Page 116 of 574 FirstFirst ... 1666106112113114115116117118119120126166216 ... LastLast
Results 1,151 to 1,160 of 5732
Like Tree97Likes

Thread: Barack Obama's citizenship questioned

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

  1. #1151
    Senior Member HighlanderJuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    1,054
    Devvy Kidd's on a roll again. Note the Orly Taitz comments.

    THE POWER OF THE PURSE, THE POWER OF THE SWORD

    ...

    Usurper president

    "While the birth certificate crisis continues to build, please remember this: Obama aka Soetoro simply producing a long form vault birth certificate will not "put this to rest once and for all". There is chatter that a new, high tech forged long form vault certificate is being prepared. Regardless of whether Obama aka Soetoro was born in Kenya, Hawaii or Nebraska, it was his father's status as a British subject that makes him ineligible period:"

    “When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children."

    Obama aka Soetoro can never be a 'natural born citizen at birth' because his father was a Kenyan national under British rule. At his birth, Obama aka Soetoro was a dual citizen. That ends any possibility of him being constitutionally ineligible. This is the core issue. Obama aka Soetoro never "reclaimed" his citizenship as claimed by his supporters because he was not a 'natural born citizen at birth." Can anyone read English anymore?

    Additionally, when his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, married Indonesian national, Lolo Soetoro, Obama became an Indonesian citizen. They do not allow dual citizenship. That is why Obama's legal name on his school records in Indonesia is Barry Soetoro. There is no evidence he ever legally changed his name to Obama or reentered the U.S. legally. The only thing an authentic, verifiable vault birth certificate might prove is what we already know: Obama is a pathological liar and that he has committed massive fraud in ten different areas; identity theft and massive, illegal campaign contributions just to name two.

    (For those who don't know, Obama aka Soetoro's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, worked for Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner's father: "It also turns out that Geithner’s father, Peter F. Geithner, serves on the board with Kissinger of the National Committee on U.S.-China Relations. This is the group that rang the opening bell at the New York Stock Exchange, celebrating Chinese investments in the U.S. economy. In another interesting connection, it turns out that Peter F. Geithner was with the Ford Foundation and oversaw the work of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, developing what are called micro finance programs in Indonesia.")

    Obama has the power to immediately fire any U.S. Attorney at his whim. If he even gets a whiff that U.S. Attorney Jeffrey Taylor will convene a Quo Warranto, it's highly likely Obama will fire him in a NY second. Of course, that would raise big red flags even with his most ardent supporters. However, we must continue hammering on elected public servants and officials in law enforcement at every level -- millions of us.
    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?cat=12

    Dr. Orly Taitz has two recent posts you should take the time to read:

    Letter to the General Counsel of Admiral Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff:
    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=225

    Can President Be Arrested or Don't let America Turn into another Sodom and Gomorrah:
    http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/?p=277

    In his book, Soviet America, published in 1932, William Z. Foster Said: "When a communist heads a government in the United States - and that day will come just as surely as the sun rises -- that government will not be a capitalist government, but a Soviet government and behind this government will stand the Red Army to enforce the Dictatorship of the Proletariat." Obama is building his storm troopers via legislation. Obama was tapped early in his life for the role he is now playing; Communism in Hawaii and the Obama Connection and then off to the most corrupt political base in America outside Washington, DC: Communism in Chicago and the Obama Connection (Special Report). How did Obama aka Soetoro get a security clearance from the FBI? Tell me.

    I have written dozens of columns presenting constitutional solutions. Tragically, the American people have continued to reward their incumbent in Congress by electing them over and over when they are the very people destroying this republic. Change is not possible with the same players. Well, we've crossed the point of no return, but the solutions are still there. Dr. Edwin Vieira will be my guest tomorrow night on my radio show (April 28, 2009). Do not miss this because we will discuss the power of the purse, the power of the sword. YOUR survival depends on taking hold of this country immediately in all 3,141 counties. While these Tenth Amendment Resolutions are a great step in the right direction, they have no teeth. The honest money bills have not passed into law. A tragedy. Edwin will discuss this and more; his bio is here:
    http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd437.htm

    Complete article with complete and proper links at:
    http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd441.htm
    In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. -- Mark Twain

  2. #1152
    Senior Member HighlanderJuan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Longmont, CO
    Posts
    1,054
    Regardless of subject interest, this Obama trick is one that needs to be defeated.

