Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

[quote="grandmasmad"][color=red]“If Sen. McCain would have won, would you be objecting to deployment to Iraq?â€

Originally Posted by FedUpinFarmersBranch

September 13, 2009
New Hampshire Secretary Of State To Investigate Obama For Election Fraud
Filed under: A Nation Of Laws, AKA OBAMA AKA Soetoro AKA Dunham AKA God — aconservativeedge @ 9:13 pm
Tags: democrats, obama, fraud, citizen, election, born, investigate, secretary, state, ballot, natural, barack, certification, candidate, new hampshire, misrepresented

New Hampshire Secretary Of State To Investigate Obama For Election Fraud.
New Hampshire Secretary of State William Gardner, a non-partisan appointee, has agreed to investigate allegations that Democrats and Barack Hussein Obama misrepresented his natural born status in order to gain placement on the New Hampshire ballot as a presidential candidate. Gardner agreed to the investigation after a request made by State Rep. Lawrence Rappaport on Thursday. According to a report by The Post & Email, the issue has arisen over the discovery that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi signed two different certifications of Obama’s nomination as the Democratic candidate, one certification stating he was a natural born citizen and constitutionally eligible to serve as president a second one omitting the constitutional qualification language. The latter certification was sent to state election officials according to the Canada Free Press. The Post & Email’s John Charlton writes:



http://aconservativeedge.com

More from the source of this investigation on Orly Taitz web site (http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/):


Friday, September 11, 2009 7:21 AM
From: This sender is DomainKeys verified “Larry Rappaportâ€

Expect nothing good from U.S. District Judge Clay Land's kangaroo court. Repost from July 17, 2009

Maj. Gen. Childers, Lt. Col. Graef, Maj. Cook v. Col. Good, Col. Wingate, Col. MacDonald, Dr. Robert M. Gates, USSecDef, Barack Hussein Obama, [de facto] President of the United States

Courtroom proceedings are unfamiliar to me, but Major Stefan Cook v. Col. Good et al was a disheartening eye-opener about how unjust "justice" can be. On the morning of July 16, 2009, in U.S. District Judge Clay Land's second-floor courtroom in the U.S. Post Office and Federal Courthouse, Columbus, Georgia, eight miles north of Ft. Benning, I saw either a preview of the Tribulation or a look back at the Inquisition.

Everything in this courtroom seemed backwards and turned upside down.



Judge Land acted like an aggressive prosecutor, Dr. Taitz, the prosecuting attorney, acted like a defender of the plaintiff, her wrongly attacked client, and the Army defense attorneys acted like bystanders who refused to get involved. Perhaps this travesty would be better understood if read in reverse order, to see how words were spoken which covered actions which had not even happened yet. It seemed that the script had been written, events in court were predetermined, and everyone knew what would happen next.
_________________________________________________

Dr. Taitz only made a ten or fifteen minute presentation, in which she presciently disassembled and defused the "no standing" ruling which Judge Land would make a half hour thereafter. This was hardly a shot in the dark, there having been 48 previous "no standing" rulings by self-preservationist judges, none of whom has been willing to step out of line and get involved in actually judging between the fraud and the victim.

Dr. Taitz asked that this case serve as representative of the other 170 or so military personnel. She told Judge Land that if he did not accept a representative case on behalf of the others, she would potentially have to bring each one before his court. He declined her request without comment, apparently not taking it seriously.

An almost as blonde female Army defense attorney followed Dr. Taitz with a ten or fifteen minute recitation of how the military expected issues to be addressed through channels [in an ideal, untainted world]. She mentioned Navy Capt. Schiver, Maj. Cook's civilian job supervisor at defense subcontractor Simtech in Pensacola. Capt. Harris had named a July 15, 2009 (the day before this trial date), date of deployment to Afghanistan for Maj. Cook precisely because Maj. Cook had asked for a July 15th date. He had volunteered before Mr. Obama took office and reaffirmed that on May 15 [May 9, actually], The Army confirmed his orders a month later, on June 9.

