Results 211 to 220 of 365
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
-
06-16-2018, 11:58 AM #211
Oh quit whining and grow a pair. You pay your utility bill every month, you pay your rent or mortgage every month, you pay insurance every month, you pay your phone, internet and cable bill every month, so you can pay the FairTax you collected on your "services" every month so the government who has it's bills every month doesn't have to borrow money waiting over a year for you to file an income tax return and trickle in your income and self-employment tax you owe. The FairTax will save the government billions of dollars a year in interest because the FairTax is collected and paid monthly.
A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
06-16-2018, 02:21 PM #212
Let us review our Founders method to tax consumption
There you go again misrepresenting what I have posted. I never called the Founders clowns. Those are your words.
Unlike our Founders who intended each article to be selected for a specific tax, and not taxing the necessities of life, the alleged fairtax does tax the necessities of life and then creates a family consumption allowance to allow poor people a rationed supply of tax free necessities, which makes them dependent upon government for their necessities and encourages them to vote for Fifth Column socialist clowns who created the socialist friendly fairtax which offers free government cheese.
Now, let us now review our founders true intentions with regard to taxing consumption.
Hamilton stresses in Federalist No 21 regarding taxes on articles of consumption:
“There is no method of steering clear of this inconvenience, but by authorizing the national government to raise its own revenues in its own way. Imposts, excises, and, in general, all duties upon articles of consumption, may be compared to a fluid, which will, in time, find its level with the means of paying them. The amount to be contributed by each citizen will in a degree be at his own option, and can be regulated by an attention to his resources. The rich may be extravagant, the poor can be frugal; and private oppression may always be avoided by a judicious selection of objects proper for such impositions. If inequalities should arise in some States from duties on particular objects, these will, in all probability, be counter balanced by proportional inequalities in other States, from the duties on other objects. In the course of time and things, an equilibrium, as far as it is attainable in so complicated a subject, will be established everywhere. Or, if inequalities should still exist, they would neither be so great in their degree, so uniform in their operation, nor so odious in their appearance, as those which would necessarily spring from quotas, upon any scale that can possibly be devised.
It is a signal advantage of taxes on articles of consumption that they contain in their own nature a security against excess. They prescribe their own limit; which cannot be exceeded without defeating the end proposed, that is, an extension of the revenue. When applied to this object, the saying is as just as it is witty, that, "in political arithmetic, two and two do not always make four .'' If duties are too high, they lessen the consumption; the collection is eluded; and the product to the treasury is not so great as when they are confined within proper and moderate bounds. This forms a complete barrier against any material oppression of the citizens by taxes of this class, and is itself a natural limitation of the power of imposing them.”
For confirmation on how our founders intended to tax consumption here is a link to our countries first revenue raising act An Act for laying a Duty on Goods, Wares and Merchandise imported into the United States. Note how each article is selected and a specific amount of tax is laid upon the article selected.
Why must you make stuff up when promoting the alleged fairtax? The fact is, the alleged fairtax, an across the board tax on consumption removes the protections our founders intended by requiring each article to be selected and a specific amount of tax to be determine on each article selected. Why do you want to remove the protections intended by our founders?
JWK
“…a national revenue must be obtained; but the system must be such a one, that, while it secures the object of revenue it shall not be oppressive to our constituents.”___ ___Madison, during the creation of our Nation’s first revenue raising ActLast edited by johnwk; 06-16-2018 at 02:30 PM.
-
06-16-2018, 03:09 PM #213
You need to write more clearly then, because you're calling FairTax proponents socialists and progressives because of a method to exempt federal sales tax on necessities of life and fruits of the labor, which is exactly what the founders you quote were trying to do. When the founders were alive, the US had little to no production, we had virtually no businesses or manufacturing, we had only farmers, services and shop-keepers who for the most part used slavery and indentured servants for their labor, so spare me your founders talk. The founders got a lot of things right, but taxation and labor weren't two of them, neither was voting.
Americans today have several tasks at hand. One is to raise enough revenue to support our government on an annual basis without borrowing more debt. Two is to protect our domestic companies, producers, businesses and workers against excess foreign imports. Three is to simplify through a uniform system, the manner in which this revenue is raised without theft, mandates and oppression. The FairTax does all three plus a lot more.
This thread was started to discuss trade. Today under the present system, American companies pay tons of taxes that foreign producers do not pay. Those goods come in either free of tariffs or at very low tariffs which do not compare with the much higher domestic tax obligations of American producers and sellers creating a huge disadvantage for US companies. The FairTax solves that taxing all products and services the same, domestic and foreign, sold in the US and does so without international disputes, conflicts, WTO's or trade agreements.