    U.S. regulatory czar nominee wants Net 'Fairness Doctrine'
    Cass Sunstein sees Web as anti-democratic, proposed 24-hour delay on sending e-mail

    Posted: April 27, 2009
    8:41 pm Eastern
    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=96301
    © 2009 WorldNetDaily


    Cass Sunstein

    WASHINGTON
    – Barack Obama's nominee for "regulatory czar" has advocated a "Fairness Doctrine" for the Internet that would require opposing opinions be linked and also has suggested angry e-mails should be prevented from being sent by technology that would require a 24-hour cooling off period.

    The revelations about Cass Sunstein, Obama's friend from the University of Chicago Law School and nominee to head the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, come in a new book by Brad O'Leary, "Shut Up, America! The End of Free Speech." OIRA will oversee regulation throughout the U.S. government.

    Sunstein also has argued in his prolific literary works that the Internet is anti-democratic because of the way users can filter out information of their own choosing.

    "A system of limitless individual choices, with respect to communications, is not necessarily in the interest of citizenship and self-government," he wrote. "Democratic efforts to reduce the resulting problems ought not be rejected in freedom's name."

    Rest of article at: http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=96301[/b]
    In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man, Brave, Hated, and Scorned. When his cause succeeds however,the timid join him, For then it costs nothing to be a Patriot. -- Mark Twain

  3. #1153
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by HighlanderJuan
    "Regardless of whether Obama aka Soetoro was born in Kenya, Hawaii or Nebraska, it was his father's status as a British subject that makes him ineligible period:"
    http://www.newswithviews.com/Devvy/kidd441.htm
    Kansas, Devvy, not Nebraska!

    "Kenya, Kona, or Kansas," no matter.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 09-01-2014 at 09:32 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  4. #1154
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207

    Documents Re Mr. Obama's Associations: Project Vote

    This from Judicial Watch, before the election...

    According to documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act from the Illinois Secretary of State, Project Vote's purpose is to "lessen the burdens of government, promote the social welfare, lessen neighborhood tensions, eliminate prejudice and discrimination, combat community deterioration, and relieve that [sic] poor and distressed through educating the public about rights, privileges and opportunities in the area of civic participation, and all permitted activities incidental to or in furtherance of these purposes."
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 09-01-2014 at 09:37 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  5. #1155
    Senior Member florgal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    3,386
    BORN IN THE USA?
    Eligibility case defendants don't want to answer now
    Lawyer for Obama, Congress says representation decision unmade

    Posted: April 28, 2009
    8:49 pm Eastern

    By Bob Unruh
    © 2009 WorldNetDaily

    Government lawyers defending President Obama and Congress in a lawsuit alleging that he's ineligible to occupy the Oval Office and that members of the House and Senate violated the constitutional rights of citizens by refusing to investigate want still more time to respond to the accusations.

    The case raises many of the same arguments as dozens of other lawsuits that have flooded into courtrooms around the nation since the November election.

    It was filed in January by attorney Mario Apuzzo of New Jersey on behalf of Charles F. Kerchner Jr., Lowell T. Patterson, Darrell James Lenormand and Donald H. Nelson Jr. It names as defendants Barack Hussein Obama II, the U.S., Congress, the Senate, House of Representatives and former Vice President Dick Cheney along with House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

    Where's the proof Barack Obama was born in the U.S. or that he fulfills the "natural-born American" clause in the Constitution? If you still want to see it, join more than 365,000 others and sign up now!

    Even though extensions had been granted to an initial round of requests to delay the proceedings, the government now says it needs even more time to prepare a response to a question that could be answered with a five-minute telephone call from the president to Hawaiian officials asking that his birth documentation be made public.

    Instead, a request submitted by Ralph Marra Jr., the acting U.S. attorney, and Elizabeth Pascal, the assistant U.S. attorney in New Jersey, explains that the Department of Justice, operating under Obama appointee Attorney General Eric Holder, still is working on a decision on representation for the defendants.

    "The failure to file an answer, move, or to otherwise respond before the expiration of the time specified is not the result of any neglect on any of the Defendants' parts," the court filing submitted yesterday said.

    "Representation decisions are made by a specialized group of individuals in the Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. In order to provide a fair opportunity for the Department to review this matter and to complete the representation determinations, Defendants respectfully request an extension of twenty (20) days from the date of this Order in which to answer, move, or otherwise respond," the court filing said.