She claimed that he should not be allowed to change the request he had so recently made or to request emergency action because of the imminence of his deployment. She said the proper procedure was a ???????-43 review process as to whether orders should be revoked. She stated that the 11th Circuit had addressed this military [deployment?] procedure as early as 2003; yet, Maj. Cook did not use those channels. The female Major stated that Maj. Cook had not taken an Article 138 complaint through channels, which is the prescribed procedure.
__________________________________________________ ____

Dr, Taitz objected to that statement as not true, because she had taken the presentment to Adm. Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, asking what was the proper route for determining the legitimacy of the chain of command for orders. Adm. Mullen's legal counsel told her that because the [de facto] Commander-in-Chief is a civilian, he is not subject to a military determination of legitimacy of chain of command. Therefore, an Article 138 complaint could not require verification of legitimacy of a civilian CinC. [And therefore, sending an Article 138 complaint through channels would be pointless in this particular case.]

Then the Army defense attorney simply restated the necessity of submitting an Article 138 complaint through channels. Otherwise, the Army defense attorney comported herself satisfactorily and without offense.

Judge Land asked Dr. Taitz if she had evidence of her statement. "Evidence... Evidence!" in almost a bullying tone. She said she could present a written affidavit, but she had not brought the original determination, not expecting that the Army attorney would make such a false statement. Judge Land then denied Dr. Taitz' testimony in lieu of written evidence, leaving the argument in the Army's favor, that an Article 138 complaint had not been submitted through channels, and Maj. Cook had gone outside of channels and filed in a civilian court.

The Army defense attorney claimed that filing in a civilian court was improper for determination of legitimacy of chain of command, and the judge appeared to agree. N.B., the Catch-22: the JCS had already determined that a military complaint process cannot validate a civilian Commander-in-Chief, yet Maj. Cook cannot validate a military chain of command in a civilian court;. Did anyone mention that this eventuality had never happened before, and that it would cause a Constitutional crisis?

Although this contradiction was apparent to all, Judge Land accepted it into the record. More than once, I feared I would be reprimanded for my involuntary gasps of disbelief. I should have been able to restrain one moan, though. By contrast, Maj. Stefan Cook sat ramrod straight and, although I could not see his face, he did not make any untoward motions throughout.
____________________________________________

After a 15 minute recess, Judge Clay Land closed the case by rebuking Dr. Taitz for four or five minutes in a statement apparently prepared BEFORE the trial, the gist (NOT A QUOTE) of which was the following:

This court is ruled by the same Constitution your client uses to prompt his refusal of military orders. You came here intending to uncover Pres. Obama's birth certificate. The Constitution defines the separation of powers, and this court will not overstep those bounds to rule on the Executive Branch.

Maj. Cook, your orders to Afghanistan have been revoked; you will not be getting any more orders. Retired Maj. Gen. Childers and Lt. Col. Graef attached their names to this case based on possible orders; this court will not rule on hypotheticals. Your employment in Pensacola is beyond the jurisdiction of this court. Your complaint fails to meet the three requirements for standing. Therefore, this case is dismissed for lack of standing.

You have your orders revoked; that is what your restraining order demanded.
__________________________________________

We all rose to show respect for the judge upon his two entrances. I had to force myself to rise to show him respect when he finally left. But, after the trial, I did render respect where respect was due - to Maj. Stefan Cook. I saluted him and told him he was the bravest man I had ever met. He said, "It's moral courage." I continued to stare at him, wanting to weep. He turned away, saying, "You make me want to cry." He could feel the emotion. Pray for this just man, unjustly persecuted to hide the wickedness of another [snip].

Someone said afterward that this was just the wrong judge. We all expressed our hopes for Keyes v. Obama under U.S. District Judge David O. Carter in Santa Ana, California.

But today, this was truly a kangaroo court; the judge had even prepared his final opinion before the case began.

"Federal court only has authority of actual cases and controversies," Judge Land said. "The entire action is dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction."

