/05/13/ ... in-friday/

(May 13, 2010) — The Columbia Treason and Sedition Trial organized by Dr. James David Manning of ATLAH Ministries with support from American Grand Jury (AGJ) begins this Friday in Harlem, NY.

Dr. Manning has stated that he has conclusive evidence that Barack Hussein Obama II never attended Columbia University and that university officials who served at the time, from 1981-83, are aware of this fact and were paid to award Obama a diploma which then became part of the life story he has provided to the public.

http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/04/27/ ... igibility/

According to Manning, the event will begin with a march around Columbia University at 9:00 a.m. on Friday. Members of the clergy are urged to bring formal attire and bull’s horns, and other “American patriotsâ€

]

Who originally and rightfully held the above Social Security Number beginning with 042?

The Social Security Death Index accepts a name and produces the SSN.
Is there a reverse index that accepts an SSN and produces the name?

We know the person was born in 1890, and the SSN was issued in 1977 to a mailing address in Connecticut.
The Social Security Administration article below says that the area number (042) does not indicate the applicant's
birthplace, but only the ZIP code of the mailing address on the application, which could originate from anywhere.
__________________________________________________ _________

[The following] is an archival or historical document and may not reflect current policies or procedures

Social Security Numbers
The SSN Numbering Scheme


Number Has Three Parts

The nine-digit SSN is composed of three parts:
The first set of three digits is called the Area Number
The second set of two digits is called the Group Number
The final set of four digits is the Serial Number

Area Number [based on the mailing address ZIP code in the SSN application]

The Area Number is assigned by the geographical region. Prior to 1972, cards were issued in local Social Security offices around the country and the Area Number represented the State in which the card was issued. This did not necessarily have to be the State where the applicant lived, since a person could apply for their card in any Social Security office. Since 1972, when SSA began assigning SSNs and issuing cards centrally from Baltimore, the area number assigned has been based on the ZIP code in the mailing address provided on the application for the original Social Security card. The applicant's mailing address does not have to be the same as their place of residence. Thus, the Area Number does not necessarily represent the State of residence of the applicant, either prior to 1972 or since.

Generally, numbers were assigned beginning in the northeast and moving westward. So people on the east coast have the lowest numbers and those on the west coast have the highest numbers.

Note: One should not make too much of the "geographical code." It is not meant to be any kind of useable geographical information. The numbering scheme was designed in 1936 (before computers) to make it easier for SSA to store the applications in our files in Baltimore since the files were organized by regions as well as alphabetically. It was really just a bookkeeping device for our own internal use and was never intended to be anything more than that.

Group Number

Within each area, the group number (middle two (2) digits) range from 01 to 99 but are not assigned in consecutive order. For administrative reasons, group numbers issued first consist of the ODD numbers from 01 through 09 and then EVEN numbers from 10 through 98, within each area number allocated to a State. After all numbers in group 98 of a particular area have been issued, the EVEN Groups 02 through 08 are used, followed by ODD Groups 11 through 99.

Group numbers are assigned as follows:
ODD - 01, 03, 05, 07, 09------EVEN - 10 to 98
EVEN - 02, 04, 06, 08------ODD - 11 to 99

See the latest Social Security Number Monthly Issuance Table for the latest SSN area ranges issued to date.
Alleged Social Security numbers containing area numbers other than those found on that table are impossible.

Serial Number

Within each group, the serial numbers (last four (4) digits) run consecutively from 0001 through 9999.
__________________________________________________ ______

A Myth About Group Numbers

Apparently due to the fact that the middle digits of the SSN are referred to as the "group number," some people have misconstrued this to mean that the "group number" refers to racial groupings. So a myth goes around from time-to-time that encoded in a person's SSN is a key to their race. This simply is not true.