    WND has reported on dozens of legal challenges to Obama's status as a "natural born citizen." The Constitution, Article 2, Section 1, states, "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President."

    Some of the lawsuits question whether he was actually born in Hawaii, as he insists. If he was born out of the country, Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the time.

    Other challenges have focused on Obama's citizenship through his father, a Kenyan subject to the jurisdiction of the United Kingdom at the time of his birth, thus making him a dual citizen. The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens from qualifying as natural born.

    Further, others question his citizenship by virtue of his attendance in Indonesian schools during his childhood and question on what passport did he travel to Pakistan three decades ago.

    Adding fuel to the fire is Obama's persistent refusal to release documents that could provide answers and the appointment of myriad lawyers to defend against all requests for his documentation. While his supporters cite an online version of a "Certification of Live Birth" from Hawaii as his birth verification, critics point out such documents actually were issued for children not born in the state.

    The ultimate questions remain unaddressed to date: Is Obama a natural born citizen, and, if so, why hasn't documentation been provided? And, of course, if he is not, what does it mean to the 2008 election or the U.S. Constitution if it is revealed that there has been a violation?

    And the answer could take only minutes: authorization from the president to Hawaiian officials to release his documentation.

    Apuzzo, on his website, says the issue "is of utmost national importance."

    "Every passing day Mr. Obama takes executive action that significantly impacts on the lives of Americans. The USA and Obama have already been granted one extension to answer to May 5, 2009. They have therefore been given 77 days to answer," he said.

    "This is enough time for them to answer. With an extension to June 21, 2009, USA and Obama are asking for 124 days and the Congressional defendants are asking for 117 days to answer. Court rules only allow them 60 days. Such delay is not in the national interest and not acceptable," he said.

    He told WND that since the attorneys for the government earlier were granted extensions for Obama and Congress to respond, there should be no further delay, and the statements should be required May 5 as planned.

    In a comments section on his website, a contributor told Apuzzo, "It's part of their stonewalling effort. They will do everything they can to stop or otherwise slow the path to justice down to snail's pace."

    A similar situation developed in a California case raising a challenge to Obama's eligibility that was filed on behalf of Ambassador Alan Keyes. The complaint was filed by Gary Kreep of the United States Justice Foundation in early November, but it didn't get court action until March, months after the actual election that it challenged.

    That case now is on appeal.

    The case being handled by Apuzzo was launched in New Jersey and focuses on the alleged failure in Congress to follow the Constitution.

    That document, the lawsuit states, "provides that Congress must fully qualify the candidate 'elected' by the Electoral College Electors."

    Get the new Whistleblower magazine, called "YOUR PAPERS, PLEASE? Why dozens of lawsuits and millions of Americans want Barack Obama to prove he's constitutionally qualified to be president."

    It provides, the lawsuit said, "If the president-elect shall have failed to qualify, then the vice president elect shall act as president until a president shall have qualified."

    "There existed significant public doubt and grievances from plaintiffs and other concerned Americans regarding Obama's eligibility to be president and defendants had the sworn duty to protect and preserve the Constitution and specifically under the 20th Amendment, Section 3, a Constitutional obligation to confirm whether Obama, once the electors elected him, was qualified," the case explains.

    "Congress is the elected representative of the American people and the people speak and act through them," the lawsuit said.

    The defendants "violated" the 20th Amendment by failing to assure that Obama meets the eligibility requirements," the lawsuit said.

    In the Russian publication Pravda, commentator Mark S. McGrew addressed the subject:

    "The United States Congress is required, under the U.S. Code of Federal Regulations, to count the Electoral College votes for president and vice president, ask if any member of Congress objects to the count and hear that Congressman's objection. This is under Title 3, Chapter 1, Section 15, 'Upon such reading of any such certificate of paper, the president of the Senate shall call for objections, if any,'" he wrote.

    Several of the various disputes around the nation have been brought to the U.S. Supreme Court on emergency motions because of the gravity of the contentions, but none yet has been given an actual hearing.

    The governor's office in Hawaii said there is a valid certificate but rejected requests for access, saying Obama would have to authorize any access, and left ambiguous its origin: Does the certificate on file with the Department of Health indicate a Hawaii birth or was it generated after the Obama family registered a Kenyan birth in Hawaii?