This bland media statement does not communicate the contempt Judge Land showed the plaintiff and Orly Taitz when he read aloud the requirements for standing:

U.S. District Judge Clay Land read to the court:

There are three requirements for standing:

I) injury in fact, which means an invasion of a legally protected interest that is
(a) concrete and particularized, and
(b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical;

II) a causal relationship between the injury and the challenged conduct, which means that the injury fairly can be traced to the challenged action of the defendant, and has not resulted from the independent action of some third party not before the court; and

III) a likelihood that the injury will be redressed by a favorable decision, which means that the prospect of obtaining relief from the injury as a result of a favorable ruling is not too speculative.

Thus, he spotlighted the irony of his inaction.

I) Maj. Cook suffered injury in that his reserve status is probably revoked along with the orders for Afghanistan. The judge told him he would not be receiving further orders from the Army. The injury is concrete and particularized to him alone, actual and imminent, like day before yesterday.

II) Maj. Cook suffered injury in that the DOD had leaned on his boss to fire him from his job at defense subcontractor Simtech. Maj. Cook was fired from his civilian job within hours of his orders being revoked. Of course, DOD will claim there was no causal connection.

III) Injury would not only be addressed by a favorable decision, but a mere court order for discovery of the usurper's birth documents would end the reign of terror for everyone before it gets really, really dire.
__________________________________________

On the sidewalk in front of the U.S. Post Office and Federal Courthouse, Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., and much-decorated Middle East combat veteran Major Stefan F. Cook patiently explained to hostile and provoking reporters about:

• his uniform sprinkled with medals and ribbons and combat buttons;
  his four combat tours in the Middle East vs. the "coward objector" slander thrown at him;
  his volunteering for another Afghanistan tour under Pres. Bush, but since March, his having second thoughts (considering the Geneva Convention) about serving in combat under a de facto Commander-in-Chief who had not demonstrated his natural born citizenship so as to be a legitimate head of state;
  the intricacies of citizenship vs. natural born citizenship;
  non-binding Sen. Res. 511 approving Sen. John McCain's purported natural born citizenship vs. the absence of examination of Sen. Obama's bona fides (actually, Sen. John McCain's Panamanian birth certificate states he was born at Colon Hospital in Colon, Republic of Panama);
  that natural born citizenship required two citizen parents, not just one, plus birth on soil under U.S. jurisdiction;
  Emmerich de Vattel's The Law of Nations, and how its principles of international law were incorporated into the U.S. Constitution;
  the 14th Amendment definition of citizenship and why that was irrelevant to natural born citizenship, yet its primary author, Rep. John Bingham, incidentally described natural born citizenship as birth on U.S. soil to parents who are citizens;
  and so much more, in her inimitable meticulous detail.

That contrasted with the lack of opportunity given in court to present the same character witness and the history of natural born citizenship. It just didn't come up in the courtroom. Neither did Mr. Obama's proof of qualification nor the lack thereof.

Devvy Kidd does a pretty good job of discussing the current status of the high visibility eligibility cases. This is a revised edition of the original post - I've added the URL links. Please advise if there are broken links.

==============

PATRIOTS: TIME FOR MAJOR PUSH ON USURPER'S CITIZENSHIP ISSUE


By: Devvy Kidd
September 15, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd467.htm

On September 12, 2009, Americans descended on Washington, DC., in one of the largest displays of citizen disgust towards government in the history of this republic. While this patriotic day of fed up Americans was happening, the usurper (Obama/Soetoro) made sure he was out of town.

As usual. Obama aka Soetoro has taken a real fondness to flying around on Air Force One with his inventory of teleprompters and stable of fawning sycophants.

Let's back up one day to September 11, 2009. The flim flam man was at the Pentagon with his militant, Marxist wife and bag lady of fashion, Michelle. The annual ceremony for those murdered on 9/11. At the same time in a court room in Georgia, Obama's lackeys were playing more games in an important case. Americans keeping up on current events know there have been dozens of lawsuits challenging the citizenship eligibility of this guy in the White House who has used five different names (Barack Hussein Obama, aka Barry Soetoro, aka Barry Obama, aka Barack Dunham, aka Barry Dunham) and concealed every single record of his life except what he wants you to see.