As should be clear from the explanation of the SSN numbering scheme, the "group number" refers only to the numerical groups 01-99. For filing purposes, the "area numbers" are broken down into these numerical subgroups. So, for example, for area numbers starting with 527 there would be 99 subgroups, one for every number starting with 527-01, and one for every number starting with 527-02, and so on. This was done back in 1936 because in that era there were no computers and all the records were stored in filing cabinets. The early program administrators needed some way to organize the filing cabinets into sub-groups, to make them more manageable, and this is the scheme they came up with.

So the "group number" has nothing whatever to do with race.

Footnote: It is true that the application form for an SSN asks for identifying information, such as date of birth, place of birth, parents' names, and (optionally) the applicant's race. But none of this identifying information is encoded in the SSN itself--not the person's date of birth, place of birth, or race.

Some say that Barack Obama II first worked at Baskin-Robbins in Honolulu in 1975, before the "042" SSN was issued. But the following article, dated 12/31/08, says that he worked there in 1979, which would have been safely after the SSN was issued (and mailed to him at a Connecticut address). Oh, what a tangled web...
__________________________________________________ ____

President-Elect Barack Obama's First Job
Posted Wed, 2008/12/31 - 20:42 by Pualani Kaai


Honolulu Baskin Robbins that teenager Obama worked. Photo/Pualani.

HONOLULU (Blue MauMau) — Back in 1979, who would have thought that the ice cream scooper in a Honolulu Baskin-Robbins would one day become the President of the United States? President-elect Barack Obama worked at this South King Street ice cream shop (pictured at left), located on a major street named after the Hawaiian kings who used to take it in a bygone era. About a mile down the road it passes in front of Iolani Palace. The shop is conveniently located within walking distance of where Barack lived, which again is conveniently located very close to Punahou, the exclusive school he attended.

The workers and manager at the ice cream shop confirmed that Mr. Obama worked there. Unfortunately, no one remembers him because back then they weren't there. The present franchise owner didn't buy this Baskin-Robbins ice cream shop, part of the Dunkin' Brands, until later.

(Continued)

Many links on this page

Obama's lies, fraud: Can Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald open an investigation?

By: Devvy
May 14, 2010

Worldnetdaily carried a headline earlier this week regarding Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham using a social security number issued in the state of Connecticut.

NEW YORK – "Two private investigators working independently are asking why President Obama is using a Social Security number set aside for applicants in Connecticut while there is no record he ever had a mailing address in the state.

"In addition, the records indicate the number was issued between 1977 and 1979, yet Obama's earliest employment reportedly was in 1975 at a Baskin-Robbins ice-cream shop in Oahu, Hawaii.

"WND has copies of affidavits filed separately in a presidential eligibility lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the District of Columbia by Ohio licensed private investigator Susan Daniels and Colorado private investigator John N. Sampson.

"The investigators believe Obama needs to explain why he is using a Social Security number reserved for Connecticut applicants that was issued at a date later than he is known to have held employment."

This issue has been around for quite some time; I wrote a column about it November, 5, 2009:

"In a letter from licensed investigator Susan Daniels to Judge Carter, Ms. Daniels states:

"I am the private investigator who contacted Dr. Orly Taitz when I found that Barack Obama has been using a bogus social security number for years, which is a felony. I have been a licensed investigator for almost fifteen years and recognized it immediately as fraudulent."

"While this may well be true, without any documentation to prove Obama used all those SSNs (For what purpose? Tax evasion, fraud regarding business transactions or campaign cash?), we just don't know. Several months ago, I had email exchange with an individual (I will not name for privacy), who believes Obama used his former home address for fraudulent reasons. This person seems to have good grounds support his allegation. However, only a full blown criminal investigation by law enforcement (like DOJ) would provide evidence."

