Thread: I support amnesty

Originally Posted by CrocketsGhost

Originally Posted by americangirl

Thereez wrote:

i sometimes smoke pot, that;s also against the law, whiel it's not in some other countries,. The law is not allowed to dictate or rule my life, I must do what I want as long as I don;t harm antoher person

Are you smoking pot now? Cause you sure do have a problem with transposing letters within the words you type ("transposing" means you changed the position of the letters).

She has greater congnitive incapacity than just transposition, as demonstrated by her claim that the answer to our problems is to "ban poverty."

to ban poverty is a way to express that you want it totlally gone, even forced. So ban poverty at any means neccesary. But you like people living in poverty, neh ?

no borders are not right as the world was one piece of land before continents were driven apart. I wish that the world could be like that again, that is was still one piece of land, surrounded by the ocean and that all people could move freely. Sigh, that's what I want.

Ridiculous. Either you are in the third grade or mentally challenged.

Also, you never answered my comment as to what is Mexico' responsiblity is to it's citizens.

Thereez wrote:

to ban poverty is a way to express that you want it totlally gone, even forced. So ban poverty at any means neccesary. But you like people living in poverty, neh ?

No, I DON'T like people living in poverty. However, nor do I take responsibility for it. I can dislike something, even loathe it, but that doesn't make me accountable for it.

Thereez, you're writing is terrible. When you write notes on your patients' charts, aren't you embarrassed at how poor your spelling and grammar are?

Originally Posted by TexasCowgirl

no borders are not right as the world was one piece of land before continents were driven apart. I wish that the world could be like that again, that is was still one piece of land, surrounded by the ocean and that all people could move freely. Sigh, that's what I want.

Ridiculous. Either you are in the third grade or mentally challenged.

Also, you never answered my comment as to what is Mexico' responsiblity is to it's citizens.

O, I may have missed your comment.
Mexico is responsible ti its citizens as far as they are able to achieve that.
You don't seem to know too much about how the world map looked like before man was on earth, neh.

Originally Posted by thereez

Originally Posted by CrocketsGhost

Originally Posted by thereez

Originally Posted by sippy

Like I told sherri and she told that too on this board that I did and do use illegal alien services, but with that money I saved, I also gave some to unicef and ticket to ireland, so I think I'm a good person.

Thereez, so how do you consider yourself to be a good person? Your greed allowed you to break the law by hiring illegals. This is not a simple crime like stealing apples, ITS A FELONY.

Well I've wasted enough of keyboard lifespan. Its pointless to chat w/ liberals. They have no validity in their arguements.

Thereez, you have your version, and we have the truth. Plain and simple.

robin hood also stole, but he is still seen as a hero. And I don't steal money as I pay my housekeeper. I payed the guy the fixed my breaks, I payed the people that helped me move form knox to nash. I support unicef, I support greenpeace, so I'm a good person. All my friends agree with me and I've many !

Not quite. Your dearth of historical knowledge is again evident. Robin Hood didn't "steal." The Normans had stolen the lands of the Anglo-Saxons and forced them from their own forests, prohibiting them from even hunting for their own food or possessing sufficiently productive lands to raise enough crops to feed themselves. By today's standards, the treatment of the Anglo-Saxons by the Normans would be considered genocidal. Robin Hood stood up against the Normans and reclaimed for the Saxons what was rightly theirs.

Despite their claims of "reconquista," the illegals aren't "reclaiming" anything, because the lands now possessed by the US were not only ceded by treaty, but were BOUGHT AND PAID FOR by the US taxpayers in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and the later Gadsden Purchase.

you're wrong. Robin Hood fought against tyranny and helped the poor.
I suggest you to read more about it and if you don't like reading, just watch the movie robin hood with kevin kostner

LOL!!!

I am talking history, you silly little person. How is reclaiming the lands stolen by the Normans in order to feed the dispossessed Saxons NOT fighting tyranny and helping the poor?

What I was disputing was your claim that Robin Hood "stole." Taking back that which belongs to you already is not stealing. Reclaiming lands stolen by a tyrant is not stealing. Just as the Scots rose against the Normans under William Waleis and Robert the Bruce and as the Welsh Bretons and Irish alternately attempted to cast off their yoke, so did the Saxons struggle against oppressive Norman rule with Robin as their leader for a time.

Why does it not surprise me, however, that your principal source for information on Robin was a Kevin Costner film? You probably also think that Robert betrayed William because that's what Mel Gibson's movie said. Sheesh.

Originally Posted by americangirl

Thereez wrote:

to ban poverty is a way to express that you want it totlally gone, even forced. So ban poverty at any means neccesary. But you like people living in poverty, neh ?

No, I DON'T like people living in poverty. However, nor do I take responsibility for it. I can dislike something, even loathe it, but that doesn't mean I'm accountable.

Thereez, you're writing is terrible. When you write notes on your patients' charts, aren't you embarrassed at how poor your spelling and grammar are?

I don't drink wine while I work, like i just told, I'm having some wines as I'm visiting my sister and she's out to work, but returns within 15 minutes and I'll leave this board by them of course. Or maybe she will be home later as traffic in the Bay Area if bad and very crowded

So far a few of you have indicated you want to go on "a little longer". Crocket, how do you feel ?

When you all are ready, please tell me and I'll lock it. When you feel that we are not making any progress and are just spinning our wheels, please let me know.

It is quite obvious that Thereez does not respect the laws of the United States.

We have tried to talk with her, I think we have been overall very polite and patient with her, and I think we have done all that we can.

Apparently she will have to learn the true meaning of "AMERICAN LAWS" the hard way.

Tell me when you're ready guys and I will lock it up and we can all move on.

Originally Posted by thereez

Originally Posted by TexasCowgirl

no borders are not right as the world was one piece of land before continents were driven apart. I wish that the world could be like that again, that is was still one piece of land, surrounded by the ocean and that all people could move freely. Sigh, that's what I want.

Ridiculous. Either you are in the third grade or mentally challenged.

Also, you never answered my comment as to what is Mexico' responsiblity is to it's citizens.

O, I may have missed your comment.
Mexico is responsible ti its citizens as far as they are able to achieve that.
You don't seem to know too much about how the world map looked like before man was on earth, neh.

I know what Pangea was. But see, I'm living in 2006. That is what the current year is einstein.

Originally Posted by thereez

Originally Posted by CrocketsGhost

Originally Posted by americangirl

Thereez wrote:

i sometimes smoke pot, that;s also against the law, whiel it's not in some other countries,. The law is not allowed to dictate or rule my life, I must do what I want as long as I don;t harm antoher person

Are you smoking pot now? Cause you sure do have a problem with transposing letters within the words you type ("transposing" means you changed the position of the letters).

She has greater congnitive incapacity than just transposition, as demonstrated by her claim that the answer to our problems is to "ban poverty."

to ban poverty is a way to express that you want it totlally gone, even forced. So ban poverty at any means neccesary. But you like people living in poverty, neh ?

What the hell is all this "meh" and "neh"? Don't you even speak the language?

The point, my foolish little moppet, is that trying to ban poverty is like trying to ban "mean people." It's the musing of a simpleton or a small child, not a serious comment by a sentient adult human being.

Guys, let me know when you want me to pull the plug on rez. W, warned her yesterday and I think we're about done with this thread.