The ignorant, biased media continues to ridicule those of us who believe the Constitution matters. Know what? I could care less. They don't pay my mortgage and I understand how the game is played. I say those who will not stand up for the truth are cowards. These useful fools who call any American vile labels for challenging the eligibility of Obama/Soetoro are either intellectually lazy and refuse to do the real research, their paychecks mean more to them than the truth, or they believe in Obama/Soetoro's Marxist agenda. This usurper must be removed from office. Not because Obama/Soetoro is a communist and is destroying this country (true), but because he never had the legal right to run for the presidency or take the oath of office on January 20, 2009.

Let's get caught up on recent events which seem to be causing 'The One' some stress. If you'll notice, the usurper doesn't seem to be walking to our helicopter with his usual jaunty stride. There is a tension there that is palpable. Stress from trying to sell his unconstitutional health care "reform" mess? I don't think so. On September 8, 2009, there was another hearing in the Barnett v Obama case in a federal court house in Santa Ana, California. I was most disturbed about what I have learned went by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation. As this can get a little confusing, I'll try to summarize here as clearly as I can.

That hearing (Barnett v Obama) was scheduled for weeks. The attorney's for the defendants, that would be the usurper and his minions, filed an eleventh hour motion on Friday, September 4, 2009. Monday the 7th was a holiday. The hearing was Tuesday, Sept. 8, 2009. How coincidental that Obama/Soetoro decided to pump some more of his propaganda to America's school children at the same time a hearing was underway that could eventually remove his lying backside from office.

There are a number of plaintiffs, but from what I can determine, things got nasty during the hearing. Here are two posts from actual plaintiffs in the case for you to read:

Plaintiff MSgt USMC Jeff Schwilk: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4247

Plaintiff Pamela Barnett: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4249

Orly has filed a notice of motion to disqualify Gary Kreep as a co-counsel due to conflict of interest ( http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4305 ).

This uphill battle should not be a damn bully contest, but that's exactly what it appears to me by Kreep. Now, all that aside, Judge Carter has set October 5, 2009 ( http://tinyurl.com/modhap ), as the next hearing to consider the motion by the Defendants; they want this to go away. A trial date, should this matter move forward, is set for January. Too far away because everyday the usurper remains office, the more complicated this constitutional crisis gets because of bills Obama/Soetoro is signing into law. Not to mention deploying soldiers as Commander-in-Chief. Although I've been told Judge Carter has further issued an expedited hearing, I am not certain as I write this. However, you can read this explanation of the judge's order here:

Judge Carter orders Motion for Rogatory Discovery to be heard: http://tinyurl.com/mg5xrh

September 11, 2009 by John Charlton
Referral Order gives rise to speculation that expedited discovery is to commence

(Sept. 11, 2009) — "Yesterday U.S. Federal District Judge David Carter (Central District of California, Souther Division) ordered the Amended Motion for expedited Rogatory Discovery, filed by Attorney Taitz in the action Captain Pamela Barnett et al. vs. Obama et al. referred to Magistrate Judge Arthur Nakazato. This order followed Carter's denial of Taitz’ request to remove Judge Nakazato from his role overseeing admission of evidence to the case, which duty he has according to Federal Court rules of procedure. Judge Nakazato is now to review the first Kenyan Birth Certificate.

"Attorney Taitz had submitted in July a Kenyan Birth Certificate (hereafter the Lavendar Document) to be authenticated by means of a mandamus to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, to move her to formally request the Kenyan Government to authenticate the document. This motion was denied by Judge Nakazato, whereupon Taitz filed a motion refusing to proceed before him, and a subsequent amendment to the initial Rogatory motion, on Aug. 20th.

"Attorney's for Barack Hussein Obama, led by Mr. George S. Cardona, acting U.S. Attorney, almost immediately replied to Carter's order, with an ex-parte Application (accompanied by a proposed order), requesting immediate halt to any discovery which might be granted by the Magistrate Judge."