Long ago, Neil Sankey was once attached to elite Scotland Yard units which hunted down IRA bombers and other high level criminals. He is now semi-retired from a life long career as a private investigator. Sankey collected hundreds of SSNs belonging to dozens of Barack Obama's, Stanley Ann Dunham (Obama's mother) and Michelle Obama. As they were in no order, I put them in three separate files:

Barack Hussein Obama
Stanley Ann Dunham(his deceased mother)
Michelle Obama

Due to a corrupt Congress that stood mute and accepted the Electoral College vote, even though the issue of Obama's citizenship was a raging issue in this country, the communist occupying the White House has done enormous damage to this republic. The entire Congress who sat there without raising a single objection demonstrated the greatest act of cowardice in my life time. I expected nothing less from the Democrats in Congress. There isn't one of them with an ounce of integrity or honor. I can only assume the cowardice displayed by incumbent Republicans was either fear or "we lost, get over it." Either way, it was and is inexcusable.

There's no need to cover all the lawsuits. There are still two remaining: (1) Appeal in the Kerchner v Obama case - filed last November 2009. A motion for leave to file supplemental Appendix was filed April 20, 1010. It is astounding that the courts feel no urgency in dealing with usurpers.

The same putrid situation is dragging on regarding the removal of usurper, Marxist Hillary Clinton [1] That lawsuit was filed January 29, 2009. The appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was filed December 31, 2009. In the meantime, Clinton is running around the globe playing Secretary of State. This is an outrage. The courts are over loaded, but when it comes to high level public officials like Obama/Soetoro and Clinton, the courts, must put those cases ahead of others for obvious reasons. Instead, they're sitting on them. Now, there is another grossly unqualified candidate (Sotomayer the other) nominated to the high court, Kagan. These games are sickening and the American people should be outraged.

The second case is the Leo Donofrio and Stephen Pidgeon lawsuit on behalf of the Chrysler dealers. That one will take time. But, time is not on our side. The date for Lt. Col. Lakin's Article 32 hearing is set for June 11, 2010. Everyday Comrade Obama remains in office is a crime, yet an honorable 18 year veteran of our military faces court martial and prison because he is entitled to the truth about the commander in chief. The dark forces who own Washington, DC., will go to any lengths to protect the big lie.

I don't know for a fact that Obama/Soetoro has been using one or more fake social security numbers, but where there's smoke, there's usually a fire.

Rev. David Manning, has been on Obama since he became aware of the serious, constitutional question of Obama/Soetoro's citizenship. Dr. Manning is chief pastor at the ATLAH World Missionary Church in NYC. Because Congress and the courts (never mind the lackey media and that includes cable networks like FAUX, CNN and MSNBC) refuse to stop the fraud of Comrade Obama occupying the White House, Dr. Manning decided to hold a trial:

"Starting Friday and for a full week, the Atlah World Missionary Church will hold in essence a citizen's court in what it bills as "the greatest trial in American history."

"The trial, which will include legal scholars and retired court officers, will examine several issues, including Obama's birth place, his citizenship status, his academic credentials and alleged ties to the Central Intelligence Agency as a student.

"The Atlah World Missionary Church, headed by Rev. James Manning, says the proceedings are not a mock trial and are permitted under the U.S. Constitution:

"A number of Americans have been gravely concerned about the eligibility issue of Barack Obama... We have been able to look at the briefs filed by several attorneys and the courts have just refused categorically to allow any access or due process on the matter... We are going to call a 10th Amendment sanctioned trial. It is not a grand jury, it's not a hearing, it's a trial and we are going to follow all the rules and practices of both federal and state jurisprudence... We are going to adjudicate this trial in such a way that it will be historically respectful and appellate proof."

The trial begins Saturday. On Friday, May 14, 2010, Rev. Manning will lead a protest march at Columbia University. The entire trial will be filmed and media will there in full force; there will be transcripts. Of course, you won't hear anything about it on ABC, NBC or CBS. Likely any mention on CNN or MSNBC will be a slam against "the birthers." Master gas bag, Bill O'Reilly, will simply label Rev. Manning a loon and move on to some sex story.