    Obama's half-sister, Maya Soetoro, has named two different Hawaii hospitals where Obama could have been born. At one point a Kenyan ambassador said Obama's birth place in Kenya already was recognized and honored.

    While an Obama spokesman one time called the allegations "garbage," the president and his team have withheld other comments. But here is a partial listing and status update for some of the cases over Obama's eligibility:

    * New Jersey attorney Mario Apuzzo has filed a case on behalf of Charles Kerchner and others alleging Congress didn't properly ascertain that Obama is qualified to hold the office of president.

    * Pennsylvania Democrat Philip Berg has three cases pending, including Berg vs. Obama in the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, a separate Berg vs. Obama which is under seal at the U.S. District Court level and Hollister vs. Soetoro a/k/a Obama, (now dismissed) brought on behalf of a retired military member who could be facing recall to active duty by Obama.

    * Leo Donofrio of New Jersey filed a lawsuit claiming Obama's dual citizenship disqualified him from serving as president. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court but denied a full hearing.

    * Cort Wrotnowski filed suit against Connecticut's secretary of state, making a similar argument to Donofrio. His case was considered in conference by the U.S. Supreme Court, but was denied a full hearing.

    * Former presidential candidate Alan Keyes headlines a list of people filing a suit in California, in a case handled by the United States Justice Foundation, that asks the secretary of state to refuse to allow the state's 55 Electoral College votes to be cast in the 2008 presidential election until Obama verifies his eligibility to hold the office. The case is pending, and lawyers are seeking the public's support.

    * Chicago lawyer Andy Martin sought legal action requiring Hawaii Gov. Linda Lingle to release Obama's vital statistics record. The case was dismissed by Hawaii Circuit Court Judge Bert Ayabe.

    * Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan sought a temporary restraining order to stop the Electoral College vote in North Carolina until Barack Obama's eligibility could be confirmed, alleging doubt about Obama's citizenship. His case was denied.

    * In Ohio, David M. Neal sued to force the secretary of state to request documents from the Federal Elections Commission, the Democratic National Committee, the Ohio Democratic Party and Obama to show the presidential candidate was born in Hawaii. The case was denied.

    * Also in Ohio, there was the Greenberg v. Brunner case which ended when the judge threatened to assess all case costs against the plaintiff.

    * In Washington state, Steven Marquis sued the secretary of state seeking a determination on Obama's citizenship. The case was denied.

    * In Georgia, Rev. Tom Terry asked the state Supreme Court to authenticate Obama's birth certificate. His request for an injunction against Georgia's secretary of state was denied by Georgia Superior Court Judge Jerry W. Baxter.

    * California attorney Orly Taitz has brought a case, Lightfoot vs. Bowen, on behalf of Gail Lightfoot, the vice presidential candidate on the ballot with Ron Paul, four electors and two registered voters. She also has brought forward several other cases and has conducted several public campaigns to generate awareness of the issue.

    In addition, other cases cited on the RightSideofLife blog as raising questions about Obama's eligibility include:

    * In Texas, Darrel Hunter vs. Obama later was dismissed.

    * In Ohio, Gordon Stamper vs. U.S. later was dismissed.

    * In Texas, Brockhausen vs. Andrade.

    * In Washington, L. Charles Cohen vs. Obama.

    * In Hawaii, Keyes vs. Lingle, dismissed.

    http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php? ... geId=96452

  6. #1156
    Senior Member cayla99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Indiana, formerly of Northern Cal
    Posts
    4,889
    Mario Apuzzo, attorney for Plaintiffs in Kerchner v. Obama, made note of the Defendant’s second request for a time extension in this case:

    Motion to Extend Time to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond & Declaration of Counsel has been filed by the defendants. The defendants have already had over two months to answer, move, or otherwise respond. As of the current deadline of May 5th they will have had 75 days from the time they were served to respond. In our opinion, that is an adequate amount of time to answer or move or other wise respond. An objection will be filed to this second request by the defendants for a further extension of time.

    As Mr. Apuzzo noted on April 13, the government is always given 60 days by which to respond to any complaint brought against it. On that same date, the federal government requested an additional 15 days by which to respond, making the deadline May 5, 2009 for any motions on their part. Subsequently, per paragraph 10 of the motion, the Defendants have requested an additional 20 days to respond, making the would-be deadline June 1, 2009.