In addition, because Americans including all legal American workers are eligible for an offset of FairTax on necessities up to an amount, this allows them tax-free spending up to that amount. Illegal aliens are not eligible, therefore, they are at a 23% disadvantage in trying to undercut American Workers by offering to work at lower wages. So instead of handing out refund checks and EITC tax welfare and child care credits and on and on and on through the income tax code to illegal aliens, they receive none of this PLUS have to pay full FairTaxes on every dime they spend in this country. And again, this achieved through the FairTax without further legislation or conflict. This means a lot to fighting illegal immigration. To show the simple math, an American worker who is paid $10 an hour, goes home with the $10 (less any state income tax) plus a Rebate of 23% up to the household consumption allowance, which for most families will raise that $10 of disposable expendable income to $12.50. The illegal alien if willing to work and be hired for the same $10 who is not eligible for the Rebate, goes home with $7.70 an hour. That's almost a $5 an hour spread before they try to undercut American workers and offer to work for less. the savings to an employer has to be rather sizable or they aren't going to risk hiring illegal aliens, so the FairTax with the Rebate not only protects our workers against the scourge of illegal immigration, it goes a long ways towards keeping our employers on the straight and narrow.
Whether someone supports the FairTax or not depends on what their objectives are. I don't see your objectives to be helping to fix our country. I see your objectives to be getting someone else to pay more so you don't have to do any reports on part time retail activity. That strikes me as completely senseless when Americans have so many big problems to solve and this simple new tax system called the FairTax helps US solve so many of them, without Congress, trade agreements, confrontations or mandates.A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
-
06-16-2018, 07:17 PM #214
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Location
- San Bernardino, CA
- Posts
- 1,810
Then where does the money for the "family consumption allowance" come from?
Originally Posted by Judy
Originally Posted by Judy
Originally Posted by Judy
Originally Posted by Judy
-
06-16-2018, 07:22 PM #215
The deadly consequences of the “FairTax” Family Consumption Allowance
Talk about clarity, once again you make stuff up and misrepresent what I have posted and what the alleged fairtax does.
Contrary to you above assertion, that I’m calling “FairTax proponents socialists and progressives”, my words were more specific and directed at “Fifth Column socialist clowns who created the socialist friendly fairtax which offers free government cheese.”
Additionally, the alleged fairtax does not exempt the 23 percent sales tax on necessities of life as you falsely assert. The necessities of life are taxed just as other consumer articles are taxed under the alleged fairtax.
What the socialist friendly fairtax does is create a new socialist entitlement called the ”Family Consumption Allowance” LINK
“SEC. 301. Family consumption allowance.”
“Each qualified family shall be eligible to receive a sales tax rebate each month. The sales tax rebate shall be in an amount equal to the product of—
“(1) the rate of tax imposed by section 101, and
“(2) the monthly poverty level.”
As we can all see, the “family consumption allowance” is a monthly entitlement check sent to every qualified household which they may spend as they please. The monthly entitlement check’s alleged intention, as expressed at fairtax.org, is to prevent “an unfair burden on low-income-families” so they may purchase a rationed supply of “tax-free” purchases, presumably the necessities of life which will have a 23 percent tax added to their cost under the alleged fairtax.
Whether intentional or not, and I believe it is intentional, the family consumption allowance does make “low-income-families” dependent upon our federal government for monthly check to pay for a rationed supply of “tax-free” purchases which in turn encourages these families to vote for socialists who promise to increase the allowance.
We were warned against this very thing in the Federalist Papers? A POWER OVER A MAN's SUBSISTENCE AMOUNTS TO A POWER OVER HIS WILL ____ Hamilton, No. 79 Federalist Papers
In contrast to the alleged fairtax which does tax the necessities of life, our founder’s method to avoid oppressing the poor while taxing articles of consumption, was to exempt articles of necessity from taxation by a “judicious selection of objects proper for such impositions”. See FEDERALIST NO. 21
“There is no method of steering clear of this inconvenience, but by authorizing the national government to raise its own revenues in its own way. Imposts, excises, and, in general, all duties upon articles of consumption, may be compared to a fluid, which will, in time, find its level with the means of paying them. The amount to be contributed by each citizen will in a degree be at his own option, and can be regulated by an attention to his resources. The rich may be extravagant, the poor can be frugal; and private oppression may always be avoided by a judicious selection of objects proper for such impositions. If inequalities should arise in some States from duties on particular objects, these will, in all probability, be counter balanced by proportional inequalities in other States, from the duties on other objects. In the course of time and things, an equilibrium, as far as it is attainable in so complicated a subject, will be established everywhere. Or, if inequalities should still exist, they would neither be so great in their degree, so uniform in their operation, nor so odious in their appearance, as those which would necessarily spring from quotas, upon any scale that can possibly be devised.