Apparently there is at least one law professor who doesn't believe Manning's effort has any clout:

"Meanwhile, a Constitution law professor at Southern University in Baton Rouge says the American Grand Jury doesn't hold the clout the Manning team espouses. This professor, who wants anonymity, and when asked about Justice Antonin Scolia’s opinion of the court in United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992), says he wouldn't accept anything Scalia says and despises all people on the far left and the far right. Yet, this position the professor takes goes completely against what the Supreme Court found in their decision in that 1992 case; the power is placed in the hands of the people in the American Grand Jury as the Fourth Branch of Government."

The case referred to here is: United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36 at 48 (1992)

"This Court's cases relying upon that power deal strictly with the courts' control over their own procedures, whereas the grand jury is an institution separate from the courts, over whose functioning the courts do not preside...."

And:

"[R]ooted in long centuries of Anglo-American history," Hannah v. Larche, 363 U.S. 420, 490 (1960) (Frankfurter, J., concurring in result), the grand jury is mentioned in the Bill of Rights, but not in the body of the Constitution. It has not been textually assigned, therefore, to any of the branches described in the first three Articles. It "`is a constitutional fixture in its own right.'" United States v. Chanen, 549 F.2d 1306, 1312 (CA9 1977) (quoting Nixon v. Sirica, 159 U.S. App. D.C. 58, 70, n. 54, 487 F.2d 700, 712, n. 54 (1973)), cert. denied, 434 U.S. 825 (1977). In fact, the whole theory of its function is that it belongs to no branch of the institutional Government, serving as a kind of buffer or referee between the Government and the people. See Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 218 (1960); Hale v. Henkel, 201 U.S. 43, 61 (1906); G. Edwards, The Grand Jury 28-32 (1906). Although the grand jury normally operates, of course, in the courthouse and under judicial auspices, its institutional relationship with the Judicial Branch has traditionally been, so to speak, at arm's length. Judges' direct involvement in the functioning of the grand jury has generally been confined to the constitutive one of calling the grand jurors together and administering their oaths of office. See United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 343 (1974); Fed. Rule Crim.Proc. 6(a). [504 U.S. 36, 48]

"The grand jury's functional independence from the Judicial Branch is evident both in the scope of its power to investigate criminal wrongdoing and in the manner in which that power is exercised. "Unlike [a] [c]ourt, whose jurisdiction is predicated upon a specific case or controversy, the grand jury `can investigate merely on suspicion that the law is being violated, or even because it wants assurance that it is not.'" United States v. R. Enterprises, Inc.,498 U.S. 292, 297 (1991) (quoting United States v. Morton Salt Co.,338 U.S. 632, 642-643 (1950)). It need not identify the offender it suspects, or even "the precise nature of the offense" it is investigating. Blair v. United States, 250 U.S. 273, 282 (1919). The grand jury requires no authorization from its constituting court to initiate an investigation, see Hale, supra, at 59-60, 65, nor does the prosecutor require leave of court to seek a grand jury indictment. And in its day-to-day functioning, the grand jury generally operates without the interference of a presiding judge. See Calandra, supra, at 343. It swears in its own witnesses, Fed.Rule Crim.Proc. 6(c), and deliberates in total secrecy, see United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc., 463 U.S. 418, 424 -425 (1983)."

Now, going back to fraud. Besides the issue of Comrade Obama using fake or multiple SSNs, there is also the issue of did Nancy Pelosi and others commit fraud when they submitted Comrade Obama's candidate certification to the 50 Secretary of State's prior to the election? I believe the answer is yes. I also obtained the "official" documents submitted here in Texas to our Secretary of State. There's no question of fraud. Now, where's law enforcement?

Obama/Soetoro has always known he was ineligible due to his father's citizenship status at the time of his birth, yet he solicited over $600 million dollars in campaign funds and is guilty of wire fraud 18 U.S.C. §1343. That's down the line, but he knows.