    Of the reasons for the time extension request, Assistant US Attorney Elizabeth Pascal mentions that Vice President Dick Cheney and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi have both requested the DOJ to represent them in this matter. Also, per paragraph 8, Attorney Pascal mentions:

    “I was unaware that I could move for an extension of time to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the complaint pending the representation decision for those Defendantsâ€
    Proud American and wife of a wonderful LEGAL immigrant from Ireland.
    The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good people to do nothing." -Edmund Burke (1729-1797) Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  7. #1157
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by cayla99
    If they actually have to PREPARE A DEFENSE, it looks like they all know they committed treason or a felony at the very least. IF Obama is indeed illegitimate, I want to file suit reimbursing taxpayers for all of these defendants' legal expenses that WE THE PEOPLE are paying for.
    I couldn't care less whether Mr. Obama is legitimate or illegitimate, unless it affects his "not-natural born citizen" status, as in the case of a Kenyan birth.

    But his eligibility or ineligibility under the U.S. Constitution, Art. II, § 1, is of the utmost importance to most Americans (except for those under the delusion of the downstream media).

    I hope the administration is not just stalling until they have a crisis to justify declaring martial law, and from there, a totalitarian oligarchy. Perhaps they are waiting for the "1960 Heidelberg [offset printer]" Certificate of Live Birth to cure sufficiently to appear authentic to the governing authorities. Or perhaps this nation is now functionally a totalitarian state and no longer a Constitutional republic. If that be the case, we need to change tactics (litigation and petition) accordingly.

    Please entreat the Lord to empower someone to crack the Barack Obama eligibility case. It is in His best interest to sustain the United States as Israel's defender and the primary channel He uses to fund missionaries for the Lord Jesus Christ around the world.
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 09-01-2014 at 09:41 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  8. #1158
    Senior Member CCUSA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    7,675
    Prayers immediately being made for this matter to be resolved.

    God save our country and Constitution!
    Join our efforts to Secure America's Borders and End Illegal Immigration by Joining ALIPAC's E-Mail Alerts network (CLICK HERE)

  9. #1159
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207
    Quote Originally Posted by CCUSA
    Prayers immediately being made for this matter to be resolved.

    God save our country and Constitution!

    At prayer meeting tonight, petitions were made for God's mercy on our nation, which so deserves a spanking for its idolatry and apostasy, worshiping money, greed, immorality, abortion, homosexuality, and self-indulgence while nearly a billion people exist on less than $1 a day. The Lord was implored to remove the usurper Commander-in-Chief, who is not a natural born citizen, and who is therefore Constitutionally disqualified for the office of the Presidency. Afterwards, I was not surprised that other people voiced their agreement with that prayer, and that none were contrary to it.

    "The conscience of the country is the church and not the state."

    Praying publicly for relief from tyrants and totalitarian governments has a glorious history:
    the Exodus of Israel from slavery when an angel slew all the first-born of Egypt;
    Jerusalem's miraculous deliverance when an angel slew 185,000 of the Assyrian army;
    the Jews' self-defense against annihilation decreed by Ahasuerus, King of the Medes and Persians;
    the Maccabean revolt against Antiochus Epiphanes IV and the Seleucid Empire (167-37 B.C.);
    the defense of Europe against the advancing Ottoman Empire, which was turned back at the Siege of Vienna (1683);
    the American Revolution;
    the fall of the Iron Curtain from within (1989);
    the deliverance, yet future, of the largest body of Christians in the world - the church of the martyrs in China . . .

    every one of these struggles for freedom was empowered by the Almighty God in response to believers' prayers. Should we expect the Lord to act in defense of the U.S. Constitution and to restore a lawful U.S. government, without that we humble ourselves, repent, submit to His authority, and then

    cry out to Him for grace and mercy and help in such a time of need as this?
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 09-01-2014 at 09:44 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

  10. #1160
    Senior Member MinutemanCDC_SC's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    tracking the usurper-in-chief and on his trail
    Posts
    3,207

    USA/Obama Say They Need 124 Days to Respond

    Tuesday, April 28, 2009
    More Delays. USA/Obama Say They Need 124 Days to Answer; Congress 117 Days

    by Mario Apuzzo, Esq.

    Justia listing of Kerchner et al v. Obama et al in the New Jersey U.S. District Court.