One other comment here about the Defendant's motion to dismiss and I cover this in my letter to Judge Carter: Their entire argument is based after the barn door was left open ( http://tinyurl.com/o567mf ). There was zero vetting at the state level to ensure Obama aka and so forth, was constitutionally eligible. That glaring error (or cover up) caused everything to snow ball from there into the mess underway.

Meanwhile, Orly was in Georgia (September 11, 2009) on another eligibility case, Rhodes v McDonald, et al. Orly was notified by the clerk that an expedited hearing had been granted, so she caught a red eye flight to Georgia for a hearing last Friday. Here is the antics of our government that should make everyone sick; posted by Orly:

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4283

"We had a hearing on 11th. Defendants were represented by 3 attorneys: US attorney, Pentagon attorney and Fort Benning attorney. they claimed that my client, flight surgeon Cpt Rhodes MD didn't show up for no reason, she just didn't feel like coming.

"I presented to the judge a notarized statement, showing that Col Jeffrey Johnson, her commander from Fort Riley, KS has forbidden Connie from leaving Fort Riley a day early and she was threatened that if she does, she will be court martialed and can be thrown into military prison. In this fashion the gov. prevented Connie from being at her own hearing and 5 minutes before the hearing they served me with the motion to dismiss.

"Judge Land did not appreciate this strong hand tactic of the government and he ordered the government to make sure Connie is able to leave the base to be at her hearing, which was scheduled for Monday at 12 noon. This time it is their responsibility to do whatever is necessary for Connie to be in court. It is a tough week for me as in 5 days I am making 5 red eye flights and long trips between OC, LA, Atlanta, Columbus and WA DC."

Here is the Notarized statement from Plaintiff ( http://tinyurl.com/rdpdyw ), Cpt Connie Rhodes MD, attesting to the fact that she was forbidden to leave the base and appear in court. Because of the shenanigans by these lawyers, a US attorney, Pentagon attorney and Fort Benning attorney, another hearing was scheduled for Monday, September 14, 2009, at noon.

I spoke with Orly by phone at about 5:45 pm EST (Sept. 14, 2009). She sounded exhausted, but said the hearing was concluded; she was able to speak for about two hours. Judge Land will issue a decision tomorrow.
While all this is going on, ABC, NBC, CBS, MSNBC and CNN have remained silent. Not a single minute of coverage. Yo! That includes the 'fair and balanced' FOX News Network.

On September 10, 2009, an exposure of documents hit the Internet courtesy of JB Williams. Two different Official Certification of Nomination letters submitted by Nancy Pelosi and a woman named Alice Travis Germond. Read the posting and copy of the documents here:
http://www.canadafreepress.com/2009/williams091209.htm.

This now brings me to my work over the weekend because time is of the essence.

This is a letter I sent to Judge David O. Carter in the Barnett case: ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/carter.pdf ). It is permissible for citizens to send polite correspondence to judges regarding a case he/she is presiding over. If you will notice, no where in my letter do I refer to the usurper's party, politics or policies. Judge Carter is ruling on the law and that must be the only point you bring out if you decide to send him a letter. I hope everyone can take a few minutes (especially vets and active duty military) to pen a polite letter to Judge Carter asap.

Next, this is a request to my Secretary of State for a copy of the Official Certification of Nomination sent for Obama/Biden by Pelosi ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/texas.pdf ). I want to see what was submitted as a result of the revelations mentioned above by JB Williams.

Next, another letter to two U.S. Attorneys requesting a full investigation into those documents ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/durbin.pdf ).

Next, no not fun in the sun. One of Orly's plaintiffs is New Hampshire State Representative Laurence M. Rappaport. According to his post ( http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=4280 ), Mr. Rappaport had a meeting with his Secretary of State (SOS), William Gardner, on September 11, 2009. I am quite familiar with Gardner from the recount last year over the vote fraud in NH during the primaries. I am not impressed with Gardner or his staff. However, since Rappaport is a member of the New Hampshire General Court, an elected official, he does have some clout.