What can be done about this? We all remember when Ken Starr was appointed Special Counsel to investigate Marxist Bill Clinton about Whitewater, the death of former White House Counsel, Vince Foster and then lying about Monica Lewinsky servicing him in the Oval Office. At that time under the statute, a three-judge panel was charged with administering the Independent Counsel Act.

The Office of Special Counsel in the United States Department of Justice replaced the former Office of the Independent Counsel in 1999. The updated version is charged with investigating alleged misconduct in the federal government's executive branch. The Office of Special Counsel is supposed to be an independent agency; it is also charged with protecting civil service employees from unfair personnel practices. The current Special Counsel is Patrick Fitzgerald, who was appointed in 2003 by Deputy Attorney General James B. Comey.

Eric Holder is the Attorney General; a corrupt political animal guilty of obstruction of justice in the Michael Trentadue murder.

Could Patrick Fitzgerald in his capacity as Special Counsel open an investigation into the allegations of social security fraud and all the testimony and whatever hard evidence comes from Rev. Manning's trial taking place right now? Comey, due to a conflict of interest in the Valerie Plame affair with Ashcroft, appointed Patrick Fitzgerald under Department of Justice regulation 28 CFR Part 600.

In a second letter to Fitzgerald from Comey dated February 6, 2004, he crystallized the authority of the Special Counsel: "...further, my conferral on you of the title of 'Special Counsel' in this matter should not be misunderstood to suggest that your position and authorities are defined and limited by 28 CFR Part 600."

It goes without saying that Eric Holder will never give up Obama/Soetoro, which means he will never authorize Fitzgerald to act in his capacity as Special Counsel to open an investigation into:

1. Fraud: Obama/Soetoro and social security numbers
2. Fraud by Nancy Pelosi and others to ballot qualify Obama/Soetoro for the 2008 presidential election knowing full well he was not constitutionally eligible
3. Any and all real evidence in the possession of Rev. David Manning and testimony of witnesses. According to Rev. Manning, two could blow this wide open:

DR. MANNING: "Right now, we are anticipating at least two government officials will testify. One will be through statements that will be uttered that will be documented, and the other will be a physical presentation where he will actually take the stand.

MRS. RONDEAU: "And are they in government now or were they past employees of the federal government?"

DR. MANNING: "One is in government now, and one is a past employee."

MRS. RONDEAU: "How did you reach out to them and when?"

DR. MANNING: "Actually, one reached out to me and the other became a matter of my investigation discovery."

Dr. Manning is nobody's fool and he has put his reputation and credibility on the line big time.

4. Any and all employees regardless of level of Occidental College and Columbia University who altered records to protect Obama/Soetro.

Fitzgerald is very familiar with Comrade Obama from investigations originating from his office which put Tony Rezko, big bud of Obama, in federal prison. On-going is Fitzgerald's investigation of former Illinois Governor Rod Blagojevich. I would bet a lot that should a real investigation as Special Counsel be opened and conducted by Fitzgerald, all of the above and more would be exposed to the world.

How could this happen? I don't know because I'm not an attorney. Can Fitzgerald open a RICO without Eric Holder's permission? Can he as Special Counsel open a full investigation and convene a federal grand jury without Eric Holder's permission? The Office of Special Counsel is supposed to be an independent agency, but reading § 600.4 Jurisdiction. from 28 C.F.R. PART 600—General Powers of Special Counsel it says:

(a) Original jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of a Special Counsel shall be established by the Attorney General. The Special Counsel will be provided with a specific factual statement of the matter to be investigated.

Do I read the fox guarding the hen house? When you have an AG as dirty as Eric Holder, where do we the people go for justice? We the people need the advice of some good constitutional attorneys. There has to be a way to have the Special Counsel investigate fraud and other crimes even if the Attorney General doesn't want to do it to protect an individual who has usurped the office of president of these united States of America.

