Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

One final thought before I start my day.

We have discussed among ourselves Obama's passport and his travels to nefarious parts of the world during his 'mysterious' days, but the world of phony passports is a long one. The following article provides a really grounded overview of the problems with phony or multiple passports.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34367002/Scot ... port-Fraud

Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan

Originally Posted by TexasBorn

Let's all don our "caucasian" exterior and stand in front of the polling place from coast to coast on election day. What are they going to do, throw us in jail?

Since mid-September, 2001, I have dangled a wooden cross from the mirror of my truck and have had a small American flag stuck in my lower windshield. My kids wanted to know why I started doing this, and I explained that if we ever got to a point where there was a question about which side I was on, Muslim or Christian American, I wanted the answer to be obvious.

I wonder how it would appear to our corrupt communist leaders in government and our Muslim enemies if everyone started doing this.

Like I've said before, screw 'em if they don't like my attitude.

Highlander, I fly my American flag in front of my house 24x7x365. I have an American flag sticker on my truck. I wear American flag shirts. I make my position known very clearly! I think everyone should start doing this to send an unmistakable message.

NH Rep. Laurence Rappaport speaks with The Post & Email about Eligibility, the Constitution, and State Sovereignty
STATE REP. BROUGHT EVIDENCE OF OBAMA’S INELIGIBILITY ALMOST TWO YEARS AGO TO HIS SECRETARY OF STATE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL

by Sharon Rondeau

Laurence Rappaport represents Coos 1 District in the New Hampshire state legislature and will run for re-election in November

(Jul. 19, 2010) — In September 2008, New Hampshire State Rep. Laurence Rappaport and another member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rep. Carol Vita, brought a complaint of possible election fraud to the New Hampshire Secretary of State, Mr. William Gardner, stating that Barack Hussein Obama’s name had been placed on the state ballot despite evidence which cast doubt on his constitutional eligibility to serve as president.

Mr. Gardner stated that he did not have the authority to intervene and referred the matter to New Hampshire Attorney General Michael Delaney, who did nothing.

Rep. Rappaport based his assertions to Gardner and Delaney on the following points:

1. The Supreme Court’s definition of “natural born citizenâ€

kathyet,

Thanks for posting the Post & Email interview of NH Rep. Laurence Rappaport. Sharon Rondeau conducts excellent interviews, and this is another good one.

I have a couple of thoughts to add.

1. I have been doing a lot of reading lately, mostly early American historical material, and I have just re-read a fine article by Prof. Steven Yates that discusses four cardinal errors we made as a young country.

Because it is 32 pages long, I will not include the article herein, but it is worth a read by anyone who is intellectually interested in understanding our 19th century American events and some of the early foreign power and control that affect America even today.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/21992009/Stev ... nal-Errors

It is my perception that if we are to understand what is going on today in America, we have to look behind the curtain that has cloaked the federal government actions. It should be clear by now to all thinking Americans that this is not an American-centric or Christian-centric federal government which is now trying desperately to control every aspect of our lives - it is an unlawful and alien form of government.

It appears our 'Constitution for the united States' has been nullified by an unlawful central government, and we are no longer operating as a confederated republic of sovereign states based on the rule of law.

2. While we think about unlawful aspects of Obama, let's not forget how much crime and corruption there is, and has been, with regard to using birth certificates as a basis for identifying individuals. See this great article provided by Scott Stewart of Stratfor entitled 'The Shifting Landscape of Passport Fraud.'

http://www.scribd.com/doc/34367002/Scot ... port-Fraud

Originally Posted by Sharon Rondeau

NH Rep. Laurence Rappaport speaks with The Post & Email about Eligibility, the Constitution, and State Sovereignty
STATE REP. BROUGHT EVIDENCE OF OBAMA’S INELIGIBILITY ALMOST TWO YEARS AGO TO HIS SECRETARY OF STATE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL

Laurence Rappaport represents Coos 1 District in the New Hampshire state legislature and will run for re-election in November

(Jul. 19, 2010) — In September 2008, New Hampshire State Rep. Laurence Rappaport and another member of the New Hampshire House of Representatives, Rep. Carol Vita, brought a complaint of possible election fraud to the New Hampshire Secretary of State, Mr. William Gardner, stating that Barack Hussein Obama’s name had been placed on the state ballot despite evidence which cast doubt on his constitutional eligibility to serve as president.