I have sent a letter ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/rappaport.pdf ) and the following documents in a nice, neat folder to Rep. Rappaport:

Letters to Janet Brown, Committees on Presidential Debates ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/brown.pdf )

Dr. Edwin Vieira on Standing (Due to length, I put on a CD): http://tinyurl.com/ku6rsw

Letters to the Secretary of State and Elections Board - State of Illinois: http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/illinois.pdf

Letter to my SOS ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/texas.pdf ) and the JB Williams article: http://www.canadafreepress.com/2009/williams091209.htm

Due to the length of these, I put them on the CD: Leo Donofrio's legal and historical research ( http://devvy.net/pdf/may09/donofrio_final.html ) on the issue of natural born citizen at birth;

another legal analysis on McCain's ineligibility ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/mccain_cd.pdf );

a document on how certain members of Congress tried to legislate Obama/Soetoro's citizenship by trying to sneak in McCain's and my letter to two U.S. Attorneys ( http://devvy.net/pdf/sept09/legislate_obama.pdf ).

I think that about covers things for now on Orly's cases. Let me go over to Leo Donofrio's web site. For those who have been following this the past almost one year, Leo's was the first case to the U.S. Supreme Court and kicked without a hearing. Leo has been posting more of his research ( http://naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com/ ); hopefully you can book mark and read when you can because it's important. Be sure to visit Leo's site and scroll down for this: FACTCHECK.ORG CAPITULATES – Admits Error In Obama Kenyan Citizenship Analysis. Why is this important? Because that web site has been the water carrier for the usurper from day one.

Next, is another very important case, Kerchner v Obama
( http://tinyurl.com/ql892d ). I have interviewed both Charles Kerchner and his attorney, Mario Apuzzo. The issue of these certifications filed with the SOS and the one Pelosi signed from the convention is already part of that lawsuit. Please see this link ( http://tinyurl.com/ql892d ); scroll down to Item 89 - 91. The docket for Charles' case is here ( http://tinyurl.com/r3g4n6 ); you can follow the progress of that case.

For almost a year, those who care absolutely nothing for the U.S. Constitution, Obama/Soetoro's supporters, newspaper pundits and popular cable news network anchors, have been screeching, calling people like you and me "wing nuts," Kool Aid drinkers, racists and conspiracy wackos. Ignore them. Don't let them sap your strength and energy. Stay focused. Below is a list of state legislators (there may be more at this time, but I don't have the full list) who are Orly's plaintiffs. Ask them to do the same as Rep. Rappaport. Now, that he has taken this first step with his Secretary of State, I believe these other stand up Americans will follow.

Mr. Eric Swafford, in his capacity of the State representative from the State of Tennessee; Mr. Timothy Jones, ESQ, in his capacity of a State Representative from the state of Missouri; Mr. Timothy Comerford, in his capacity of a State Representative from the State of New Hampshire; Mr. Frank Niceley in his capacity of the state representative from the state of Tennessee; Ms. Cynthia Davis, in her capacity of a State representative from the State of Missouri; Mr. Larry Rappaport in his capacity of a State Representative from the State of New Hampshire; Mr. Stacey Campfield in his capacity of a State representative from the state of Tennessee; Mr. Casey Guernsey in his capacity of a State Representative from the state of Missouri; Mr. Glen Casada, in his capacity of a State Representative from the state of Tennessee

Please feel free to send this column or any of the material in it to your state rep or senator with a polite snail mail letter asking for them to come forward as has Rep. Rappaport. If one of the above is your rep, be sure to thank them in a polite letter for already being plaintiffs in Orly's legal challenges and ask them to join Rep. Rappaport by petitioning your SOS. They need to know you will stand with them.

Let us keep the momentum going and show both Washington, DC and our state legislatures that we the people will no longer be ignored and we will not stop until the whole truth about the usurper is exposed and he is removed from office. Yes, Obama, we can and we will.