If there is a way, then we the people need to go into overdrive in putting the heat on Fitzgerald to open an investigation. If it means marches and demonstrations in front of his office, then it gets done. If it means a massive campaign like Worldnetdaily.com has been doing with bill boards and petitions, then we get it done and we keep the pressure on until an investigation is opened. No more secrecy. No more protecting the criminal syndicate out in Washington, DC. This is our country, not theirs. We have a right to a legitimate president and opening a full blown investigation will not only expose the fraud, but also the cover up regarding Obama's past.

The issue of his dual citizenship at birth, by his own admission, still has to be settled by a court. One step at a time. First, we need to find out if Fitzgerald in his official capacity as Special Counsel can open an investigation. This is one of the greatest frauds in the history of our republic. We can't give up. I am hopeful this column will spur on some of these larger organizations who have attorneys they can consult with about the statues governing the Special Counsel and make their qualified opinion available on the Internet. Then we the people will go into action.

Footnote

[1] Judicial Watch lawsuit to remove Clinton
Appeal filed January

Implementation of the U.S. Department of Justice's Special Council Regulation

Hearing Before the Subcommittee on Commercial and Administrative Law
of the Committee on the Judiciary
House of Representatives
February 26, 2008
Serial No. 110-172

Pay particular attention to the testimony beginning on page 123 - 126 and
Patrick Fitzgerald's testimony beginning on page 128.

B-302582, Special Counsel and Permanent Indefinite Appropriation
September 30, 2004

The Nonsense Published by Our Nation's Editors
Regarding Obama’s Eligibility to be President

Obama, the Putative President of the U.S., was Born a British Subject
Governed by the British Nationality Act of 1948, and is Currently
also a British Protected Person and/or a British Citizen to This Day

Eye-popper: Is Nancy Pelosi in on eligibility cover-up?

NWC Leads Worldwide Letter Writing Campaign for
Independent Review of Major Tax Fraud Whistleblower
(Corruption is Eric Holder's middle name)

Google hides Obama's Social Security Number story
(Which is why I use www.scroogle.org)
Devvy's Obama Archives


Obama’s proven communist connections in Hawaii and Chicago :

Hawaii

Chicago

THE THREE ENABLERS

Devvy Kidd authored the booklets, Why A Bankrupt America and Blind Loyalty; 2 million copies distributed. Devvy appears on radio shows all over the country. She left the Republican Party in 1996 and has been an independent voter ever since. Devvy is a constitutionalist who believes in the supreme law of the land, not some political party.

Visit Devvy's website at: http://www.devvy.com. You can also sign up for her free email alerts. Devvy's radio show broadcasts Mon-Fri. To listen, go to: http://www.devvy.com/new_site/rense_show.html

http://www.devvy.com/new_site/manning_o ... 51410.html

Originally Posted by [url=http://www.socialsecurity.gov/employer/stateweb.htm

The Social Security Administration[/url]]Social Security Number Allocations

Since 1973, social security numbers have been issued by our central office. The first three (3) digits of a person's social security number are determined by the ZIP Code of the mailing address shown on the application for a social security number.

Because the SSA central office in Baltimore issued the SSN's, I can only assume that "the mailing address shown on the application" is that of the applicant rather than that of any SSA state office to which the application may have been addressed.

Thence, I pose a conjecture about a conceivably possible explanation for Mr. Obama's "042" SSN.

• When Mr. Obama applied for a SSN, he wrote "Honolulu, HI 96nnn" in the return address box on the application. But the Baltimore office misread his handwriting as "Honolulu, HI 06nnn" and assigned a Connecticut "042" number, based upon that misread handwritten ZIP code. The Post Office would have easily figured out the correct routing for "Honolulu, HI 06nnn" on the SSA return letter.

"Never attribute to conspiracy what can be readily explained as stupidity."

However, my conjecture doesn't explain how someone born in 1890 had this particular SSN ending in "4425". Did investigators John Sampson and Susan Daniels identify that person by name?

Originally Posted by Devvy Kidd

Obama's lies, fraud: Can Special Counsel Patrick Fitzgerald open an investigation?