Mr. Gardner stated that he did not have the authority to intervene and referred the matter to New Hampshire Attorney General Michael Delaney, who did nothing.

Thank you for this post, kathyet. I logged on to post it, only to find you had just done so.

At "Military Times," a reader listed military personnel and others pursuing eligiblity lawsuits (2/24/09-3/23/09).
Active Duty Officer, Retired Col & State Reps join in eligibility lawsuit

This exchange is at forums.hannity.com, about the ratification of Mr. Obama by Joint Session of Congress on 1/8/09.

Originally Posted by MinutemanCDC_SC

After Mr. Cheney had finally skipped any call for objections, there was some activity at the lower left corner of the C-SPAN video, but it was almost completely off screen. I wasn't there, and I cannot vouch for what happened, but only that, on the video, there appeared to be some disturbance. I could be mistaken about the following.

It was reported that one unidentified Congressman objected, oriented at two o'clock from the Senate President's desk and several rows back. Several other (Republican) Senators and Representatives blocked Mr. Cheney's view of him to prevent recognition of his objection. One even stood on the desk in front of the objecting party so as to obscure him.

Originally Posted by get er done

I had not heard about the above scene in the Congress during the ratification process. Every member of congress was notified by letter, sent by certified mail, of Obama's ineligiblity to be president BEFORE congress ratified the election.

Pelosi was mailed a certified letter which informed her of Obama's ineligiblity to be president before the election was ratified, hence she jumped to her feet and applauded her crime, cutting off Cheney's opportunity to ask for objections. Pelosi knew that one congressman with a conscience would raise an objection. Odds are Pelousi was well aware of Obama's ineligibility long before O's election was ratified.

Cheney's hesitation to ask for objections allowed the fulfillment of ancient prophecy and allowed Obama to rise to power.

Originally Posted by Mick R.

Perhaps the reason you didn't hear about this incident is because it never happened. This is why the birther movement has credibility issues - People tossing out things they've "heard" without a shred of proof to back it up.

Seriously... Do you REALLY think a congressman was blocked from lodging a protest and you would just now be hearing about it?? And what about this mysterious "unidentified congressman" - why did we not hear from him?

Originally Posted by Roberts_the_man

BTW - Objections to the vote count are not unheard of ...

It happened for the count involving Nixon in 1969, in a contested vote for Wallace, and when .........

A single Dim from Florida did it in 2000 concerning Bush and could not move it forward, and yet again two Dims did so with the needed congressman and senator in 2004, which resulted in a debate that lasted for about 2 hours, and yet again concerning Bush .

http://www.democracynow.org/2005/1/7/hi ... dems_force


The second occurrence involved Cheney as president of the senate, who did call for objections in 2005 but not so in 2009 .



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BcGt8hQZ ... re=related
Actually anyone can see the guy in the middle portion of the left hand side of the above video at about 27:27, and YES there is a bearded man who can be seen raising his hand in objection ....

Over the applause and celebration no one can hear his objection .



Probably much like the congressman who yelled liar [Rep. Joe Wilson, R-SC] and the congressman who apologized to BP - the R leadership most likely shut him up .



So you are WRONG !

[The following is the opinion of locals in Zanzibar or Tanzania, who live less than an hour by air from Barack Obama II's birthplace in Mombasa.]