"But what do we mean by the American Revolution? Do we mean the American war? The Revolution was effected before the war commenced. The Revolution was in the minds and hearts of the people; a change in their religious sentiments, of their duties and obligations... This radical change in the principles, opinions, sentiments, and affections of the people was the real American Revolution." -- John Adams, letter to H. Niles, February 13, 1818

Links:

1 - Federal judge calls soldier's Obama challenge 'frivolous.' The judge whose backside is protected by soldiers like Major Cook: http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106692

2 - Proof of judge Lazzara sealing and hiding his orders from the plaintiff, plaintiff's attorney and public: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=3813

3 - Why For McCain, But Not For Obama? http://puzo1.blogspot.com/

1 - Photos show President Barack Obama as Barry the freshman ( http://tinyurl.com/ojn6j9 ) - Hey, let's just change your name! "It was at Occidental where he stopped being called “Barryâ€

Because I get sick of hearing the National Anthem sung badly, I thought maybe you would enjoy hearing this also.

And with no "artistic interpretation" - this, my friends, is the way it should be sung.........

It just doesn't get any better!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ETrr-XHBjE

Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan

Because I get sick of hearing the National Anthem sung badly, I thought maybe you would enjoy hearing this also.

And with no "artistic interpretation" - this, my friends, is the way it should be sung.........

It just doesn't get any better!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ETrr-XHBjE

Please do not stand next to me when the anthem is played. My college room mate described my singing voice as comparable to a dying water buffalo in heat (How she knows what a dying water buffalo in heat sounds like is beyond me.) However, when my anthem is played, I stand at attention, hand over heart, and sing loudly.

Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan

Because I get sick of hearing the National Anthem sung badly, I thought maybe you would enjoy hearing this also.

And with no "artistic interpretation" - this, my friends, is the way it should be sung.........

It just doesn't get any better!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ETrr-XHBjE

Highlander...wow! Just no words to describe...thanks!

I am sorry if this is a dupe. If you go to url you can see the document.

Meet The Soetoros!
Posted by Dale Gordon on September 15, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Received this in an email:

This DOES ANSWER a NUMBER OF QUESTIONS and RAISES OTHER ISSUES! The AMERICAN PEOPLE DEMAND THE TRUTH!


Indonesia
Left to Right:
Lolo Soetoro, Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro, baby Maya Soetoro, and 9 year oldBarry Soetoro

This registration document, made available on Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia,
shows the registration of Barack Obama <http://www.daylife.com/topic/Barack_Obama> under the nameBarry Soetoro made by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro.




Name: Barry Soetoro
Religion: ….. Islam
Nationality: ….. Indonesian

How did little INDONESIAN, Barry Soetoro, (A.K.A. Barack Obama) get around the issue of nationality to become president?
Someone who tells lies is a L __ __ r?
PART 2:

In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama’s qualifications for the presidency, the group
“Americans for Freedom of Informationâ€

Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan

Because I get sick of hearing the National Anthem sung badly, I thought maybe you would enjoy hearing this also.

And with no "artistic interpretation" - this, my friends, is the way it should be sung.........

It just doesn't get any better!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ETrr-XHBjE

Thanks....I needed that!

[quote="butterbean"]I am sorry if this is a dupe. If you go to url you can see the document.

Meet The Soetoros!
Posted by Dale Gordon on September 15, 2009 · Leave a Comment

Received this in an email:

This DOES ANSWER a NUMBER OF QUESTIONS and RAISES OTHER ISSUES! The AMERICAN PEOPLE DEMAND THE TRUTH!


Indonesia
Left to Right:
Lolo Soetoro, Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro, baby Maya Soetoro, and 9 year oldBarry Soetoro

This registration document, made available on Jan. 24, 2007, by the Fransiskus Assisi school in Jakarta, Indonesia,
shows the registration of Barack Obama <http://www.daylife.com/topic/Barack_Obama> under the nameBarry Soetoro made by his step-father, Lolo Soetoro.




Name: Barry Soetoro
Religion: ….. Islam
Nationality: ….. Indonesian

How did little INDONESIAN, Barry Soetoro, (A.K.A. Barack Obama) get around the issue of nationality to become president?
Someone who tells lies is a L __ __ r?
PART 2:

In a move certain to fuel the debate over Obama’s qualifications for the presidency, the group
“Americans for Freedom of Informationâ€