Yes, he certainly can. But will he? Not without more pressure than just mailing him documents in complaint.
But go ahead and give it your best effort. You may get better results than I did (no response).

I've just posted a copy of Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer's speech regarding her signing SB 1070, along with a working copy of the actual bill, in my library on Scribd.com.

I've posted this information simply to help clear the air regarding what the Arizona bill actually says, as well as the Governor's reasons for signing the bill. This is NOT a racist document.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/31516257/Ariz ... nforcement

The combined document is 21 pages long, font size 12 - not nearly as large a document as the more widely known ObamaCare bill (2000+ pages), so it shouldn't take too long to read and understand.

I'm going to place this up on Scribd.com with the endnotes correctly reflected.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/31518900/Tim- ... BC-in-2008

=====================

[b]The Senate defined “natural born Citizenâ€

Originally Posted by At forums.hannity.com, Brianroy

MinutemanCDC_SC, I do not concur with your conclusion of how the minor child Barry Obama could have obtained a Connecticut SS #, prior to his 18th birthday (that is how he would have conceivably obtained a 042 number prior to his using any SS# to enter Occidental College).

THE 042 SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER OF AN HAWAIIAN BASED OBAMA POINTS TO FRAUD AND A FOREIGN BIRTH.

Obama would not have applied as a youth pre-August 1979 (Occidental College bound) for the Social Security Number without the intervention of a parent or guardian present, and he would have done so in Hawaii, and would have been issued only a 575 or 576 number in the presence of a parent or guardian (since he would have been allegedly only 15-17 in the years of 1977- pre-August 1979).

If Investigator Susan Daniels affidavit is followed, we have the 042 number issued for the child Michael Matt Garafalo born on October 30, 1971. And in her statement, we see that she also states that the same 042 number was previously issued for someone born in 1890 (see statement 8 of her affidavit).

This leads us to conclude of the likelihood of a later technological manipulation and back trail that begins with the 1890 individual whose total data was not fully erased from the system, and whose Social Security Number identity was taken over, renamed, and re-entered into the system.

Unfortunately, the attempt to salvage Obama doesn't wash in light of the falsified acquisition and use of Garafalo et al.'s Social Security Number.

Had Barack Hussein Obama a genuine US Birth Certification, he would have been using a genuine Hawaii issued 575 or 576 Social Security Number.

Because Barack was unable to obtain a legitimate state of Hawaii Social Security Number issuance, this proves that the accusations that he is of foreign birth and foreign citizenship are NOT unfounded.

Mr. Obama is Constitutionally disqualified for the Office of President, because he is not a natural born citizen, that is, one born on U.S. soil of two U.S. citizen parents.

Brianroy, we are on the same side of this issue, and I agree with about 95% of what you are saying. Please do not interpret my correspondence as arguing with you on major substantive points. This is a friendly discussion and not friendly fire. Please, Brianroy, do not consider this post as correcting you, but only as getting our facts straight, the details nailed down, and our ducks in a row. There is room for working out the details among those with a common cause. There are a number of details that have been accepted without close inspection or analysis, and some of those details should be corrected before the Obots make mock of us for them.

Barack Obama II in Honolulu getting a Connecticut "042" SSN looks like fraud, indicates fraud, and is certainly cause for suspicion, but to prove fraud requires supporting evidence. We have better evidence of his birth in Mombasa, Kenya, without using this. We don't have to prove Social Security fraud to establish foreign birth; even if we did prove fraud, that wouldn't prove foreign birth; and if we failed to convince the judge, he might suspect, question, or even disallow the independent proof of foreign birth.