Zanzibar could reverse trend to have president from Pemba
Tuesday, 29 June 2010 19:29

By Hawra Shamte and Salim Said

For more than 200 years US citizen could not pick a president who has roots outside the country. This might have been the result of racism or belief that a person other than ‘original’ US citizen was capable of effectively leading the powerful nation and help it to maintain its values.

But after political changes globally, and strengthening of democracy, things have changed in the US. We witnessed last year a senator with his origins from east Africa, Barack Abdallah Husein Obama, becoming the first black US president. He won the race on Democrat ticket and was sworn on January 20, 2009 as US president. (Continued...)

[quote="Roberts_the_man"][size=117]According to his campaign staff, Mr. Obama visited Pakistan in 1981, on the way back from Indonesia, where his mother and half-sister, Maya Soetoro-Ng, were living. He spent “about three weeksâ€

Third Circuit Reverses order to Atty. Mario Apuzzo to pay damages
THE THIRD CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FINDS ATTORNEY APUZZO NOT LIABLE FOR OBAMA’S/CONGRESS’ DAMAGES AND COSTS INCURRED BY THEM IN DEFENDING THE KERCHNER APPEAL

by Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

Atty. Mario Apuzzo specializes in citizenship law and represents four plaintiffs in Kerchner v. Obama & Congress

(Jul. 22, 2010) — On July 2, 2010, the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision affirming the New Jersey Federal District Court’s dismissal of the Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al case for lack of Article III standing. The Court ordered that I show cause in 14 days why the Court should not find me liable for just damages and costs suffered by the defendants, not in having to defend against the merits of plaintiffs’ underlying claims that Putative President Obama is not an Article II “natural born Citizen,â€

Ex-congressman: President a 'threat,' must be impeached
'We have man in White House who brazenly disregards his oath of office'

Posted: July 23, 2010
3:05 pm Eastern

By Bob Unruh
© 2010 WorldNetDaily


A former congressman and GOP presidential candidate says for current members of the House and Senate to uphold their oath of office that includes the defense of the United States against enemies "foreign and domestic," they need to be filing impeachment charges against Barack Obama.

Former U.S. Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., joined what has become a growing surge of those recommending the ultimate solution for apresident they believe not only has disagreeable policies, but is participating in actions that damage the nation.

Tancredo wrote in a opinion piece in the Washington Times that, "Mr. Obama's refusal to live up to his own oath of office – which includes the duty to defend the United States against foreign invasion – requires senators and representatives to live up to their oaths. Members of Congress must defend our nation against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Today, that means bringing impeachment charges against Mr. Obama."

The ultimate guide to Obama's radical agenda – and how to stop it!

Tancredo is not the first to raise the idea of impeachment against Obama, who has implemented legislation and policies effectively nationalizing financial institutions, automobile companies, health care and many other previously private interests.


In fact, he was not even the only person on this particular day. Times columnist Jeffrey T. Kuhner, who also is president of the Edmund Burke Institute, wrote at the same time, "President Obama has engaged in numerous high crimes and misdemeanors. The Democratic majority in Congress is in peril as Americans reject his agenda. Yet more must be done: Mr. Obama should be impeached."

Kuhner continued, "He is slowly – piece by painful piece – erecting a socialist dictatorship. We are not there – yet. But he is putting America on that dangerous path. He is undermining our constitutional system of checks and balances; subverting democratic procedures and the rule of law; presiding over a corrupt, gangster regime; and assaulting the very pillars of traditional capitalism. Like Venezuela's leftist strongman, Hugo Chavez, Mr. Obama is bent on imposing a revolution from above – one that is polarizing America along racial, political and ideological lines. Mr. Obama is the most divisivepresident since Richard Nixon. His policies are Balkanizing the country. It's time for him to go."

Tancredo's arguments aren't complicated. During his brief presidential run in 2008 he focused on the border security issue of the United States, and he still is concerned that the failure to secure the U.S. boundary – especially with Mexico – will lead to tragic consequences at the hands of border-crossing terrorists.