It is a signal advantage of taxes on articles of consumption that they contain in their own nature a security against excess. They prescribe their own limit; which cannot be exceeded without defeating the end proposed, that is, an extension of the revenue. When applied to this object, the saying is as just as it is witty, that, "in political arithmetic, two and two do not always make four .'' If duties are too high, they lessen the consumption; the collection is eluded; and the product to the treasury is not so great as when they are confined within proper and moderate bounds. This forms a complete barrier against any material oppression of the citizens by taxes of this class, and is itself a natural limitation of the power of imposing them.”
For confirmation on how our founders intended to tax consumption here is a link to our countries first revenue raising act An Act for laying a Duty on Goods, Wares and Merchandise imported into the United States. Note how each article is selected and a specific amount of tax is laid upon the article selected.
Now, Judy, instead of obfuscating, misdirecting and employing a number of stupid debating tricks, and rambling on and on as you did in your last post, how about discussing the obvious consequences attached to the “family consumption allowance”, which all thinking people would agree creates a dangerous voting block dependent upon government for a monthly subsistence check.
JWK
A nation of people made dependent upon government for their subsistence, is a nation doomed to being enslaved by the iron fist which feeds them.
Last edited by johnwk; 06-16-2018 at 08:18 PM.
-
06-16-2018, 07:27 PM #216
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Location
- San Bernardino, CA
- Posts
- 1,810
-
06-16-2018, 07:35 PM #217
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Location
- San Bernardino, CA
- Posts
- 1,810
So you are a liberal after all. Progressives are people who move to the Democrat party!
Originally Posted by Judy
=Judy]It's fabulous!!!!
-
06-16-2018, 07:40 PM #218
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Location
- San Bernardino, CA
- Posts
- 1,810
-
06-16-2018, 08:50 PM #219
- Join Date
- Sep 2017
- Location
- San Bernardino, CA
- Posts
- 1,810
Putting the cart ahead of the horse. You are definitely a liberal! It is our duty to finance our government better so they can waste more of our money on programs they want, like providing school, medical and many other benefits to illegal aliens? We elect them to manage our country's finances, but we have no control over how they spend it. Most of us have to live within a budget. They don't and vote themselves a raise which telling us to cut back as they raise our tax rates.
Originally Posted by Judy
Originally Posted by Judy
Originally Posted by Judy
Originally Posted by Judy
Originally Posted by Judy
Originally Posted by Judy
Originally Posted by Judy
-
06-17-2018, 01:26 AM #220
The money comes from the FairTaxes you pay when you make purchases and consume. If you buy a television from a store for $500 and they give you a $100 Rebate, where does that money for the Rebate come from? It comes from the $500 you paid the store, they're just refunding you the money you paid them. It's the same thing with the Rebate on the FairTax except you should receive the Rebate first of the month so you have it hand to pay the FairTax on your monthly expenses up to the allowance amount.
No, you still don't understand. The Rebate doesn't pay for the $11,770, it only pays for the 23% FairTax on that amount which is $2,707 a year or $236 a month. No one gets the family consumption allowance, only the TAX on it, which is the same as the tax you pay when you make the purchases. It doesn't matter whether you pay for your stuff with income, savings, credit, gifts, assistance, Social Security, Disability, food stamps, SSI, WIC, TANF, insurance, Medicaid, family, spouse, doesn't matter. The FairTax taxes spending whatever the source of the money or credit or EBT, and the Rebate just offsets the FairTax you would pay on your consumption of new goods and services up to the allowance.
No, the Rebate only applies to the Tax, not the whole spending amount. You don't receive $11,770 in Rebate, you only receive 23% of that amount in Rebate which is $2,707 a year or $236 a month.A Nation Without Borders Is Not A Nation - Ronald Reagan
Save America, Deport Congress! - Judy
Support our FIGHT AGAINST illegal immigration & Amnesty by joining our E-mail Alerts at https://eepurl.com/cktGTn
Similar Threads
-
Georgia FairTax Bill Introduced in the House
By JohnDoe2 in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 02-04-2015, 01:43 PM -
Idea for FairTax Supporters
By Judy in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 10-17-2011, 11:44 AM -
FairTax Friday - Tax Day 2010 - Stand Up For America
By Judy in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 2Last Post: 04-09-2010, 11:57 AM -
FairTax Friday
By Judy in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 0Last Post: 12-04-2009, 03:41 PM -
The FairTax -- The Truth
By CitizenJustice in forum Other Topics News and IssuesReplies: 16Last Post: 12-02-2007, 07:29 PM
Report: White House Considers Inviting Gaza Palestinians as...
05-01-2024, 04:27 AM in General Discussion