Results 61 to 70 of 99
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
09-14-2005, 01:02 PM #61
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 43
I just read an article somewhere about a N.O. firefighter applying for jobs in Dallas or Houston, for a forklift operator and a warehouse job.
It's still not too late to do something about Bush's plan to use illegal aliens to rebuild N.O. If we can't stop N.O. from being rebuilt, then we should be doing something to make sure Americans and legal immigrants get those rebuild jobs.
That may entail MinuteMen/Women actually doing an interior enforcement event--rally or protest or watch-- in N.O. And of course the goonies go where we go. That should be fun.
Anyway, time to call/email/write/screamfromrooftops/ANYTHING to get those people taken care of.
-
09-14-2005, 01:04 PM #62
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 625
either way
Either way it doesn't matter. It has been a vigorous workout.
What strikes me as interesting is that this appears to be a test as to the will of the people who re-establish the rule of law. In almost every case of a convicted felon being punished and incacerated, there is near always some excuse to mitigate their crimes. Most people in prison either didn't do it, or what they did, isn't really wrong. Classic psychopathic blame the victim. In this case, the victims are us. I guess if I had a came from a Country that crapped all over its people like messyco, I would be grasping at any straw I could to justify my illegal actions.
Here is the clue, no amnesty, it just encourages the perception of weakness. We apply the law, round up illegals, prosecute their employers and harborers and go from there. The problem will sort itself out. Do I care if industries that use illegals, pay no benefits, or any unemployment co pays, etc. etc. go out of business? I can't wait!! Then we can start re-establishing legitimacy of economy based on law. Do I care whether felonious businessmen go out of business. Na.
Will I pay more for lettuce? Na. I can do without it. One thing is for sure, America will figure out how to manage without illegals.
We don't need them, anymore than a crack addict needs more crack to break his addiction.
I waste no more time on this. newhoustongirl, you and your opinions prepare to be deported out of my mind. People here cannot be turned from the reality of regaining the lawful elements of how our country is meant to run. Sophistry is the tool of deceit and lairs. As for what happens in the rest of the world, they are not facing our levels of immigration, and frankly who cares what they are doing anyway? This is America.
It is really simple, there you go. Harboring illegals is a FELONY, and you can be subject to civil suits. cheers glenn
-
09-14-2005, 01:50 PM #63
No time to read everyones posts here so I'll just respond to the original post.
Well, I ain’t gonna fight the guest worker program. Although I know it’s actually wrong and unjustified to the people who do take a hard effort to come here legally, but we just have to stick to reality here.
also do I know that normally an amnesty should only be an individual case and should not be applied to an entire group of people. Neither am I happy about the so called guest workers plan.
I'd like to see this happen:
1 ) First of all close our borders with Mexico and Canada for a Maximum one year period. So no tourism too for just that one year.
2 ) Check all the people here whether they are legal or illegal.
3 ) The illegals that have been here less than 3 year should be deported UNLESS they gave birth to infants on US Soil. Cause then the children are citizens under the constitution and it would not be nice to separate children from their parents.
4 ) The illegals that have been here for over 3 years, can stay and should be given a Green Card. Why ?? Because I think that they have contributed to this country also.
The bush guest worker programme is going too far in my humble pov, but at least he's trying hard to deal with the issue. And that's why I think the guest worker programme should be accepted by Congress, although I do have a bad feeling with such a guest worker program. But it's the lesser of the 2 evils.
Total guest worker programme is bad, but deporting and separating parents and children from each is also bad. So I'd pick the and would support the Guest Worker Program.
And I also think that most illegals are hard working people looking for a better live. Just like my parents did when they fled communism in Hungary. They also came for a better life without oppression, so I think it would be wrong for me to bar other people to come here if they want a better life.
Although, this is what I think.
As a legal immigrant you should be very upset that someone would sneak in after you fought long and hard and did everything right to come here. Instead you are falling for the same falsehoods that the open borders crowd is throwing your way. They themselves don't think that entering our country illegally is any big deal and that their is no difference between legal and illegal. There is a big reason we have an immigration policy. We just simply can't subsidize the world, we can't move every single human being into America. We don't have the resources or the living space or the jobs.
I think you need to stick around here and educate yourself more on this issue before accepting what the politicos want you to accept.Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
09-14-2005, 01:53 PM #64
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 43
<<<We don't need them, anymore than a crack addict needs more crack to break his addiction.>>>
That's how I feel about it, we as a nation have become 'addicted' to illegal alien slavery just as we once were 'addicted' to African slaves. There will be a rough period of adjustemnt as there always is when overcoming an addiction and learning to live in the real world without a crutch, for both the slaves and their owners.
Once the USA shed itself of slavery, we became a world leader. By allowing ourselves to go back in time, readopt slavery and 'return to our own vomit' we are the laughingstock of the entire planet.