    See the copy of the court documents electronically filed by the defendants on Monday, April 27, 2009:
    www.scribd.com/doc/14705757/

    The lawyer for USA and Obama, Elizabeth A. Pascal, who works in the office of Ralph J. Marra, Acting United States Attorney, is now asking the Court a second time through her motion for more time to answer for the defendants.

    Initially, Ms. Pascal only represented the USA and Obama, whose answers or motions were initially due on April 20, 2009. Ms. Pascal requested and obtained an extension to file her responses to May 5, 2009.

    Now Ms. Pascal states in her declaration that former Vice President Cheney, the House of Representatives, and Speaker Pelosi have asked that the Department of Justice represent them in the action. She adds that the Justice Department is also deciding which Congressional defendants (meaning Congress, Senate, House, Cheney, and Pelosi) it will represent. Pending the Justice Department making that decision, she is moving the Court for an order allowing all the Congressional defendants more time to answer or otherwise move. She includes in her request additional time for the USA and Obama to answer, whose answers are now due on May 5, 2009.

    Ms. Pascal made her motion returnable June 1, 2009 and is asking for an order that she be allowed to file an answer or otherwise move within 20 days of the date of the order to be entered by Magistrate Judge Joel Schneider. This means that if Magistrate Judge Schneider signs the extension order on June 1, 2009, the defendants' answers or motions will be due by June 21, 2009.

    Whether or not the President of the United States is eligible for the Office he currently occupies is of utmost national importance. Every passing day Mr. Obama takes executive action that significantly impacts on the lives of Americans. The USA and Obama have already been granted one extension to answer to May 5, 2009. They have therefore been given 77 days to answer. This is enough time for them to answer. With an extension to June 21, 2009, USA and Obama are asking for 124 days and the Congressional defendants are asking for 117 days to answer. Court rules only allow them 60 days. Such delay is not in the national interest and not acceptable. As to the Congressional defendants, a twenty-day extension for them to answer is reasonable, making their answer due by May 18, 2009. Given the national importance of the issues, an extension for all defendants to answer by June 21, 2009 is not acceptable.

    Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
    185 Gatzmer Avenue
    Jamesburg NJ 08831
    Email: apuzzo [AT] erols.com
    TEL: 732-521-1900 ~ FAX: 732-521-3906
    BLOG: puzo1.blogspot.com

    P.S. Also, please feel free to join the discussions and comments in this forum about the subject of the Natural Born Citizenship clause in Article II of our U.S. Constitution by (Clicking Here).

    puzo1.blogspot.com/2009/04/more-delays-usaobama-say-they-need-124.html
    ___________________________________

    In the body of U.S. laws and codes, are there corresponding laws or regulations to the following?

    Quote Originally Posted by The Magna Carta (1215)
    40. To none will we sell, to none deny or delay, right or justice.

    61. ...if we [kings and queens], or our justice, or our bailiffs, or any one of our servants shall have transgressed against any one in any respect, or shall have broken one of the articles of peace or security, and our transgression shall have been shown to four barons of the aforesaid twenty five: those four barons shall come to us, or, if we are abroad, to our justice, showing to us our error; and they shall ask us to cause that error to be amended without delay. And if we do not amend that error, or, we being abroad, if our justice do not amend it within a term of forty days from the time when it was shown to us or, we being abroad, to our justice: the aforesaid four barons shall refer the matter to the remainder of the twenty five barons, and those twenty five barons, with the whole land in common, shall distrain and oppress us in every way in their power,--namely, by taking our castles, lands and possessions, and in every other way that they can, until amends shall have been made according to their judnnent [judgment]. Saving the persons of ourselves, our queen and our children. And when amends shall have been made they shall be in accord with us as they had been previously. And whoever of the land wishes to do so, shall swear that in carrying out all the aforesaid measures he will obey the mandates of the aforesaid twenty five barons, and that, with them, he will oppress us to the extent of his power. And, to any one who wishes to do so, we publicly and freely give permission to swear; and we will never prevent any one from swearing.


    www.britannia.com/history/docs/magna2.html
    Last edited by MinutemanCDC_SC; 09-01-2014 at 09:56 AM.
    One man's terrorist is another man's undocumented worker.

    Unless we enforce laws against illegal aliens today,
    tomorrow WE may wake up as illegals.

    The last word: illegal aliens are ILLEGAL!

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •