Thread: Don't Believe The Ron Paul Hype

Originally Posted by MW

Greg wrote:

Lock this one please

Why? Personally, I don't see where things have gotten out of control on this thread. Just my opinion..........

havent seen you over in the coin thread and the like ...

I actually removed my Duncan Hunter link so as not to lead new comers into thinking ALIPAC supports one particular candidate

="MW
After performing exhaustive research on Paul, I consider myself very informed regarding his contradictions and inconsistencies regarding border security and illegal immigration. Futhermore, my personal feelings on Paul are irrelevant where his suitability to be President of the United States are concerned.

A key contradiction is to say NO amnesty and NO deport. You can’t have these together. If NO to deport then where will be an amnesty in some form

Originally Posted by MW

Greg wrote:

Lock this one please

Why? Personally, I don't see where things have gotten out of control on this thread. Just my opinion..........

I say Why also
Some of the same postings are on the Ron Paul blog and it's not being locked. Nothing wrong in proving facts but when the name calling starts then that's a problem.

People need to know the truth/facts and this board is about illegal immigration

fear is running high.

the establishment is getting very very nervous.

Anybody worth their voting salt could see thru smear pieces like this with just 10 minutes of research, but the sheeple usually don't. That is what the MSM does, shapes perceptions for those don't like free thinking...

I am glad most here are smarter enough to see thru this drivel.

You know, Brightnail, does make a point here.

We only have 3 candidates, I think, that are with us on illegal immigration. Hopefully, we will vote for one of those three.

We have been asked not to discuss specific candidates for a while and I will respect that.

If, however, we get into trashing either of the three, it is not a good thing.
Let's don't force each other into a corner or cause such hard feelings that we can't come together and vote for one of them - whether it's the one we prefer or not. Anything else, means the 'other side' gets their man/woman in office.

That's exactly what they want ------.

Originally Posted by nntrixie

You know, Brightnail, does make a point here.

We only have 3 candidates, I think, that are with us on illegal immigration. Hopefully, we will vote for one of those three.

We have been asked not to discuss specific candidates for a while and I will respect that.

If, however, we get into trashing either of the three, it is not a good thing.
Let's don't force each other into a corner or cause such hard feelings that we can't come together and vote for one of them - whether it's the one we prefer or not. Anything else, means the 'other side' gets their man/woman in office.

That's exactly what they want ------.

I don't see alot of T and H bashing, but I do see alot of the "other" being bashed. Is it maybe because the "other" posters are more vocal?

I guess I haven't seen much derogatory about the others - but maybe I have paid more attention to anything about Ron Paul because I am trying to learn about him.

Again, I just hope we don't get ourselves so angry with each other that we can't come together on one of the three.

Originally Posted by butterbean

Originally Posted by nntrixie

You know, Brightnail, does make a point here.

We only have 3 candidates, I think, that are with us on illegal immigration. Hopefully, we will vote for one of those three.

We have been asked not to discuss specific candidates for a while and I will respect that.

If, however, we get into trashing either of the three, it is not a good thing.
Let's don't force each other into a corner or cause such hard feelings that we can't come together and vote for one of them - whether it's the one we prefer or not. Anything else, means the 'other side' gets their man/woman in office.

That's exactly what they want ------.

I don't see alot of T and H bashing, but I do see alot of the "other" being bashed. Is it maybe because the "other" posters are more vocal?

There's only 2 candidates if illegal immigration is important to you
The ones that will do the deporting if not then there's going to be amnesty.

Show me in any RP's speechs or writtings the DEPORT word
NO DEPORT = AMNESTY

I am not going to get into a discussion or argument about any particular candidate. For one thing, I think we have been asked not to do so - until a forum has been created for that.

I am just suggesting we can discuss, but even when the forum opens, I hope, we don't take a tack that will divide us - or create such anger and hard feelings, we can't come together and vote together.