Tancredo appeared on Fox News today to defend his position from skeptics, saying Obama's responsibility is to protect and defend the Constitution andthe United States, not "fundamentally transform" them.

"Our president is an enemy of our Constitution, and, as such, he is a danger to our safety, our security and our personal freedoms," Tancredo warns, affirming his belief that Obama is more dangerous forthe United States than al-Qaida.

"He is more dangerous simply because he is inside," he said. "Few people took him seriously about fundamentally transforming America. That is what he is all about. That is what he has set about doing. He is a committed ideologue. When you have someone like that in the White House, it is a scary proposition."


He cited the president's lack of action to adequately secure the border with Mexico.

"He's putting his country in danger," Tancredo said. "The country the Founders put together, that's what's in jeopardy."

"Barack Obama is one of the most powerful presidents this nation has seen in generations. He is powerful because he is supported by large majorities in Congress, but, more importantly, because he does not feel constrained by the rule of law. Whether he is putting up the weakest possibledefense of the Defense of Marriage Act despite the Justice Department's legal obligation to support existing law; disenfranchising Chrysler and GM bondholders in order to transfer billions of investor dollars to his supporters in the United Auto Workers; or implementing yet a third offshore oil-drilling moratorium even after two federal courts have thrown out two previous moratoriums, President Obama is determined to see things done his way regardless of obstacles," Tancredo wrote in his op-ed.

"To Mr. Obama, the rule of law is a mere inconvenience to be ignored, overcome or 'transcended' through international agreements or 'norms.'"

Tancredo wrote that the "dedicated Marxist who lives in the White House" holds power over budgets, the judiciary, national defense and health care. As such, "his regime and his program are not just about changing public policy in the conventional sense. When one considers the combination of his stop-at-nothing attitude, his contempt for limited government, his appointment of judges who want to create law rather than interpret it – all of these make this president today's single greatest threat to the great experiment in freedom that is our republic.

"Yes, Mr. Obama is a more serious threat to America than al-Qaida. We know that Osama bin Laden and followers want to kill us, but at least they are an outside force against whom we can offer our bestdefense . But when a dedicated enemy of the Constitution is working from the inside, we face a far more dangerous threat. Mr. Obama can accomplish with the stroke of his pen what bin Laden cannot accomplish with bombs and insurgents."

Tancredo, who served five terms representing Colorado and now is chairman of the Rocky Mountain Foundation, was joined by Kuhner, who accused Obama of abusing hisoffice and violating his oath.

Kuhner cited Obama's demand that all Americans buy health insurance.

"The federal government does not have the right to coerce every citizen to purchase a good or service. This is not in the Constitution, and it represents an unprecedented expansion of power," he wrote. "Yet Obamacare's most pernicious aspect is its federal funding of abortion. Pro-lifers are now compelled to have their tax dollars used to subsidize insurance plans that allow for the murder of unborn children. This is more than state-sanctioned infanticide. It violates the conscience rights of religious citizens."

He further cited Obama's actions regarding the BP oil spill.

"There is a legal process for claims to be adjudicated, but Mr. Obama has behaved more like Mr. Chavez or Russia's Vladimir Putin: He has bullied BP into setting up a $20 billion compensation fund administered by an Obama appointee. In other words, the assets of a private company are to be raided to serve a political agenda."

He also wrote about the takeovers in the auto and financial industries, and the New Black Panther case.

"Under Mr. Obama, the Constitution has become a meaningless scrap of paper," he said. "As president, he is supposed to respect the rule of law. Instead, his administration has dropped charges of voter intimidation against members of the New Black Panther Party. This was done even though their menacing behavior was caught on tape: men in military garb brandishing clubs and threatening whites at a polling site."

Tancredo nearly two months ago broached the subject of impeachment, suggesting an "impeachment file."

"I believe there is a growing body of evidence of impeachable offenses sufficient to warrant a formal impeachment resolution in the House, followed by a trial in the Senate," he wrote at the time.