We need to pick ourselves up, clean ourselves off and get back to the business of running a country the honest way; by being resourceful, hardworking, not afraid of dirt, being innovative and courageously taking risks. When's the last time the USA made any big technological breakthroughs in agriculture and botany? Probably the 1960's when we started using little brown-skinned people instead of our own brains and backs. We are fast falling behind the rest of the world in inovative technology---rather like opium users.
If we keep resting on our laurels and don't get off the crack-pipe of Mexican slaves, we will become the third-world country that we hate so much.
-
09-14-2005, 01:59 PM #65Here is the clue, no amnesty, it just encourages the perception of weakness. We apply the law, round up illegals, prosecute their employers and harborers and go from there. The problem will sort itself out. Do I care if industries that use illegals, pay no benefits, or any unemployment co pays, etc. etc. go out of business? I can't wait!! Then we can start re-establishing legitimacy of economy based on law. Do I care whether felonious businessmen go out of business. Na.
Will I pay more for lettuce? Na. I can do without it. One thing is for sure, America will figure out how to manage without illegals.
We don't need them, anymore than a crack addict needs more crack to break his addiction.Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
09-14-2005, 02:07 PM #66
Wait. Do you all say no on even farm workers? Seasonal farm workers?
If there were a legal guest worker program, those taking part in it would not be illegal. They'd come, make their money and then go home.
-
09-14-2005, 02:19 PM #67
dman,
Just a slight point of clarification where I think you inadvertently slipped just a little. The founding fathers had nothing to do with the 14th Amendment. It was written and ratified after the Civil War to assure that children born to ex-slaves would not be denied citizenship. But you are still absolutely correct in stating that the 14th Amendment was never intended to give citizenship to children of aliens, foreign diplomats, etc. born on U.S. soil. That can be verified by reviewing the Senate record of the debate on the 14th Amendment.
Thanks for the information on how the 14th became to be interpreted as it is. I was never sure if that was due to judicial or administrative malfeasance.
Great post, analysis, and conclusions!
-
09-14-2005, 02:32 PM #68
- Join Date
- Jan 1970
- Posts
- 625
yep
Yep; Even farm workers.
I figure Americans are the fattest loads on the planet. Maybe, if food was more expensive for a bit, the majoraty of people would lose a little weight.
I would be more than willing to subsidize American farmers for increased food costs for the term, until some program could be devised to allow foreign labor to re-enter America. I would make that YEARS away, so illegals will go home and agitate in Mexico and get that country to REFORM itself. This way we would develop a realistic cost for food grown here with legal labor, and mexico would become a stronger, better, more equitable nation.
For those of you who don't want food prices to go up, I'm sorry. At least the money might go to the farmers, small scale farming might pick-up. Why should Americans complain? We now subsidize non-americans to live here and take our jobs and do the same for overseas companies.
We subsidize Suadi Arabian sheiks because, well many of us drive big fat loads. Do you understand this? This is the basis of tariff protectionist national based economy. We are big enough and smart enough, we don't need global meddling. Look what it has produced!!!
Refer to Washingtons' Farewell Address, for a guide to running and retaining ownership of your own Country. cheers glenn
-
09-14-2005, 02:55 PM #69
Quote NewEnglandGirl:
Well, I ain’t gonna fight the guest worker program.
Well, I can certainly tell you have a good grasp of the english language. By the way, what 2 words make up the contraction ain't? Or is that a new english word, and so, being old and everything, I wouldn't know what it meant? I guess I should check my dictionary for the word programme too, since I had no idea where the word program originated from. I would have never guessed it was a different (mostly foreign) spelling of the word most Americans use, which is program. (Sarcastic-in case you couldnt tell)
While I'm at it, your usage of etcetc is wrong, or at least it's annoying. It's either etc. or ecetera(s), not etcetc.
By the way, thank you for addressing each one of us that had a disagreement with you over one thing or another. You must have alot of time on your hands.RIP Butterbean! We miss you and hope you are well in heaven.-- Your ALIPAC friends
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at http://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
09-14-2005, 02:56 PM #70Just a slight point of clarification where I think you inadvertently slipped just a little. The founding fathers had nothing to do with the 14th Amendment. It was written and ratified after the Civil War to assure that children born to ex-slaves would not be denied citizenship. But you are still absolutely correct in stating that the 14th Amendment was never intended to give citizenship to children of aliens, foreign diplomats, etc. born on U.S. soil. That can be verified by reviewing the Senate record of the debate on the 14th Amendment.Please support our fight against illegal immigration by joining ALIPAC's email alerts here https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
Musk’s X Silences Warnings About Migrant Voters
05-06-2024, 11:14 AM in ALIPAC In The News