I have posited no conclusion - only a conjecture - as to how the Connecticut "042" SSN was assigned in 1977 to Barack Obama II in Hawaii. The handwritten "Honolulu, HI 96nnn" on his application for a SSN could have been misread as "Honolulu, HI 06nnn". The SSA assigned an Area Number based upon the return address ZIP code alone, without reference to the city and state. So, if the ZIP code had been misread or incorrect, an Area Number would have been assigned in error based solely upon that erroneous ZIP code. Mr. Obama's handwritten "9" is plainly not a "0", so I am not implying nor do I suppose that this is what happened, only that it could have happened. Therefore, it might be submitted to a court of law as a (however remotely) possible explanation for Barack Obama II receiving a Connecticut "042" SSN when he actually lived in Hawaii. It could have been a clerical error just as easily as felony ID theft or fraudulent use of a counterfeit Connecticut birth certificate. The "042" SSN does not by itself prove that there was ID theft or fraud.

The Social Security Death Index does not include this SSN ending in "4425", so it is not very likely that Mrs. Stanley Dunham (Madelyn) lifted this SSN from the documents of the deceased which she handled as a volunteer in the Honolulu County Probate Judge's Office. Investigator Susan Daniels reported a (no month, no day) 1890 date of birth associated with the SSN ending in "4425", but I do not know of any supporting evidence about that person born in 1890. If that "1890" lacks corroboration, it could conceivably have been a spurious, erroneous cross-entry in the SSA records. Maelstrom says there is a real person born in 1890 with this SSN. If so, the SSN ending in "4425" should be on the Death Index, but it isn't. I do not know if such a person exists, but if Maelstrom will PM that person's name to me, I will be informed - and stand corrected.

Nothing in your comments (in blue) precludes the possibility of a clerical error at the SSA in Baltimore, a handwriting ambiguity on the application form which Barack Obama II wrote in Honolulu, or an intentional subterfuge to use a Connecticut address (and perhaps even counterfeit Connecticut birth documents) to obtain an ostensibly authentic SSN in 1977. In 1977, SSN's were issued only by mail by the SSA in Baltimore, not at a local office in the presence of parents or guardians. "A genuine US Birth Certification" from a Honolulu hospital, the State of Hawaii, from any other state, or even from a foreign country (if naturalized), would not determine the Area Number assigned. The Area Number is based solely upon the ZIP code of the return address which the applicant writes on the SSN application.

Your comments (in red) mention Barack Obama II using Michael Matt Garofalo's SSN. Mr. Obama's SSN ends in "4425"; Mr. Garafalo's SSN ends in "4426", and he is still using it himself.

However, if the SSA - for whatever reason - did in fact assign Barack Obama II an SSN with a "042" Area Number, then his SSN was in sequence with those of Thomas Wood (b. 1962 - d. 1981) and Michael Matt Garofalo (b. 1971), who were likewise issued SSN's in Connecticut between 1977 and 1979.

Latest Update on Columbia University Trial

EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW WITH MIKI BOOTH, CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE AND WITNESS SCHEDULED TO TESTIFY ON MAY 18

by Sharon Rondeau, Post & Email
Date: May 17, 2010
http://www.thepostemail.com/2010/05/17/ ... ity-trial/

Dr. James David Manning is acting as prosecutor at the Columbia Trial in New York, where testimony and evidence are being presented refuting Obama's claim of having attended that institution

(May 17, 2010) —The following is an interview with Miki Booth, a first-hand witness to the Columbia Trial being held in Harlem, NY by Dr. James Manning, Ph.D., as previously reported by The Post & Email here.

SHARON: Tell me about your day in New York – how it started and what you heard as far as testimony.

MIKI: We went to Columbia University right outside the main gate and we assembled there because Rev. Manning was going to start the march at 9:00 a.m. We got there at 8:30 or so and people kept arriving, and we saw some people with American flags, so we knew they were part of us. There were quite a few of the area people and those associated with Rev. Manning’s church, and they’re all black. There were probably about 50 of us, and about half were black and half were white. It was great. When Rev. Manning came, he and his wife Elizabeth, he was wearing a long white robe and he did a wonderful prayer to start, and then we all walked by twos, holding hands, whites holding hands with blacks, and a lot of guys from my neck of the woods that some people would call “redneckâ€