And the suggestion even has come from onlookers at a presidential appearance. CNN has documented when Obama made a surprise visit to a crowd on a shuttle bus, one onlooker shouted, "When are you going to quit. When are you going to be impeached?"

The issue even has appeared among online gamers, when Microsoft told an Xbox user the signon name "Impeach Obama" was not allowed because, "If you were President Obama, how would you feel if someone wanted to impeach you?"

Floyd and Mary Beth Brown, in a column on WND, discussed the ImpeachObamaCampaign.com that they launched.

They reported that many, instead of examining the evidence, attacked the messengers.

"We expected these attacks," they reported. But they said the unresolved issues include:

* "Obama repeatedly lies to the American people when he says we can keep our private insurance, knowing full well that his legislation will inevitably drive private insurers out of business.

* "Gerald Walpin, inspector general of the Corporation for National and Community Service, investigated Kevin Johnson, a big buddy of the president, for misuse of funds from an AmeriCorps grant. Obama did not like Walpin's investigation and findings, whereupon he vindictively fired Walpin to cover for his friend, Johnson. A subsequent investigation vindicated Walpin's judgment in the matter.

* "Barack Obama oversaw the effective takeover by government of banks, the largest insurance company (AIG), General Motors and Chrysler – the bulk of the U.S. auto industry – thus stripping bondholders, shareholders and others of their personal property.

* "Barack Obama is actively pursuing cap-and-trade legislation. Instead of taxing the very air we breathe, it will instead, in a manner of speaking, tax the air we exhale, giving the government unprecedented control over the economy and American businesses. Those taxed businesses will then pass the fees onto the American people.

* "Spending American citizens' money, Barack Hussein Obama is running up our debt at an alarming rate. In just the nine months since Obama assumed office, our national debt has gone up by over a trillion dollars. To put that figure in perspective, it took George W. Bush eight years to add $4.8 trillion to the national debt.

* "And, to add insult to injury, Obama is printing money like it's going out of style. The effect will be hyperinflation, a crippling of our economy and, quite possibly, personal hardship on a scale that has not been experienced since the Great Depression.

* "Barack Hussein Obama appointed countless "czars" to oversee everything from the closing of Guantanamo to the food we eat. These czars don't have to be approved by the Senate. The czars have unprecedented power and report only to Obama. Members of both parties are disturbed by these extra-constitutional excrescences. Sen. Robert Byrd said: "The accumulation of power by White House staff can threaten the constitutional system of checks and balances." Rep. Jack Kingston called the czars a "parallel government."

* "And finally, Obama consistently refuses to approve the release of his actual birth certificate, college transcripts and his medical records. Is he trying to hide something that will threaten his presidency?"


Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely

Retired U.S. Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely, a noted military leader who now is a presence on the Internet with his Stand Up For America and Veterans Defenders websites, told WND he would like Obama to resign.

Vallely, who served in Vietnam and retired in 1991 from the U.S. Army as deputy commanding general for the Pacific, said, "We now must call for the immediate resignation of Barry Soetero (AKA President Barack Hussein Obama) … based on incompetence, deceit, fraud, corruption, dishonesty and violation of the U.S. oath of office and the Constitution."

"We can wait no longer for a traditional change of power and new government," he has warned.

"'We the People' have had enough. Enough is enough. The Obama White House and identifiable members of Congress are now on a progressive socialist, treasonous death march and are bankrupting and weakening the country. We have watched them violate their sacred oath of office. 'We, the People' cannot wait for and solely rely on the next round of elections in November of this year. It is now and each day that these public servants must put the citizen's interests above self-interest by resigning immediately," he said.

Peter Ferrara, on the American Spectator website, also has predicted Obama's resignation.

"I am now ready to predict that President Obama will not even make it [to 2012]," he wrote. "I predict that he will resign in discredited disgrace before the fall of 2012," Ferrera said.
http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=182929